Slashdot Mirror


OnePlus 3 Featuring 5.5-inch FHD Display, Snapdragon 820 SoC, 6GB RAM Launched at $400

Chinese startup OnePlus is only three years old, but you will be surprised with just how much importance and traction it receives from the Android community. Its well-built, high-end Android smartphones are priced fairly aggressively, allowing it to compete with the likes of Samsung, HTC, and LG among others in the cut-throat smartphone market. The company today unveiled its third flagship smartphone, the OnePlus 3. Priced at $399 (for the unlocked version), the OnePlus 3 sports a 5.5-inch AMOLED display (the company is reluctant on moving to QHD display, insisting that higher resolution will unnecessarily drain the battery faster). It is powered by Qualcomm's Snapdragon 820 SoC, coupled with 6GB of RAM, a 16-megapixel rear camera with OIS, an 8-megapixel front-facing shooter, a fingerprint scanner, and 64GB of built-in storage. The dual-SIM capable smartphone houses a 3,000mAh battery, which the company says can go from 0 to 60 percent in just 30 minutes. In its review (the media received the device a week ahead of the launch), CNET finds the OnePlus 3 to be an "excellent performer", and its nearly stock Android operating system a refreshing change. The publication concludes that at $400 price point, OnePlus 3 is a great purchase.

20 of 125 comments (clear)

  1. QHD by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the company is reluctant on moving to QHD display, insisting that higher resolution will only drain the battery faster

    The voice of reason! Thank goodness some manufacturer is finally being sensible instead of blindly following the "more pixels = better" mantra even when the pixels are too small to see.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    1. Re:QHD by MobyDisk · · Score: 2

      Came here to post this. And with stock android on there you have something that instantly beats any phone I see in the stores today. These are both cases of "less is better." They could even charge me *more* for the lower-resolution screen and I'll still be happy because the net result is a faster phone with less power drain.

  2. No SD slot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No SD Slot, No Sale. It's that simple.

    1. Re:No SD slot? by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm kind of with you. I'm not sure what the reason is for not including an SD card slot. 64 GB is probably big enough that I wouldn't need one, but it would also be tempting to spend $20 and get another 64 GB of storage. I'm sure that if the phone had something like 512GB of storage that I wouldn't feel the need for it, and any complaints would be unfounded, but it's almost the principle of the matter. Why wouldn't you take minimal steps to have expandable storage on a phone.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  3. How are they a startup? by schwit1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    This isn't their first phone.
    This isn't their second phone.

  4. Re:"Nearly" stock Android. by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't mind since I only use english and the Chinese cannot understand that.

  5. Re: What's the deal with wireless charging.. by DigitAl56K · · Score: 3, Informative

    I used to be a fan of wireless charging, but when I last used it it out around 1A, which is a slow charge these days, and made my phones very hot, which is bad for battery life. USB-C ports seem to hold up better than older formats, so I'm less concerned about plugging in these days.

  6. Is this what they've determined we want? by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do we really need 6 GB of RAM on a phone? Until Android gets something like Continuum on Windows phone, where you can dock the phone and use it like a desktop, there seems little reason to have that much RAM. I guess they've just run out of things to upgrade to justify the high price. Personally, I won't spend much more than $200 on a phone at this point. Things are changing too fast on the software side, and updates to operating systems are often not available. You basically have to get a new phone every year or two to be guaranteed having the latest OS, and spending $400+ on a new phone every year or two is a little rich for my tastes.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:Is this what they've determined we want? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I guess they've just run out of things to upgrade to justify the high price.

      It's a low price, actually. You own the phone, you are buying it outright, you are not renting it from your carrier and paying monthly. An unlocked Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge, for example, costs $790. That's what the Oneplus Three competes against, so it's $400 versus $790. I own my Oneplus outright, I don't rent it from my carrier, so my cell phone bill is lower. You're still paying for your phone, just not all at once. If you cancel your contract early you'll notice that your carrier bills you for the remainder of the phone price.

      spending $400+ on a new phone every year or two is a little rich for my tastes.

      Yeah, I thought that paying $400 for my Oneplus One 2 years ago was a little much, but it's the best phone I've ever owned. It has great hardware, and the OS has received regular updates. In fact, the reason why I don't feel the need to upgrade to the Oneplus Three is because my phone still works fine. And, in those 2 years, my cell phone bill has been less every month because my carrier didn't subsidize my phone. It also didn't come pre-loaded with a bunch of crap software, the only thing on it was the OS with the default apps.

      A top of the line phone, unlocked, which you own, with no crap on it, which you can move between carriers (or even use 2 carriers at the same time if you need to), for half the price of the competing phones. That's what you're getting, but if that's not what you're looking for then feel free to continue renting.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    2. Re:Is this what they've determined we want? by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

      I also got an unlocked phone about a year ago, but mine only cost me $200. I'm also receiving OS updates still. I never said I was renting my phone. I own my phone outright, pay $35 a month (taxes included) for unlimited calling, texting, and 5GB of data with no overage charges (connection is slowed one you go over the cap). I personally can't believe that people spend $700 on the latest Samsung or Apple phones. Even a $400 phone is too rich for me. It's just not worth it at all. I spend $200 on my phone, buy it outright, and if something happens like the phone breaking, or OS updates not coming out for whatever reason, or a new feature that somebody hadn't thought of last year, then I upgrade to a new $200 phone.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:Is this what they've determined we want? by Ichijo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Do we really need 6 GB of RAM on a phone?

