Slashdot Mirror


One Million IP Addresses Used In Brute-Force Attack On A Bank (softpedia.com)

Cisco says in just one week in February they detected 1,127,818 different IP addresses being used to launch 744,361,093 login attempts on 220,758,340 different email addresses -- and that 93% of those attacks were directed at two financial institutions in a massive Account Takeover (ATO) campaign. An anonymous reader writes: Crooks used 993,547 distinct IPs to check login credentials for 427,444,261 accounts. For most of these attacks, the crooks used proxy servers, but also two botnets, one of compromised Arris cable modems, and one of ZyXel routers/modems. Most of these credentials have been acquired from public breaches or underground hacking forums. This happened before the recent huge data breaches such as MySpace, LinkedIn, Tumblr, and VK.com.
It's apparently similar to the stolen-credentials-from-other-sites attack that was launched against GitHub earlier this week.

11 of 50 comments (clear)

  1. Internet of Thieves by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Informative

    Didn't realize what IoT actually stands for.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Internet of Thieves by DaMattster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is why self-driving vehicles are a bad idea! One good penetration could turn a 80,000 lb semi into a lethal weapon.

    2. Re:Internet of Thieves by spire3661 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Self driving doesn't have to be connected." For the most part yes it will be forced. Your vehicle will be connected to the road, other cars (V2V) and the internet, possibly on separate links. The vehicle will only operate once authenticated by the road. To be road authenticated you will have to running the most current version of software, which will be updated very frequently. The future of driving is bleak and glorious all at the same time.

      --
      Good-bye
  2. I'm surprised this isn't happening more often by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My own personal (as in, at home hosted on a cable modem) web server used to get these same kinds of distributed dictionary attacks, botnet attempts to gain access to whatever they can. There were times when I would see this type of thing almost once a month or so; then it started to taper off and I haven't seen it in some time. I figured the botnets were just doing other things (or had decomposed).

    And yes, I acknowledge that there is nothing important about my web server. I figured the botnets just occasionally go through every IP address they can find that accepts ssh connections and my number comes up every so often. I've never seen an IP address come up in both my web and ssh logs.

    And yes, I know I can do more to prevent this. People offer up plenty of suggestions. Frankly I don't care, and I actually enjoy seeing tons of blocked ssh traffic in my logs from time to time. As you might expect the vast overwhelming majority of traffic is Chinese script kiddies attempting dictionary attacks as root; I don't care about those as I don't allow remote root. I find the distributed, phone book, and distributed phone book attacks much more interesting. They even give me a chance to tune up my cron jobs that parse my server logs :)

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:I'm surprised this isn't happening more often by pepsikid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, one of the perks of running servers on a residential line is seeing firsthand all of the exploits. I'm fond of decrypting those mime-encrypted javascripts embedded in urls and finding the patebin page or hostname which it tries to fetch more scripts from; getting that shiat reported. If I were evil, i could build quite a library of exploits to use on others. They just send me these things haha!

    2. Re:I'm surprised this isn't happening more often by pepsikid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have my own cloud. I save on electricity by packing multiple servers into one box which is on 24/7 anyway. Having the servers physically located beside me relieves me of further concern that my hardware, website or forum might be seized or MitM'd. Also, the HOA can't sweet-talk some meddling corporation into kindly muzzling "that scofflaw." :)

    3. Re:I'm surprised this isn't happening more often by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      SO lets see. You are not saving energy by keeping a system on 24/7, you are spending more money on power and cooling than you would if you put that computer in a colocated datacenter (I have ran the numbers more than enough times, I'm using typical residental power rates of 9cents/kWhr). Second, having physical access to your servers doesn't increase security. Your 5 pin tumbler lock is no match to an advanced lockpick set compared to the IDing, fingerprinting, and biometric scanning most datacenters put you through. Finally, the corporation can sweet talk the HOA, your local police, and ISP into redirecting, restricting, or rejecting packets destined to or from your server.

      Do yourself a favor, either host in a datacenter somewhere or host at home. But don't fool yourself into thinking you are more secure, saving money, or run your own "cloud" on a single piece of hardware. You are doing none of the above.

  3. 3 backdoors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How incompetent do you have to be as a company to have THREE backdoors in your own router, intentional or accidental....

  4. Re: Where's the fucking Chekov article!?!? by Jack_the_Tripper · · Score: 2

    Agreed, the editors have really been dropping the ball for years. It takes them days to report on recent events.

    Well...them IP addresses, they had to count them all. Now they know how many IPs it takes to fill the Albert Hall.

  5. Re:One Million is nothing by Imrik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    First, you should recheck your numbers. Second, Obama called it treasonous when Bush did it.

  6. Re: One Million is nothing by Beeftopia · · Score: 2

    Money is a measure of effort required to get a unit of it. It is also like a claim on goods and services. It is a logical construct, but it is not meaningless. The construct has persisted for millennia as a result of the benefits it provides to individuals.

    To a central bank which can have it printed, it can seem meaningless. And the effort required to obtain a unit of it by an agricultural field hand versus the CEO of a financial services company are obviously very different. Central banks can distribute it to desired companies via bond purchases and other enticements.