Slashdot Mirror


Internet, Web Enjoy One Final Day As Proper Nouns (go.com)

An anonymous reader writes: The Internet and Web will be downgraded to "internet" and "web" tomorrow with the new edition of the AP Stylebook. Therefore, today marks their last day as proper nouns. The AP Stylebook is a manual that many journalists follow, offering a comprehensive guide to the usage of words, style, spelling and punctuation. "The argument for lowercasing Internet is that is has become wholly generic, like electricity and the telephone. It never was trademarked and is not based on any proper noun," writes Tom Kent, AP Standards Editor. "The best reason for capitalizing it in the past may have been that the term was new. At one point, we understand, 'Phonograph' was capitalized." The two names will join the likes of website (formerly Web site) and email (formerly e-mail).

211 comments

  1. Re:Can we downgrade Linux, too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh brother... Right before we downgrade Windoze to lower-case subscript....

  2. Oh, yeah? Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You ain't stupidester than me!

  3. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Today I learned the AP has standards. Been reading their horribly researched biased articles for so long I forgot.

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this the "stylebook" that mandated the change from illegal alien to illegal immigrant to undocumented immigrant to undocumented worker and finally to "dreamer"?

    2. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this the "stylebook" that mandated the change from illegal alien to illegal immigrant to undocumented immigrant to undocumented worker and finally to "dreamer"?

      Dunno, but it's the same "stylebook" which decided that the Oxford Comma was entirely useless. For example:
      Oxford Style: "There was a news conference with some strippers, Hillary Clinton, and Donald Trump."
      AP Style: "There was a news conference with some strippers, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump."

      Oxford Style: "We had breakfast with Uncle Dan, the Preacher, and a Whore from downtown."
      AP Style: "We had breakfast with Uncle Dan, the Preacher and a Whore from downtown."

      See? No difference in meaning AT ALL.

  4. can't change facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is still a proper noun regardless of capitalization.

    1. Re: can't change facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's go back to calling it by its proper name, the Information Superhighway.

    2. Re: can't change facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go back to sleep Al.

    3. Re:can't change facts by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      So you're saying it should be spelled 'Facts' ?

    4. Re: can't change facts by Jayfar · · Score: 2

      I prefer Infomercial Superhypeway.

    5. Re:can't change facts by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Consider 'the world.' Or 'the sky.' There's only one of each (synecdoche and other planets notwithstanding) but we don't really regard them as proper nouns. In fact, you have to go back pretty far to find a language where one of these vast media are encoded in a way that's even ambiguously a true proper noun in what is still decidedly poetic writing. I confess I initially resisted the idea of this too, but... it's not really a bad thing, in the end. The dream of the ARPANET, NSFnet, and other early nets was always to create a network medium that was invisible and omnipresent. This is just another step on that journey.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    6. Re:can't change facts by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The Earth is capitalised, so world isn't a particularly good example. There are others, such as god, where capitalisation is used to differentiate between a god and the specific God. Similarly, there are many internets (any network of networks is an internet), but only one Internet.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:can't change facts by Trix · · Score: 2

      The problem with your analogy is that it is possible to have an internet (one or more connected, yet autonomous, networks that are not connected to the Internet (a global connection of connected, yet automomous, networks taken as a unit). It's more like a clump of dirt is earth, but Earth is a planet.

      --
      I want all of the power and none of the responsibility.
    8. Re: can't change facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Total misnomer.

      "Porn Chute" is more like it...

    9. Re:can't change facts by sootman · · Score: 1

      "World" is a generic term. The world on which we live does have a name -- Earth. Which is capitalized. (Lowercase-e earth is also a word -- a synonym for 'dirt'.) "World" is like "person" in that sense. You don't capitalize "person", even if you're referring to someone specific, but you do capitalize their name if you use that.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    10. Re:can't change facts by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Not so fast. When you stick "the" in front of "Earth" it becomes a common noun and loses its capitalization. I believe this is for the same reason that 'world' and 'sky' aren't capitalized; the usage descends from pre-Galileo, non-Heliocentric practices. It's a medium, in addition to referring to soil and a planet.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    11. Re:can't change facts by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Not a problem. You can have more than one sky or ocean, too.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    12. Re:can't change facts by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      As I told Raven64, it's more complex than that for 'earth.' There are three uses of the word, two of which are uncapitalized. One of those does refer to the medium in a manner analogous to the 'sky' and 'world' usages I described, in a pre-Heliocentric way. When you say "the bird plummeted to the earth," you're referring to the ground as a whole, not the third planet of the Sol system, and not mere soil. Same for "every man, woman, and child on this earth."

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  5. Bad reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you made a list of internets, it would be a short list. Hard to claim that "internets" have become generic when there's only the one.

    1. Re:Bad reasons by Jayfar · · Score: 1

      If you made a list of internets, it would be a short list. Hard to claim that "internets" have become generic when there's only the one.

      More correctly internet (small 'i') has always referred to any network, such as your local LAN or maybe a multi-site network. Small 'i' internets are countless. The Internet (capital 'I') refers to all of the interconnected internets.

    2. Re:Bad reasons by grahamm · · Score: 2

      More correctly internet (small 'i') has always referred to any network, such as your local LAN or maybe a multi-site network. Small 'i' internets are countless. The Internet (capital 'I') refers to all of the interconnected internets.

      Even more correctly, an 'internet' is a set of connected networks, so a simple LAN is not an internet, but if 2 LANs are connected via a router (not a bridge) then they form an 'internet'.

    3. Re:Bad reasons by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

      The Internet (capital 'I') refers to all of the interconnected internets.

      ...You mean the one Al Gore invented... ...whoa...I think I just had a flashback...that's really trippy...

    4. Re:Bad reasons by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

      Thank you... that's the thing, when referring to "The Internet" it is to a very specific thing. When you are from New York, you don't refer to "Manhattan"... you refer to "The City". If you move to Tokyo, you still know "The City" is Manhattan.

      Internets which is an abbreviation for inter-network of course has always been a generic. As another poster clearly defines, inter-network communication takes the term network which (annoyingly enough) refers to the bounds of a layer-2 broadcast domain... this is also known as a LAN or local area network. Upon connecting these two LANs or networks together using a routing device (surprisingly generally referred to as a router) that performs forwarding at based on layer-3 addressing (not necessarily using routing tables), inter-network communication is accomplished. This previously was referred to as internet communication. Though we no longer commonly use the term as it is easily confused with Internet communication which is absolutely not the same thing as internet communication.

      Internet (with an upper-case "I") communication refers specifically to "The Internet" which there is and can only ever be one of.

      internet (with a lower-case "I") simply requires two connected LANs via a router. This topology definition can be called internet but instead should be called inter-network communication.

      The AP obviously lacks on-staff technical expertise, researchers or fact checkers, otherwise they would have caught this sooner.

    5. Re:Bad reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you... that's the thing, when referring to "The Internet" it is to a very specific thing. When you are from New York, you don't refer to "Manhattan"... you refer to "The City". If you move to Tokyo, you still know "The City" is Manhattan.

      And if you move to London, then you'll get very confused. [See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      Just saying - not the best example

    6. Re:Bad reasons by shortscruffydave · · Score: 1

      1 computer = 1 computer
      many computers connected = 1 intranet (or 1 LAN)
      many intranets connected = 1 internet (or 1 WAN)
      many internets connected = 1 Internet

    7. Re:Bad reasons by cyberchondriac · · Score: 0

      The AP obviously lacks on-staff technical expertise, researchers or fact checkers, otherwise they would have caught this sooner.