      My Nexus 5 has 2 GB, and I often run out of RAM which slows down the phone. Right now it's using all but 382M. If I force close apps or reboot, I can reclaim some of that free RAM. So it would be nice to have at least double the RAM in order to keep the phone running smoothly without requiring regular maintenance on my part.

      Do I need 6GB instead of 4GB? Maybe not, but it couldn't hurt, especially when it's so cheap. Someone once said 640KB ought to be enough for anybody, and we all know how that turned out!

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
  7. Re:What's the deal with wireless charging.. by Yvan256 · · Score: 2

    Incomplete technology? Charging via "contacts at the bottom" has been used for decades, son.

  8. Re:"Nearly" stock Android. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 4, Informative

    OxygenOS was developed by OnePlus, not the Chinese government. Unless you care to cite a source which shows otherwise, of course. The OxygenOS kernel is here if you'd like to go through it:

    https://github.com/OnePlusOSS/...

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  9. Re:Anyone know.. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 2

    My Oneplus One arrived with Cyanogenmod installed (I never switched to OxygenOS after the deal with Cyanogen fell through). There isn't a single app that can't be uninstalled, there aren't any paid apps at all as far as I can tell. Everything was pretty stock CM, I assume it's the same deal with the newer phone. I may upgrade, but the only thing that is stopping me is that my phone still works fine, that's why I never got the Oneplus Two. The only things that may be pushing me to upgrade are stupid bugs in some of the CM apps, for example the email client doesn't exactly download and view attachments (you know, not that something like viewing a PDF from email is a huge use case or anything), and the messaging app is slow to update the list of messages, it sits there for a while before displaying anything. I may finally just install a different email client, but those are the only real gripes I have. There are a couple settings I'd like a way to change also, for example I don't need a notification every time my phone gains or loses a signal, and it would be great if I could turn my phone silent and disable the vibrate without turning off all notifications.

    For your other questions or concerns, Oneplus has an active community forum that should be able to address anything.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  10. Will they fuck it up like the OnePlusX? by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    it had better be an octoband covering ALL bands possible. Their stupidity of not covering the 700mhz band on the X made a perfect phone into a pile of poo.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  11. Re:What's the deal with wireless charging.. by losfromla · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They pushed through standardization on micro-usb, so yes, why not? Governments are good for lots of standardization type directives. Only morons think that government can't get anything right.

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  12. I like to move my SD card to a new phone, maybe co by raymorris · · Score: 2

    Whenever I get a new phone, either because the old one broke or I just want an upgrade, I move my SD card to my new phone and all my stuff is there. I can't do that with built-in memory. If all photos and data is stored on built-in memory, I'm screwed when the phone dies. Yes, I have a backup, but that's plan B; I don't want to rely on the backup as being the only way to move my data to a new device. If the "backup" is plan A for moving data, that would leave me with no actual backup. For that reason, an SD card is a requirement for me.

    Ocassionally I also have need to put the SD card in my computer, such as to copy over a large folder of media files. That's not as important as the case above of moving to a new phone, but it does make an SD card useful.

  13. Re:Screw the 6GB of RAM by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

    Maybe I'm being naive here, but I see little reason why we don't have SSD class storage in our phones at this point. Can someone please explain it to me? Does it require too much power? It doesn't seem unreasonable to me to have a phone with a 120 GB SSD in it. Maybe the phone would be a bit thicker, but I think it's a feature a lot of people would like to have. I really hope Samsung can find a way to put this SSD in their next phone.

    Some phones do. I mean, they don't use eMMC like the rest of them, or UFS, the successor to eMMC. They use a real SSD controller.

    Apple's iPhone 6s uses a PCI-E/NVMe based controller using a TLC+SLC flash combination to give fairly impressive speeds for the storage system.

    Supposedly the SSD controller is similar to what Apple uses for their laptops, though it's single channel which limits the speed you can get since you can't parallelize across multiple NAND dice.

  14. Re:"Nearly" stock Android. by DuckDodgers · · Score: 2

    The problem with any backdoor is that someone else can figure it out. So even if you don't care that the Chinese government can read your email, you should care that someone somewhere might find the same vulnerability and use it to capture your credit card number.

    That's arguably the biggest reason backdoors are always wrong - even if you trust the FBI and the NSA, you implicitly have to trust every black hat hacker in the world too because sooner or later they'll get the keys to the same door the FBI and NSA are using.

  15. Re:Screw the 6GB of RAM by thewolfkin · · Score: 2

    Maybe the phone would be a bit thicker

    dude they're thinning away the 3.5mm headphone jack. Phone makers are idiots who think thinner is better they won't be happy until our phones fit in magic the gathering card sleeves.

    --
    Just another second banana