Slashdot Mirror


93% Of Phishing Emails Are Now Ransomware (csoonline.com)

According to the latest data from security firm PhishMe, 93% of all phishing emails as of the end of March contained encryption ransomware. The numbers underscore a growing trend in the security space as ransomware instances in phishing emails grew up by 56% since December last year. From a report: The anti-phishing vendor also counted the number of different variants of phishing emails that it saw. Ransomware accounted for 51 percent of all variants in March, up from just 29 percent in February and 15 percent in January. The skyrocketing growth is due to that fact that ransomware is getting easier and easier to send and that it offers a quick and easy return on investment. Other types of cyberattacks typically take more work to monetize. Stolen credit card numbers have to be sold and used before the cards are canceled, for example. Identity theft takes even more of a time commitment.

79 comments

  1. Its a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we cant put as much effort into catching these fraudsters as we put into catching underwear bombers.

    1. Re:Its a shame by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

      The legal system hasn't caught up with them.

      It should be a capital penalty on some of those crimes, especially when it comes to ID theft for profit.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:Its a shame by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      We don't need any penalties at all for this. If people would stop running Windows, this wouldn't be a problem.

    3. Re:Its a shame by Jason+Levine · · Score: 3, Informative

      One of the problems is jurisdiction. When the police were investigating my identity being stolen (used to open a credit card in my name, not related to phishing/ransomware), they told me that they weren't highly motivated to put in a lot of effort because they'd likely have to hand the case to another department to make the arrest. In their minds, they were asking why do the work when someone else would get the collar. Then there are international cases where the victim is in the US but the phisher is in Ukraine or some other country out of the reach of normal US law enforcement. As long as the phisher doesn't hit too big of a target (e.g. a major US government agency or Fortune 500 company), they will likely fly under the radar of law enforcement and/or pleas to local law enforcement will be made but they will not result in arrests (either due to corruption or lack of interest in pursuing these cases due to the victims being from another country).

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    4. Re:Its a shame by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Scammers and fraudsters don't care about operating system, they just want to get your money.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    5. Re:Its a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And if people would stop crossing the street, they wouldn't get run over by a drunk driver. It doesn't make the offender any less guilty for knowingly breaking the law.

    6. Re:Its a shame by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      The legal system hasn't caught up with them.

      It should be a capital penalty on some of those crimes, especially when it comes to ID theft for profit.

      Before the terrifying prospect of punishment is going to make a difference you have to first increase the prospect of actually being caught. Otherwise the threat of punishment is just whining.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    7. Re:Its a shame by stealth_finger · · Score: 3, Funny

      we cant put as much effort into catching these fraudsters as we put into catching underwear bombers.

      The bombers come to you, all you have to do is grab their junk.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    8. Re:Its a shame by stealth_finger · · Score: 2

      What you you suggest? Everyone one OSx so it becomes the biggest target base so the majority of malware is written for it then we can say that's what you get for using a mac?

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    9. Re:Its a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is not that people steal your identity, the problem is that stealing your identity has a negative impact on your life. This can be counter by having explicit right to everything that can be stolen, ie: everyone has access to all things that can be stolen, so no one steals.

      alternatively, ban cryptocurrencies

    10. Re:Its a shame by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      This attack is just using tools present on the OS and application, it isn't something that can be patched. Other OSes and applications offer similar capabilities. The old "download this app/codec/message" tactic is platform-independent.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    11. Re:Its a shame by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      we cant put as much effort into catching these fraudsters as we put into catching underwear bombers.

      But there have been more of the fraudsters caught than the TSA has caught underwear bombers. So at least the effort has been more effective.

    12. Re:Its a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest Linux so the security gets actual peer review and we can stop hearing the "because it's popular" apologetics.

    13. Re: Its a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny because there have been plenty of exploits on Linux. Market economics is what drives Windows exploits. Seeing how ransomware is designed to get money; it only makes sense to me that they'd target the highest number of users.

      I'm guessing economics is not one of your strong subjects.

    14. Re: Its a shame by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing economics is not one of your strong subjects.

      Or technology. Ransomware doesn't need admin privs to be effective, all it needs to do is encrypt every file you have write access to. It will work just as well on Linux(*) as on Windows.

