Slashdot Mirror


Burning All Fossil Fuels Would Scorch Earth, Says Study (phys.org)

mspohr quotes a report from Phys.Org: A new study published in the Journal Nature Climate Change shows our precarious climate condition: "Using up all known fossil fuel reserves would render Earth even more unlivable than scientists had previously projected, researchers said on Monday. Average temperatures would climb by up to 9.5 degrees Celsius (17 degrees Fahrenheit) -- five times the cap on global warming set at climate talks in Paris in December, they reported. In the Arctic region -- already heating at more than double the global average -- the thermometer would rise an unimaginable 15 C to 20 C." This would make most of Earth uninhabitable to humans (although the dinosaurs seemed to do fine with it 65 million years ago). The report also stated that if fossil fuel trends go unchanged, ten times the 540 billion tons of carbon emitted since the start of industrialization would be reached near the end of the 22nd century. For comparison, "older models had projected that depleting fossil fuel reserves entirely would heat the planet by 4.3 C to 8.4 C. The new study revises this to between 6.4 C and 9.5 C," writes Phys.Org.

2 of 418 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Circle Of Life by lobiusmoop · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Nope, 'Dino sludge' was a one-shot deal. On the timescales needed for new fossil fuel, the sun will have died to the extent that Earth CO2 levels will have dropped below the level needed to sustain plant life (and thus animal life).

    --
    "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
  2. Re:Why believe the models? by Rei · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Models being too extreme? Hardly.

    Forecast: 1990 IPCC sea level rise predictions vs. actuality
    Forecast: 1988 Hansen temperature predictions vs. actuality (Scenario B was described as most likely)
    Forecast: IPCC temperature predictions vs. actuality vs. contrarian models
    Backtest: IPCC AR1 sea ice loss models vs. actual

    Temperatures are tracking, on long running average, right on what has been forecast. Sea level rise is well on the high end. As it stands, our arctic sea ice models predict significantly less loss than we actually see (we're not very good with sea ice right now, and this is well acknowledged by the IPCC).

    I know there's been this contrarian myth circulating claiming that climate models predicted warming that never occurred. There's a nice, well-referenced debunking of it here.

    --
    Friends! Help! A guinea pig tricked me!