Belgium Tops List Of Nations Most Vulnerable To Hacking (theguardian.com)

Alex Hern, reporting for The Guardian:A new "heat map of the internet" has revealed the countries most vulnerable to hacking attacks, by scanning the entire internet for servers with their front doors wide open. Produced by information security firm Rapid7, the National Exposure Index finds that the most exposed country in the world is Belgium, followed by Tajikistan, Samoa and Australia. The U.S. comes 14th and the UK 23rd. [...] Tom Beardsley, one of the report's three authors, was surprised by his own findings. "We expected to find that the most exposed countries were also the richest," he explained. The richest countries (by aggregate GDP, which place large countries like China near the top of the list) were likely to have the most net-connected devices, which should mean they proportionally have the most potential for damage. "If you're a rich country, you have a lot of internet. But we didn't find any correlation between the number of nodes and the exposure."

Comments

Try the veal

[PopeRatzo]

Belgium Tops List Of Nations Most Vulnerable To Hacking

It's because their leaders keep waffling.

Re:Bad headline

[dfsmith]

Agreed. "Exposed ports" != "vulnerable ports".

I have no problem with telnet as long as you can't access anything too interactive (e.g., a shell) through it. After all, http, SMTP, POP, daytime, chargen and echo are all telnet-like protocols. (Ok, not really, but close enough,) It used to be quite fun to run a honeypot (fake) telnet server to see what was happening in the wild woolly internet.

Even open, unencrypted RDP and VNC have a [narrow] use case (broadcasting games and videos, anyone?)

Can't think of a good use case for open SQL ports though; except for very specialized applications.

ipv6 and open ports

[cobbaut]

More than half of Belgium is on ipv6, the test only includes ipv4 hosts.

And since when does 'open port' equal 'vulnerability' ?