      * Excepting possibly an isolation system like QubesOS, again excepting VM escape exploits.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    15. Re:Its a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well no.

      The issue is that people can be tricked into running software. This is a variant of the AI Box problem.

      The upswing is likely due to bitcoin allowing the (usually foreign) scammers an avenue to extract the ransom from their victims in an automated fashion which makes this kind of attack more profitable than the labor intensive "Nigerian prince" scams as the target need not be quite as gullible and less time is expended per mark.

    16. Re:Its a shame by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      And the lack of penalties as well. If the risk of stealing would mean that you lost your head literally you would be a lot more careful.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    17. Re:Its a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That makes zero sense. These malware ransomware things are not exploiting the OS. They are exploiting the user. Get the same users who run Windows today one a Linux machine and they will click the same shit. Get enough people on Linux so that it is a viable target and the ransomeware will be written to run on Linux. Your solution isn't a solution.

    18. Re:Its a shame by The-Ixian · · Score: 2

      Seriously?

      If anything, it would be easier to encrypt files in Linux because the attackers don't need to bring all the tools with them.

      If everyone running Windows today switched to Linux, you can bet that the malware people would rejoice since the very utilitarian nature of Linux would then be working in their favor.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    19. Re:Its a shame by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Make the punishment for considering thinking about aiding in any kind of computer crime an offense that gets as the ONLY and MANDATORY kind of punishment being hung, drawn and quartered live on national TV. And you will not even see a dent in those statistics.

      Why?

      Because people who live in a country the name of which ends in -stan don't give half a shit about what laws your country has.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    20. Re:Its a shame by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Nope. Works just as fine in Linux or Mac.

      Why?

      For the same reason it works so great on Windows. You need the permissions of the current user to manipulate (read: encrypt) all his files. Anything beyond, like wedging a resident part into your boot routine, is just icing on the cake, but not really mandatory for the attack to succeed.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    21. Re:Its a shame by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      They could quite literally replace their comparably huge payloads with a very small script...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    22. Re:Its a shame by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Nope. A lack of a chance of being caught is the problem. Not the punishment afterwards.

      There are crimes that are virtually unheard of. Despite carrying rather minor penalties. How many people do you see jaywalking in the vicinity of areas with a lot of police presence? The penalty isn't that crippling, but it's almost certain that you will get caught and it's just not worth it. Same for speeding in areas where you KNOW that there is either a police presence or a radar box waiting for you.

      Now compare this to the penalties in copyright infringement. We're talking about millions and billions being sought by companies from people who could not even pay a few thousands. Does that mean that there is nobody using torrents anymore?

      Ask your favorite ISP if you don't know the answer.

      If you want to deter people, increase the likelihood of getting caught. Nobody gives a shit about the most insane punishment if the chance to get caught is zilch.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    23. Re:Its a shame by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      We don't need any penalties at all for this. If people would stop running Windows, this wouldn't be a problem.

      No. Phishing is operating system agnostic. You can receive fake emails on linux (I get them almost every day), windows, osx, ios, Android, etc. Every operating system has email clients that allow you to click on links in an email to be lured to a fake website, or reply to emails with personal information.

      The problem is, the ransomware emails are not phishing. They are simply booby-trapped email. Phishing means you are trying to hook a victim into revealing usable information by either replying to the email ("Pleas send bacnk account number and routing to collect the $24 million you have won...") or log into a fake website ("Your account will be deactivated unless you log in here and reset your password now.")

      Simply sending a virus or malware by email is not phishing. Yes, eliminating "Windows" will stop all the current Window-oriented malware, but it will only be replaced by whatever the replacement OS is.

    24. Re: Its a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What law does ransomware break anyways? You have to install it yourself. And it doesn't actually steal your data it just encrypts it. And everybody knows encryption is good.

    25. Re:Its a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will never see a prevalence of malware on GNU/Linux Machines.

      AFAIK almost all of the viruses or malware ever written for GNU/Linux machines are targeted at Windows Machines that the Linux machine might be in contact with.

      And here are some reasons why Linux is more secure.

