As long as the tenants have another way to enter and exit the building without being surveilled, then the landlord is welcome to put the system in.
If the system covers every entrance and exit, then there is absolutely no practical difference than surveilling them at the entrance to their own flats.
But if it doesn't cover every entrance and exit, then it's hardly worth installing, as anyone they would ostensibly want to profile (AirBnB-ers, sub-lessees, etc.) would be using the un-monitored entrance.
As long as you're not violating occupancy laws, your landlord has absolutely no right to know who, what, or when people or things are going to or from your flat.
The United States desperately needs an information ownership law that revises the existing "you collect it, you own it" data practises. If companies can't sell data about you, they won't bother to collect it.
I haven't watched American "news" in over a decade. Journalistic integrity has flown the coop. I don't agree with much, but Trump is right about "fake news" - only he doesn't go far enough. It is almost ALL fake these days.
The "news" doesn't report facts any longer; it sensationalises events.
I don't want their "news". I want facts and honest analysis. I am not apathetic; I am disenfranchised. Yet somehow these cunts persist.
I'm afraid I have to agree more with GP's oligarch statement.
I do large-scale security and risk mitigation for a living, and have done for more than two decades. I know a thing or two about walls, locks, and people.
Trump's idea of a 'big, beautiful wall' would be as effective as the TSA. That is to say, completely useless at the task it was designed for, while making the entire situation worse.
The whole wall concept (and to be fair, not even remotely first conceived by Trump) is worse than throwing the baby out with the bath water - it's throwing the baby out and keeping the bath water. Is it very nearly the worst possible idea for addressing the problem, and is not just a waste of money - it's actively contributing to the problem.
it *was* largely a bunch of white guys that brought about western culture, economics, industry and technology and societies
Well sure, when you enslave, kill, invade, repress, marginalise, and otherwise disempower everyone who isn't a white guy, that does rather leave the pitch open for the white guys to dominate!
Windows 10 is a privacy invasion hiding behind a desktop.
I will never use it.
So my choices are OSX and Linux. While I love using Linux at work, it's worse than useless for work.
For better or for worse, the majority of the time OSX just works. And sadly, Linux will never overtake Apple in that space until their overarching ethos becomes focused principally on UX (at the kernel level, not simply at the UI level).
people will screw each other over if left to their own devices
If not otherwise incentivised, this is true. The goal of government/civilisation is to incentivise those behaviours that are good for both the individual and the collective... which, oddly enough, is exactly what Nash found provides the optimal outcomes for both.
"Dark" side of the moon? In this day and age, seriously?? Even the translation of China's press release correctly refers to it as the FAR side of the moon, which actually gets slightly MORE light than the near side!
Slashdot Mirror
As long as the tenants have another way to enter and exit the building without being surveilled, then the landlord is welcome to put the system in.
If the system covers every entrance and exit, then there is absolutely no practical difference than surveilling them at the entrance to their own flats.
But if it doesn't cover every entrance and exit, then it's hardly worth installing, as anyone they would ostensibly want to profile (AirBnB-ers, sub-lessees, etc.) would be using the un-monitored entrance.
As long as you're not violating occupancy laws, your landlord has absolutely no right to know who, what, or when people or things are going to or from your flat.
The United States desperately needs an information ownership law that revises the existing "you collect it, you own it" data practises. If companies can't sell data about you, they won't bother to collect it.
Fresh eggs from local hens taste remarkably better than mass-grown ones. I wish I had the room and time to keep hens, ducks, and quail.
(Also, the alternative link in the summary is bologna.)
Because they're as bad at grammar as they are at security.
It's fewer than 30.
But it should be fewer than ONE.
I think this is more stripe-dressing scientists, but we might be splitting mares here.
Shit sandwich.
I haven't watched American "news" in over a decade. Journalistic integrity has flown the coop. I don't agree with much, but Trump is right about "fake news" - only he doesn't go far enough. It is almost ALL fake these days.
The "news" doesn't report facts any longer; it sensationalises events.
I don't want their "news". I want facts and honest analysis. I am not apathetic; I am disenfranchised. Yet somehow these cunts persist.
I'm afraid I have to agree more with GP's oligarch statement.
Arbeit macht bleifrei, achtung alle...
I prefer to think that both the Copenhagen and Many-worlds interpretations are correct.
I do large-scale security and risk mitigation for a living, and have done for more than two decades. I know a thing or two about walls, locks, and people.
Trump's idea of a 'big, beautiful wall' would be as effective as the TSA. That is to say, completely useless at the task it was designed for, while making the entire situation worse.
The whole wall concept (and to be fair, not even remotely first conceived by Trump) is worse than throwing the baby out with the bath water - it's throwing the baby out and keeping the bath water. Is it very nearly the worst possible idea for addressing the problem, and is not just a waste of money - it's actively contributing to the problem.
All of the things you mention are important.
Not a single one of them would be addressed by a wall.
So, a wall is cheaper.
It is cheaper, indeed.
You know what's even cheaper than the wall and just as effective?
Doing absolutely nothing.
Considering that's a private jet and not a commercial airliner, there's no such thing as 'economy class' on that flight.
You forgot the salutation:
"Dear Penthouse"...
To a software developer, that sounds suspiciously like scope creep.
it *was* largely a bunch of white guys that brought about western culture, economics, industry and technology and societies
Well sure, when you enslave, kill, invade, repress, marginalise, and otherwise disempower everyone who isn't a white guy, that does rather leave the pitch open for the white guys to dominate!
Easier to imagine than none on /.
(Such as yourself.)
I think the commentary to Muppets from Space might have it beat.
Kermit, Rizzo, Gonzo, and the director watch the film (MST3K-style), with some excellent one-liners.
Hey friend, over here Dude.
Windows 10 is a privacy invasion hiding behind a desktop.
I will never use it.
So my choices are OSX and Linux. While I love using Linux at work, it's worse than useless for work.
For better or for worse, the majority of the time OSX just works. And sadly, Linux will never overtake Apple in that space until their overarching ethos becomes focused principally on UX (at the kernel level, not simply at the UI level).
you'll find you can easily bend it with finger pressure
Though be aware that each finger is single-use for this test.
FFS, what a day to be without mod points.
1) You obviously didn't read TFA
2) You can't master basic English (responsive? shotty? really??)
3) You have no idea what you're on about.
Step away from the keyboard. I'm revoking your internet privileges for 24 hours.
This has not been my experience in any way, shape, form, or manner.
Linkedin has become absolutely insufferable since Microsoft acquired them.
people will screw each other over if left to their own devices
If not otherwise incentivised, this is true. The goal of government/civilisation is to incentivise those behaviours that are good for both the individual and the collective... which, oddly enough, is exactly what Nash found provides the optimal outcomes for both.
"Dark" side of the moon? In this day and age, seriously?? Even the translation of China's press release correctly refers to it as the FAR side of the moon, which actually gets slightly MORE light than the near side!