Slashdot Mirror


Europa's Ocean Chemistry Could Be Earth-Like (discovery.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Alien life in the universe could be close to home, swimming around Europa's ocean. The idea has been floating around scientific minds for more than a decade: beneath the icy surface of the Jovian moon could slosh a deep, wide ocean with the perfect environment for life to develop. In new research published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, NASA scientists studied how the chemical composition of the Europan ocean may have evolved and what chemicals it possibly contains, assuming similar geochemical processes as on Earth are at play. Europa is thought to possess a rocky core fractured with deep cracks that have filled with water. Since the formation of the moon, the core has continued to cool, creating more cracks and exposing more rocks to chemical processes with this water."We're studying an alien ocean using methods developed to understand the movement of energy and nutrients in Earth's own systems," said planetary scientist Steve Vance, of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif. "The cycling of oxygen and hydrogen in Europa's ocean will be a major driver for Europa's ocean chemistry and any life there, just it is on Earth."

73 comments

  1. Substrate does not need to be what we're made of. by headkase · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Life is a process and any substrate that facilitates that process qualifies as "alive." See: Code of the Lifemake for a illustration of that.

    --
    Shh.
  2. Re:Substrate does not need to be what we're made o by headkase · · Score: 1

    Dammit, "Code of the Lifemaker." Not "Lifemake."

    --
    Shh.
  3. Time for a reminder by haruchai · · Score: 5, Informative

    "All these worlds are yours, except Europa. ATTEMPT NO LANDING THERE."

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    1. Re:Time for a reminder by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      That killer kelp may not make for great sushi.

    2. Re:Time for a reminder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear the rock lobsters & sea rats from Ganymede are pretty good though.

    3. Re:Time for a reminder by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I read mixed reviews about the Jovian shark fin soup.

    4. Re:Time for a reminder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be far more worried about the intense radiation.

    5. Re:Time for a reminder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To Ganymede and Titan
      Yes, sir, I've been around
      But there ain't no place
      In the whole of Space
      Like that good ol' toddlin' town
      Oh! Lunar City Seven
      You're my idea of heaven
      Out of ten, you score eleven
      You good ol' Titan' town
      Oh! Lunar City Seven
      Lunar Cities One through Six
      They always get me down
      But Lunar City Seven
      You're my home town

    6. Re:Time for a reminder by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 0

      Didn't read the book, eh? Nor read countless comments about not having read the book? It shows.

      A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

    7. Re:Time for a reminder by arkansasbill · · Score: 1

      I'll start worrying when the swastika shows up...

    8. Re:Time for a reminder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mediocre book, forgettable movie. But it's no wonder nerds are fawning over it. Nerds love crap, because it's like their life: a pile of shit.

    9. Re:Time for a reminder by haruchai · · Score: 1

      You're confusing nerds with ACs.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    10. Re:Time for a reminder by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      the from the director's cut was much better:
      "All these worlds are yours, except Europa. ATTEMPT NO LANDING THERE. FOR THIS IS MY FRONT YARD."

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  4. Re:Substrate does not need to be what we're made o by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    In short, don't let Von Neumann probes run wild on distant planets.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-replicating_spacecraft#Von_Neumann_probes

  5. Who the Hell Named That? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There already is one of those, and it's just across the pond.

    1. Re:Who the Hell Named That? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Galileo Galilei named Europa(moon) and if you read wikipedia, it actually makes sense. It's named after Europa, who happened to be a lover of Zeus. Zeus is the Greek God the Romans called Jupiter. Galilei figured it might make sense that the object orbiting Jupiter would be his lover.

      It's a bad name today due to the nameclash with the continent. However I'm not so sure that it mattered back then. The prince in Troja was named Paris and they certainly didn't care about city nameclashes. There is an aircraft carrier named George Washington. I haven't heard anybody complaining that they confuse the ship with a human being. There are plenty of intended or unintended nameclashes. We just have to live with those because renaming would be even more confusing.

    2. Re:Who the Hell Named That? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Uranus did.

    3. Re:Who the Hell Named That? by gr8dude · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was aware of a somewhat different story.