      Privileges of accounts
      In Windows users by default have access to everything in the system because they are given administrator rights. If the virus will be able to penetrate their system, they can quickly gain access to important parts of the system. On the other hand, in Linux, they have a lower access rights, and, theoretically, the virus can only access local files and folders, the system will remain safe.

      Competent community
      Windows and other operating systems are more vulnerabilities to the type of social engineering Ltd compared to Linux. Incompetent users can easily download a virus by simply opening an attachment in e-mail. Of course, this is not the case of Linux, when users are more technically savvy, and are unlikely to access and download such suspicious attachments. They also need to give the rights to execution, so unlikely to happen real damage. Various developers and testers working on Linux, so, as soon as there is some kind of vulnerability, it will be quickly found and fixed, unlike other operating systems.

      IPtables
      An even higher level of security on Linux machines is implemented using IPtables. This firewall that allows you to create a more secure environment for the execution of any command or access the network.

      The separateness of the environment
      Linux works in many environments and distros such as Linux Mint, Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo, Arch, and many others. Various email clients, the environment console and system packages also make the system extremely fragmented and difficult for any virus. The architecture of Windows is not so divided, so a virus could easily reach the many computers of the system which will cause harm to their users.

      Recording system events Linux
      Linux accesses to files and system accesses are written to a log file. If someone tries to enter safe system files, these system gaps can be viewed by the system administrator. Also are written to the disk failed login attempts and other security issues, and all this is available to study later.

      Less users
      The number of users using Linux is much less in comparison with Windows and Mac OS. As the number of users is smaller, less viruses will strive to hit their computers to gain access to important data.

    26. Re: Its a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The legal system is too busy trying to lock people up for growing plants or being unfortunate enough to actually need pain medicine to do anything useful.

    27. Re:Its a shame by nukenerd · · Score: 2

      If the virus will be able to penetrate their [Windows] system, they can quickly gain access to important parts of the system. On the other hand, in Linux, they have a lower access rights, and, theoretically, the virus can only access local files and folders, the system will remain safe.

      Data is more imortant than the system - the system can be restored. We are talking about data encryption here.

    28. Re:Its a shame by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      They'd still need to get their key on the target machine so they'd still need more than just a script.... but once they did...call up gpg using THEIR gpgdir. Probably something like this, but most likely my syntax is wrong:

      for x in *; do
      gpg --homedir rodinamafiyaphishgpg -r rodinamafiyaphishgpg@yandex.ru --passphrase correcthorsebatterystaple -o $x.pgp -e $x
      done

    29. Re:Its a shame by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I wasn't talking about phishing, I was talking about ransomware only. And yes, it would be eliminated by using Linux. No, it wouldn't be replaced, unless some company were stupid enough to create and popularize an email client that automatically executes code contained in an email attachment (or downloaded from a site pointed to by the email), and people were stupid enough to use this client in ridiculously huge numbers.

    30. Re: Its a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can deduce that guessing is one of your weak skills; you're only looking at benefit, not cost.

    31. Re:Its a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Encrypted by what, a program installed somewhere that isn't the system?

    32. Re:Its a shame by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      And how exactly do you get malware to run on a Linux computer?

      "Please download this attachment, then open up a terminal window, use 'chmod' to change the permissions to 755, then run the program by typing './runmalware.sh'"

      Sorry, but anyone dumb enough to run random software from an email from a sender they don't know is not going to have a clue about how to make a downloaded file executable.

  2. Eh, whaddya goona do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Business is business.

    Now, where do I sign up?

  3. I have a solution to this by JoeyRox · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just click on the following embedded link:

    ...

    1. Re:I have a solution to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As instructed, I left the money (non-sequential $20 bills) in a brown paper lunch bag in the bushes behind the park bench. I wrote "Joey" on the bag with a black magic marker so you know it's for you. Please send me the decryption key so I can continue to read Slashdot.

  4. Technical solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't there a technical solution to require significant user intervention before a program (especially downloaded from email) is able to access files and modify them? Can't we put programs in more restrictive sandboxes by default? Also we need software widely installed that encrypts files for cloud backup and is easy for users to run. Backups stop ransomware in its tracks.

    1. Re:Technical solution by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there's a really easy technical solution: stop running Windows!