      Well, it is the AP. They're more concerned presently with being politically correct than technically correct.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  6. Only one question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is "iPhone" a proper noun?

  7. typical commenter by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Informative

    "The best reason for capitalizing it in the past may have been that the term was new."

    Wonderful research this guy has done here, couldn't he even bother to read Wikipedia before opening his slap trap? Wikipedia would have told him clearly:

    The words internetwork and internet is simply a contraction of the phrase interconnected network. However, when written with a capital "I," the Internet refers to the worldwide set of interconnected networks.

    People who don't do basic research are the reason we get cynical demagogues for presidential candidates. There is no forgiveness for Tom Kent, may he burn in the deepest circle of hell with the morons.
    Q: "Why are you in hell Tom?"
    A: "I don't deserve it, I was the smartest man in the world, everything I knew about came from Facebook reposts."

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:typical commenter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hell is a proper noun and should be capitalized. Or did I miss a joke?

    2. Re:typical commenter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wikipedia articles are that much better/reliable than Facebook posts?!

    3. Re:typical commenter by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wikipedia articles are that much better/reliable than Facebook posts?!

      YES

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:typical commenter by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Basically what I am trying to say is that I hope he dies in a fire and continues to burn in one thereafter. Is that part clear?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:typical commenter by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You seem to have misunderstood what he was saying. Read it again, carefully:

      "The best reason for capitalizing it in the past may have been that the term was new."

      He is saying that it shouldn't be capitalized, regardless of what Wikipedia thinks, but that it was anyway and the best reason anyone can come up with for that may be simply that it was a new term.

      When we talk about "the internet" there is no need for capitalization, in the same way that when we talk about "the capital" there isn't because although there are many capital cities we are assuming that the listener will know which one we mean from context. When we talk about "internet services" there is no need for capitalization because those services could run on any internet, not just the main one we all use.

      People who don't do basic research are the reason we get cynical demagogues for presidential candidates. There is no forgiveness for Tom Kent, may he burn in the deepest circle of hell with the morons.

      I'd say people leaping to conclusions and not bothering to understand what the other person is saying, or at the very least assuming a great much, is the main cause.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:typical commenter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is only 1 Internet, therefore I think it should be capitalized. The moment we have 2, we can call the current one "an internet".

    7. Re: typical commenter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. It isn't. When posting on the internet you should aim for the lowest common denominator. So: "Hell"

    8. Re:typical commenter by epine · · Score: 1

      He is saying that it shouldn't be capitalized, regardless of what Wikipedia thinks, but that it was anyway and the best reason anyone can come up with for that may be simply that it was a new term.

      Then he goes and uses "Phonograph" as a comparable, showing off how little he understands about the ubiquitous bound forms featuring the word "the" as the first element, and why that might give off an edible smell to the proper noun olfactory gland, even though it's just some chemical in a test tube with a dubious history.

      "the Internet"

      "the Donald"

      Half of America sees little distinction.

    9. Re:typical commenter by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      He is saying that it shouldn't be capitalized, regardless of what Wikipedia thinks, but that it was anyway and the best reason anyone can come up with for that may be simply that it was a new term.

      It's pretty clear that he didn't read Wikipedia, because that is not the best reason anyone can come up with, and furthermore I think you are a moron for actually thinking that's the best reason anyone can come up with, and also, your explanation is kind of dumb because Capitol is capitalized. But cool you're trying to defend someone.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    10. Re:typical commenter by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Oh, and also, he could have looked in OED, which would have given him the correct answer.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    11. Re:typical commenter by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Almost.

      There are many internets, and many of them are connected to or part of the Internet.

    12. Re:typical commenter by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      When we talk about "the internet" there is no need for capitalization

      Other than to differentiate between the global Internet and whatever local internet you may be referring to.

      in the same way that when we talk about "the capital" there isn't

      When we get a global Capital you will have a valid analogy there.

      I'd say people leaping to conclusions and not bothering to understand what the other person is saying, or at the very least assuming a great much, is the main cause.

      As you have failed to understand the difference between a global network and local, and the reason why it can be important to differentiate between them without having to use a dozen words.

    13. Re:typical commenter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure that's a widely held definition of the Internet. The Internet is a collection of many networks which are connected to form the Internet. At least that's how I see it.

    14. Re:typical commenter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We do have Internet2. Doesn't that justify it being capitalized? In fact, the 'Internet' should be retroactively rebranded as Internet1 to distinguish it from the lesser known but faster Internet2

  8. Which internet? by omnichad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Nobody talks about any other internet when they say Internet. It's a proper place name just as much as Asia.

    1. Re:Which internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody talks about any other internet when they say Internet. It's a proper place name just as much as Asia.

      You insensitive clod!!! What about all the alternate-universe internets???

    2. Re:Which internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      This is just it. The journalists obviously are clueless about what they are writing about if they use "internet". It's called "The Internet" because it is a singular, proper thing. It would be like saying "The united states" or "The queen", it's bad grammar.

    3. Re:Which internet? by BitterOak · · Score: 1

      Nobody talks about any other internet when they say Internet. It's a proper place name just as much as Asia.

      Exactly. I learned that "Internet" is capitalized because the word "internet" is a generic term for a network of networks. The Internet (with a capital "I") is the internet that most of us use.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    4. Re:Which internet? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      No. "The United States" is a charted, deliberate single entity. There is no "internet," really. There are thousands (millions?) of networks that talk to each other through common protocols. When we talk about an internetworked collection of networks (for convenience, "internet"), that's like saying the US is made up by a collection of states (not States).

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    5. Re:Which internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody talks about any other internet when they say Internet. It's a proper place name just as much as Asia.

      The Simpsons "The Blunder Years" Season 13 Episode 5

      Young Carl: Have you heard about this internet thing?
      Young Lenny: Internet?
      Young Carl: Yeah, its the inner netting they invented to line swim trunks. It provides a comforting snugness.

    6. Re:Which internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asia has been around for a while. It's asia from now on.

    7. Re:Which internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are talking about AN internetworked collection of networks. You know, something that makes up a larger whole that we call "The Internet", the one slashdot and netflix are on. A formess but nonetheless singular entity that I deliberately want to connect to so that I can watch TV and post here.

      If you want to test the truth of this, connect your significant other to another internet which doesn't have twitter and google. Will he or she say that their Internet connection is good if their mail doesn't work?

    8. Re:Which internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. "The United States" is a charted, deliberate single entity. There is no "internet," really. There are thousands (millions?) of networks that talk to each other through common protocols. When we talk about an internetworked collection of networks (for convenience, "internet"), that's like saying the US is made up by a collection of states (not States).

      There is no "Internet"????
      How does /. work then?
      There are lots of internets, and one Internet.

      And if you're getting picky about capitalization:
      The Earth is made of earth, and some religions consider God to be one of many gods.

    9. Re:Which internet? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      When you go for a vacation drive, do you use The Roads, or do you drive on the roads?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    10. Re:Which internet? by Ded+Bob · · Score: 2

      I drive on the roads but have not had the opportunity to use The Roads. If I visit there, I could use the roads of The Roads to explore the area.

      Do you live on the Earth or the earth? Personally, I live on both. Technically, I live on the Earth and on top of the earth while relying on food grown from earth on the Earth. :)

      I have used internets that are part of the Internet.

