Slashdot Mirror
Spotify's New Family Plan Is Cheaper, $14.99 For Up To 6 people (techcrunch.com)
An anonymous reader writes: Spotify on Monday announced some changes to its family plan subscriptions, allowing them to use Spotify Premium for $14.99 per month and get six different Spotify accounts and profiles. This is the exact same deal as the one you can get on Apple Music today. Spotify is just making sure you're not going to move your entire family over to Apple Music for pricing reasons. The company introduced family plans back in 2014. At the time, it was one of the first subscription services with family plans. You could get 50 percent off extra Spotify accounts. So it would cost you $14.99 for two accounts, $19.99 for three accounts, $19.99 for four accounts, etc. For big families with at least three accounts, the new Spotify family plan is cheaper. For singles and couples, it's the same price.
What is the deductible?
And does this include Vision and Dental?
How about a quick summary of what the damn thing is?
Crazy how others want to profit from other people's thoughts, isn't it?
Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
Could a group of six non-family people band together and use this to obtain a cheaper per-person price?
Is this actually news, or is it just a fucking ad?
family plans? seriously? let me break this down as a dad how it works...
My Wife: uses itunes nearly exclusively since it interfaces with her nano which she needs for the gym. if she gets something for $holiday its usually through amazon.
me: Perfectly happy with whatever audible frequencies are coming out of mpd and ncmpc. icecast is good enough for me because back in my day we whipped the llamas ass and we liked it.
Kids: youtube, youtube-dl, and sharing mp3s at will during school or while hanging out. otherwise pandora, or some freemium service that caters to obscure genres like glitch-core or butter-pickle-hop or whatever squeeling fan belt noises kids listen to these days.
my parents: Vinyl and tape...mostly tape.
Good people go to bed earlier.
Single person here. Fuck family plans. That is all.
Family plans usually have a "one household" restriction in their terms and conditions, but here Spotify didn't put any requirements on where or who the...
primary account holder and up to five (5) subsidiary accounts (“sub-accounts”)
...need to be.
The conspiracy theorist in me says it was intentional, since Spotify and Apple Music know they could make way more money if they cut their subscription rates—and have repeatedly tried to do so—but the labels are adamant about a $10/mo minimum. This could be a clever end-run around their contractual obligations.
How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
Why?!?
And as an added bonus, Spotify won't delete all your existing music during setup.
In other important News for Nerds, CostCo has a great deal on dairy products and Jiffy Lube just mailed me a coupon for $15 off my next oil change (so watch your mailbox, everyone!).
"Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
How can you people claim you're 'cutting the cord' when you PAY for all these rediculous streaming services? Go back to owning your own music, not paying every month to listen to it, and turn on the nice, free, broadcast radio otherwise, and not use up your expensive, overpriced dataplans. Seriuously: Pay for a connection to the Internet, then pay someone for content, too, every month? Rediculous. You're just cutting one cord and getting TWO new ones.
Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
You gotta say, this is one of the good results of competition. Apple started with the $15/mo family plan, then Google added, now Spotify must compete.
Of course, with pricing exactly the same one would wonder if it's the music industry who's actually setting the price...
Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
Just imagine, Deep Purple would be obscure and penniless if everyone knew the source code for Smoke On The Water. We cannot allow economical terrorism to run rampant with their tablature and g-clefs and their music theory.
I have the cheap Slacker plan at $5 /mo and while you can only have one stream active, you can cache to somewhere around 5 devices, as I recall, so everyone can listen to a cached station simultaneously without any additional fee. I've not directly compared to Spotify, which I read has a larger library, but I've been pleased enough with it.
I've been using Spotify almost since the beginning. All along I'd be happy to pay even twice as much, if the artists actually get a healthy chunk of that (big if, I know).
Given how much goes to the hands of middlemen and just a pittance to the artists, I am happy obtaining the music I want through non-subscription means and alternate distribution channels.
Seriously, I can't see how people would stomach paying more than $20-40 a year for unlimited, well curated music and music suggestions. The current Spotify and Pandora pay models are just stupid overpriced.
Secondly, I already pay for most of the music. You know the products which the do the radio ads which pay for the music on the radio. We've all bought some of them. The margin on those products paid for the music, we've paid for it already.
You know what music I do pay for and buy all the time? Albums from local artists I enjoy who aren't on AM/FM radio. Some are marginally obtainable on online services, but I rather pay $10-15 for a CD and know that $8-14 went straight to the band / artist.
My family can save money with this. We have 3 cars with satellite radio and another music streaming account so this could help.
Is it safe to assume that like restaurants, amusement parks and many other marketers, this family plan discriminates against single people? Singles typically pay ~60% of what a family of five would pay.
Here's the math: Price for a family of five for a popular movie ~$22+ popcorn. Single person for a popular movie ~$14. Overhead cost to theater owner for five seats (popular movie) ~$5; cost for 1 seat ~$1. Profit to theater owner for family ~$17; profit for single person ~$13; profit for 5 single persons ~$65. When the movie isn't popular and the seats aren't full this equation does not apply but it's still a rip-off of single people. It's also not as profitable for the theater owner as more fairly priced tickets for single guests. Likewise most other venues.
...omphaloskepsis often...