Slashdot Mirror


Valve Faces Lawsuit Over Video Game Gambling (bloomberg.com)

An anonymous reader writes from a report via Bloomberg: Valve's Counterstrike: Global Offensive game is being sued for its role in the multibillion-dollar gambling economy that has fueled the game's popularity. Michael John McLeod filed a lawsuit Thursday in the U.S. District Court in Connecticut alleging that Valve violated gambling laws and engaged in racketeering with a handful of off-shore gambling companies. McLeod, who has been gambling on CS:GO since 2014, is asking for class-action status for the suit. The suit was first reported by Polygon and doesn't give a specific request for damages, nor does it say how much money he lost by betting on the site. According to Bloomberg: "Valve provided for money, technical support, and advice to such websites as CSGO Lounge and Diamonds, which take bets, and OPSkins, which runs a market where virtual goods are traded and can be redeemed for cash." Valve has yet to respond to the suit.

73 comments

  1. WHy dont we sue ice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this basically the same as suing winter because people gamble on hockey

    1. Re:WHy dont we sue ice by vux984 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Isn't this basically the same as suing winter because people gamble on hockey

      Not really. Valve has been on a lot of people's radar already for how some of its F2P marketplaces are operating. (Team Fortress, DOTA, and CS:GO in particular.)

      http://wccftech.com/problem-un...

      A 2nd part of the issue is that the major Casino's are unregulated, allow minors to play, (and accusations that its rigged by its owners etc.) So these sites are operating illegally; and quite probably corrupt.

      There's a reasonable argument to bad that Valve has an obligation to prevent such sites from tying into its APIs etc.

      There is also a reasonable argument to be made that Valve is endorsing it by allowing such things as this:

      For example:

      CS:GO Lounge
      "A community based around the trading of CS:GO items "

      "trading" lulz... right, "trading"... the discussion has a nice forum post pinned for everyone:

      Bets: the all-in-one guide
      http://steamcommunity.com/grou...

      or this, a "hey kids, if you got scammed its on you" and then signs off with safe betting.

      http://steamcommunity.com/grou...

      This isn't on some 3rd party site. This is right on the steam forums, in a Steam Group. You can arguably suggest that its not steams problem to stop 3rd parties from betting... but this stuff is right on Steam. They probably do need to take some ownership of the issue if they are letting it make itself that comfortable right on steam itself.

    2. Re: WHy dont we sue ice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But skins and hats literally do nothing in game.
      If people want to buy them from you what is the problem? They are handed out randomly or you can buy more random skin keys. You aren't gambling because you will always get something and they are all equal value. Zero.

    3. Re:WHy dont we sue ice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it more like suing the NHL because people gamble on hockey?

    4. Re:WHy dont we sue ice by timrod · · Score: 1

      It's not just accusations of rigging, it's outright proof. In late 2014/early 2015, there was a site called Sweetstakes (which is still up) that was meant for TF2 gambling. The way it worked is that people put their items into a "pool", with higher valued items giving people a higher chance to win. The problem was that there was one guy with tens of thousands of dollars in items and a bunch of stooges who would hand this guy their items so that he had a higher chance of winning (on the promise that he'd pay them back later, which he never did).

      The scammer would find people gambling high-value items and then use his massive stockpile to essentially guarantee himself a win - giving himself and the site owners a huge amount of profit. The site owners KNEW what this guy was doing and did absolutely nothing to stop it because they get a 5% cut of each pool regardless of who wins. There were also allegations that they had rigged the system to ensure the scammer kept winning (and thus kept getting them more money).

      It was only after a couple of trading sites found out about (and subsequently banned) the scammer after his stooges complained about not getting their cut that the Sweetstakes site admins did anything about it.

      I'm sure Valve knew about Sweetstakes and about the scandal - but they were content to let it go and keep taking their cut from people making in-game purchases to fund their gambling habits.

    5. Re: WHy dont we sue ice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No because this is obviously the most important matter in the US Government's eyes... Stupid Democrats.

  2. Man with Gambling Addiction tries to Recoup Losses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    News at 11.

  3. Re:Man with Gambling Addiction tries to Recoup Los by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 0

    News at 11.