    11. Re: Which internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I usually drive on the roads or highways or freeways, but when I get on the Internet it's usually through an Internet Service Provider... Guess which Internet they are providing me service with, not my local interconnected network of computers, not my businesses wide area network, but the Internet through their gateway that is connected to other networks. I guess they Re all just iSP now. Since they no longer provide me with Internet access but boring new internet access.

      Well at least I can say "Back in my day it was the Internet!"

    12. Re:Which internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      internet is a type of network (another example is intranet), you are referring to the world wide web which is the proper term to describe the internet that spans globally.

  9. What do we gain from that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Internet is the dominant globally routable network. An internet is a proposal for the Internet, an inferior network that uses IP, or anything other than the dominant IP network. Likewise, a web is something a spider weaves. I see no reason to change the current usage. I'll continue to capitalize these words when referring to them. Who are these people anyway?

    1. Re:What do we gain from that? by deniable · · Score: 1

      An internet doesn't have to use IP. Look at IPX sometime and get off my lawn.

    2. Re:What do we gain from that? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      IPX ?! What does your "lawn" consist of, ferns from the Paleozoic? - because grasses hadn't evolved yet.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    3. Re:What do we gain from that? by Megol · · Score: 1

      Funny as the network you are most likely using to post here is based on IP version 4, a network that is older than the IPX one...

  10. Re: Can we downgrade Linux, too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FreeBSD will never be demoted to lowercase. Never, I say!

  11. Generic? by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wouldn't there have to be more than one Internet for there to be an internet? Is Internet 2 another internet, or is it a research WAN?

    What do I call this network I am on now? I tend to call it the Internet.

    I usually call the planet I'm standing on "Earth" and not "earth". Although I can use the word "earth" for just about any pile of dirt.

    I certainly recommend calling the start that Earth revolves around the Sun and not a sun. A lowercase "sun" is a useful generic term for the many suns of the universe. Sol is another name we like to use for the Sun, but "Sol" not necessarily the preferred name in English.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Generic? by swillden · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Exactly. There is and always has been a reason to distinguish between the general concept of an internet, and the specific, publicly-accessible, globe-spanning Internet.

      However, I guess that it is very rare for AP articles to need to draw that distinction. Whatever. I'm going to continue using "Internet" to refer to the Internet and "internet" to refer to the concept of an internet.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    2. Re:Generic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FFS, people, it's never been about how many of something there is. It's about whether the word is that thing's name.

      Learn to English, people.

    3. Re:Generic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and "the internet" is just what it is. Maybe it's also its name, but that isn't how most people think about it. To most people, the internet doesn't have a name, and the idea that people might give it one is rather stupid. "We have an internet, and its name is Internet" is as stupid as "we have an internet and it's name is Fred."

    4. Re:Generic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FFS, what is The Internet's name?

    5. Re:Generic? by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      I remember being told at one point in school that "Earth" should be capitalized unless you are saying "the earth" (both referring to the planet obviously). But even then I thought it didn't make sense. Also, why do we refer to some proper nouns with "the" and not others? And there are exceptions both ways...

      "Earth is the 3rd planet from the Sun." Perfectly fine.
      "The Earth is the 3rd planet from the Sun." Also fine.
      "Mars is the 4th planet from the Sun." No problem.
      "The Mars is the 4th planet from the Sun." Wrong.
      "The Mars is the 4th planet from Sun." Double wrong.

      What. The. Hell.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    6. Re:Generic? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't there have to be more than one Internet for there to be an internet? Is Internet 2 another internet, or is it a research WAN?

      What do I call this network I am on now? I tend to call it the Internet.

      Well, for technical papers, you wouldn't use the AP Style Guide. You'd use the style guide appropriate for the paper.

      The AP Style Guide basically applies to general common use by laypeople - if you ask them, there is only one "internet" and that's the one they do their Facebook, etc on. They may have an idea of Internet 2, but for the most part, they don't call up Comcast and ask for a high speed connection to Internet 2.

      Basically the AP Style Guide is meant to reflect common usage, and the common layperson uses "internet" and "web" to refer to the Internet and World Wide Web respectively.

    7. Re:Generic? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      "Earth is the 3rd planet from the Sun." Perfectly fine. "The Earth is the 3rd planet from the Sun." Also fine. "Mars is the 4th planet from the Sun." No problem. "The Mars is the 4th planet from the Sun." Wrong. "The Mars is the 4th planet from Sun." Double wrong.

      What. The. Hell.

      The difference is that "earth" is both the dirt beneath your feet and a specific planet in space, so you need different phrases to tell the two meanings apart. There's no such issue with Mars, which has always been a proper noun.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    8. Re:Generic? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Is Tokyo the Capital of Japan, or is Paris the capital of France?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:Generic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Internet 2 (and yes, it is capitalized) is part of the Internet since they are interconnected in the first place (and at a lower level than the usual AS-to-AS connections that make up the Internet).

      I will keep capitalizing Internet for now.

    10. Re:Generic? by tomhath · · Score: 1

      "the internet formerly known as the Internet"

    11. Re:Generic? by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      There is also a difference between.

      I need an internet connection.
      and
      I need a connection to the Internet.

      I personally would capitalize the later but not the first, previous AP guide said that both should be capitalized.

      I wonder if there is a difference between. "The Internet is down," and, "My internet is down" ??

    12. Re:Generic? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      "I is..."

      "No, you say 'I am.'"

      "Oh, right. I am the ninth letter of the alphabet."

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    13. Re:Generic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FFS, people, it's never been about how many of something there is. It's about whether the word is that thing's name.

      Learn to English, people.

      The Internet is a specific thing... it's one example of an internetwork.

    14. Re:Generic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We have an internet, and its name is Internet" is as stupid

      It's stupid because it's not "an internet", it's an internetwork. We call one particular internetwork "The Internet".

      You need to keep in mind this is the AP Stylebook pushing for the change. The same people who would have you believe that these statements are identical:
      Oxford Style: "His global tour included encounters with Nelson Mandela, an 800-year old demigod, and a dildo collector."
      AP Style: "His global tour included encounters with Nelson Mandela, an 800-year old demigod and a dildo collector."

      Based on this stunning display of logic, one can only assume that the purpose of AP Style is not to be more grammatically correct or precise, but rather to help generate misleading click-bait headlines.

    15. Re:Generic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember being told at one point in school that "Earth" should be capitalized unless you are saying "the earth" (both referring to the planet obviously). But even then I thought it didn't make sense. Also, why do we refer to some proper nouns with "the" and not others? And there are exceptions both ways...

      "Earth is the 3rd planet from the Sun." Perfectly fine. "The Earth is the 3rd planet from the Sun." Also fine. "Mars is the 4th planet from the Sun." No problem. "The Mars is the 4th planet from the Sun." Wrong. "The Mars is the 4th planet from Sun." Double wrong.

      What. The. Hell.

      Actually, if you're using "the earth" referring to the planet, then you're doing it wrong.
      And the answer to your question is..... some proper nouns are also common nouns.

    16. Re:Generic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But we all say "the Sun" and not "Sun" to refer to our system's star.

    17. Re:Generic? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Not many people know this, but it's "Fred".

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    18. Re:Generic? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      To add to this, the proper name of the sun is "Sol", not "Sun". (though both terms original from ancient gods, Norse Sunne and Roman Sol).
      Interestingly, no one ever refers to it as Helios, though helio is used as a prefix or suffix to describe attributes relative to the sun : heliotropic, heliocentric, perihelion, etc..

