Slashdot Mirror


SanDisk Made an iPhone Case With Built-In Storage (theverge.com)

An anonymous reader writes: SanDisk has made its iXpand Memory Case to alleviate the problem that Apple creates when they release an iPhone in 2016 with only 16GB of on-board storage. The iXpand Memory Case is an iPhone case with flash storage built directly into the case itself that connects/charges via the Lightning port. You won't need a new phone and you won't need to carry around an extra charging dongle, which is the case for many other third-party cases and accessories. Since Apple doesn't make expanding your storage with third-party devices easy, you will need to download/install the companion SanDisk iXpand Memory Case app on your iPhone, which will automatically back-up your camera roll and password-protect your photos and files. If you need some extra juice, you can spend an extra $40 to receive a 1900mAh battery pack that attaches to the case. The iXpand Memory Case is only available with the iPhone 6 and 6s and is available with 32GB, 64GB, and 128GB of extra flash storage for $59, $99, and $129, respectively. Oh, and of course there are varying color options: Red, Grey, Sky and Mint. Maybe your phone battery is running low (God-forbid it is dead) and you just so happen to be nearby a KFC in Delhi or Mumbai, KFC has you covered. They have introduced a meal box that doubles as a smartphone charger.

48 comments

  1. unlimited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have 50GB of iCloud storage, and an unlimited data plan.

    Only hipsters want to manage physical chips of storage between devices.

    1. Re:unlimited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      until you go to an area with poor coverage then all your cloud storage goes to shit. Also the govt can just grab your info off the cloud apparently

    2. Re:unlimited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      its not "cloud" - its a fucking server you useless fucktards

    3. Re:unlimited by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      I have 50GB of iCloud storage, and an unlimited data plan.

      Ooh. Fifty gigabytes. That will almost hold the contents of my phone. Once. Or the contents of one of my DSLR's flash cards.

      Only hipsters want to manage physical chips of storage between devices.

      Only hipsters think the cloud is a viable means of moving large quantities of content between devices.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    4. Re:unlimited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its not "cloud" - its a fucking server you useless fucktards

      Mod parent up.

    5. Re:unlimited by DaHat · · Score: 1

      Only hipsters think the cloud is a viable means of moving large quantities of content between devices.

      What % of iPhone users would you call 'hipsters'? What % of 'hipsters' are on Android?

      Speaking as a Windows Phone user (yes, the elite .7%) I can report that there are no hipsters here, just the foolish who haven't jumped ship yet.

    6. Re:unlimited by idji · · Score: 2

      A server is a machine - a piece of hardware. the cloud could be anywhere on the planet and is virtualized, it is abstracted away from a server. so server is not cloud. cloud software generally doesn't know nor care about the hardware that it is sitting on.

    7. Re:unlimited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, a server is any machine and/or software that serves data. I could run many servers off of a single PC or load balance them across many PCs. They are still servers regardless of the distribution across the underlying hardware.

      The term "cloud" is marketing bullshit.

    8. Re:unlimited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are a lot of wannabe hipsters using Windows. Check out this loser. The rest are the common, naive plebes who buy into shit like surveillance and believe that everyone is looking out for them.

      Apple has a lot of the wannabe arteests who think having Apple products will somehow imbue them with creativity. The remainder are metrosexuals, "bisexuals" and the technically incompetent. Apple users are generally the loudest and cannot tolerate anything less than glowing praise for all things Apple.

      Google has a lot of uneducated and chintzy skinflints who would rather have malware and scamware-filled freemium shit than spend a couple bucks for clean, functional, standalone software. The rest are people who exploit the open nature of Android to get the most out of it.

      Linux and BSD are all over the place. From huge supercomputers to embedded systems to the Cheetos stained virgins who love to argue over the internet.

    9. Re: unlimited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cloud doesn't work like that. Nice fairy tale though.
      Abstracted away from servers? You just made a bunch of people laugh. Your brain is abstracted from reality.
      The cloud doesn't work if you don't have internet access, the internet connects to *gasp* networks that probably contain servers.

