Slashdot Mirror


The Geek Behind Google's Takeover of the Map (fastcompany.com)

tedlistens writes: Google's map isn't just a map. It's a living, complex manifestation of the data that billions of users and a team of thousands of engineers and designers feed it every day. The public face of the company's mapping effort is Ed Parsons, a gregarious Briton and geographer who as Google's Geospatial Technologist evangelizes for its mission of organizing the world's geographic information. He also works on building the trust the company needs to make Google Maps and Google Earth more detailed, useful, and increasingly, 3-D and interactive -- what he describes as "a selfie for the planet."

The terrain isn't easy: that mission faces challenges from cartographical purists, hoping to preserve the art of cartography, and the democratic mappers of OpenStreetMap ("it's become almost a parody"); from governments seeking to police sensitive borders; from a host of tech companies fighting over the map business; and from privacy defenders concerned about what Google does with that data. "We're kind of looking at what to do with it. We've got a very rich source of data there, but also one that we have to be very careful of," he says. "Your location on the planet is one of the most sensitive pieces of information that anyone can hold on you."

19 of 97 comments (clear)

  1. Historically Significant by retroworks · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was thinking, I hope they are planning a date figure, so in the future we can see street maps by date and year or decade. In the future it would be interesting to visit not just a place but a year. In the same way that old maps have value because political lines have changed, I hope Google Maps is investing in keeping the older data as the lines change. It would be good to see what Florida was like before it was submerged in water, for example.

    --
    Gently reply
    1. Re:Historically Significant by DamonHD · · Score: 2

      You already can to that to some extent. When I look at streets in London I can often choose to go back and look at previous Street View images over several years:

      Eg looking at the end of Ely Place here in 2009:

      https://www.google.co.uk/maps/...

      Rgds

      Damon

      --
      http://m.earth.org.uk/
  2. Re:Privacy my ass by peragrin · · Score: 2

    yes you can delete the data, but it isn't easy to find, especially on mobile devices.

    my google maps still shows a favorite spot, from a year ago. on one hand this make sense on the other it is an ex girlfriend, and I have purged the data from google maps several times since then.

    You can never erase it all, and it keeps coming back. echoes of the past that should be forgotten.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  3. The Google Maps UI is fucking unusable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All joking aside, the newest version of the Google Maps UI is fucking unusable.

    First of all, it's way slower than the "classic" Google Maps was. I zoom, and sit and wait for the goddamn images to load. The fuzzy placeholder images they show are more annoying than just showing no image at all!

    Second of all, the search panel is fucked. When I search for something it shows the panel on the left listing the results. The panel takes up 1/3rd of the screen, which is really fucking annoying. But let's say I find what I'm looking for, and so I click on the search result. The map moves to that location. Now that I found what I was looking for, I want to get rid of the search panel since it's so goddamn huge. My first instinct is to click on the large "X" next to the search input. That hides the search panel, but it also clears the search results and the markers on the map, which is really fucking annoying! It turns out you need to click the tiny little arrow button outside of the search panel to close the panel. It's some of the stupidest Millennial/Hipster design I've ever seen. Maybe those shitheads don't realize it, but an "X" icon means close, not clear! And eraser icon is what should be used to indicate an input can be cleared!

    Third or all, the goddamn street view dragging never works reliably for me. On my desktop it takes 3 or 4 drags before it finally starts showing the goddamn street view, and it doesn't work at all on my iPad! I should just be able to right-click or press-hold somewhere on the map, select a "Street View Here" menu item and it shows me the closest street view to that point! There shouldn't be any of this goddamn dragging nonsense that Millennial/Hipster designers used!

    I don't even bother with Google Maps any more. I just use OpenStreetMap most of the time.

    Google Maps used to have a really good, really usable UI. Then a bunch of Millennials/Hipsters must have had their way with it, because like every other piece of software that these people have touched (Firefox, GNOME 3, Windows 8/10, Chrome, Slashdot Beta) it became a fucking awful mess.

    1. Re:The Google Maps UI is fucking unusable. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2, Informative

      All joking aside, the newest version of the Google Maps UI is fucking unusable.

      Just as another example, once upon a time, I could map out routes in Google Maps the way I wanted to. I might want to make a side trip on the way to another destination, I'd just make waypoints. Now? I get two choices of directions. If neither go through where I'm trying to go, its TTC.

      Anyone that doubts it should DDGo "Google maps suck".

      You should be modded up to +5, AC.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    2. Re:The Google Maps UI is fucking unusable. by MarkRose · · Score: 3, Informative

      Click on the route and drag to make a new waypoint where you want.

      If you want to add another destination click on the + next to the departure time.

      I use both all the time.

      --
      Be relentless!
  4. Re:Privacy my ass by tomhath · · Score: 2
    FTFA:

    "Your location on the planet is one of the most sensitive pieces of information that anyone can hold on you."

    "sensitive" = valuable to Google

    But let me be in charge of it

    Ha, Ha. You're a funny guy. That was a joke, right?

  5. Is he also responsible for the maps interfaces? by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because if he is, he is a massive fuckup. Maps has become steadily less useful over the years, both the Android app and the website. The interfaces are both just pure garbage.

