Slashdot Mirror


In the Aftermath Of Brexit, Brits Google About Irish Passport, Meaning Of EU, and Why it All Happened

As the world makes peace with the news that the United Kingdom has voted to leave the European Union, people in the UK are increasingly trying to figure out what this means. Google noted on Twitter late Thursday that "What is the EU?" was the second top UK question on the EU since the news broke, with "Why did Britain leave the EU?" being the first. The questions also speak volume about the awareness of the issue among them. Understandably, some people also resorted to the search engine to look for Irish passports. "Getting an Irish passport" keywords saw a 100% surge.

8 of 693 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Control by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 5, Insightful

    rule-making body a thousand miles away
    Cough cough ... look on a Map? Bruessels and Strassbourg are not thousands of miles away from London.

    same about the World Trade Organization. Why are THEY making decisions for Americans?
    Erm? Because they are basically run by American Mega Corporations and their cronies?

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  2. Re:BBC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Negotiations have already started. Not Article 50 negotiations, of course. Only the UK can invoke those. But as far as the 27 EU member states are concerned, the UK is overstaying its welcome from today onwards. They UK can legally stay as long as it wants, but politically it will be treated like a stranger.

    It is already clear that if the UK wants continued access to the single market, it will basically have to accept all the things that voters hoped to get rid off with their "leave" vote, and get no say in the future decisions of the EU. Pay dues to the EU? Check. Grant foreigners freedom of movement? Check. Follow EU rules on marketability of products? Check. Get to vote on any of those rules? Nope. Some people are still delusional about this. They think the UK will get special treatment because at the moment it imports more from the EU than it exports to the EU, implying that the EU needs the UK market more than the UK needs the EU market. But that's a flawed argument. Almost half the exports of the UK are sold on the European market, but only 14% of the EU exports are sold in the UK.

  3. Re:A preview of President Trump's upcoming win. by tripleevenfall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Aside from all the nonsense this election cycle, the sentiment in the world is the same among working-class people in the west - that the political elites have abandoned them. They are angry about immigration depressing wages, and they are angry about globalism wiping out jobs altogether.

    These two things have been ignored by politicians for so long now, that people angry enough to elect idiots like Johnson and Trump in order to effect change.

    They've made their own bed.

  4. WTBH? by MiniMike · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From TFA:

    "What is the EU?" and "What happens if we leave the EU?" The former was the second top UK question on the EU after the results were officially announced.

    Seriously, shouldn't they have been asking this before they voted?

  5. Re:Control by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I feel the same about the World Trade Organization. Why are THEY making decisions for Americans?

    The WTO is the successor to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). This was an attempt to set international institutions in place to regulate international trade in order to make it easier to get trade moving. It was an attempt to provide an international framework in which countries could sort out their differences on trade matters peacefully without resorting to trade wars, protectionism, and to prevent a repeat of the same economic conditions that ultimately led to two world wars.

    Does that answer your question?

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  6. Re:A preview of President Trump's upcoming win. by CaptainLard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually, this is great information for America. We get to observe what happens when a stable western country with a large economy makes a drastic change driven mainly by xenophobia. Maybe the British economy crashes, maybe its all roses. All we have to do is watch...

    (many probably won't watch)

  7. Re:A preview of President Trump's upcoming win. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The creation a low-paying, 16-hours/day, 7-days/week job in Vietnam doesn't mean jack shit to somebody who used to have a moderately well-paying, 8-hours/day, 5-days/week job working at a factory in the UK or the US. There wasn't a net win globally; the third-worlder isn't all that much better off than before, and may actually be much worse off if they went from an agricultural job they had some control over their destiny to a dismal factory job where they have no control at all. Meanwhile, the first-worlders are much worse off, being unemployed and often unable to find employment due to widespread economic destruction affecting entire regions and even countries. The only ones benefiting are a very small ownership class reaping all of the benefits, who thanks to their political connections and ability to bypass taxation systems have tended to avoid contributing back much to society at large. Then there's the spin-off effect from the destruction of middle class jobs. Eliminating one middle-class job may make one ownership-class individual wealthier, but it also makes numerous other middle-class individuals much worse off economically now that they've lost much of the business of the other middle-class employee who lost his job.

    People in the UK and the US are now voting based on their own personal experiences with globalization, with immigration, and with free trade. These experiences have been devastating. It's no wonder they've had enough, and are doing what they can to get some major changes going on.

  8. Re:So.. by Gr8Apes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm assuming triggering Article 50 just got delayed by his resignation.

    I think it got delayed because Boris Johnson and that other pro-Brexit guy whose name I don't remember say he shouldn't rush into it. "In voting to leave the EU it’s vital to stress that there’s no need for haste, and as the Prime Minister has just said nothing will change in the short term except work will begin on how to extricate this country from the supranational system. As the Prime Minister has said there is no need to invoke Article 50."

    So the pro-Brexit guys are back-pedaling already because they aren't ready for Brexit? That's truly the funniest thing I've heard all day. "We want out. We want out". Holy shit! We won? Now what? Better start planning..... Sounds like the Conservatives just won another round in office.

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.