    10. Re:unlimited by TRRosen · · Score: 1

      You carry a lot of porn around huh?

    11. Re:unlimited by TRRosen · · Score: 1

      But nobody moves large quantities of content between devices.
      They look up a contact, listen to a song, or show a coworker a picture of their dog.
      We don't use our phones to edit the next Pixar film. 99% of my time on a mobile device is spent on apps that require connectivity anyway.

    12. Re:unlimited by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      But nobody moves large quantities of content between devices.

      I do. I do it every time I import photos from my DSLR. I move tens of gigabytes at a time from the camera to a computer. In some cases, I then painfully upload tens of gigabytes to a server in another state so that other folks can enjoy the pics as well. That last part takes weeks, thanks to (IIRC) 768 kbps DSL upload speeds. I don't move them to my phone because my phone can't hold any meaningful percentage of my photos anyway. I also don't access them online very often, because it is an order of magnitude too slow.

      We don't use our phones to edit the next Pixar film. 99% of my time on a mobile device is spent on apps that require connectivity anyway.

      Ah, but what you're missing is that the main reason we don't use mobile devices for more things is that they have inadequate storage and no good way to move content into and out of them. Otherwise, people would be doing video editing on iPads far more than they do. I mean, the editing workflow of slicing things and dragging chunks around lends itself to a touch interface, but it needs hundreds of gigabytes of storage backing it (not to mention lots of CPU behind it).

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    13. Re:unlimited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speak for yourself. The only app on my mobile devices that requires an internet connection is the web browser.

      Most of us are too busy with important things to be using Facebook or Twitter or WhatsApp or whatever all day.

    14. Re:unlimited by Mats+Svensson · · Score: 1

      Yeah!

      Damn hipsters with their SD-cards.

      Get a shave, and smaller on-board storage, damn hipsters!

    15. Re:unlimited by jon3k · · Score: 1

      Most of us are too busy with important things to be using Facebook or Twitter or WhatsApp or whatever all day.

      Usage statistics show this to be factually incorrect. Most of us are not too busy to communicate with friends and family using social networks. I'm in the small minority who doesn't use social networks.

    16. Re:unlimited by avandesande · · Score: 1

      yeah we have a little thing called 'DNS' that has been doing this for decades

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    17. Re:unlimited by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Quit confusing people with facts. It's a cloud, damn it!

    18. Re:unlimited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      50GB for life is what I got from Box.com in 2011 for owning an LG phone. Apple should keep up with the storage needs of the time and give a minimum of 1TB to its customers.

      Nowadays even my tiny SanDisk Sansa Clip Zip has a 128GB SD card in it.

    19. Re:unlimited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That means nothing because it doesn't tell us what percentage of use social media gets on the individual devices. If the average user uses their mobile device for a total of 4 hours a day, they aren't spending 3.9 hours on social media but probably just a few minutes total.

      Social networks are a hassle to use to talk to friends and family and completely impersonal. I prefer to speak to them directly, but maybe I just care about my loved ones more than people who use social networks.

  2. one better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My phone has expandable storage built right into the phone.

    Supports up to 128 GB uSD, IIRC. Inside the device itself.

    1. Re:one better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine too. I've got 16GB onboard plus a 128GB micro SD. Once the 256GB cards are available on Amazon, I'm grabbing a few to put into my devices.

    2. Re:one better... by Mattcelt · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised no one has mentioned the Mophie Space case yet... battery and storage for iPhones in one.

      Unfortunately, the Mophie app (which is required for file management, same as the SanDisk) is a broken piece of absolute shit. My mophie has 64GB of storage, but will only manage 10k photos. (I have over 13k on my phone.) But it runs poorly even in the best of conditions.

      I am horribly disappointed that SanDisk is only making this for the 6 series phones. It could have been a contender...