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    19. Re:Generic? by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      My point was that referring to the planet both with and without the preceding "the" is considered acceptable.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    20. Re:Generic? by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      There are tons of proper-yet-not-common nouns that are only correct when preceded by a "the": the Eiffel Tower, the Taj Mahal, the Great Wall of China, etc.

      If someone said to you "Here is a picture of the Earth.", would you really push up your glasses and smugly correct them?

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
  12. It's a proper noun and should be capitalized by Xylantiel · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is only one Internet. That's what the capital is for. It is a proper noun indicating the network of all globally routable addresses. If the people at the AP are so clueless as to not know that, no wonder the news is so bad.

    1. Re:It's a proper noun and should be capitalized by hey! · · Score: 2

      You expect reporters to understand that?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re: It's a proper noun and should be capitalized by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2

      The Universe.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    3. Re:It's a proper noun and should be capitalized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "If the people at the AP are so clueless..."

      It's worse than that. There are many "Style" guides out there, the AP guide is supposed to be for general Journalism with a specific audience- it's the "Associated Press" after all. Grab a story off of the teletype, change a few words, and send it out to be typeset. Reuters and UPI have their own Style guides, and they can be very catty about capitalization, commas, abbreviations, and the like.
      At the Lab, we had several style guides, again meant for the several different audiences. For general reports and articles, it was the Chicago Manual; largely because many of the original Scientists hailed from there. "The University Of California, Berkeley Style Guide" was universally ignored.
      Of course, for newspaper articles, we had folks who could speak "AP" if necessary. There actually was a Science Reporter from the NYT who depended on us for not making him appear too foolish in print...

      As for the "Internet"- "....It is a proper noun indicating the network of all globally routable addresses..." is half right, since there are chunks of the Internet that don't have "globally routable addresses", they may have private IP addresses. But they are still on "The Internet".
      I actually like capitalization- there are people who loathe it for some reason. Maybe their mothers were scared by a COBOL at some point in the Maternity troff.

      In the early days of Computer Indexing, one of the tricks was to capitalize words in advance that have Indexing meanings, which meant transistors, could be ignored in scanned text, while "Transistors" were a clue to the PDP-11 that something of importance was being discussed. Context was everything.

    4. Re: It's a proper noun and should be capitalized by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Donald.

    5. Re: It's a proper noun and should be capitalized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have any tips to fend off feral COBOLs?

    6. Re:It's a proper noun and should be capitalized by StormReaver · · Score: 2

      If the people at the AP are so clueless as to not know that, no wonder the news is so bad.

      I have to wonder how many other stupid decisions are in the AP style guide. There was always a reason I couldn't put my finger on that I despised that guide when I was in college. This decision helps illuminate my "irrational" dislike for it.

    7. Re: It's a proper noun and should be capitalized by fustakrakich · · Score: 1
      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    8. Re: It's a proper noun and should be capitalized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm much more concerned about Dire COBOLs.

    9. Re: It's a proper noun and should be capitalized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why am I totally not surprised that you are Drumpf fan? You are dumb and should feel dumb for being dumb.

    10. Re:It's a proper noun and should be capitalized by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      No, there are millions of internets. One of them runs in my house, another at my office, and a 3rd at the data center we use ... they are all connected to other internets via The Internet.

      The AP is clueless and regularly makes changes that are just fucking stupid in order to have something to do, but that doesn't actually change that your usage of internet is specific to one collection of internets and ignores the actual proper usage of the word.

      The Internet is different from my internets, or my intranets.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    11. Re: It's a proper noun and should be capitalized by Bob_Who · · Score: 2

      The Donald.

      small penis.

    12. Re:It's a proper noun and should be capitalized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's bitztream, the autism-hating internet troll.

    13. Re: It's a proper noun and should be capitalized by sbaker · · Score: 1

      "Common Business Oriented Language" should be CoBOL.

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
    14. Re:It's a proper noun and should be capitalized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      internet is a type of network and just like other networks whatever their name there can be more than one internet. You are referring to the world wide web which is the proper term to describe the internet that spans globally.

  13. Re:Can we downgrade Linux, too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux seems like a generic rip-off of unix, so let's downgrade the name.

    Systemd on the other hand is a unique contribution that has no basis in historic unix. And should probably only have ever existed in the minds of its creators and should have never been released on the world.

  14. How about the ACM or APA style guides? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 2

    I don't tend to use anything else.

  15. Oxford English Dictionary by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 4, Informative
    I would have thought the Oxford English Dictionary was the usual arbiter of the English language. They actually make note of the difference between its use without a capital letter and with:

    Originally (with lower-case initial): a computer network comprising or connecting a number of smaller networks, such as two or more local area networks connected by a shared communications protocol; an internetwork; spec. such a network (called ARPANET) operated by the United States Department of Defence. In later use (usually the Internet): the global network comprising a loose confederation of interconnected networks using standardized communication protocols...

    This is far better researched than a style guide used by US journalists which seems to have made the change entirely for arbitrary reasons. It also makes sense to capitalize it since there is only one, well unless you get your language from George Bush but I'd hate to think they are using him as an inspiration.

    1. Re:Oxford English Dictionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worse, if you don't capitalize it, idiots may start to think it's the iNternet. Trademarked by Apple in 5...4..3...

    2. Re:Oxford English Dictionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IBM used the i prefix on product ranges years before Apple even thought about getting into consumer electronic media devices. Then the moronic masses started adding it after Apple got stuck with iThing brand names.

    3. Re: Oxford English Dictionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it should be all uppercase, as in "HEY LOOK IM ON THE INTERNET!"

    4. Re: Oxford English Dictionary by xupere · · Score: 1

      "Caps Lock is cruise control for cool."
      -Some INTERNET user forever ago

    5. Re:Oxford English Dictionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have thought the Oxford English Dictionary was the usual arbiter of the English language.

      There is no arbiter of the English language, in any country that speaks English. Other languages have language academies, but English does not.

    6. Re:Oxford English Dictionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Journalism in the US has been dead for a long time.

  16. News for Nerds? by Kwyj1b0 · · Score: 1

    Slashdot editors, however, will continue to ignore all rules of grammar, punctuation, and spelling, and continue their decades-long campaign to commit atrocities against the English language.

    1. Re:News for Nerds? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      Slashdot editors are all crackpots at heart, and crackpots like to Capitalize random Words because it Seems Biblical or Something.

  17. Re:Can we downgrade Linux, too? by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like the Microsoft devs have a lot of free time on their hands again.

    Honestly, you guys have a lot of bugs you need to fix, stop trolling slashdot and get back to work.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  18. Needs a rew-rite Re:News for Nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slash-dot editros however will, continue to ignore al rulez of grammar; punctuation; and speling and continue there decades long-campaign to commit atro-cities against the english Language?

    Thier, fixt that 4 u.

  19. I've never much cared for the AP guidelines by Red_Chaos1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This does not make sense to me. It's not just "a" Internet or "a" Web, they are "the" Internet and "the" Web. Unlike the Phonograph, there are not multiple vendors and multiple versions. It's all one very unique thing.

    1. Re: I've never much cared for the AP guidelines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is just like the sky, the sun, or the planet -- ubiquitous and therefore not proper. It could be named at some point, if needed to differentiate itself from another, as happens with Sol or Earth.

    2. Re:I've never much cared for the AP guidelines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well let's make a new term.

