Slashdot Mirror


Fake Hacker Found Guilty Following Gutsy Mitt Romney Extortion Scheme (softpedia.com)

An anonymous reader writes: "Michael Mancil Brown, 37, of Franklin, Tennessee, faces up to thirty years in prison, a fine up to $250,000, and orders of restitution to victims, because of a daring stunt he pulled off in 2012 that involved fake hacking the PricewaterhouseCoopers consulting firm, and US presidential candidate Mitt Romney. Back in 2012, Brown had the bright idea to write a letter alleging to have hacked PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) servers and stolen tax documents prior to 2010 for Mitt Romney and his wife, Ann," writes Softpedia. The "hacker" asked for $1 million in Bitcoin, and after publishing details about his fake hack online, he almost received it from a "third-party," but not before the FBI arrested him and then uncovered his lie. Last Friday, Brown was found guilty and then convicted of six counts of wire fraud and six counts of using facilities of interstate commerce to commit extortion.

19 of 108 comments (clear)

  1. sentencing (in August) will be interesting by raymorris · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll be curious to see what kind of sentence he gets in August. The "faces up to" maximum theoretical penalties are less useful than Comcast's "up to 50 Mbps*" advertising.

    * speed may be significantly lower during peak periods, business hours, evenings,nights, weekends, maintenance windows, and other times.

    1. Re:sentencing (in August) will be interesting by Grunschev · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Reagan was one of the best presidents of the last 50 years"

      You can't be serious. I'd put him in the bottom three of that period.

      His was the most corrupt administration in my lifetime. Have you forgotten Ollie North's conviction for destruction of evidence? Have you forgotten all the pardons George H. W. Bush granted for Reagan's people, including the Secretary of State?

      When he wasn't corrupt, he was just horrible. His AIDS policy ("let the queers and drug addicts die") resulted in the poisoning of the blood supply, killing thousands.

      Then he went and laid a wreath at the burial plots of the Waffen SS. He couldn't be bothered to even visit any concentration camp sites.

      I'm hoping you're just ignorant.

    2. Re:sentencing (in August) will be interesting by publiclurker · · Score: 2

      the fact that you consider Reagan to be one of the best presidents in 50 years actually shows the downside to Alzheimers and other mental problems.

  2. Gutsy? by TapeCutter · · Score: 5, Informative

    Gutsy would imply an act of bravery, what we have is an act of stupidity.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    1. Re:Gutsy? by tnk1 · · Score: 2

      Bravery and stupidity are not mutually exclusive, despite the fact that bravery has a much better connotation.

  3. Tax documents worth $1 million? by janinl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm wondering what the "victim" had to hide, to be willing to pay $1 million for it...

    1. Re:Tax documents worth $1 million? by wiredog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      From the sound of things ("he almost received it from a "third-party,"), the victim wasn't willing to pay anything for it.

    2. Re:Tax documents worth $1 million? by tomhath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm wondering what the "victim" had to hide, to be willing to pay $1 million for it..

      Apparently nothing, since Romney refused to pay and the "third party" was almost certainly an FBI trap.

  4. You are forgetting the news here is usually crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It said a "third party" almost paid him. That could be anyone including a wealthy member of the opposite political party.

    But the news here is always misleading baiting crap these days.

    There are precious few articles here these days that you can really trust the headline or summary to be exactly what it sounds like.

  5. But it was just a prank! by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

    Maybe he should have filmed it and put it on his youtube channel. Then it wouldn't have been a real crime, right?

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  6. Probably nothing to hide by digitalderbs · · Score: 2

    In the grand scheme of an election--and the fact that Mitt Romney's net worth is 250 million--1 million isn't a lot of money. It would likely be worth paying that sum just to have control on when and how the tax information was released.

  7. Twenty Five years for this by humptheElephant · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This guy is facing a 25 year prison sentence and yet banksters who took down our economy by their playing in the casino got no prison time. We have 2 kinds of justice in this country, one for the uber rich and one for the rest of us.

    1. Re:Twenty Five years for this by schwit1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The economy going to hell had a lot of help from the government. Chris Dodd and Barney Frank should be in cells next to the banksters.

    2. Re:Twenty Five years for this by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Please list the names of bankers who committed crimes, and the specific crimes they committed (it would be helpful if you mentioned the actual statutes they violated). Then point out when the DoJ became aware of these specific crimes but refused to indict. Thanks for the details. If you're aware of specific financial crimes that the DoJ does NOT know about, why aren't you making phone calls?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  8. Not just "Gutsy" by mi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Gutsy would imply an act of bravery

    Committing a crime in a country with robust law enforcement takes bravery...

    But this extortionist is not merely "gutsy" — the "stunt" is also described in the write-up as "daring"... Carefully selecting terms and adjectives for (not so) subtle spin — while remaining factually correct — is what they teach in journalism classes. But some people are just natural — Vladimir Putin's weaponized propaganda organization would be most interested.

    When the subject is described as "gutsy" and "daring", the punishment seems excessive — even if only to subconsciousness. Were it "plucky" and "outrageous" and a "crime" (or, better yet, a "felony"), rather than a "stunt", you'd be less likely to develop any sympathy for the criminal.

    It also helps prevent any sympathy for the victim of the crime — see, it is Mitt Romney's own fault, according to many posters here, not all of them anonymous. (Should not have worn so short a skirt, if he did not want to be raped.)

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Not just "Gutsy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If he had done this to a Democrat candidate, the press would not use such nice words.

  9. Reminds me of Joe Biden talking by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I remember how Joe Biden, in describing the huge undertaking by hundreds of intelligence and support people, along with the on-the-scene deployment of SEAL Team 6 to actually do the deed of killing Bin Laden in his Pakistani sanctuary ... Biden described Obama's decision to follow the intel team's advice as "the gutsiest thing I've ever seen." That word appears to be in danger of no longer meaning anything at all like it used to, and might be worth a second thought on the part of editors and public figures, if this is how it's going to be put to use. Thank you for reading this gutsy comment.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re: Reminds me of Joe Biden talking by jsh1972 · · Score: 2

      Just please don't link to gutsy.cx!

  10. Re:You can't be a fake hacker by JustBoo · · Score: 2

    captcha: nipple. Those, my friend, are real.

    Not for most of slashdot, my friend, no they are not. They are as foreign and fake as a cosplay girl who is actually pretty. (And an actual girl.)