    No kidding! LOL

    --
    You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
  4. SELL SELL SELL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SELL SELL SELL

  5. Please protect us from ourselves, Big Brother! by Enigma2175 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Once again someone is petitioning the government to protect them from themselves. Listen, dumbass. You're the one who made the bets, if you won I doubt you would be filing a suit. But since you're a loser, and will always be a loser, I guess it's time for you to ask the nanny state to go after that evil company that hosted a game where your in-game experience mirrored your real life - you being really overconfident but lacking any skills to back up your hubris.

    --

    Enigma

    1. Re:Please protect us from ourselves, Big Brother! by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Well, it depends...

      Were the sites operated in compliance with gambling laws? Were there audits to ensure that the system wasn't rigged unfairly (apart from the inherent and well-known house advantage)? Were all transactions accounted for and recorded properly?

      There are a lot of regulations that make gambling a mostly-fair enterprise. Yes, you're still likely to lose, but it's entertaining to play and sometimes win. It's not entertaining to play and never have a chance of winning, and that would put the site in the "scam" category.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    2. Re:Please protect us from ourselves, Big Brother! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure it depends. Were the sites' servers located under American jurisdiction?

    3. Re:Please protect us from ourselves, Big Brother! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop making excuses. You gamble, you're guaranteed to lose it all eventually.

    4. Re:Please protect us from ourselves, Big Brother! by Calydor · · Score: 1

      and OPSkins, which runs a market where virtual goods are traded and can be redeemed for cash.

      If this works like a kind of off-site market board or auction house from an MMO, I assume sites like eBay also make sure to comply with gambling laws?

      There is a point at which you really have to tell people to take a hint of personal responsibility.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    5. Re:Please protect us from ourselves, Big Brother! by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      The funny bit is claiming Valve supported the gambling sites with money. It's a ridiculous assertion he has no evidence for and that didn't happen.

    6. Re:Please protect us from ourselves, Big Brother! by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      The USA claims jurisdiction if I sell drugs to a US citizen, even though it is legally allowed here. There is no reason why the Dutch judiciary could not claim jurisdiction over Valve in this matter. Especially since they sell the game to Dutch citizens knowingly, tying into a paying system that is tied to Dutch banks (IDEAL).

      Funny enough, I had a very similar conversation last year with a friend of mine who is a lawyer and he was wondering why Valve got away with selling a game that includes gambling as a basic part of the game after my kid bought a skin for 30 euro. I agreed - I don't know why they weren't sued before now.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    7. Re:Please protect us from ourselves, Big Brother! by St.Creed · · Score: 2

      Valve runs a game where you buy keys to boxes for 5 dollar or more. The box can give you a skin that is worth up to a 1000 dollar in cash. And the sites where you can convert it into cash are supported by Valve.

      This is nothing like eBay or an auction house. The point is that I have to buy tickets in order to have a chance at a nice payout. It's a lottery, and Valve made the very serious error of supporting sites that convert in-game items into real cash. Suddenly, we're talking tax evasion, running a lottery without a permit, and selling lottery tickets to minors. I dunno about where you live, but in my jurisdiction these are highly problematic behaviours for a company to display if they want to keep doing business.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    8. Re:Please protect us from ourselves, Big Brother! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

    9. Re:Please protect us from ourselves, Big Brother! by Kvathe · · Score: 1

      What gives you the idea that Valve supports these sites?

    10. Re:Please protect us from ourselves, Big Brother! by Kvathe · · Score: 1

      Gambling is not a basic part of the game, it's done entirely through third-party websites. And if your kid is buying CS:GO skins then you're part of the same group of parents that complain when their children spend $1000 on farmville; it's your own fault for giving them credit card info.

    11. Re:Please protect us from ourselves, Big Brother! by Kvathe · · Score: 1

      What gives you the idea that Valve supports these sites?

      My bad, I didn't realize that the article had made this claim. They don't provide any evidence for this though, and I've been unable to find any myself. The closest thing I could find is this quote from the original polygon article, which says that:

      The lawsuit filed on behalf of Connecticut resident Michael John McLeod alleges that Valve and third-party sites (CSGO Diamonds, CSGO Lounge and OPSkins) "knowingly allowed, supported, and/or sponsored illegal gambling by allowing millions of Americans to link their individual Steam accounts to third- party websites."

      This is really what it all comes down to, and he's basically complaining that Valve allows them to use their API to let users login to their steam account on a third-party site. This is less "Valve supporting them" and more "Valve not stopping them."

    12. Re:Please protect us from ourselves, Big Brother! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering he's talking about "Dutch" and "IDEAL", the kid likely has a "child" bank account which can't go into the red.
      No archaic things like credit cards are involved.