      Jupiter's moons are sometimes collectively referred to as "Medicean moons". Galileo chose that name to express gratitude towards his patron/sponsor, the Medici family.

      `Galileo's dream` by KSR, is a work of fiction that covers that period of his life and the process of discovering the moons, naming them, and so on. You might enjoy this book.

  6. Over a decade? by flyhigher · · Score: 3, Informative

    This was hinted at much longer than a decade ago:

    "The idea that Europa and other ice-covered bodies in our solar system might possess an ocean of liquid water under a crust of ice was first proposed by John S. Lewis in his paper Satellites of the Outer Planets: Their Physical and Chemical Nature (which appeared in Icarus, vol.15, 1971)." (source: https://www.math.washington.ed...)

    And I recall Carl Sagan talking about life on Europa in his Cosmos television show, back in the 80s.

    But astrobiology has come a long way since then. I'm halfway through Nick Lane's "The Vital Question" and he goes into detail about the mechanisms which can form complex cellular structures given nothing but alkaline water, hydrocarbons, rock (to supply catalysts), and an energy source.

    1. Re: Over a decade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cut the funds for astrobiology and instead use them to secure our southern border.

      Don't worry, Canadians don't spend much money on astrobiology.

    2. Re: Over a decade? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Cut the funds for astrobiology and instead use them to secure our southern border.

      Cut the funds to secure our southern border to train young people to become skilled tradesmen to rebuild America.

    3. Re: Over a decade? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, Canadians don't spend much money on astrobiology.

      Not that southern border, the other southern boarder. Do you think Mexicans like Central and South Americans taking their jobs?

    4. Re: Over a decade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Astrobiology is important, what if there are a planet full of trumps heading our way
      the more we learn, the better we can protect ourselves

    5. Re: Over a decade? by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Just wait until space aliens from Europa take our jobs.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    6. Re: Over a decade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting point. If Mexicans are having issues with South Americans, then frankly it would be impossible to secure our border. I mean think of it. If the fucking Panama Canal cant stop someone, whats a fence gonna do.

    7. Re: Over a decade? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      I know you're trolling, but I have a feeling that we could cut every cent the government pays for astrobiology and still not fund a wall separating us from Mexico. In fact, we could probably cut NASA entirely ($19.6 billion budget for 2016) and that wouldn't be enough for a wall between the US and Mexico. Besides, why cut NASA's budget to build the wall? I thought Trump was going to magically convince Mexico to do it with Jedi mind tricks or something.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    8. Re: Over a decade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have two words for your - NAFTA and TTIP

    9. Re: Over a decade? by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      what if there are a planet full of trumps heading our way

      We'll build a Dyson Sphere around the Earth, and make THEM pay for it!

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    10. Re: Over a decade? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't be a very useful construction.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  7. Re:And nobody's life is changed by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can anyone provide a real answer to the question? I doubt it.

    Someone else might find it useful today, tomorrow or 300 years from now. That's the nature of scientific research. How far would have Einstein have gotten without Newton?

  8. Bird strike? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't know if there is life, but it sure looks like it hit something pretty big... I doubt it's alive now

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Bird strike? by headkase · · Score: 2

      The reason Europa looks like that is because Jupiter has enough mass that tidal force from them are constantly squeezing and stretching the moon. Creating those features.

      --
      Shh.
    2. Re:Bird strike? by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 2

      I think the tidal forces are also the reason the ocean doesn't freeze.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
  9. Re:And nobody's life is changed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The discovery of life on Europa, or anywhere else in the Universe for that matter, would immediately disprove and discredit the Holy Christian Bible and indeed all other earthly religions. The eventual demise of mankind's myths that have been around for thousands of years are a prerequisite to progress and future growth as a species, eventually leaving this little blue marble and taking our rightful place in the universe.

  10. Re:Substrate does not need to be what we're made o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hogan was a kook but he did write a few memorable stories, that was indeed one of them, but a compelling sci-fi story does not a scientific theory make...

  11. Why is this even news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like more and more of Slashdot is this kind of regurgitated non news. This kind of speculation has been around since at least the mid eighties. There is very little new here.

