Slashdot Mirror


Humanoid 'Pepper' Robot Needs US Android Programmers (usatoday.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from USA Today: Japan-based SoftBank Robotics announced Wednesday at Google I/O, the company's annual developer's conference, that it is opening a new Pepper-focused outpost in San Francisco and unveiling an Android SDK, or software development kit, in the hopes of enticing programmers to write code for the robot. Asked if SoftBank will roll out at SDK for iOS developers, Carlin says he wouldn't rule anything out but "for the moment Android is the pervasive language." Pepper is a white hard-plastic robot with humanoid features such as large eyes and arms as well as a display screen for a chest. The robot is said to be able to read human emotions by processing visual and vocal inputs through its various microphones and cameras. Its purpose is to be "much more than a robot, he is a genuine humanoid companion created to communicate with you in the most natural and intuitive way," according to the company's website. Pepper already has been deployed commercially in Japan, where it is used to greet customers at 140 SoftBank Mobile stores as well as help take orders at fast food eateries and discuss car model details at dealerships. Carlin says programmers working on Pepper-related tech will get access to "a best in class developer portal" that includes a developer forum, links to robotics workshops, access to SoftBank's engineering team and scientific details about Pepper. Google CEO Sundar Pichai announced the Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) at Google I/O, which the company claims advances machine learning capability by a factor of three generations.

29 comments

  1. US Programmers = HB1's by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    We don't like the overseas time zones and with H1B's we can chain them to the job.

  2. Looks nothing like Pepper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks nothing like Pepper. Where are the freckles across the nose?

  3. Has it been programmed to lie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, it's working at car dealerships!

    1. Re:Has it been programmed to lie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't tell if it's a bug or a feature

    2. Re:Has it been programmed to lie? by Hizonner · · Score: 1

      That is, of course, the whole point.

      Once they spend however many years it takes to work the bugs out of this sort of thing, the obious hope is that it will be able to lie to you much better than a human could, because it will never, ever have any of the tells a human does... but it will be able to send the signals that trick your monkey brain into thinking it's your friend. Better yet, it will be good at misleading you without technically lying. It will never forget to upsell, and it won't just be following a fixed script. It will be superb at manipulating you to get the maximum amount of money out of you, and it will never, ever feel remorse at talking you into a bad deal, no matter how obviously poor and naive you are.

      Not just at car dealerships, either. The creepiest thing so far along those lines is the cloud-connected talking Barbie doll.

  4. Android may be pervasive but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Android may be pervasive but that doesn't mean it's good. Java sucks so much on its own and Android is even worse. The tools are slow and suck anyway. I have never had an IDE get in my way as much as Android Studio (Eclipse is way worse though).

    Then you have Java, holy hell what a piece of shit. I remember the first time I did Java development (back in the pre-1.0 days) and I was constantly thinking "WTF were they thinking?!" when trying to use the API's. Today it's still the same, there are so many stupid "Java-isms" that are totally retarded and they just keep making new stuff the same way.

    1. Re:Android may be pervasive but... by Livius · · Score: 1

      If you think Java is bad now, look at all the Java stuff that been deprecated.

      It's been slow, but it has been getting better.

  5. make roboz sad by Thud457 · · Score: 2

    Such big, innocent trusting eyes.
    Oh man, they're going to eat you up. I can't wait to see the depravity they inflict on Pepper.

    Also, WTF, no legs?! This is 2016, a robot should be able to walk around like God and Lewis Padgett intended!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:make roboz sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such big, innocent trusting eyes.

      Oh man, they're going to eat you up. I can't wait to see the depravity they inflict on Pepper.

      Also, WTF, no legs?! This is 2016, a robot should be able to walk around like God and Lewis Padgett intended!

      If I saw that thing in a dark alley or moving across the room with the lights out.. I would not be thinking "Robot" I would be thinking "Grey Alien" It would scare the shit out of me in the right circumstances.. I want to buy one for practical jokes along those lines.

    2. Re:make roboz sad by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2

      Also, WTF, no legs?!

      Not everyone has legs, you insensitive clod. Maybe it's a paraplegic robot?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    3. Re:make roboz sad by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It needs legs, how else will it run away from the robosexual predators?

  6. That's humanoid? by mark-t · · Score: 1

    It looks about as humanoid as some toys by Fisher Price.

  7. First thing I am going to program for this robot.. by Eldragon · · Score: 1

    First thing I am going to program for this robot is have it shoot nerf guns any anyone it perceives as sad. It will then Speak: "Turn that frown upside down meatbag".

  8. Yep, let's replace human workers with a robot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We'll sure be able to afford cell phones, fast food and new cars when our jobs are automated!

    1. Re:Yep, let's replace human workers with a robot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And sadly no one mentioned "basic income" on the thread.

  9. Re:First thing I am going to program for this robo by Livius · · Score: 1

    It will then Speak: "Turn that frown upside down meatbag".

    Followed by "You have twenty seconds to comply."

  10. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  11. Task 1? by jpellino · · Score: 1

    "Bender" mode.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  12. Wrong editor note? by phizi0n · · Score: 1

    The OP is about a robot but the editor note is about TPU's which are never mentioned in the OP or article.

  13. can't fuck it by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1
    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:can't fuck it by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, I'm sure someone will come out with an app you can side load. Although I am still sure how you would go about fucking it.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  14. Totally misunderstood the headline. by MMC+Monster · · Score: 2, Funny

    Reading about humanoid robots needing American android programmers got me really confused.

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    1. Re:Totally misunderstood the headline. by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      Your post is currently rated as funny, although I am not sure if you meant it to be. It took me a minute to figure out the the Android SDK is not the Android SDK. If I am mistaken, Id'e like to hook one up and switch the values for sd card and internal storage. One reboot and you just might end up with a psychopathic killer bot.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    2. Re:Totally misunderstood the headline. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's obviously a play on words, regarding "humanoid robots" needing "android (humans)"

    3. Re:Totally misunderstood the headline. by Kyont · · Score: 1

      "Humans' 'Droids Humanize Droids!" - Details after the jump...

      --
      You shall see a cow on the roof of a cotton house.
  15. check out the website. This is going to be a FAIL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a joke. A $8k USD platform. And compared to the ROS compatible robots out there you are MUCH BETTER off developing for a platform that supports ROS.

  16. Re:IDE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe it is possible using command line tools, but make sure you don't ever even remotely try to load the Android emulators. Although I understand there are faster 3rd party ones available, the official one runs like it was coded in Excel macros.

    In any case, if that's your preferred dev style (mine too!), prepare to be "eclipsed" by Google kids using the latest and greatest hardware.

    CAPTCHA: asocial

  17. Documentation by Phlogistique · · Score: 1

    Here's a link to the documentation, as it seems to be kind of hard to find through Google: https://android.aldebaran.com/... Note that the SDK contains a virtual robot so you can use it even if you do not have a Pepper.

  18. Re:IDE? by Phlogistique · · Score: 1

    Well, I do not know about a "better" way, but some of the tools in the Pepper SDK (like the robot simulator) are standalone executables so you could certainly manage to run them independently. On the ther hand there is no doc for doing this, so you would need some messing arround to figure it out.