  3. Win for consumer by amoeba47 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apple sets its price points based on flash storage amount. If people can easily add more storage, that will be a win for the consumer. Yay, competition!

    1. Re:Win for consumer by DaMattster · · Score: 2

      Apple sets its price points based on flash storage amount. If people can easily add more storage, that will be a win for the consumer. Yay, competition!

      The win is purely empirical because you still need to use SanDisk's App to move files between your iPhone and the SanDisk unit. It does not completely integrate with the iOS platform. It would be a real win if you could actively use the SanDisk unit for storage. Really, the iPhone is a very consumer unfriendly device. I drink the Apple Kool Aid as far as my MacBook Pro is concerned. For my choice of smartphone, I am Android all of the way. I don't believe in spending more than 150.00 for a smartphone. At the prices of the flagship phones, I'd rather have a better tablet or spend my money elsewhere.

    2. Re:Win for consumer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called a price. They set their price.

      But at the end of the day, Sandisk has a product that really finds the synergy between form and function. It appears they had to think outside the box to reach such a customer-centric solution. This is a win-win for the consumer.

    3. Re:Win for consumer by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Nope. Or at least, I don't think that's correct.

      It sounds like it's only accessible from an app that specifically accesses the storage, and you can use it to back up data that you store on your phone, freeing up space on your main phone flash ram for other things.

      It's basically like adding an external hard drive to your desktop computer. It gives you something to back up your data to, but in the general case, it won't typically increase the storage you have for regular use when all of your applications are only configured to use your main hard drive.

    4. Re:Win for consumer by andrewa · · Score: 1
      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
  4. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Another ad.

    1. Re: Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you gonna cry?
      It's new, so it's news. Deal with it.
      Nobody forced you to read it, and since this is slashdot you probably came to the comments without reading it anyways.

    2. Re:Great by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 2

      Worse, it's not even an advert for a new and exciting product. I mean, it might be a new SanDisk case, but there have been similar implementations available for /years/ (right to offering options with an without extra battery). Some of them use the lightning port (IIRC, some of these devices even pre-dated Lightning and used the 30-pin port) and others used WiFi, but the idea is not new.

      At least if you are going to spam us with slashvertisements, make it for interesting new products. This is the equivalent of a breathless announcement about how Honda is manufacturing some sort of car. It's not news, it's not interesting; it's just product placement. It's the sort of thing I expected from Dice; I was hoping Slashdot's new overlords would be a bit less weaselly (or at least would be more subtle about it :)

  5. Not an iPhone by youngone · · Score: 2

    iPhone case with flash storage built directly into the case...

    Or I can buy a phone with an SD card slot built directly into the phone

    You won't need a new phone and you won't need to carry around an extra charging dongle...

    No I won't will I?

    Since Apple doesn't make expanding your storage with third-party devices easy...

    Other phone manufacturers do however, so I'll just buy one of their products.

    1. Re:Not an iPhone by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      This is why I don't have an iPhone. I wanted one until I found out you could not expand it or change the battery. I know lots of people don't care and I'm fine with that. I like to be free.

    2. Re:Not an iPhone by antdude · · Score: 1

      I never understood why Apple never added SD slots to their iDevices. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  6. If you're going to be in the Apple phone Ghetto by pecosdave · · Score: 1

    may as well drive the car with felt padding on all the seats and panels and chrome rims.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  7. Sandisk is smart, like Apple by naughtynaughty · · Score: 2

    Selling 128GB flash drives for $20 more than 32GB flash drives isn't nearly as profitable as selling 128GB flash drive cases for $70 more than 32GB flash drive cases.

    1. Re:Sandisk is smart, like Apple by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I bought two 128GB evo cards off amazon for 23 and some change per each. One went into my old Samsung S5 and one into my wife's LG. Instant happiness for little money.

    2. Re:Sandisk is smart, like Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At that kind of price, you should use f3 or h2diskw to verify that they aren't avtually 8GB cards that merely claim to have 128GB capacity and discard all writes past 8GB.