  12. Re:Substrate does not need to be what we're made o by headkase · · Score: 1

    Another illustration from fiction is Dragon's Egg.

    Really though, what matters for "life" is that whatever the substrate is is able to store information - DNA in our case - and have an ecosystem of related ways to raise and lower energy states in appropriate materials. If both those conditions are met then the process a specific set of material changes with can be called "alive."

    --
    Shh.
  13. Re:And nobody's life is changed by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

    " Can anyone provide a real answer to the question? "

    For the same reason we maintain research settlements in Antarctica. Finding life in any other place would tell us a lot about the conditions in which any ecosystem and its species can survive. There would be intense study of what any species there might have in common with Earthly life, both to check for any proof of the panspermia hypothesis and to extend the extremophile envelope in which life can exist.

  14. "Could be" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It also could be made of marshmallow.

    1. Re:"Could be" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A weasel word (also, anonymous authority) is an informal term for words and phrases aimed at creating an impression that a specific and/or meaningful statement has been made, when only a vague or ambiguous claim has been communicated, enabling the specific meaning to be denied if the statement is challenged.

      It's part of the dumbing down of culture.

      Dumbing down is the deliberate oversimplification of intellectual content within education, literature, cinema, news, video games and culture in order to relate to those unable to assimilate more sophisticated information.

  15. Re:And nobody's life is changed by TapeCutter · · Score: 2

    Can anyone explain how this research impacts anyone in any substantial way

    We explore because that's what humans do, those instincts have served us well and helped us climb to the top of the food chain. Also I think you mean "practical" rather than "substantial" because finding ET will have substantial philosophical impacts on billions of people, but probably won't have any immediate practical use..

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  16. Enough empty Europa stories already! by Theovon · · Score: 2

    Why do we keep getting these articles about Europa devoid of any new science? Let me know when someone actually gets some new measurements or, for Christ’s sake, sends a probe to collect samples.

    1. Re:Enough empty Europa stories already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, why don't we hear anything about other jupiter satellites, like Ganymede. Ganymede is pretty similar to Europa in most regards except that it actually has a magnetosphere that would help protect developing life from radiation.

  17. Re:And nobody's life is changed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure why people like you even go on living. Since you've already given up on learning, the only thing that truly matters in life, you may as well just kill yourself.

  18. Re: And nobody's life is changed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sure have a lot of *ahem* faith that this shall come to pass. Not very prophetic, though.

  19. More than a decade? by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

    The idea has been floating around scientific minds for more than a decade

    More than a decade? As I recall this was a major plot element of 2010, Odyssey Two, published in 1982. No doubt the idea originated considerably earlier. So, more than three decades at least.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  20. Re:And nobody's life is changed by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

    Do you really think everyone who is religious would just declare "Well, there's life on another planet, I guess God doesn't exist"? Of course not. They'll just say that God created that life also but the Bible was detailing the creation of life on Earth. The discovery of alien life won't mean much for them.

    For scientists, though, the discovery of alien life would be an enormous discovery. We already know a lot about evolution, biology, etc, but all of our data points come from one source. This would be an entirely different source to examine. Would life on Europa have cell structures like ours or totally different? Would they have DNA or another information storing mechanism? Would they have eyes similar to ours, completely different, or no eyes at all? (Life in Europa's waters might be dark and so no eyes might be needed - or perhaps their eyes evolved to "see" certain forms of radiation.) The scientific advances from even the simplest life forms would be amazing.

    For everyone else, the benefits would come down the road. With a greater understanding of biology and evolution, we might be able to design better treatments for diseases or fix genetic-based ailments.

    Plus, there's the "coolness" factor of discovering that we're not alone in the Universe.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  21. Ganymede is a dude, man! by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1

    All four Galilean moons are named after Zeus' (Jupiter's) lovers.

  22. Number crunching... by mi · · Score: 1

    In fact, we could probably cut NASA entirely ($19.6 billion budget for 2016) and that wouldn't be enough for a wall between the US and Mexico.

    In 2007, the economic losses from crime in the US were $15 billion. A whopping $179 billion more was spent on police, legal proceedings, prisons, etc. In other words, we lose over $200 billion every year to crime.