    2. Re:Technical solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like Windows' UAC?

    3. Re: Technical solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Windows has nothing to do with the problem other than being the prevalent OS. Windows had UAC which should help prevent these types of issues but rabsomeware operates on the user's directories so it has permission to modify files. Mac OSx would allow the same. Linux also... You don't need root to house up a user's files.

      The basic problem is that you can't fix stupid.

    4. Re:Technical solution by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      There are various approaches like application control for this, or disabling macros in Office. The problem is, the same path is used for legitimate purposes and breaking it is problematic.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    5. Re: Technical solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And signed executables... but Joe User just keeps clicking.

    6. Re:Technical solution by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Unix systems (Linux, OSX, etc.) are much more secure and require direct user intervention before much damage can be done. That's why you only see these infections on Windows. Really, Windows is a security nightmare and can't be fixed.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  5. And what's our suggestion to friends and family? by Thanshin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm scared of my mother calling me one day telling me "I've lost every picture from all my life and a guy is asking me $10K to recover them".

    By that point it will be late to tell her "shouldn't have been storing them in a disk permanently attached to your windows laptop".

    But I don't know how to stop her. I won't convince her to use linux. I won't manage to teach her not to execute random crap once per year.

    Should I trust hard drives to store data for decades?

  6. What I've Done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to help mitigate the threat of ransomeware.

    At work I use a MacBook Pro (issue). Personally, I use Dropbox and Google Drive to store all of my personal files. I leave nothing personal on my work machine, which also happens to be the only laptop I have. I don't have a personal laptop. I have two personal Android phones. One is a Nexus on Project Fi, the other a Samsung Galaxy S7.

    I don't like my Dropbox or my Google Drive accounts to my MacBook or either phone. The Google account with my stuff is a separate account. All of my accounts use 2FA using the Google Authenticator app (in case of no signal). I do not have the Dropbox of Google Drive clients on any device. I log into these accounts in a browser just for them.

    I've seen people's Dropbox and Google Drive accounts have the contents encrypted by malware so I keep my own accounts "cloud only". I also keep hard copies of the account reset passwords in my wallet with no reference to the account names on them. Both Google and Dropbox issue 10 reset passwords that can be regenerated if lost or used.

    I recommend this way of doing things even though it might be inconvenient.

  7. What percentage target Windows vs. Mac. Linux? by pteddy · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing that of that 93% you only have to worry if you're on Windows.

    1. Re: What percentage target Windows vs. Mac. Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Linux. However your argument is dumb. You don't need root to encrypt a user's files regardless of the OS. If you execute a file in Linux or OSx, you do not need to elevate permissions to modify your own files. You could be spoofed into running an executable on any OS that can hose your user directory.

      You might be smarter than the average user (really stretching the imagination) but the only real difference is market saturation which Windows gets the most bang for the effort.

    2. Re:What percentage target Windows vs. Mac. Linux? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Yes, but only because people use predominantly Windows. If they used Linux, we'd probably get to see a lot of phishing mails that hope for people who run shell scripts that look like PDF files...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  8. Re:And what's our suggestion to friends and family by heypete · · Score: 1

    Have good, versioned backups. I like CrashPlan, as one can use it to backup to various destinations, including local systems/disks, remote systems associated with one's account, remote systems belonging to others (so long as they give permission), and for paid users, to the CrashPlan-run storage service.

    All backups are encrypted so that the destinations cannot access one's data, it keeps regular versions so one can easily recover from a ransomware (or other) infection that corrupts or destroys files slowly over time, and compresses/deduplicates data to save space. I've used it for years and it's saved my bacon a few times. Their family plans are quite affordable.

    (Disclosure: I am a paid CrashPlan user but otherwise have no connection, financial or otherwise, with the service.)

  9. I have email, but no spam filter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I have yet to receive my first ransomware phish. Or any phish.

    Apparently I'm doing something right, yet I feel strangely left out.

    1. Re:I have email, but no spam filter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same. I've had a generic, easy to guess hotmail account for over a decade and never had any spam. And I'm not being particularly careful either, aside from not giving my email to every shady site. Meanwhile, my father who types with a single finger and only ever read the news has 20+ spam emails every week.

