Slashdot Mirror


Let's Drug Test The Rich Before Approving Tax Deductions, Says US Congresswoman (theguardian.com)

Press2ToContinue writes from a report via The Guardian: "The [tax] benefits we give to poor people are so limited compared to what we give to the top 1% [of taxpayers]," Congresswoman Gwen Moore says. "It's a drop in the bucket." Many states implement drug-testing programs to qualify for benefit programs so that states feel they are not wasting the value they dole out. However, seven states who implemented drug testing for tax benefit program recipients spent $1 million on drug testing from the inception of their programs through 2014. But the average rate of drug use among those recipients has been far below the national average -- around 1% overall, compared with 9.4% in the general population -- meaning there's been little cost savings from the drug testing program. Why? "Probably because they can't afford it," says Moore. "We might really save some money by drug-testing folks on Wall Street, who might have a little cocaine before they get their deal done," she said, and proposes a bill requiring tests for returns with itemized deductions of more than $150,000. "We spend $81bn on everything -- everything -- that you could consider a poverty program," she explained. But just by taxing capital gains at a lower rate than other income, a bit of the tax code far more likely to benefit the rich than the poor, "that's a $93bn expenditure. Just capital gains," she added. Why not drug-test the rich to ensure they won't waste their tax benefits? She is "sick and tired of the criminalization of poverty." And, she added: "We're not going to get rid of the federal deficit by cutting poor people off Snap. But if we are going to drug-test people to reduce the deficit, let's start on the other end of the income spectrum."

4 of 760 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Apples-Oranges by kilfarsnar · · Score: 5, Informative

    If they do not want to be tested, they don't need to apply for the money.

    If they do not want to eat, they don't need to apply for the money.

    FTFY.

    Well...I suppose they could do something radical and say, try to educate/better themselves and get a fucking JOB and pay their own way, no?

    You could suppose that, but you'd be wrong. You think most poor people are poor because they just don't feel like getting a job? Beyond that, some people with jobs still have to go on public assistance because their job doesn't pay enough to live on. What do you think of raising the minimum wage?

    Welfare, or SNAP, or whatever don't pay very much. It's not like these people are kicking back while the rest of us work. It's no fun to be poor, working or not.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  2. Re: WTF? by Namarrgon · · Score: 5, Informative

    Another person who thinks taxes are the government "taking" your money. It's an exchange - in return, you get roads, security, stability, infrastructure, many public services, and a range of safety nets if/when you are no longer able to earn money.

    And yes, you have a choice. You're free to opt out of this social contract at any time, by leaving the country. (Also by making your income low enough to avoid taxes, or high enough to avoid taxes.)

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  3. Re: WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    They cost more than they save as already proven in Florida. Guess who owned shares in the drug company that got the testing contract in Florida? Rick Scott's wife.

  4. Re: WTF? by dtmos · · Score: 5, Informative

    When you make an allegation of corruption you need to back it up. Link to some source.

    I'm not the OP (an AC), but for starters:
    The Tampa Bay Times.
    Forbes.

    For those just tuning in, Rick Scott, Governor of the State of Florida, was previously the CEO of Columbia/HCA when it was found to have committed the largest Medicare fraud ever, up to that time ($1.7 Billion in 1997), leading to his resignation.