Slashdot Mirror


Report: Average American Will Use 22GB of Mobile Data Per Month In 2021 (mashable.com)

An anonymous reader writes: According to Ericsson's latest Mobility Report, it's predicted that the average American smartphone subscriber will use 22GB of mobile data by the end of 2021. The report shows the explosion of mobile data consumption, with mobile traffic growing 60-percent between 2015 and 2016. It's forecasted that Western Europeans will use about 18GB per month per subscriber, while subscribers in the Asia Pacific region will use up about 7GB per month, even though it will have the largest share of mobile data traffic in 2021. The report claims smartphone subscriptions will overtake non-smartphone subscriptions in the third quarter of 2016. In 2021, 95-percent of all phones in North America will be smartphones. Fast 5G networks, which should start to be commercially deployed in 2020, will be able to handle the increased traffic and reach 150 million subscribers globally by the end of 2021. As for Internet of Things devices, the number of which will quadruple to 16 billion globally by 2021.

104 comments

  1. Extrapolating by GrumpySteen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My friend had given birth to 0 kids last month. She had 1 this month. By January of 2021, linear extrapolation shows that she will have over 50 kids.

    1. Re: Extrapolating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. So much this. 22gb? Are you retarded? Unless 16k youtube becomes the standard next year thus is just stupid.

    2. Re: Extrapolating by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 2

      tethering?

      I have ADSL on 50GB a month and there are months I use less than half that.

      it might be cheaper just to ditch wired broadband if the price of mobile data comes down.

    3. Re: Extrapolating by WarJolt · · Score: 1, Troll

      Really 50GB? Hello 2005, welcome to 2016. Yep we have a black president.

    4. Re: Extrapolating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I streamed the entire Star Trek TNG series in a month once - 45GB on 3G.

    5. Re: Extrapolating by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I should have mentioned I'm in Australia, the home of fraudband (NBN).

      one *can* pay an additional $20 a month for a terabyte a month.

    6. Re: Extrapolating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing stopping me from using that much right now is cost.

    7. Re: Extrapolating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing stopping me from using that much right now is cost.

      In Canada 22 GB per month wireless data usage costs approximately CAD100.00 (USD80.00) per month and there are no unlimited data plans. Data overage ranges from 5.00 per GB to 10.00 GB depending on the data plan and contract. For 100 GB I would pay CAD145.00. The worst part is there is plenty of capacity available due to relatively low subscriber numbers compared to say the United States or many places in Europe on a per cell tower basis.

    8. Re: Extrapolating by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      How do you keep your data usage so low? I hit 300gb every month.

    9. Re: Extrapolating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you limit videos it's not too hard to stay under 100 GB, not sure how to keep it under 50 though.

    10. Re: Extrapolating by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Because I don't torrent and I don't have a netflix subscription.

      I watch 1/2 hr tv shows a couple of times a week and the occasional movie on catchup through our multi-cultural broadcaster SBS but aside from watching a few youtube clips that's about it.

      The NBN hasn't come to my area yet and I'm hoping the incoming Labor govt will builld fibre-to-the-premises and not the 25mbps schmozzle the current government are offering.

    11. Re: Extrapolating by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 2

      Well I'm not (currently) writing code, so downloading 10s of gigabytes of github repos isn't an issue either. :)

    12. Re: Extrapolating by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      My plan gives me 20GB/month, with rate limiting, not overage fees, after that. It also includes free international calling to over 70 countries, 2 extra incoming numbers from the countries of my choice (to facilitate extra-nationals calling me on what is to them a local number), unlimited local SMS and a second local number I can give out to people I don't care about. And I pay about $26 USD/month.

      Glad I don't live in a first-world country such as the US or Canada.

    13. Re:Extrapolating by no1nose · · Score: 1

      Dang. 50 kids! Gettin' jiggy wid it.

    14. Re: Extrapolating by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      I think you have buckleys of having the next government built FTTP no matter who wins. Labor have already said they are not going to.

      Outside of that I burn through more that 25gb a month in backups. I have no idea what youtube sends me but it's a lot. And even though I never get to play them I seem to like installing steam games so that chews through heaps as well.