    I use maps regularly, but I gave up on using it for navigation/directions beyond point to point and just use my Garmin for multi-stop trips in spite of its crap interface.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Is he also responsible for the maps interfaces? by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Funny, I gave up on my Garmin for the exact same reason.

      Using the Garmin is almost unbearably slow, but I can successfully enter multi-stop trips into it, whereas with google maps most of the time when I try that on the web it decides to shit the bed almost every time. Slow and poky is better than not working at all.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Is he also responsible for the maps interfaces? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Because if he is, he is a massive fuckup. Maps has become steadily less useful over the years, both the Android app and the website. The interfaces are both just pure garbage.

      I use maps regularly, but I gave up on using it for navigation/directions beyond point to point and just use my Garmin for multi-stop trips in spite of its crap interface.

      I agree. I sort of wonder if they eliminated all but the most obvious route was in response to the dumpkoffs that got lost or killed by trying weird directions and found themselves driving off cliffs when trying to drive their Camry on Jeep roads?

      We live in a world where people can sue for stupidity, like not knowing that alligators live in ponds in Florida, so why not?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    3. Re:Is he also responsible for the maps interfaces? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 2

      The initial post was about the user interface. The user interface on a Garmin is horrible. Yes, it may work, but it takes you 20 minutes to even figure out how to do something, then you need to actually get around to doing it. Maps on a phone is not that much better, but if you plan your trip in a web browser and transfer it to the phone, it's quick and easy. Garmin used to let you do that, then dropped support for it.

  6. Please put all your google maps complaints here by davide+marney · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Google maps is pretty good, I'll admit. But their driving directions, don't get me started!

    Why isn't there an "easy" routing option? Just yesterday maps sent me to an interstate exit going in the opposite direction with an immediate u-turn, instead of the normal, right-hand exit. Maybe the u-turn was a few seconds faster, but it's about 200% more dangerous, it's confusing, and just maddening beyond belief.

    Another time, maps took me off a paved road onto a gravel road, over a one-lane bridge almost axle-deep in mud next to a cattle yard, onto a dirt road, and then: back on to the same paved road again, a quarter-mile down the road! The routing algorithm had basically just cut out a bend in the road. It was so outrageous that I imagined Google engineers were actually trying to punk us -- hey, Larry, look, I can't believe that guy actually took the cow path!

    OK, don't be evil, I get that. But also, don't make your customers want to throttle your apps with their bare hands.

    --
    "We receive as friendly that which agrees with, we resist with dislike that which opposes us" - Faraday
    1. Re:Please put all your google maps complaints here by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Informative

      Google maps is pretty good, I'll admit. But their driving directions, don't get me started!

      Why isn't there an "easy" routing option?

      There was at one time. You could enter waypoints, and map it out. Then they changed it in 2015. Somehow taking command of your own trip was a bad thing that had to be eliminated.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    2. Re:Please put all your google maps complaints here by kheldan · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't think Google Maps is 'pretty good' at all, I think it's so super-bloated as to be close to unusable. I more or less have to go find something else to do for the time it sits there loading up and resolving everything on the map, and it doesn't matter what computer I'm on, it's still unbelievably slow. It didn't used to be this way, either, it used to be fairly quick. Even the so-called 'lite' version you can revert to is still so slow and and pokey that you want to pound the keyboard if you're in a hurry. And the driving directions? Very often laughably bad. In many case I'll write down my own with pen and paper rather than wade through the nonsense that Google Maps spits out. And routing? Maybe half the time it'll give you the best route. It also limits the number of 'added destinations' you can enter, which is infuriating if I'm trying to plan out a specific route for myself.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  7. Hey Ed . . . by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Your maps continue to get worse and worse. Why can't I rotate a map to orient it on North? Why does the sidebar continually pop out even after I close it? Why is it so difficult to drag the line of a route to a different route without it doubling back on itself?

    Hey Ed, how about taking care of the things which are important rather than worrying about shiny. All of the above are why paper maps are still superior in many ways to what you produce.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  8. I use by Max_W · · Score: 4, Informative

    OpenSreetMap.org on desktop, and Maps.me on smartphone, as it does not require internet connection.

    For viewing locations of Wikipedia articles on the map I use http://ausleuchtung.ch/geo_wik... . It works for different Wikipedia language versions.

    1. Re:I use by CRCulver · · Score: 2

      OpenStreetMap is ultimately just a database that you can feed to whatever renderer you please. Even the OSM website offers several tile sets.

    2. Re:I use by bluegutang · · Score: 2

      The OsmAnd app allows you to download OpenStreetMap data ahead of time and use it offline.
      It was a lifesaver when I recently visited a third world country and my data plan stopped working.

  9. Re:Privacy my ass by Etcetera · · Score: 2

    You can do all of this, already. Kinda makes you wonder, what else are you wrong about?

    You can ask Google to do this. Once it's off your device, it's off your device.

    Hopefully, we'll start demanding en masse for more and more data to remain on your device. F Google, Apple, and Facebook's cloud learning systems. For the actual processing and interpretation of data, we all have more than enough processing speed and more than enough space in the devices sitting in our pockets to parse through it offline.

    Download Offline Maps, download a daily set of ads and rules, and let the CPU in my phone decide what to show me based on where I am now.