      "The Webinet" if Internet and Web were capitalized for being new (they weren't but that's what the abstract says) then if we come up with a new name it too can be capitalized.

      All hail the Webinet.

    3. Re:I've never much cared for the AP guidelines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This does not make sense to me. It's not just "a" Internet or "a" Web, they are "the" Internet and "the" Web. Unlike the Phonograph, there are not multiple vendors and multiple versions. It's all one very unique thing.

      I'll go back to using "WWW" to avoid the ambiguity. Problem solved. Next time I use the word "web," it will be in reference to spiders. If users of the new AP guidelines are then confused, it serves them right for being so gullible.

    4. Re:I've never much cared for the AP guidelines by sootman · · Score: 1

      Everyone has their pet peeves on one side, and things that they don't mind or aren't aware of on the other. For example, something is either unique or it isn't, but I know people who say things like "very unique". ;-)

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  20. Par for the course by Solandri · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "The argument for lowercasing Internet is that is has become wholly generic, like electricity and the telephone. It never was trademarked and is not based on any proper noun," writes Tom Kent, AP Standards Editor. "The best reason for capitalizing it in the past may have been that the term was new.

    Bozos like this is why general press coverage of technical and scientific stories still sucks. Rather than ask someone who knows for their informed opinion, they think they already know everything so can make decisions without having to ask.

    • An internet is any collection of interconnected networks. If a company connects its Los Angeles branch LAN with its New York branch LAN so they can share files, they now have an internet.
    • The Internet is the biggest grouping of such interconnected networks, which happens to span the globe (it didn't always). It is capitalized to distinguish it from other internets.

    Lowercasing 'Internet' makes about as much sense as lowercasing Associated Press, because the AP used to be new, but now there are several other associations of press corps.

    1. Re:Par for the course by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't worry too much about what the tom kents of this world think.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  21. Re: Can we downgrade Linux, too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    One letter at a time my friend. One letter at a time.

    freeBSD
    freebSD
    and the last sad step before netcraft confirms the lower case...
    freebsD

  22. It's true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The users typically don't shower or otherwise practice proper grooming habits.

    See, you're showing your ignorance. Linux has a cutting edge biometric security that uses body odor as a security key. But, it's not too sensitive. So, when I'm doing a lot of Linux work or I'm about to, I have to skip showers for a few days. I don't shave either.

    1. Re: It's true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean it uses the BO operating system.

  23. Journalism by Livius · · Score: 1

    I can see why some people would put "internet" in the same category as utilities like cable, telephone, or telegraph, which are common nouns.

    But you would think journalists of all people would take a little more pride in their use of language, and recognize a proper noun.

    Then again, given the state of "journalism", I doubt if pride is in their vocabulary.

  24. Can we delete "webinar"? by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    That phony word is so irritating. And while we're at it, a pox on the house of people who insist on trying to make a word out of an acronym. It's a GUI not a gooey.

    1. Re:Can we delete "webinar"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word is annoying, but what would you replace it with?

    2. Re:Can we delete "webinar"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing worse than a webinar is a "lunch & learn" which serves only to ruin lunch,

    3. Re:Can we delete "webinar"? by swb · · Score: 2

      I used to go to a lot of webinars, but since the office started refusing my mileage reimbursements for them I had to stop going.

    4. Re:Can we delete "webinar"? by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 2

      In order to be an acronym by definition, the shortened version has to be pronounced as a word itself, e.g. NATO === nay-toe. What you are proposing is that we treat GUI as an initialism, where each letter is pronounced separately, e.g. FBI === eff-bee-eye.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    5. Re:Can we delete "webinar"? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      It's a GUI not a gooey.

      A lot of early computer stuff, and especially early Internet were done by military, and they live pronouncing their acronyms - to the point that most people don't even know they are acronyms (see snafu and the origin of the brand name Jeep).

      Besides, how do you efficiently speak about acronymed things otherwise?

    6. Re:Can we delete "webinar"? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      P.S. How do you pronounce RAM?

  25. So did a man land on the Moon or moon? by ukoda · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was trying to think of an analogy to use to make the point to the idiots at AP and it occurs the me that the Internet is the most widely known specific internet in the same way the Moon is the most widely know specific moon. If you wanted to be pedantic you could refer to the Moon as the moon in orbit around the Earth (or should that be the earth now?). If you call the Internet just internet how do you specify which internet you want to refer too? What about Internet2, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/..., is that now internet2?

    Apparently AP think it is the moon and some people are not happy about that, http://www.airspacemag.com/dai...

    1. Re:So did a man land on the Moon or moon? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      AP is correct about Earth's moon. 'Moon' is not its name.

      If you wanted to be specific, you would refer to Earth's moon by name, Luna.

      Moon is generic. Luna is specific.

      internet is generic. The Internet is specific.

      The fact that you don't know the name of the moon is the real problem in your post.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    2. Re:So did a man land on the Moon or moon? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

      If you wanted to be specific, you would refer to Earth's moon by name, Luna.

      No you wouldn't. Its name is "the Moon."

      http://planetarynames.wr.usgs....

      Moon is generic. Luna is specific.

      The word "moon" is generic. "The Moon" is specific.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    3. Re:So did a man land on the Moon or moon? by ukoda · · Score: 1

      I knew Luna is the Latin name for the Moon, but I speak English not Latin. I have never hear anyone say how bright or how beautiful Luna looks. Pink Floyd didn't release and album call "Dark side of Luna" or "Dark side of a moon". How about NASA, you know, the guys who have actually been there? They do tend to be more precise usually referring to it as the Earth's Moon though are rather flexible about Moon vs moon. They mention lunar but not Luna. Even their URL has moon, not luna, http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/pl....

      Basically I see no 'real' problem with my post, However, I'm reasonable, no need for descent. I will continue to call it the Moon and you can call it Luna and I'm sure other Slashdot readers will have own idea what it should be called.

    4. Re:So did a man land on the Moon or moon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Moon and the Sun really aren't used as proper nouns, it's much like calling the current president "The President". You can see this most clearly when people refer to moons of other planets (meaning large natural satellites), real or otherwise, and millions of suns in a galaxy (regardless of whether or not they are sun-like).

      Earth is used as both a generic noun and a proper noun, and this gives rise to confusion. You can spot this since it's a lot less common to refer to "earths" in other systems and when people do they are usually implying "Earth like" rather than "generic planet".

    5. Re:So did a man land on the Moon or moon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's bitztream, the autism-hating Slashdot troll.

    6. Re:So did a man land on the Moon or moon? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      No you wouldn't. Its name is "the Moon."

      Not always. Sometimes its name is "Oh fuck, what is that big round thing?! Holy shit it's coming towards us! Quick, run, save yourself - every man for himself"

      Depends on context and substances.

  26. JESUS CHRIST ALREADY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't fucking matter. Save your outrage for things like the use of "flaunt" to mean "flout," which has been done enough to now be considered at least marginally proper English: http://www.dictionary.com/browse/flaunt?s=t

  27. 1995 is calling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who in actual reality except pedantic grammar choppers and some annoying spell check routines has capitalized "internet" since the mid 90s?

    1. Re:1995 is calling by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      Who in actual reality except pedantic grammar choppers and some annoying spell check routines has capitalized "internet" since the mid 90s?

      Since they're just now changing their style guide, apparently everyone who wrote for the AP from the mid 90s until today?