      NBN isn't schedule to me for at least the next 3 years, but I'm lucky and really close to my RIM so I have a cable length us 47m. I actually max out my adsl 2 :)

    15. Re:Extrapolating by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Ha! I came here to say something similar.
      I use my phone a fair bit and never go over my 1.5GB quota. As much as the marketers would like us to be streaming HDTV to our phones, I've never ever seen anyone do it. A phone is good for calls and a few casual apps, but most people most of the time won't be using them as PC replacements.

    16. Re: Extrapolating by Gussington · · Score: 1

      How do you keep your data usage so low? I hit 300gb every month.

      On what? I use about 50GB which covers the entire family's web/email/youtube/spotify/gaming, as well as a few torrents (we're not big TV watchers, but get through a few each week).
      I have friends who hoard thousands of 1080p movies and boxsets that they never watch, but they are hardly representative of your average users.

    17. Re: Extrapolating by Shinobi · · Score: 1

      Then your family is extremely lightweight in its internet usage.

      We're not extreme in any way by swedish standards, and we use on average ca 280GiB/month down and 80GiB/month up on the non-work VLAN.

    18. Re: Extrapolating by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      2 Kids with tablets probably eat 50GB in youtube videos....

      I have metered uploads though. So backups chew through a fair bit. My wife takes a stupid number of videos and photos and those are always uploading. Torrents play a small part but not huge. I have a number of streaming video services I use as well.

    19. Re: Extrapolating by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      tethering?

      I have ADSL on 50GB a month and there are months I use less than half that.

      it might be cheaper just to ditch wired broadband if the price of mobile data comes down.

      Why would data rates come down. Typically, they will get you with introductory low rates, but once you are addicted, the rates go up.

    20. Re:Extrapolating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha! I came here to say something similar.

      I use my phone a fair bit and never go over my 1.5GB quota. As much as the marketers would like us to be streaming HDTV to our phones, I've never ever seen anyone do it. A phone is good for calls and a few casual apps, but most people most of the time won't be using them as PC replacements.

      For a smartphone you are correct in most cases. My wireless data usage on my smartphone is under 3 GB a month usually less than 1.5 GB. However, my wireless modem for primary Internet access is another matter. For the most part it is sending/receiving email, browsing websites, and streaming radio stations along with watching lecture videos for various professional development courses which comprises my typical data usage. Yes, I could continue with my unlimited wired Internet connection but I was/am trying to transition to 100% wireless. There is plenty of network bandwidth capacity in my country but the wireless carrier cartel is corrupt to the core. Based on my monthly usage I am willing to pay CAD50.00 for unlimited data but nobody offers unlimited wireless data-only at any price (not including data overage fees above their highest tiered cap).

    21. Re: Extrapolating by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Like the parent, I don't torrent or use Netflix. I use ~20GB/month (10GB with vzn and 10GB with Cricket/att). At nearly $200/month, it's a fucking joke but it allows me to function at 3700m above sea level on the edge of the wilderness...

    22. Re:Extrapolating by tsqr · · Score: 1

      Same here. My wife and I have the lowest tier Verizon data plan (1GB shared) and haven't exceeded the allotment a single time in four years. But then, neither of us is fond of spending a lot of time hunched over a tiny screen watching video.

    23. Re: Extrapolating by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I should have mentioned I'm in Australia, the home of fraudband (NBN).

      To be fair, it should have been obvious from your username.

      Is $20 AUD(?)/month to upgrade to 1TB that bad? I guess it would depend on how much you're already paying. Is that the only jump: 50GB -> 1TB? I'd be curious how your service/price compares to mine (Canada). I've certainly heard the "horror" stories of terrible Australian internet...