      And gambling is a pat of the game. What do you think crate drops, that when opened with a bought key give a random weapon, are?

    13. Re:Please protect us from ourselves, Big Brother! by mindwhip · · Score: 1

      Wait. didn't this guy just officially tell the courts he was breaking the law gambling illegally? Why isn't he in jail already?

      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
    14. Re: Please protect us from ourselves, Big Brother! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you aren't the solution, you are apart of the problem.

      I think Hitler mad that saying famous. I could be wrong. IANAL. Chuckles. :P

    15. Re: Please protect us from ourselves, Big Brother! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately no he didn't claim to be gambling by the legal definition.
      Fortunately he also hasn't accused valve of gambling by the legal definition either.

      In law "gambling" only occurs when the house takes a cut.
      Valve hasn't even facilitated gambling, let alone taken a house cut.
      (I can't speak on behalf of any 3rd party site)

      Valve giving api access to these 3rd party sites and ONLY these 3rd party sites may count as facilitating, but since I too can get access to that api just like you and everyone else can, that claim is false too.

      And even if the house does take a cut and the action is called gambling, there are regulations one can follow to be legally gambling, which obviously isn't a crime.

      If you came over to my house to play poker, and we all buy in a fixed amount of chips (myself too, as the game host) then none of us are gambling by the legal definition.
      If I as the host always took a fixed cut to buy in, or a cut of the winnings, then we are gambling according to law, and only then does the question of legal/illegal gambling come into play.

    16. Re: Please protect us from ourselves, Big Brother! by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Not a single post in this thread actually addresses the parent's point...

    17. Re: Please protect us from ourselves, Big Brother! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      News to me. I've asked valve and they refused to cash out my steam balance.

    18. Re:Please protect us from ourselves, Big Brother! by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      Gambling is not a basic part of the game, it's done entirely through third-party websites.

      Gambling is a basic part of the game: you need to buy keys and they open a box with random contents. If I open a box with a Dragon Lore AWP skin, I may be able to sell it on the community market for $800 dollar, which after paying a commission to Valve is deposited straight in my Steam account by Valve, which I can then turn into $800 dollars in my paypal account by visiting a site they support. It's gambling for real money and they know they're dealing with kids doing the gambling.

      And if your kid is buying CS:GO skins then you're part of the same group of parents that complain when their children spend $1000 on farmville; it's your own fault for giving them credit card info.

      I don't complain about this happening without my knowledge: he is free to buy skins out of his own pocket money - I deposit his pocket money in his steam account (within reason) and he had to save for months to save up this much. I'd much prefer him to find out how worthless pixels are now, rather than when he is 30. I don't start a lawsuit and I haven't even complained about the gambling to Valve because my kid doesn't do it. It's not *my* problem. But if we can agree that marketing a game to kids and then including paid gambling in it *could* be an issue somewhere, then yes, Valve has that issue.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    19. Re:Please protect us from ourselves, Big Brother! by don+depresor · · Score: 1

      Gambling is a basic part of the game: you need to buy keys and they open a box with random contents. If I open a box with a Dragon Lore AWP skin, I may be able to sell it on the community market for $800 dollar, which after paying a commission to Valve is deposited straight in my Steam account by Valve, which I can then turn into $800 dollars in my paypal account by visiting a site they support. It's gambling for real money and they know they're dealing with kids doing the gambling.

      I think you're mistaking the meaning of "basic".

      You can absolutely play CSGO for years, try all of it's game modes and NEVER have to use a damn skin or open a box. In fact lots of people do.

      Just because a minority of players decide to waste ridiculous amounts of time and money in a side aspect of the game doesn't make that aspect "basic" at all.

      Also, please explain to me how are pokemon and many other card games not forbidden to kids, since to you they fill the definition of gambling.

      P.S.: 99% of dragon lores don't come from boxes, they drop randomly for operation players without need to buy any keys, get your damn facts straight.

  6. This is an easy one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just arrest the man who confessed to illegal gambling. This may have been his worst gamble yet.

    1. Re:This is an easy one. by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      Not arrest, but the suit should not succeed on it's merits.

