Judges Rule Raped Woman Can Sue 'Enabling' Web Site (vice.com)
Web sites that matched models to photographers also led dozens of women to a pair of rapists in 2011, according to Vice. "Civil court documents show that the owners of Model Mayhem knew about the first wave of rapes but failed to issue a warning to users," Vice reported last summer. Facebook, Craigslist, and Tumblr filed briefs in support of the "Model Mayhem" site, arguing that allowing women to sue them could create a new "failure to warn" liability for other web sites.
But now AmiMoJo writes:In a decision that one day could have reverberations across the internet, a three-judge panel in California decided she can sue the Model Mayhem site that the pair used to lure their victims. "Congress has not provided an all purpose get-out-of-jail-free card for businesses that publish user content on the Internet," Judge Richard Clifton wrote in the panel's decision.
The CDA traditionally exempts web sites from liability for anything their users post. Do Slashdot readers think there should ever be any exceptions?
> Here come the MRAs crying censorship....... because insanity always works
Well, you seem to think so. You certainly think that your shrill hysterics will discourage people from sticking up for things like equality, due process, and the rule of law.
You should get the kind of regime you seem to pine for. Just leave the rest of us out.
A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.