      I'm paying $75 CAD for 30Mbps and 300GB. If I wanted to get more data, the next plan up is $95 for 60Mbps and 450GB. Since the bandwidth increase is kinda BS (you never get that anyway), I'd basically be paying $20 for only 150GB more. I don't know if you can pay less just for a higher data cap or not.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    24. Re: Extrapolating by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      It's streaming video that will do it. If you throw Twitch streams on for a few hours in the background while working/whatever, it can easily get there.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    25. Re: Extrapolating by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      It depends on the ISP. Cheapest, and not necessarily most reliable for 1TB is around $AU70 not including landline rental on ADSL2+ at about 15Mbps.
      Then the government, as you've probably read on here, decided to neuter the NBN rollout to 25Mbps, which is hardly worth the effort. ;(

    26. Re:Extrapolating by ripvlan · · Score: 1

      I find it hard to believe people in the USA will ever get to 22GB / month. It will be a very slow climb - since AT&T and Verizon will slow everyone down - traffic growth will be unable to achieve this rate due to the high-pass filters. They just won't allow it - or will complain that customer use to much data !!!

      Let's see - 22GB plan is what.... $2,500 / month? + $45 for each device I want to use.

    27. Re:Extrapolating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife and I were doing 1gb, but one of her random games (or the facebook app, I forget) was sucking data for no real reason. I upped it to 2gb then told her we had to kill whatever app was doing this. We doing all our streaming on our wired network at home and even at that, with netflix, we never go over 100gb a month.

    28. Re: Extrapolating by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Then your family is extremely lightweight in its internet usage.

      Or maybe you are just a bandwidth hog?
      What is all this data you are downloading? Outside of crap TV and movies there really isn't much else on the Internet for regular people.

    29. Re: Extrapolating by Gussington · · Score: 1

      2 Kids with tablets probably eat 50GB in youtube videos....

      Maybe your kids should get out more? That much screen time can't be healthy...

    30. Re: Extrapolating by Gussington · · Score: 1

      So just don't do that then.
      Seems to be an odd complaint, why do people love watching screens so much?

    31. Re: Extrapolating by Shinobi · · Score: 1

      Not really, there are plenty of families that use even more.

      As for what we're using the internet for? Well, it's several hours of streaming every day, including news, documentaries and educational. Often multiple HD streams going at the same time. It's gaming, with Steam, GOG etc. It's backups. It's video calls with grand parents. It's sending photos and videos back and forth with family members. It's updates for multiple OS's and applications.

    32. Re: Extrapolating by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      Lol, who's complaining? Like I said, outside of things I actually follow regularly, it's nice to just have some background noise while doing something else.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    33. Re: Extrapolating by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I'm pretty ignorant of this topic, lol. Never heard of the NBN until you mentioned it in the GGP. My curiosity has piqued though so I'll read up on it a bit.

      Again, what you're describing (15Mbps/1TB @ $70 AUD) doesn't sound that bad. It's a bit expensive for the bandwidth, but like I said before the data cap is better than mine and I pay about the same (AUD and CAD are near par). I guess since you didn't include the "landline rental" fee then it might be a lot worse. Obviously I can't comment on the reliability, mine has been very reliable so there's that.

      Thanks for the info!

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    34. Re: Extrapolating by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Not really, there are plenty of families that use even more.

      Yeah but it's not the norm. I have ISP experience, so can assure you that 300GB/month is most definitely in the high range.

      As for what we're using the internet for? Well, it's several hours of streaming every day

      You should get out more.

  2. USA! USA! USA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beats the rest off by a mile!

    1. Re:USA! USA! USA! by Barny · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I hear you are great at beating off...

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    2. Re: USA! USA! USA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this the line for beating off?

  3. Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The average American will be too fat to use a phone in 2021

  4. So that's how they're doing it by johnsmithperson123 · · Score: 2

    Extreme overcharge fees. No wonder the provider lock in scam is so profitable! Google,please design Android to be impossible to vendor lock. It's in your interest you know.

    1. Re:So that's how they're doing it by WarJolt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Buy a nexus. It's not their fault you don't buy their phones.

    2. Re:So that's how they're doing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up.

    3. Re: So that's how they're doing it by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      It certainly is if the reason I refuse to buy them is their arbitrarily crippled nature.

    4. Re: So that's how they're doing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... arbitrarily crippled nature.

      Care to expand on that, fellow AC?

  5. Sounds about right by scunc · · Score: 5, Funny

    And 20 GB of that will be from ads!