  10. Re:And what's our suggestion to friends and family by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can buy a 4tb external for 100$ teach her to backup once a week and "DISCONNECT" the disk once she's done. That's what I did.

  11. Re:And what's our suggestion to friends and family by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep an offsite backup for her. Actualize it monthly. Those kind of people need support, they are unable to help themselves.

  12. Re:And what's our suggestion to friends and family by Jeremi · · Score: 2

    Our suggestion is that they make backups of their valuable data... and since that may not be something they are confident/knowledgable enough to do on their own, if you want to make sure it gets done, you may need to set it up (and occasionally check up on it) yourself.

    On Mac, setting up a Time Machine backup drive is pretty trivial to do. For Windows, similar solutions exist. For a laptop, there are solutions that back up data via WiFi, if plugging in an external drive is too much bother. In either case, if you want to be completely safe, you may want to swap out the backup drive with a spare every month or so, to avoid the possibility that the ransomware finds a way to encrypt both the computer's primary drive and its connected backup drive.

    Do all that, and the likelihood is that a ransomware attack will require only a reformat and reinstall, followed by a recovery from the latest backup, and only a few hours' worth of data will be lost.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  13. Re:And what's our suggestion to friends and family by wbr1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    VERSIONED BACKUPS! VERSIONED BACKUPS! VERSIONED BACKUPS! Automated, off-site, and with rollback. Hell, carbonite can do this for her.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  14. Re:And what's our suggestion to friends and family by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

    For some people education works. My father called me when "Windows" (not Microsoft) called him telling him he had errors on his system and they wanted to remote in to fix them. I informed him of the scam and he avoided being hooked. (Now he harasses the scammers calling him.)

    For others, education doesn't work. My wife's grandmother still clicks on suspicious links in Facebook because "Well, it was on my friend's wall and said I'd get this free stuff so it must be good, right?" This despite a dozen "No it isn't and stop clicking those links" cries from us.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  15. Re:And what's our suggestion to friends and family by stealth_finger · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm scared of my mother calling me one day telling me "I've lost every picture from all my life and a guy is asking me $10K to recover them".

    By that point it will be late to tell her "shouldn't have been storing them in a disk permanently attached to your windows laptop".

    But I don't know how to stop her. I won't convince her to use linux. I won't manage to teach her not to execute random crap once per year.

    Should I trust hard drives to store data for decades?

    Just go ahead and delete it all now, that way no harm can come to the files.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  16. Why does anyone even have local data anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google GAVE me 65 gigs free for clicking on something once.

    Why do you have local data on high risk users workstations?

    Stop using Windows? Uh.. well phishing scams don't magically only work on Windows and honestly the Ransomware part is the LEAST important part. If someone has your personal info from phishing, that's WAY more important that your local data in 99% of cases.

    50% or more of home users don't even have local data they care about anymore. What they care about is on the web or they just stop caring because they have so many devices and so much redendancy and 1000 times more info than they ever had before. People don't care as much if they lose pictures because pictures are so much more plentiful now, same goes for most data.

    We create so much more data now, people care about it less, not more. The data that matters is in the cloud, inside the websites of our banks, utilities, email providers and so on. Phishing doesn't work that well because of two factor. Ransomware seems powerful, but most people don't even have local data to lose and that trend will only continue.

    Store you data on a professionally run datacenter for free or next to nothing and these problems all go away. If I was hit by Ransomware, I'd just laugh, format and be glad a had a nice fresh install anyway. There is no better security than not having much to lose and what you do have, keep it diversified in the cloud and behind two factor.. ideally non SMS two factor. If you do that you are basically too much work for most hackers and they will go find lower hanging fruit.

    Google could also improve their spam filter.. a lot. That would be the easy central point to stop mots of that. Google should also better regulate and protect it's users from the endless security hole that is Google Images.

    For Google Images to be safe, it has to be trusted image hosts only. Millions of people get infected from google images every year and I never hear anyone talk about it. It's a giant cluster of unchecked links all one click away.

    Also.. friends don't let friends use flash.