  7. CSGO hit its peak and is on its way out by Woldscum · · Score: 3, Informative

    The 3 top Twitch streamers have quit streaming the game. Twitch has 3 to 4 Esport companies CSGO tournaments a week. Twitch also has its own weekly CSGO turny which the finalist play on TBS every weekend. CSGO is over exposed and will die soon just like Starcraft before it. If you have skins sell out now at the top of the market. No more skin gambling and it is all over.

    http://www.e-league.com/news/2...

    1. Re:CSGO hit its peak and is on its way out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CSGO hit its peak and is on its way out

      Want to feel old? The phrase "Counterstrike hit its peak and is on its way out" has been around longer than Windows XP

    2. Re:CSGO hit its peak and is on its way out by Woldscum · · Score: 1

      You mean 1.6 or Source. CSGO really only blew up to what it is now after skin betting.

      https://csgolounge.com/

    3. Re:CSGO hit its peak and is on its way out by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      I've heard that in CS 1.6. And in CS:S. True both times, for that specific version :) And now I'll return to a casual round of CS:GO. With the rest of the millions of players.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    4. Re:CSGO hit its peak and is on its way out by Kvathe · · Score: 1

      I play a lot of CS:GO, and somewhat follow the esports scene. In my experience, the competitive community is largely separate from the Twitch community. Every time I've gone to Twitch to check for interesting CS:GO streams, the top streams were all gambling and or Russian. Twitch recently added a rule that streaming gambling for more than 30 minutes will result in a ban for non-gaming content; that's probably why the 3 top streamers have left. It has nothing to do with actual Counterstrike. Additionally, I've never even heard of the Twitch tournaments; as far as I'm aware players are mostly just concerned with the Majors, large tournaments sponsored by Valve that occur 3 times a year.

      Regarding the article: I've never gambled, with CS:GO skins or otherwise, and I fail to see the attraction. However, it is undoubtedly a large part of csgo, and you see the effects of it all over. Many pro teams are sponsored by gambling or betting websites, and top players carry skins that are renamed with site URLs. Through the steam market and steam trading, Valve has provided TF2 and CS:GO players with a huge amount of freedom over their virtual items. Given the ability to do what they want, this is just one of those things that people are going to do. It's unfortunate, but I value the freedom that we have and I'd rather not see Valve go the way of Twitch and Riot, who micromanage their communities and closely regulate what players can do with their own virtual items. The worst thing that could happen is that Valve forms a community management team full of a bunch of idealistic boneheads who go around banning everything they don't like.

      TL;DR: CS:GO is not dead; Twitch is dead; gambling sucks but Valve has always been hands-off with the community and forcing them to control the community will result in a worse steam experience for everyone.

    5. Re:CSGO hit its peak and is on its way out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just curious, who do you consider to be the top 3?

    6. Re: CSGO hit its peak and is on its way out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't something to think about dummy. There is a list.

    7. Re:CSGO hit its peak and is on its way out by Woldscum · · Score: 1

      By viewers Summit, TimTheTatMan and JoshOG. Phantomlord really only gambles and does giveaways. https://twitter.com/PhantomL0r...

    8. Re:CSGO hit its peak and is on its way out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CS hit its peak at 1.2 or 1.3 and has been on the way out for a while.

      I miss the beta days of escape and escort maps.

    9. Re: CSGO hit its peak and is on its way out by untoreh+ · · Score: 1

      Starcraft overexposed? When did that happen? Twitch was not even a thing when sc2 wol came out and all the streaming services back then were shitty quality or pay locked. When twitch was gaining traction mobas were already at the top. Heart of the swarm was probably the top exposure, but had the worst meta. Legacy of the void seems to have died out pretty fast despite the good improvements.

    10. Re: CSGO hit its peak and is on its way out by Woldscum · · Score: 1

      Starcraft overexposed? When did that happen?

      About 2 years ago. Tournaments EVERY weekend with the SAME players playing each other. Week after week after week after week. The big Esports groups just milk the hell out of the hottest game and run sport into the ground. Until everyone is sick of the game. This is happening right now with CSGO. ESEA, FACEIT, ESL, ECS, E League and more than that. The same 10 or so teams playing each other OVER and OVER and OVER and OVER 5 to 6 days a week.

  8. Yes, it's gambling. Just like fantasy sports. by ffkom · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And just like trading derivatives on a financial exchange. Whether it's deemed illegal totally depends on the size of their respective lobby.

    1. Re:Yes, it's gambling. Just like fantasy sports. by Kvathe · · Score: 1

      I'd say it depends more on the size of the players.