    1. Re:Sounds about right by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And another 1GB from Facebook tracking.

    2. Re:Sounds about right by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Data is everything a mobile phone sends and receives. So a video phone call is a data sent and data received. As growth in video phone calls increase, so will recording and sending videos, rather than sending a photo, with a corresponding surge in data traffic.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re:Sounds about right by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Data is everything a mobile phone sends and receives. So a video phone call is a data sent and data received.

      What? No. When people talk about mobile data, they're talking about what goes across the IP network, not the cellular call data.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A video call is most certainly data.

    5. Re:Sounds about right by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      A video call is most certainly data.

      Yeah, I figured out my mistake about halfway through hitting submit, too late. And then I actually went and looked back to see if it had gotten posted by checking the top entry in my comments list, and it wasn't there, so I thought I had gotten away with it (I hit ESC before the content came back... but not in time to stop the form submission, apparently.)

      My bad.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Sounds about right by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      I was making a satirical comment on the state of how we let big companies track our movements online. Obviously it wouldn't take 1GB of 22GB and it wouldn't just be Facebook (I'm looking at you "Don't be evil" Google).

    7. Re:Sounds about right by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Curse you, good sir! I came here to post the exact same thing!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  6. How much will be marketing and bad JS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How much of that data downloaded will be excessive advertising or obtrusive javascript files?

  7. Lucky me! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    I'm way below average

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Lucky me! by WarJolt · · Score: 2

      Yeah, we know.

  8. Shit... by sycodon · · Score: 1

    ...my daughter uses that much now.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re: Shit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. I average 150+ a month. Thanks to my Verizon unlimited data plan.

    2. Re: Shit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. I average 150+ a month. Thanks to my Verizon unlimited data plan.

      Wow, I use about 500MB.

    3. Re: Shit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I average 150+ a month. Thanks to my Verizon unlimited data plan.

      Wow, I use about 500MB.

      If I stream music from a live radio station for approximately 8 hours the data usage is 2 GB. If I listened to the music from Monday to Friday while I work an eight-hour period, then in one week the data usage would be 10 GB without email or the occasional tweet. In a month 40 GB of data used would be the minimum assuming I limited myself to only 8 hours of streaming radio and a few emails and tweets. This costs me CAD90.00 plus taxes. What if I work 12-hour days or on the weekend or I want to watch videos on YouTube or stream a movie or television show using the broadcasters website? I would easily be paying CAD145.00 a month assuming not overage.

    4. Re: Shit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. I average 150+ a month. Thanks to my Verizon unlimited data plan.

      Wow, I use about 500MB.

      If I stream music from a live radio station for approximately 8 hours the data usage is 2 GB. If I listened to the music from Monday to Friday while I work an eight-hour period, then in one week the data usage would be 10 GB without email or the occasional tweet. In a month 40 GB of data used would be the minimum assuming I limited myself to only 8 hours of streaming radio and a few emails and tweets. This costs me CAD90.00 plus taxes. What if I work 12-hour days or on the weekend or I want to watch videos on YouTube or stream a movie or television show using the broadcasters website? I would easily be paying CAD145.00 a month assuming not overage.

      How dare you soil the wondrous beauty of radio by listening to it over the bastard internet.

  9. Too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to Ericsson's latest Mobility Report, it's predicted that the average American smartphone subscriber will use 22GB of mobile data by the end of 2021.

    Judging from what I pay Verizon for 2gb, the average monthly phone bill is going to be about $1000.

  10. Not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at these prices.

  11. Bandwidth growth is impossible b/c infrastructure by raymorris · · Score: 0

    The article claims that in the last 90 days, there were 150 million new LTE subscriptions. They claim that bandwidth usage in the US has increased 1000% in the last few years. As any regular reader of Slashdot knows, that's not possible.

    It's been pointed out many times by Slashdot commenters that the cell companies built their networks ONCE, and have been rolling in the profit ever since. They never replaced all the 2G equipment that provided 50Kbps, 3G never happened. 4G is make believe. They aren't constantly upgrading the networks, spending hundreds of millions of dollars every year, so there can be no increase in mobile bandwidth. GPRS is all there has ever been, and all there will ever be. Slashdot comments always remind us, the mobile networks were built once - nothing is ever replaced with newer equipment and faster interconnects.

