Slashdot Mirror
Is Denver The Next High-Tech Center? (newyorker.com)
An anonymous reader write: "The spread of the tech industry outside Silicon Valley has helped make Denver the fastest-growing large city in the U.S.," reports the New Yorker, saying it's now growing faster than Austin and Seattle, becoming one of America's 20 most populous cities. Cost-conscious investors and tech executives now are opening offices in cheaper "secondary cities" outside of Silicon Valley, like Salt Lake City, and the good universities near Denver mean a well-educated workforce, coupled with a low cost of living.
"Though the city isn't the headquarters for any big tech companies -- like Dell in the Austin area or Microsoft and Amazon in Seattle -- several of them, including IBM and Oracle, have offices here. The presence of those offices, and of the universities, has also helped create a vibrant startup scene: people get educated here or come here for jobs, and then they graduate or leave those jobs and become entrepreneurs." Last year venture capitalists invested $800 million in Demver's tech, energy, food, and marijuana companies, and in 2014 Oracle paid over a billion dollars to acquire Denver-based Datalogix.
Anyone else live in a burgeoning "secondary" tech city? Scott McNealy said he co-founded his data-analysis startup in Denver because in California "The prices of everything have skyrocketed. The regulations. The pension deficit. The traffic. It's just not a fun place to go start."
"Though the city isn't the headquarters for any big tech companies -- like Dell in the Austin area or Microsoft and Amazon in Seattle -- several of them, including IBM and Oracle, have offices here. The presence of those offices, and of the universities, has also helped create a vibrant startup scene: people get educated here or come here for jobs, and then they graduate or leave those jobs and become entrepreneurs." Last year venture capitalists invested $800 million in Demver's tech, energy, food, and marijuana companies, and in 2014 Oracle paid over a billion dollars to acquire Denver-based Datalogix.
Anyone else live in a burgeoning "secondary" tech city? Scott McNealy said he co-founded his data-analysis startup in Denver because in California "The prices of everything have skyrocketed. The regulations. The pension deficit. The traffic. It's just not a fun place to go start."
I work in tech in the Salt Lake City area and the tech industry has been booming here for years, but lately it has grown even more so. Adobe, eBay, IMFlash, Overstock.com, and many other firms of varying sizes have either moved ops here or started here. Some new comers make a big deal of the LDS church influence in life in Utah and this because many people are LDS and live their religion, that is where the influence lies. Plus they make great neighbors. Being a native Californian it took some getting used to, but I wouldn't have it any other way. Utah is a great place to live, work, and be outdoors.
What kind of infrastructure would you need that makes a "center of high tech industry" sensible?
Employees at other companies to poach?
The OP's observation is really behind the times.
I moved to the Denver area 28+ years ago. Since I got here, the state's population has gone from 3.3M to 5.5M, almost all in the Front Range urban corridor. Much of that growth has been driven by tech, it's just been quiet. The state is consistently in the top several for VC money spent. There's also a long history of Colorado companies reaching a certain size and then being acquired by the giant coastal firms.
University of Colorado (~40 miles) and Colorado State University (~65 miles) have solid engineering and computer science programs. There's also a good concentration of GIS and environmental companies due to the various relevant programs at both universities. Salaries are far lower than in traditional tech hubs, however.
As I mentioned in another comment, out of date. 25 years ago the Brown Cloud was a real problem. Today, Denver doesn't even make the 25 worst cities in the country for overall air pollution. Having lived here while it happened, it's just absolutely amazing how much cleaner the air is now.
5 months after legalization.
A doubling of hospital admittances 1 year after legalization.
Different story, same result. 1 year after legalization.
2 deaths from marijuana use 1 year after legalization.
Third death the following year.
Unreported death due to marijuana.
The last article raises the question, how many more deaths as the result of marijuana use have gone unreported? We know more and more traffic deaths have marijuana as a cause.
But please, let us here more excuses how none of the above is related to marijuana use. Drug users are good at making excuses, especially when presented with facts.
We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
when people of a region think that 'bathroom gender' is the highest prio that needs solving - no - I don't want to be living with people who think along those lines.
The "bathroom gender" issue is being pushed by liberals, not by conservatives. Conservatives are resisting and protesting it, but the issue was raised, and is being pushed, by liberals.