    Now, the percentage of crimes committed by illegal aliens is surprisingly hard to obtain — federal government is unwilling to keep an officially tally (maybe, Trump will fix this). But the sentencing statistics say: "Twelve percent of murder sentences, 20 percent of kidnapping sentences and 16 percent of drug trafficking sentences are meted out to illegal immigrants."

    Maybe, that's an overestimate by those nasty racists at FauxNoos and the real figure is "only" 10%. If we could get rid of that, we'd be able to afford another NASA with the savings... But even if the money went to building the wall instead, as you suggested, we'd break even — just have fewer murders and kidnappings.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Number crunching... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And how much of that "crime" is related to the cultivation and distribution of plant products ?

    2. Re:Number crunching... by Alomex · · Score: 1

      The correlation factor there is drug trafficking not visa status. Facts are that illegal immigrants have a lower rate of crime than the average population. And it is very easy to see why. If you run a red light the worst punishment is a simple fine, while if an illegal immigrant runs a red light the least punishment is deportation.

      Illegal immigrants have a crime rate of about half that of native born Americans.

      But yeah sure, a wall will stop that. It's not like Mexican culture is already aware of such technological advances as a tunnel or a ladder. No sire bob, a wall will stop them.

      Only an eight year old would think of a wall as a solution to this problem. Anyone with a mental age past that should be able to see why it would achieve much of nothing.

    3. Re:Number crunching... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Isn't slowing the drug trade a worthy enough cause in your book than?

      It is a worthy enough cause that Mexico wants to help fund a wall. Perhaps you should learn a little about the world before trying to paint everyone as racists.

      The fact of the matter is that 100% of illegal immigrants have committed a crime, that crime is called illegal immigration, and is punishable by deportation. Anything that reduces the crime rate of people entering the US is a good thing, as these people apparently have no regard for the laws of the US as they break them entering our country.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    4. Re:Number crunching... by Alomex · · Score: 1

      It is a worthy enough cause that Mexico wants to help fund a wall.

      Huh? Trump wants Mexico to help, Mexico has said no we won't.

      Anything that reduces the crime rate of people entering the US is a good thing,

      An obviously false statement. Releasing lions so they feast on illegal immigrants crossing the border would help reduce crime but clearly that would be inhumane and not a good thing.

      So, there you go, your infantile argument to justify the wall can be debunked in five seconds of thinking, which seems to be more than the combined total of trump supporters.

      Trump's half baked off the cuff proposals are usually selfcontradictory or nonsensical, often both, but simpletons lack the ability to follow them through and see how childish in their inception they are. Hey, why not simply deploy Chuck Norris in the border. I hear he lives in Texas.

      Oh, and by the way, I have nothing against the USA trying to stem illegal immigration. Simply prosecute the people who hire them. No need for a really tall wall made of vibranium.

  23. Re:And nobody's life is changed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He has no choice ultimately. Science has disproven free will. His posting, as yours, was set at the moment of the creation of the universe.

  24. With any luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it hasn't been overfished

  25. Re:And nobody's life is changed by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

    We learn useful things like antibiotics all the time studying Earth life. The amount of things we could learn studying alien life are incalculable. Small example: alternative metabolisms could be used to efficiently make chemicals or extract minerals from substrate where Earth life would not be able to.

  26. Re:And nobody's life is changed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This research is important because it shows what a loser you are. That is the only reason they are doing it.

  27. Re:And nobody's life is changed by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

    He has no choice ultimately. Science has disproven free will. His posting, as yours, was set at the moment of the creation of the universe.

    There may not be true free will, but you are not accounting for choice.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  28. Walls help by mi · · Score: 1

    illegal immigrants have a lower rate of crime than the average population

    This statement — unsupported by any citations, BTW — is irrelevant to my point. Even if they are less crime-prone on average, they are a source of crime anyway.

    We can not get rid of native criminals by deporting them anywhere, but we can deport the folks, who have entered this country illegally (and already have this "original sin" to their name).

    But yeah sure, a wall will stop that.