    3. Re:Sandisk is smart, like Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it might be one of those Micro SD(tm) Crads

      It's not even that much cheaper than a real 128GB "crad".

    4. Re:Sandisk is smart, like Apple by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Instead I just loaded a bunch of movies and music on it. I don't know if it's 128gb for sure but I do know it's 103.48gb at least.

    5. Re:Sandisk is smart, like Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And have you tested all of the stuff you have loaded?

      The fake cards will report a higher capacity than they have. Once you exceed the true amount of storage, usually just a couple GB, everything you write to the card just overwrites the content that was there previously. Since the filenames aren't removed from the file table, they still show up and it looks like you still have your stuff, until you try to use it.

  8. In lieu of actual innovation... by swb · · Score: 1

    ...maybe Apple could implement some user-friendly pseudoinnovation, like using the lightning port for attaching mass storage devices and some kind of filesystem to go along with it.

    And while I'm thinking about it, have any iOS apps ever tried to use the camera roll as a generic filesystem? I'd imagine that the APIs make sure you're storing data that has the right filetype magic that matches supported image files, but do they resample it or otherwise manipulate the data so that you couldn't store random data to the camera roll?

    Is there any reason you couldn't store an MP3 in the camera roll with just enough encoding to make the OS think it was a JPG but that apps that knew "this one trick" couldn't read it?

    1. Re:In lieu of actual innovation... by wbr1 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Or you could use an android with a real file system, usb on the go for storage, and maybe even a micro sd slot.

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
  9. In-Exhaustible Battery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From TheVerge link:

    "Since Apple doesn't exactly make it easy to expand your storage with third-party devices, you'll need to install the companion app on your phone, which can automatically back up your camera roll and password-protect your photos and files. There's also an optional 1900mAh battery pack that can be attached to the case if you're willing to spend an extra $40.

    Sadly if you have an older iPhone or the bigger iPhone 6 Plus or 6S Plus, this case won't be of much help. The iXpand Memory Case is only compatible with the iPhone 6 and 6S and is available with 32GB, 64GB, and 128GB of extra storage for $59, $99, and $129, respectively."

    Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but if you keep the extra battery charged up, meaning the phone's main battery will never go through the 500 or so 'cycles' a battery has, shouldn't the phone's battery stay good indefinitely?

  10. Overpriced by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1

    It's probably the best attempt I've seen at increasing the iPhone's available storage (yeah, yeah, we know that Apple should allow microSD - you don't need to say it), but it seems rather overpriced.

    Considering that cards from Sandisk are around $12 (32GB), $20 (64GB) and $40 (128GB) and considering $40-$45 for a case, then you should be looking at $55, $65 or $85.

    Better yet, it should just have been sold as an empty shell of a case with a microSD slot for you to fill - although I appreciate that the profit margins on such a thing wouldn't have been quite so healthy.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  11. OtterBox uniVERSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or you can just use OtterBox's newest case, the uniVERSE (www.otterbox.com/en-us/universe-case-system). SanDisk makes an iXpand Flash Drive module for it as well (http://www.otterbox.com/en-us/iphone-6-6s-iphone-6-6s-plus/sandisk-ixpand-flash-drive/sndk-ixpand.html). This is better because you can swap out the module with multiple other SanDisk flash drives and all of the other uniVERSE modules (battery packs, external speakers, macro lenses, Square Card Reader, etc). Way better than the 1-trick pony SanDisk case. And it's an OtterBox so you know it's protective.

  12. Nope, I'm good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I'll just continue buying devices that actually speak to the public instead of some hipster crap that everyone blindly follows because "iPhones are so much better than Android, duh!"

    This expandable storage thing has been an issue with iPhones ever since the manufacturers who make Android phones actually listened to the consumer public and gave us what we needed. Screw you, Apple. We're not buying your crap, nor is it going to sway us to buy your crap just because SanDisk is trying to solve your problems for you.

    Sincerely,

    The SMART technology consumers who actually think before they buy a device