  17. Re:And what's our suggestion to friends and family by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been making it part of MY backup process. Use 2 drives, visit my parents occasionally - drop off 1 of my drives at their house, pick up their newest backup drive, connect their old one, etc.

    It's not the most precise offsite backup solution (sometimes it's a month or more) - but i think it's mostly ok.

  18. Re:And what's our suggestion to friends and family by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Tell her now, with current news articles in hand, that this is the risk you run by using Windows. If she won't listen and move to Linux, then too bad: she was warned.

  19. Re:And what's our suggestion to friends and family by johnw · · Score: 1

    I had the same problem with my father.

    What I did was to arrange for all his files to be rsynced daily to one of my servers, which in its turn was backed up nightly.

    We had a couple of instances of him accidentally deleting stuff and I was able to restore it for him easily. Happily he never got hit with any malicious software - not after I weaned him of Windows anyway.

  20. Re:And what's our suggestion to friends and family by Thanshin · · Score: 1

    And the backup needs to be done in a way that guarantees profilaxis from the ransomware.

    I think from now on, when visiting parents and sisters I'll bring a usb bootable linux and a hard drive that I'll take back with me.

    I predict much debate over what's "Important to keep".

  21. Re:And what's our suggestion to friends and family by johnw · · Score: 1

    The trouble with that is, after remembering a couple of times the job will then be forgotten.

    Whatever it is, it has to be automated.

  22. Re:And what's our suggestion to friends and family by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its simple, you automate your reminder to them to do it every three months. If you wanted to, you could probably write a script that automatically reminds them to backup.

  23. Re:And what's our suggestion to friends and family by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup, 100% on this.

    A friend of mine runs a small business from home, she knew enough to keep offsite backups of critical data but not enough to know about versioning.
    Then I got a call one day, she couldn't file her tax return, non of her spreadsheets etc wouldn't open, she'd been hit by ransomware.

    The backups were useless, since her "backup" software had already copied the ransomwared versions to the server.
    Fortunately it hadn't got everything, and only the last months worth of accounts needed to be reentered from the paper versions.

  24. This works vs. the payload links + C&C's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://www.bing.com/search?q=%...

    Less power/cpu/ram + IO use vs. DNS/routers/addons/antivirus (slows you) + less security issues/complexity. Compliments firewalls (w/ layered drivers blocking less used IP addys vs. hosts blocking more used domains) & DNS (lightens dns load). Gets data via 10 security sites.

    Ads rob bandwidth/speed, security (malvertising), privacy (tracking) + anonymity.

    Hosts add speed (hardcodes/adblocks), security (bad sites/poisoned dns), reliability (dns down), & anonymity (dns requestlogs/trackers) natively. Hosts != ClarityRay blockable (vs. souled-out to admen inferior wasteful redundant slow usermode addons)

    Works vs. caps & HTTP PUSH ads w/ firewalls.

    Avg. webpage = big as Doom http://www.theregister.co.uk/2... & ads = 40% of the size.

    APK

    P.S. - Safe https://www.virustotal.com/en/... (Verified by Malwarebytes' S. Burn "I've seen the code & it's safe" http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... )

  25. Hotmail is the worst offender... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yesterday my hotmail account was slammed with about 120 spam emails, all with different subjects and all with an attachment. Gmail does not have the same problem, only a few per day.

  26. Re:And what's our suggestion to friends and family by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should be able to set the OS to backuo automaticly at intervals (say weekly)

    the trouble would be that the important part was the "disconnect and swap" which has to include a human in the loop to pull the plug. Without that step it juts takes a smarter bit of ransomware to find and encrypt your connected backup drive as well.

  27. Re:And what's our suggestion to friends and family by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then write a damned script which automatically backs up the files once the specified external drive is inserted and train him/her to connect the drive once per week then disconnect it after the job is done.

  28. Bad graphic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The title is actually wrong. If you look in the research PDF, you'll see that ransomware is actually 50%. 93% of all ransomware is made up by 3 ransomware families.

  29. Good ol' capitalism by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Are you honestly complaining that they noticed that nobody falls for 419 scams and penis enlargement anymore and instead of wanting a government bailout to prop up their failed business they went to a more profitable venue?