    It may not stop that entirely, but it will reduce it, that's for sure. 15 years ago, when Israel was building its much derided wall, similar predictions of failure were made.

    But the walls work:

    The number of fatalities from terror attacks within Israel dropped from more than 130 in 2003 to fewer than 25 in 2005.

    According to a 2006 estimate cited by Slate (the article itself is hardly sympathetic to the idea, BTW), an Israel-kind of wall stretching for 2000 miles would cost $6.4 bln (or about 1/3rd the annual cost of NASA). And we may not even need it that high and sophisticated — because, unlike Israel, we aren't facing an enemy bent on our destruction... Nor are there any border-disputes with Mexico — the other complication of their project.

    Only an eight year old would ...

    My eight year old would already recognize this rhetorical trick as one used only by crooks and liars. Your parents should not have allowed you access to the Internet until you've read up on classic literature...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Walls help by Alomex · · Score: 1

      This statement â" unsupported by any citations, BTW

      LMGTFY:

      From The Economist:

      Indeed, Robert Sampson, a sociologist at Harvard, has found that "increases in immigration and language diversity over the decade of the 1990s predicted decreases in neighborhood homicide rates in the late '90s and up to 2006." An eight-year study of violence in Chicago led Mr Sampson to conclude that Mexican immigrants are less prone to violence than native-born Americans, whites or black, of comparable age and socio-economic status. In recent years, El Paso, Texas has had the lowest murder rate of any American city with a population of 500,000 or more, despite sitting directly across the Rio Grande from Juarez, a Mexican city plagued with horrific gang violence. Other metropolitan magnets for new arrivals from south of the border, such as San Diego, San Antonio and Phoenix, are similarly pacific. "Cities of concentrated immigration are some of the safest places around," Mr Sampson observes.

      These patterns are reflected, as one would expect, in data on incarceration rates. White men born in America are twice as likely to end up in prison as men born abroad, while American-born black men are many times more likely to land in jail than their immigrant counterparts.

      Studies cited therein:

      https://contexts.org/articles/...

      http://www.urban.org/urban-wir...

      http://migrationinformation.or...

      is irrelevant to my point.

      Right, because in a debate about crime and immigrants what could crime rates of said immigrants could possibly have to do with it?

      Clearly you've run into information that contradicts your point, i.e. that crime rates would go down with less immigrants, and rather than revaluating your prejudice you double down on it. Brilliant.

      an Israel-kind of wall stretching for 2000 miles would cost $6.4 bln

      I don't know how Slate came up with that quote, but just the property rights have been estimated at several times that. It implies a cost of less than 60c per linear foot . If you ever stood next to the wall in Jerusalem you would know how ridiculously low that estimate is. Simply driving the segment of the wall to its final location would cost you that much in fuel, before we consider material and installation costs.

      As I said, the wall is a simplistic solution from the mind of a child. You actually want to stop illegal immigration? punish the employers. It was tried in the 80s and it worked wonders, which is exactly why it was repealed back then (incidentally that is how Canada does it. They essentially do not have an illegal immigration problem, and believe you me there is no wall between the USA and Canada. As it is it would be trivial for any of the 11 million illegal immigrants to cross the border into Canada). Facts are we have illegal immigration because business needs illegal immigrants.

    2. Re:Walls help by mi · · Score: 1

      White men born in America are twice as likely to end up in prison as men born abroad,

      This carefully mixes legal and illegal immigration together. And there are over twice as many illegal immigrants in the US today, than there were in the 90ies. Oh, and you carefully replaced the number of crimes with the number of incarcerations — illegals don't always go to prison, some times they may get deported instead. Nice try, but fail...

      Another funny bit is that neither you nor your source cite figures for Black men — even though this would've supported your point (much) better, you chose to shy away from it for fear of appearing racist... Another ill Trump's presidency may be able to fix...

      that crime rates would go down with less immigrants

      Not crime rates — the number of crimes.. Fewer people, fewer criminals, less crime. Just housing the already convicted illegal immigrants cost the US taxpayers $1.87 bln in 2014 — on top of the devastation of the victims and the great costs of investigating and prosecuting the crimes.

      just the property rights have been estimated at several times that

      Another unsubstantiated claim.