  12. And the most bandwidth by fred911 · · Score: 1

    One can purchase will be 20GB requiring most to pay extra for the 2GB most need.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  13. Verizon just poked the bear by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

    I usually run 1-10 gigs per month on my unlimited plan but they finally got around to charging me that extra $20/month on my last cycle. Since they increased my bill, I'm not going to put up with the crappy service I get at my house. In the evening, I barely get 3G speeds (tho I have an LTE connection and usually get 60-80ms pings). I used to just connect to my cable service when I'm at home but, if they're going to charge me more, I'm going to demand more. No more offloading to WiFi. And the only way I can tell what kind of speed I'm getting is to move data. As a result of testing, I've moved 41 gigs in the last week. My speed goes from about 0.3-0.5Mbps in the evening hours to 10-15Mbps around 2am. They swear they're not throttling me and that demand is just high during those hours. Right. I live in a pretty rural area so it's not a population density issue. And Charter has uncapped 60Mbps cable internet here so nobody's stuck with cellular as their only internet option.

    The crazy thing is I can go a few miles away and get 50Mbps in the Home Depot parking lot any time day or night.

    So screw Verizon. They want that extra $20? Fine. They're going to earn it. I'll keep moving a ton of data through my phone while opening tickets about shitty service at home. I bet Star Citizen needs a 20+ gig update. I'll start that before I go to bed.

    1. Re:Verizon just poked the bear by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      How is the signal at your house?

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    2. Re:Verizon just poked the bear by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      -108 dBm, 32 asu right now. I know it's not great but I averaged 4-5mbps during evening hours when I bought the house. I've used it a few times as a backup when the cable went out and it was fine. I streamed the superbowl in HD through my phone this year. The drop in performance is very recent. I was going to ignore it until they increased my bill. They should have left me alone. :)

      I don't expect stellar performance with that signal but I'm getting 7Mbps now at 1:45am. I've seen it sustain 15Mbps just last week with the phone sitting in the same spot. If they're really that oversold that the service becomes unusable every evening, then I'm not the only one getting bad service and they need to increase capacity. They've got 3 LTE bands and my phone can use all of them. Spread it out. Add more towers at lower power or smaller arcs so the towers serve smaller areas.

    3. Re:Verizon just poked the bear by Rob_Bryerton · · Score: 1

      I do the same thing w/my AT&T unlimited account; AT&T pulled a similar stunt w/their grandfathered unlimited accounts, plus they send an automated text at around 20GB/month stating that you may experience throttling at 22.5GB or so depending on network load or some-such crap. So apparently, in AT&T-speak, "unlimited" means "20GB, give or take".

      Anyways, every month or two, I make sure to delete 20-40GB of music from my phone, and then re-download my "80's-90's Music" playlist from iCloud :)

      Oh, and look at that, my mp3's seem to be getting a bit stale; looks like I need some fresh copies. ;)

    4. Re:Verizon just poked the bear by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      Verizon's not allowed to throttle grandfathered LTE. It's part of the agreement they made when they bought their huge chunk of the 700Mhz spectrum years ago. They're allowed to throttle 3G but I get LTE at home.

    5. Re:Verizon just poked the bear by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      Sounds about like my experience it used to run between 8-10mbps but in the last 6 months it dropped down to 4mbps or less and the connection would drop out and I would have to manually reset it.

      Swapped out all of my equipment ended up replacing my longtime router modem combo with a t1114 That fixed the need for the manual resets but it was still slow and unstable.
      So I dont know if it was the trees or if verizons towers loose range the more heavily loaded they are.

      What I ended up doing that solved my problem was finding a place in my house with a clear line of sight (no trees) to the only visible celltower from my house signal jumped from -105 to -95.

      Now it runs at 25-30mbps better than I've ever gotten at home and best of all so far it appears to be stable Its run about 2 weeks now without issue.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  14. is it due to the retarded caps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can only wonder

  15. Doing what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... smartphone subscriber will use 22GB of mobile data ...

    Doing what? That's either big data or hi-def movies. Both of which, can't be done on a smart-phone.