      As noted by many others above, an internet is a set of interconnected networks. The Internet is a specific global grouping of interconnected networks, which happens to also be by far the largest one, in terms of number of distinct networks and nodes.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
  28. Gotta love it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From Webster
    Proper noun: a noun that designates a particular being or thing, does not take a limiting modifier, and is usually capitalized in English —called also proper name

    From ABC
    Don't mourn for the Internet and the Web too much, though. When the two names for the great global network gets their new, lower-case stature on Wednesday, they'll will be in good company, joining the likes of website (formerly Web site) and email (formerly e-mail). We have a sneaking suspicion it will only be a matter of time before Wi-Fi joins them in the coming years.

    The clueless commenting on the clueless.
    There are many websites, and emails. So a limiting modifier is required to pick one.
    WiFi is a trademark for a specific technology, so no I would not expect the AP to try to downgrade it without a visit from some lawyers.
    There is only one Internet and Web so the only thing that could cause them to be non-caps is if they are usually non-caps which they are not.

    If AP were clueful, they would understand the internet and web are also technologies, so there is benefit to separate them from Internet and Web.
    I guess this is too optimistic.

    This seems like a way for AP to get in the news more that anything else.

  29. The AP is wrong. by mbone · · Score: 1

    The following sentence shows the appropriate capitalization.

    The internetworking protocol of the Internet is the internet.

  30. i write everything in lowercase by crispytwo · · Score: 1

    so, i don't care!

    shift is for noobs

    1. Re:i write everything in lowercase by dwye · · Score: 1

      thank you, e.e.cummings

    2. Re:i write everything in lowercase by Robert+Goatse · · Score: 1

      shift is for noobs

      How did you get the exclamation point?

    3. Re:i write everything in lowercase by xupere · · Score: 1

      Alt-33

  31. Re:Which internet? Which universe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's also only one universe as well. But yet capitalization of it varies:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universe
    http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/02/artificial-universe-no-mans-sky/463308/
    http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/02/artificial-universe-no-mans-sky/463308/

    The problem you may be having his thinking that language is supposed to obey a series of set rules like your english teacher told you. It doesn't. Language only has to convey meaning. Are you really confused when someone uses internet instead of Internet? If not, then why do you care?

  32. AP says: IT'S OUR LANGUAGE by axewolf · · Score: 1

    And you SHALL use it in such a manner as PLEASES US or you SHALL be subject to the CONSEQUENCES fitting an irreverent deviant who would take liberties with such great art that he hardly has the right to behold from afar!
    The time for organic language has passed! By divine mandate we have been granted the power to engineer language and in turn engineer minds! Your instincts are irrelevant and must be put down!

    Don't forget, censorship is the bane of humanity and you should recognize it in all of its forms.

  33. now Slashdot can make some adjustments . . . by swell · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How many of these words need capitals?
    Internet,
    Web
    Enjoy
    One
    Final
    Day
    As
    Proper
    Nouns

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
    1. Re:now Slashdot can make some adjustments . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why have people been complaining about title case in titles for the last few weeks? Is it a new troll meme or something, like that Golden Girls song or the Apper guy?

    2. Re:now Slashdot can make some adjustments . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's called title case you dickhead.

  34. interesting, but wrong by l3v1 · · Score: 1

    "The argument for lowercasing Internet is that is has become wholly generic[...]"

    I don't think that's the case. Everyone still refers to it as "the" Internet, since there are lots of networks, but there's only one Internet. It's not like there are lots of internets out there (like one of the bad examples, "telephone"), and it's alo not a natural phenomenon like the other bad example, "electricity". It's the one, and I can't see why it couldn't be kept capitalized. I don't much care if it's lower case of not, but I can't agree with the argument here. Also, "the two names for the great global network" is just wrong - their meaning might have merged for the general public, but they are not the same thing.

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
  35. Wait a minute... by nowsharing · · Score: 1

    I thought "web" reached EOL a decade ago.

    1. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would've thought the same for the term "cybersecurity", yet here we are.

  36. Who sets the standard? by Panoptes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The AP Stylebook is an American product, written by and for American journalists. Saying that the Internet should henceforth be 'internet' is a parochial decision without global authority.

    In Britain the standard is set by the Oxford University Press, which has a rather longer and more illustrious history than the AP Stylebook. When the OUP and the Oxford English Dictionary declare that the word should not be capitalised, I shall accept their authority. Until then, it's the Internet for me.

    1. Re:Who sets the standard? by olau · · Score: 2

      In Britain the standard is set by the Oxford University Press, which has a rather longer and more illustrious history than the AP Stylebook.

      Has the Oxford University Press even discovered the internet yet?

    2. Re:Who sets the standard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Britain the standard is set by the Oxford University Press, which has a rather longer and more illustrious history than the AP Stylebook.

      Has the Oxford University Press even discovered the internet yet?

      Which one? The Internet, or any ol' interconnected network that existed before anyone had dial-up?

      No one gives a shit about AP or there guidelines. They're no longer relevant in a click-bait no real journalism US-centric news world that's little more than propaganda and disguised adverts.

    3. Re:Who sets the standard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends. Which internet are you referring to?

  37. Better examples by olau · · Score: 2

    A better example is the electric grid. Or the highway network.

    Yes, it's true that for many years, there has been an common explanation for why "the Internet" should be capitalized, but I think what people here need to realize that one logical deduction does not make language. These things are much weirder.

    I can see why you're annoyed. In Danish, the same decision was made years ago. I think for people don't give a damn about networks the capital "I" just looks plain weird.

    1. Re:Better examples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that it's nonsense. These know-it-alls aren't even consistent! We have them here too, in Sweden, where they have decided that for some reason NATO and some other alphabet organizations are supposed to be written with a capital initial and the rest in lowercase, while FBI and a whole host of other foreign and native organizations gets to keep their capitalization. So, not only is it inconsistent, in the end you're not able to discern whether the name actually is a name, or just an acronym. Grrr.

      Silly old fogies trying to be chick.

  38. Re:Can we downgrade Linux, too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey! Windows is case-insensitive you case-sensitive clod!

  39. What about v2? by antdude · · Score: 1

    Whatever happened to Internet 2?

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:What about v2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ask the same thing all the time. Nobody mentioned it all through the CS program when I was at univ., though I graduated a few years back. They did have an abundance of buildings, hallways, and rooms that were closed off to the student population, though, and most of the CS professors were quite disturbingly condescending and secretive. Three cheers for the police state; it has such a positive effect on academia.

  40. Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Internet and Web, or internet and web, will still be proper nouns. There is a convention that proper nouns in English are capitalized, but it is not a hard rule. This is the AP changing a convention in their style guide, and no more.

    A proper noun is one that normally refers to a unique entity, which the Internet and World Wide Web are generally considered to be. It is NOT just any noun that's capitalized.

  41. Ignorance by Archtech · · Score: 1

    The decision demonstrates considerable ignorance on a number of levels. "Phonograph" is a common noun, but more to the point there are more phonographs than one. In common parlance, the term "Internet" refers to the one and only Internet. True, you can have separate internets and lowercase them if you wish (and it even seems desirable to distinguish them from the Internet). In the term "Internet Protocol(s)", the capital letters are also fully justified by the fact that IP(s) are proper names.

    As for the Web, it is obviously and even more emphatically one and unique. Otherwise Tim Berners-Lee would not have chosen to call it "the World Wide Web". Since he also chose to give it away free, rather than sucking vast profits from it, I think we can afford to honour his decision - the more so as it is eminently logical and sensible. If anyone has not read TBL's own explanation, see https://www.w3.org/People/Bern...