      Simply driving the segment of the wall to its final location would cost you that much in fuel

      And another...

      the wall is a simplistic solution from the mind of a child

      Israel's wall works — the point you do not even attempt to refute. So will ours.

      You actually want to stop illegal immigration? punish the employers.

      One measure does not exclude another. But you may be exaggerating the current ease of hiring illegals. When I was hired recently, for example, I had to bring my passport (or some other proof of eligibility) with me on the first day. I forgot and they sent me back home for it...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    3. Re:Walls help by Alomex · · Score: 1

      Another funny bit is that neither you nor your source cite figures for Black men

      Except that it does, which you would have seen had you bothered to follow the links.

      As for the supposedly unsubstantiated claims they are all a google search away from you. If you are too lazy to search for the facts before bothering to make up an opinion don't expect me to fix that by doing it for you. I'm not your monkey.

      BTW I'm not trying to convince you that you are wrong. I've been in the interwebs long enough to know that idiocy is not an electronically curable disease. I participated in this debate for the benefit of people who care about the facts and are trying to reach an opinion on the matter. They can readily search any of the statements I made and see that they are true.

      You are welcome to wallow in your ignorance.

  29. Comment by WallyL · · Score: 1

    Ocean chemistry is earth-like-- complete with all the plastic trash and oil and other debris?!

  30. Debating by mi · · Score: 0

    unsubstantiated claims they are all a google search away from you

    No, darling. That's not, how debating works. You make a claim, you substantiate it.

    BTW I'm not trying to convince you that you are wrong

    Sure, sure. That's one way to surrender. Not the most graceful, but acceptable.

    idiocy

    Name-calling is less graceful — try to avoid that, if you do not want to be considered an asshole.

    You are welcome to wallow in your ignorance.

    Ignorance of what exactly? Let's recap my statements:

    • Many of the crimes in the US are committed by illegal immigrants — an indisputable fact, even if we can not agree on the exact figures.
    • That building a border-wall would greatly reduce their numbers — indisputably proven by Israel's border wall.
    • Even a 10% reduction in crime will pay for the wall within one year. Maybe, the 10% figure is exaggerated, but 1% is certainly reasonable. So the wall will pay off in 10 years instead — still a big win.

    You lost... Remember to logout.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Debating by Alomex · · Score: 1

      You are wrong. It's the person making an absurd claim who needs to substantiate it. Say, if we have two competing claims such as "there is a dragon behind that door" and "no there is not". Only one of those two people is really compelled to produce evidence.

      So, for example, the Israeli wall is 18ft tall and made of concrete, plus the buried portion. Concrete is a heavy material, so a quick estimate gives about one ton of weight per linear foot of barrier. Assuming that we use local quarries within 100 miles of each section at a standard shipping cost of $0.05 per ton mile, you get an average of $2.50 shipping cost per linear foot (assuming there is a welt built road to get there in the first place). All of this is basic common sense and well within the grasp of someone who has a mental age over 8yrs.

      You on the other hand like to believe in dragons no matter what. As I said, there is no cure for that and no, it is not my responsibility to dissuade you from your ignorant belief.

    2. Re:Debating by dywolf · · Score: 1

      Many of the crimes in the US are committed by illegal immigrants — an indisputable fact, even if we can not agree on the exact figures.

      False.
      Saying its indisputable doesn't make it so.
      There are what, 10mil illegal immigrants?
      Compared to 320mil legal residents?
      And you expect us to believe they commit more crimes than legal residents?
      Even as a percentage that just isnt supported...anywhere.

      http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1742...

      Oh gee. Looks like they aren't connected after all.

      http://www.wsj.com/articles/th...

      Doh, not there either.

      http://openborders.info/hispan...

      Damn.
      Still more numbers.

      so much for "indisputable".

      That building a border-wall would greatly reduce their numbers — indisputably proven by Israel's border wall.

      Really? Indisputably? Again?