      I know a copyright infringer (he doesn't distribute so technically, he's not a pirate), who just got a 1,000 GB home connection: He's complaining it's impractical to download 30 movies per day, via a pacific island nation, as allowed by his home connection. He thinks an 8 GB allowance for his smart-phone is excessive; I'm guessing, it's because he doesn't use his smart-phone for sucking data.

  16. I scoff at your pithy 22GB/month by scdeimos · · Score: 1

    One of my nephews burns through 5-15GB per day whenever he stays over just from using multiplayer games like Bloodborne, Dark Souls III and Overwatch on the PS4.

    1. Re:I scoff at your pithy 22GB/month by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      Sounds very inefficient.

    2. Re:I scoff at your pithy 22GB/month by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      Really? That sounds ridiculous (not saying your wrong). I thought the consensus was that online gaming didn't need a lot of bandwidth and data, just low latency. Maybe it's a console thing? I really don't think my PC is pulling down GBs/day for gaming online; streaming is most definitely what eats into my data cap the most.

      Also, I assume that you're not letting him do that through a Mobile connection, lol.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    3. Re:I scoff at your pithy 22GB/month by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Maps and character skins/models. It was a long time ago now, (closing in on a decade) but when Unreal Tournament 3 came out, we were shocked to find that maps were clocking in at 50-100mb each. While you could play just fine on a 1-2Mbps DSL connection, you'd miss the first few minutes of each map if you didn't already have everything downloaded. That included if someone used a custom skin or model that was on the server but which you didn't have. Part of the problem was often that the server didn't have the upstream bandwidth to push both the game traffic as well as the content to a couple people at a time, so it wasn't just the straight download speed that caused the late entry to maps.
       
      Given that we're nearly a decade out from this, and knowing how far graphics have come, I'd be surprised if the maps and models of current games weren't pushing a half gig to a gig in size now. Games needing 20-50gb of HD space are not uncommon, which makes me guess that this is the case.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    4. Re:I scoff at your pithy 22GB/month by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I guess that makes sense. Yeah, 20-50GB is basically average for any AAA game nowadays.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
  17. Caps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Caps are keeping mobile data usage artificially low today.

  18. Re:Reasons why I don't like the Internet of Things by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    As a colleague of mine said:

    IoT - imagine all the stuff in the world that works suddenly became as easy to use and dependable as your printer.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  19. Really? So little?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In antemillenial units, that's just one CD per day. Don't you think people will be watching series and movies on their phones? By then we will most definitely have usable mobile projectors, folding screens, maybe viewing glasses or even a brain interface.

  20. Plus tumblr will stay bloated by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Report: Average American Will Use 22GB of Mobile Data Per Month In 2021

    Oh come on, now. We'll use much more than that watching 4Ks of Where The Boys Aren't, vols. 127, 128, 129, and 130.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  21. Will Use 22GB of Mobile Data Per Month by l3v1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, the more important issue is not how much mobile data any American will use, but:
    - how much will 22gb/month cost for them, and
    - how many of those average Americans will have at least a usable 4G connection by then.

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    1. Re:Will Use 22GB of Mobile Data Per Month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the more important issue is not how much mobile data any American will use, but:

      - how much will 22gb/month cost for them, and

      - how many of those average Americans will have at least a usable 4G connection by then.

      I have wireless data-only plans for Internet access from two wireless carriers. One carrier's wireless modem provides 3G service while the other carrier's wireless modem provides 4G/LTE service. Honestly, from an end-user perspective I have not noticed a discernible difference. Maybe the 4G/LTE is falling back to 3G although their are towers for both carriers nearby my house.

    2. Re:Will Use 22GB of Mobile Data Per Month by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

      Yea, that was my thought too. Unless they seriously build out capacity, I have zero reason to pay out the nose for that kind of data.

      Besides, phones keep getting thinner and thinner so where is the battery life going to be coming from? I don't plan on being chained to a power outlet to use 22 gigs. Utterly bonkers.

  22. Re:Reasons why I don't like the Internet of Things by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

    I prefer the "Appy Apps" guy, at least he's concise.

    Apps!