    I cannot help feeling that the rush to lowercase these terms reflects little more than fashion. There is a trend to lowercase words and phrases that obviously should be capitalized, including proper names. We should not allow that modish trend to lead us astray, as we are more interested in the true meaning of words than in their superficial appearance.

    --
    I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
  42. Did they say anything about commas and title case? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    Internet, Web Enjoy One Final Day As Proper Nouns

    Meanwhile Slashdot is making up for it by capitalising words whether they are proper nouns or not.

    Title case is ridiculous.

    And it is okay to use the word "and". This is the Internet (or the internet). You're not paying by the byte for bandwidth and there's no physical space restriction so there's no need to replace it with a comma.

    Why are the "new media" so intent on hanging on to the pointless traditions of the past?

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  43. Wrong. by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

    There are governing authorities of specific standards and technologies to ensure that there is ONE Internet and that everyone on it can communicate.

    Or should ICANN and IANA change their names? What do they govern now?

    1. Re:Wrong. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Or should ICANN and IANA change their names? What do they govern now?

      They govern standards, not the infrastructure. Which is why you can use those same standards in a completely separate network of networks that isn't in any way connected to the corporate, government, academic, and personal networks that happen to be what we use shorthand to refer to as "the internet." Just like we don't say we're going to head down The Driveway and then use some Roads and The Highway System to make a trip to work.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:Wrong. by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      No, they govern common infrastructure in a single place known as the Internet. Specifically the DNS system and the numbers. They exist specifically to ensure uniqueness in this single entity.

      That's why when people refer to "google.com" they're not referring to your local DNS servers' record for your houseplant. It's because there is a capital-I Internet.

      IETF handles standards. I left them off the list because their reason to exist isn't exclusively to the Internet, but they also handle standards which are also applied to the google.com houseplant. ARIN and ICANN only exist because of a capital-I Internet.

    3. Re:Wrong. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      No, they ensure unique numbers/names for those that want to play along. If you don't want to play by their rules, you can have your own 'google.com' on your own network, pointing to whatever IP address you want. Where is the internet? You can't answer that because it's a reference to optional behavior on the part of network operators who want to get involved in peering with other networks - it's not a thing, and it's certainly not a place. It's a concept, sort of like "driving on the right" or "league bowling."

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    4. Re:Wrong. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it still exists.

      Just because it's loosely defined, optionally implemented, constantly in flux and generally quite ineffable doesn't preclude its genuine reality and the usefulness of it having a name.

      It's called the Internet. If you really want to bitch about something, focus on the lower case t on the.

    5. Re:Wrong. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Just because it's loosely defined, optionally implemented, constantly in flux and generally quite ineffable doesn't preclude its genuine reality and the usefulness of it having a name.

      Lots of things have names. Like "the telephone system" and "life insurance" and "commercial agriculture" and "the postal system" and "shopping malls" and "the film industry" and "rail freight" and "bulletin boards." Do you walk down the hall to pin something on the dormitory bulletin board, or the Bulletin Board? Do you pick up the phone and make a call on the Telephone System? Do might use the US Postal Service, but do you tell people that you're Mailing them a letter? The only reason anyone ever stuck a capitol "I" on "Internet" was because the low-information journalists involved couldn't get their head around the fact that it's just like a "road system," and that they don't drive on the Road System.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    6. Re:Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that's exactly why you need the capital versus lower case distinction. I am free to use 'google.com' for whatever I want on an internet, for example the internet in my house or the internet at my office, but not on the Internet. You see how it makes sense to use the definite article with the lower case 'i', and the lower case is the only means of distinguishing it?

    7. Re:Wrong. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Well, many countries have post offices, but in the UK I go to the Post Office.

      Sometimes capitalisation is correct, such as the Internet, and sometime's it's not, such as the muppet.

    8. Re: Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just occurred to me this is one group making a standard dictating standards of another group, so how about we say that AP is now ap because we can so anytime ap is used on the Internet it will now be the ap since reasons...

      And hahahaha to journalistic standards!

    9. Re:Wrong. by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      "Where is the internet? You can't answer that because it's a reference to optional behavior on the part of network operators who want to get involved in peering with other networks - it's not a thing, and it's certainly not a place. It's a concept, sort of like "driving on the right" or "league bowling." "

      Open up an ISP where google.com is your houseplant and you'll get an earful from people who can tell you very specifically where the Internet isn't.

    10. Re:Wrong. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Well, many countries have post offices, but in the UK I go to the Post Office

      That's because that's the proper name of a government agency. It's like saying "Department of Defense." It's reasonable to say, "I'm in the army. The U.S. Army."

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    11. Re: Wrong. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Just occurred to me this is one group making a standard dictating standards of another group, so how about we say that AP is now ap because we can so anytime ap is used on the Internet it will now be the ap since reasons...

      "AP" is short for "Associated Press," which is the proper name of that business. The word "internet" is short for "internetworked [stuff/systmes/networks]" and isn't the proper name for anything. Saying you'll use the internet is like saying you'll take the highway.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  44. Journalists are ignorant cretins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hence they changed 'AIDS' to 'Aids', 'NASA' to 'Nasa', and 'ISIS' to 'Isis'.

    Why? Because a sufficient number of them, including editors, were too stupid to remember to type 'AIDS' in capital letters, that's why. And actually they all should be 'A.I.D.S.', 'N.A.S.A.' and 'I.S.I.S', but that would be far too much to expect of these idiots.

    Who cares what 'journalists' say? They are illiterate, Bolshevik nation-wreckers, and will all get theirs in the end.

    1. Re:Journalists are ignorant cretins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hence they changed 'AIDS' to 'Aids', 'NASA' to 'Nasa', and 'ISIS' to 'Isis'.

      Why? Because a sufficient number of them, including editors, were too stupid to remember to type 'AIDS' in capital letters, that's why. And actually they all should be 'A.I.D.S.', 'N.A.S.A.' and 'I.S.I.S', but that would be far too much to expect of these idiots.

      Who cares what 'journalists' say? They are illiterate, Bolshevik nation-wreckers, and will all get theirs in the end.

      Yes - I'm constantly confused by the news these days with all the references to an Egyptian goddess.

  45. Internet is NOT like Telephone or Phonograph by mysidia · · Score: 1

    Because there is one and only one Internet.

    There are many Telephones and many Phonographs, but only one Internet.

    The Internet is the network of networks....

    Internet is kind of like the word Universe, or "The Big Bang Theory"

    Theoretically more than one could exist, BUT new ones will not be called Internet.

    For example: An experimental network of networks has been called the Internet2

    New network of networks will not be called Internet. The Internet is only one specific global arrangement of networks.

    1. Re:Internet is NOT like Telephone or Phonograph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Universe seems an especially proper noun because it means everything. All matter, all energy, multiple dimensions, time, space, alternate realities, and probably a lot more. Spinoza and Einstein thought that if God is all powerful, then he and the Universe are one. (Not a very useful, but a provable religion?)

      SiFi has the term multiverse which is probably the same thing, but gives us the idea that there might be multiple known universes, which are not proper nouns but are often used as if they were.

      Aside from lack of doing their homework, we'll know that the ap has gone over the deep end when they decide to downgrade Universe.

  46. I should care how reporters want me to write why? by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    Seriously, fuck 'em. As with so many others here, I shall mock them if they don't understand why it's got a capital.