      Ok...here we go:
      The wall has done very little to stop attacks or crossings.
      Even Israel's own right wing factions acknowledge the wall has played little part and is ineffective.
      That credit goes to waning support for violence, and the ability of the Israeli Intelligence to disrupt them.
      The real reason for the wall is to further expand the territory they have, since possession is 9/10 the law.
      http://972mag.com/wave-of-stab...

      The Second Intifada ended for a number of reasons, only one of which was the separation barrier. That becomes especially clear when you look at how little of the barrier had actually been constructed by the time the attacks stopped.

      The violence of the Second Intifada wound down because Israeli intelligence managed to wear down armed Palestinian groups. Popular Palestinian support for the violent uprising slowly dwindled due to the painful consequences, namely Israeli military operations, sieges, closures and curfews, which affected more and more of Palestinian society with little to show for their suffering. And finally, momentum simply fell off; the First Intifada also lasted for roughly five years before slowly coming to a halt.

      Even a 10% reduction in crime will pay for the wall within one year. Maybe, the 10% figure is exaggerated, but 1% is certainly reasonable. So the wall will pay off in 10 years instead — still a big win.

      No, it's not reasonable.
      And you've clearly ignored upkeep costs.

      The wall Trump wants would cost a minimum of 30 billion to build.
      that's just in materials, and does not include labor or logistics. which would easily be 2/3 or more of the total project cost.
      so to build out you're talking ~70-90 billion.
      (All that....and defeating it as simple as spending ~30$ at Home Depot on a ladder.)

      The harsh desert sun and wind would quickly put it into poor shape, so regularly maintence is a must.
      maintenance costs alone would exceed the initial build cost after only 7 years. so annualized that's ~10 billion a year (at 70b build cost).
      plus, because walls are stupid-easy to defeat with ladders and tunnels, you're still going to have to man it, which means even more border agents, cameras, monitoring equipment than we currently have. so thats even more money.

      So, even going conservatively, 10 year cost total comes to 170billion.

      Annually, crime costs ~15b in economic losses, and ~180b in government spending fighting it.
      That's ~200b a year.

      So no, you're not paying it off after 10 years.
      Or ever really.

      And thats again ignoring that the wall will not reduce crime anyway because your entire premise is that immigration is the source of the majority of crime, whic

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    3. Re:Debating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's on you.
      http://www.nizkor.org/features...

      Or in words your intellect can grasp: i am rubber, you are glue, bounce off me, back to you.

  31. Re:And nobody's life is changed by Agripa · · Score: 1

    Do you really think everyone who is religious would just declare "Well, there's life on another planet, I guess God doesn't exist"? Of course not. They'll just say that God created that life also but the Bible was detailing the creation of life on Earth. The discovery of alien life won't mean much for them.

    After they said only God could create organic compounds, the first organic compound synthesized was appropriately urea. That did not change their mind.

  32. Re:And nobody's life is changed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pissing you off is funny. That's reason enough. Do you see that dark hole in the sky? It's not a black hole: it's mankind's collective anus, about to shit on you.

  33. Re:And nobody's life is changed by idji · · Score: 1

    What if life actually started on Earth and found it's why to Europa due to meteor bombardment on Earth before the dinosaurs. Wouldn't you like to know if you have neighbours and if those neighbours are related?
    Just remember that wifi that you most likely used to post your comment was created by Astronomers to do obscure star stuff, and it netted CSIRO 450$M of royalties, because it changed people's lives. http://www.theaustralian.com.a...
    The internet itself was "something that won't change anyone's life" when it was built in the 1970's.
    That is what basic science is all about. Discovery for curiosity's sake. If your child is dying of zika or malaria or ebola and a cure is found you might be grateful for the scientist who stumbled upon the answer by doing something completely different, or because they used software built by geologists or astronomers. Astronomy has also influenced cancer research, because software to identify stars can also be used to identify tumours. Astronomy is always valuable. New weather satellites that will better predict storms and flooding will save many lives in years to come.
    The poor country Bolivia now has a satellite, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/..., which enables Andean farmers to communicate with each other and their markets - improving their personal income by helping them bypass expensive middle merchants.
    I challenge you to compare your own country's research spending and compare it to spending on pet food or candy. You should be horrified at the result.