    --
    Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
  23. Re:Reasons why I don't like the Internet of Things by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

    I think that says more about your colleague's printer than the IoT. I'd pay good money for the IoT if it worked like my printer does. Brother wireless color laser, if you're interested in knowing. It sits there and does nothing for months at a time in a deep sleep, and when when I hit "Print" on my laptop, provided we haven't piled crap on the top of it, it wakes up and spits out nice full color pages and then goes back to deep sleep. It's not accessible from the outside world, and as far as I can tell by looking at network traffic, it doesn't try to connect to anything in the outside world. It's an appliance that does nothing most of the time, but when called upon does it's job rapidly and reliably, and then goes back to sleep.
     
    I stopped buying cheap printers a long time ago, and it was truly the best decision I've ever made. This color laser costs less to use than any other printer I've had. Why? There is no ink to go dry, and it doesn't break, jam, choke, and clog up all of the time. And It Just Works, which saves piles of my time.

    --
    Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
  24. Re:Reasons why I don't like the Internet of Things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for that unsolicited Brother testimonial. Clearly, your printer selection skills are top tier!

    This is why we all come to Slashdot to be closer to people of your stature!

  25. Not with data caps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not with data caps in the u.s.

    ALL wireless in the u.s. has a data cap of some sort. Even the unlimited plans have a point where data is throttled.

    Since the caps are not actually needed for quality of service, the vendors will never let them go and will not raise them much either.

    1. Re:Not with data caps by rhazz · · Score: 1

      +1. Even in Canada too. I managed to get a plan during a crazy wave of promotions that gets me 600 MB for $40/mo (which includes the base phone plan as well). That was 3 years ago. Under today's promotions, $40/mo will only get me 400MB. Why would anyone expect data usage to go up if costs are not coming down? Are people willing to pay 22x more for 22x more data?

  26. 1 of Usable Data and 21 GB of Ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see this. More than 21 gigabytes of ads. The data consumed for my own purposes, unchanged from today. I am seriously considering becoming a luddite and living as a hermit. Another commode accessory advertised with a squatting unicorn defecating soft-serve ice cream I can live without. Damn! I can't enjoy soft-serve ice cream anymore.

  27. not entirely fair by bobmajdakjr · · Score: 1

    i would not say the average user would /use/ that much data so much as the average user will be forced that much data. strip the ads and retarded scripting from pages and its amazing how light they are. imagining that the state of commericialisation will only get fatter from here on out.

  28. Re: Reasons why I don't like the Internet of Thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    45 gb data plan for $12

  29. Re: Reasons why I don't like the Internet of Thin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://s32.postimg.org/k1m6y13wl/P60229_033803.jpg

  30. Re:Reasons why I don't like the Internet of Things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be awesome, my printer works great, and it has done ever since I ditched the shitty inkjet and got a laser printer.

  31. Re:Reasons why I don't like the Internet of Things by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    Agreed on all points, I love my Brother laser printer.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  32. Re:Reasons why I don't like the Internet of Things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used mine to print out the "coren22 colossal fail list" vs. apk. It performed great. You didn't. 3 strikes yer out Coren22 https://slashdot.org/comments.... , http://slashdot.org/comments.p... , https://slashdot.org/comments....

  33. Re:Reasons why I don't like the Internet of Things by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    Please give a detailed analysis of how I failed anywhere in those posts. Linking to posts where I refute your logic doesn't prove me wrong, not does posting the same exact thing over again refute anything I said. Your analysis is due on Monday, get cracking skippy.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  34. Re:Reasons why I don't like the Internet of Things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why? You did a great job of opening your mouth and inserting your foot 3 times as apk made you eat your words Coren22 https://slashdot.org/comments.... , http://slashdot.org/comments.p... , https://slashdot.org/comments.... your illogic logic seems to say that losing on your end is winning.

  35. Extrapolating about extrapolating by radarskiy · · Score: 1

    Fitting to two points give a silly result, therefore all extrapolation is worthless.

  36. What's with the 22GB? by Thurmont · · Score: 1

    Odd that I switched to a new AT&T "Unlimited Plan" which gives me 22GB of data before throttling me down to the stone age and now Ericcson is predicting 22GB will be what everyone needs in a few years. Not 20GB, not 25GB. What's so special about the 22GB amount? http://arstechnica.com/busines...

    --
    "If it's got a switch... it's my bitch!!"