  47. Why Should I Care? by andywest · · Score: 1

    I do not care what the AP says. I will still use the words Internet and Web in caps, just as I use the term e-mail, just as use the word 'hacker' for a clever programmer and 'cracker' for losers who break into computers. Only a bourgeois loser takes journalists seriously anyway.

    --
    --- Andy West http://andywest.org
    1. Re:Why Should I Care? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      I do not care what the AP says.

      That's fine, because they don't care what you do.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  48. The Internet is a place. by sbaker · · Score: 1

    In common usage, the Internet is a place. "My wife and I met on the Internet" is no different than "My wife and I met on Earth".

    When it's not being used as a place, by all means down-case it, "I had a hard time getting internet access at my hotel" versus "I had a hard time getting onto the Internet from my hotel".

    --
    www.sjbaker.org
  49. Next you'll say Pluto isn't a planet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get off my lawn!

  50. No sole arbiter by FlexAgain · · Score: 1

    In general, there is no sole arbiter of what words, grammar or syntax is English. English is largely defined by common usage.

    The Oxford English Dictionary, and other popular dictionaries or encyclopedia may well be used as supporting evidence for how we use English, but I certainly don't look to the Associated Press, as reported by ABC News, as a strong basis for what I should be doing with my speech and writing.

    --
    Actually it is rocket science...
  51. Explain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are Proper Nouns and why are they called Proper and not some more logical name?

  52. But Internet is *NOT* generic by dwheeler · · Score: 2

    Tom Kent falsely claims that, "The argument for lowercasing Internet is that is has become wholly generic, like electricity and the telephone." Here's a thought experiment: I'll create a few disconnected networks, interconnect them, but *not* to the Internet. By definition, any set of interconnected networks is an internet (but not *the* Internet). Then I'll sell a service that lets people access my internet... which lacks Google, Wikipedia, and many other things. I bet he'll suddenly find that "the Internet" is *NOT* generic - it is a *specific* set of interconnected networks, which has a proper name. Governments still routinely create interconnected networks that use TCP/IP, but do *NOT* connect to the Internet - especially when security is critical. AP may be unaware of this, but it's still true. Upper/lower casing in the end isn't THAT critical. The REAL problem is that too many reporters do not understand what they're reporting about, nor do they check their sources to find out. The difference between "Internet" and "internet" have been documented for decades. Failure to understand, and failure to check sources, is the REAL problem here.

    --
    - David A. Wheeler (see my Secure Programming HOWTO)
  53. RFC-1918: Why Internet & internet are both cor by infernalC · · Score: 1

    See https://tools.ietf.org/html/rf... .

    An internet is any computer network which is addressed by Internet Protocol.

    The Internet is the large super-network of a bunch of interconnected internets.

    RFC-1918 is the perfect example of these distinct uses. I firmly believe that since the second aforementioned use is a particular collection of internets, that the correct usage is as a proper noun. You can connect multiple private internets, but that would not constitute the Internet.

  54. Re: Can we downgrade Linux, too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "unique contribution" indeed.

    Is that PC for "retarded" in the vein of "Thank you Johnny for your unique contribution. Further contributions are not welcome. Farting in class is not ever a valid answer. You may see the principle after school"

  55. Re:Which internet? Which universe? by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    Why does the ap care whether or not I capitalize their acronym?

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  56. Re: Can we downgrade Linux, too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right after we downgrade windows for similar reasons.

  57. Chipping in just one more by SkyLeach · · Score: 1

    There is only one Internet

    everything else is an intranet /discussion

    --
    My $0.02 will always be worth more than your â0.02, so :-p
  58. Re:Can we downgrade Linux, too? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's case preserving, which is a sort of half-assed compromise.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  59. Only One Internet by sudon't · · Score: 1

    "The argument for lowercasing 'Internet' is that is has become wholly generic, like electricity and the telephone."

    Except that there's only one Internet, not dozens of different kinds or brands of the internet. It depends on how you're using the word. While you can use these words in a generic sense, if you're talking about the Internet, it is a proper noun. Same with the Web, short for the World Wide Web.

    --
    -- sudon't

    Air-ride Equipped

  60. Must be Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Must be great to be wrong about everything , yet everyone else follows your lead. Also AP's news ain't what it used to be either.

  61. downgraded status by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what is the best case sinario?

  62. Make stuff up if you work for the AP... by gavron · · Score: 2

    Internet is capitalized to distinguish between "internetwork" (interconnected-networks) and THE global internetwork using IP -- The Internet (caps).

    Tom Kent's comments that "The BEST reason MAY HAVE BEEN" blah blah blah does a disservice to anyone who could either research this very simple thing, or ask someone who knows. It's not anything he says it is. Also there's no connection between a trademark (requiring an individual or company to register exclusive use in commerce) with the capitalization of a word!!! Truly this guy is a marvel in not knowing anything about words.

    They can stop capitalizing it. The word internet and the word Internet will still be different, the former being any networks tied together, and the latter being The Internet.

    E

  63. Re: Can we downgrade Linux, too? by BancBoy · · Score: 1

    Intended typo AC? I'm chuckling either way.

    --
    [UID-HeinzIntel]
  64. New definition of journalism effective tommorrow by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    APs failure to understand difference between the Internet and an internet is far from surprising. These failures have become so commonplace the definition of Journalism (US) effective tomorrow has officially changed to more accurately reflect present day usage.

    journalism (ËjÉ(TM)r-na-ËOEli-zam)
    Noun.
    "Process of bumbling basic facts, hyperbole and trolling for profit"

  65. Hear my testimony! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no internet but Internet, and Tim is its prophet.

  66. Re: Can we downgrade Linux, too? by DudemanBullfrog · · Score: 1

    Thanks, I thought I was the only one who would even think about saying that.

  67. Cultural milestone by Lothar+0 · · Score: 1

    Whether or not the non-capitalization is accurate is beside the point. If one of the most laggard, lame, and clueless group of people - journalists - have decided that the internet or web is no longer new, and therefore no longer "cool", then the spirit of the media-manufactured "Strange New World of the Internet" from Time's July 25, 1994 cover is officially dead. There can be no more doubt that browsing the web has the same level of awe and sophistication as a meth-addled trailer parker watching Perry Mason reruns at two in the afternoon. This is more or less the death knell of any pretense that being on the web instead of the teevee is somehow better.

    --
    "Anonymous Coward" is for whistleblowers, not unpopular opinions.
  68. Re:Can we downgrade Linux, too? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    It's compiling.

  69. Scabble! by tmjva · · Score: 1

    Finally I can use "internet" in Scrabble!

    --
    Tracy Johnson
    Old fashioned text games hosted below:
    http://empire.openmpe.com/
    BT
  70. Re: Can we downgrade Linux, too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its creator is already low class it's only right it becomes lower case.

  71. Re:RFC-1918: Why Internet & internet are both by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RFC-1918 describes an intranet. A private network that may or may not be connected to the larger internet

  72. It should stay Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is only one internet (inter connected network) that anyone refers to, it is the Internet. There not additional internets that anyone cares about in general. Ditto for the Web. You have your companies intranet and their internal web servers, but the Internet is THE Internet and the Web is the world wide web tied together by the top level DNS servers.

  73. Re:RFC-1918: Why Internet & internet are both by infernalC · · Score: 1

    No, actually, it is specifically titled Address Allocation for Private Internets.

  74. Re: Can we downgrade Linux, too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought freeBSD was those people who support the palestinians.