    What is wrong with you, are you commies or what?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  30. Re:And what's our suggestion to friends and family by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The answer is the same answer you should have been giving all along:

    HAVE. A. BACKUP.

  31. What average home users need! by sbrown123 · · Score: 1

    Imagine an external drive connected to the laptop/PC via USB (Thunderbolt, etc). Minimum double bay set at RAID-1. Owner can read and write to the drive. Attempts to delete or modify files or folders on the drive will fail though. A physical, hardware lock needs to be "turned" to enable that capability.

    This would prevent ransomware (of that drive's data anyways). It would also help prevent accidental deletes of files.

    Does such a unicorn exist? I'm not looking for some half-baked alternative.

    1. Re:What average home users need! by Mr.CRC · · Score: 1

      The answer is called "archives." It's different from backups. I'm working on a script to use xorriso to write only my changed files to BD-R[E], after an initial full write of all my important data (self-created data, financial records, important email dirs, all amounting to only 4-5 GB).

      I can even run this several times per hour when doing high value work, such as electronics design/embedded software engineering. The overhead is small, a few MB per session, just to write out a few changed files and a new version of the directory tree. What the disk looks like is a list of directories in the root named according to date+time, plus one named "current." I can swap disks ever day or so, then get interleaved archives, so that even if one disk goes bad, I loose at most one day.

      If anything unexpected happened to my files, like being changed without authorization, then I'd see an unexpectedly large write being prepared. I could stop there, and I'd still have everything since the last run.

      I strive to make archiving and backups take so little effort, that they just become a habit. There are many strategies one can apply. This was just one example.

  32. Re:And what's our suggestion to friends and family by dougmc · · Score: 1

    I'm scared of my mother calling me one day telling me "I've lost every picture from all my life and a guy is asking me $10K to recover them".

    Yup, this is a real, justified fear.

    It's wise to not attempt to switch her to Linux -- she'd probably fight that (it's too different for most people without any real benefits for what they do), and it's not really a solution to the problem anyways.

    Probably the best answer to this is to buy her a big USB hard drive and set up some sort of backup that she can run just by clicking on something, and drill into her head how important it is to 1) do the backup occasionally. and 2) leave the drive off when you're not doing backups.

    Ransomware isn't the only concern. Hard drive failure and software crashes that erase the disk are others.

    Alas, often it's only an actual loss of files that convinces people to take backups seriously -- and it's unethical at best to *fake* a loss of files (and then recover them all because you got "really lucky") so that's not really an option unless you're dishonest.

    If you see her often and she doesn't mind, you could do the backups yourself and keep the drive yourself -- that way, when she calls you, you just say "That sucks! Fortunately, I backed up all your stuff last week ..."

  33. Re:And what's our suggestion to friends and family by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

    Carbonite.

    Yeah, I could manually back up everything onto a separate hard drive every month or something, but Carbonite (and similar backup solutions which I'm sure exist) you just install it, and everything's backed up continuously. With versioning, even, so you can get last week's version back if you get cryptowalled.

    It's not the most elegant and techy solution, but it's a 'fire and forget' solution that just works.

  34. Re:And what's our suggestion to friends and family by imidan · · Score: 1

    Apparently many of these malwares also encrypt data on attached volumes like Windows shares and the like. It seems to me that the best approach is a 'pull' solution, where Mom keeps her photos in a place that's shared on her network, and then another machine does periodic backups of that share. Mom's computer doesn't have write access to the pulling machine, in fact doesn't even know or care that it's there. So the backups are safe.

    That means having a linux machine in the house to do the pulling. Build a super tiny linux box with a big hard drive, stick it in a closet, and let it pull nightly backups from Mom's computer. If she gets ransomwared, just reformat her hard drive, reinstall the OS, and grab her personal files from the backup. She never has to interact with linux, and her files are pretty safe.

  35. Guaranteed no phishing -- Click here! by Mr.CRC · · Score: 1
  36. Re:And what's our suggestion to friends and family by Jeremi · · Score: 1

    I predict much debate over what's "Important to keep".

    I find that debate can be avoided by spending the extra $20 to get the Absurdly Huge External Drive (rather than just the Impressively Huge model). Then you can just back up everything and call it a day.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.