      In this case, many of them are kids.

    2. Re:Yes, it's gambling. Just like fantasy sports. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      There's a big difference. If you trade derivatives, you are betting with other people's money.

  9. This lawsuit makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been following CS:GO pretty closely for a few years and as far as I know, Valve has never mentioned or condoned gambling, or ever mentioned any gambling site in any way. This is like suing a car company because they sold you a car that you later lost betting pink slips in a street race.

    That being said, Valve obviously benefits hugely from their skin market, and a huge part of that is due to gambling. Valve's stance with CS:GO has been to remain quiet on a lot of issues and let the community essentially run itself, which may or may not be the best move in some instances. There's CS:GO streamers now that get paid big money just to simply bet on a gambling site while they stream, using skins they are given by the site. There's tons of money in it now. Valve obviously doesn't provide any actual platforms for actual gambling, just the currency, but I do think they need to be more vocal about things going on within their scene, especially gambling.

  10. The real crime is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how Valve are bringing in hundreds of millions of Dollars (yes, really) a year on CS:GO, but won't spend jack shit on developers to fix the poor technical quality and rampant cheating in the game.

    They are even so cheap they won't spend enough money on finding cheaters that they out-source it, at no expense, to the players themselves in a program called "Overwatch", where the players are responsible for finding and reporting the cheaters. Do you hate cheaters? Then you have to put in the time and effort weeding them out, because Valve won't spend money on doing it themselves.

    1. Re: The real crime is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I heard was wahhhh I am a whiney little bitch

    2. Re:The real crime is by Kvathe · · Score: 1

      This is wrong. Valve's VAC system isn't perfect, but it's disingenuous to say that they rely on the Overwatch system to police cheaters. Yesterday over 2000 people were banned by VAC, whereas Overwatch contributed less than 300 bans. source.

    3. Re:The real crime is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This... Add to that, the fact that Valve started what's called 'Prime Matctchmaking' which is supposed to be a better experience but some people sign up just to troll the matches.

      I've been pretty lucky, spent almost $125 to unbox a $250 knife and from there I gambled my way up to an inventory worth almost $1000. But, I grew tired of all the bullshit in this game. Toxic players and blatant cheaters are plenty and Valve obviously doesn't care. I've decided I'm going to cash out my inventory since I figure in less than 5 years, the game will be filled with nothing but toxic players and cheaters. By then skins will be worth next to nothing since there will be no one left to buy them. The joke is going to be on them, the toxic players and the cheaters will be left holding the bag with their worthless skins.

    4. Re:The real crime is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VAC doesn't ban. VAC is a stupid door-guard that only manages to keep cheaters from joining an online game, and only after they have first been identified by the players. The built-in anti-cheat mechanisms, if there are any at all, are ridiculously weak.

    5. Re: The real crime is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you seem like one of those useless turds who cant even manage something simple as playing a video game, so you have to cheat to get some points. are you good at anything at all?

  11. Um....no. by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    There is a _huge_ difference between real gambling and financial exchanges. Financial exchanges are heavily regulated with a ton of rules to protect investors. It's assumed that the person selling stock is doing so in good faith and they would go to prison if they didn't. Yes, I'm well aware these rules are not well enforced, but that doesn't make them magically go away. A little political will would solve the problems in the financial exchange system.

    As for gambling, it's well known that the "house" has much, much better odds. There is some very basic regulation in place to remove addicts and the mentally ill, but for everyone else it's understood that it's a very, very expensive game. In otherwords, you're comparing an entertainment product to an investment one. Yes, our weak regulatory system sometimes allows the lines to blur. But the solution is to enforce the laws (or make new ones to close loop holes), not throw up your hands and give up.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Um....no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's talking about derivatives, not stocks. Learn to read before replying.

  12. Money Laundering, too by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

    Don't forget all of the $400 items on the Steam CS:GO Marketplace. You know, the ones that normally sell for $0.83, but then suddenly spike momentarily to the maximum of $400 for an item?

    Either there are some incredibly stupid millionaires out there, or, more likely, this is one step in any number of money-laundering schemes.

    Tell me how I am wrong here.

    1. Re:Money Laundering, too by higuita · · Score: 1

      humm... how would that work? i have tons of dirty money, buy a item for $400, then what? sell it for $1 ? even if i sell it for $200, how do i get my money back? steam do not give you real money back... maybe i could buy some games and sell the account? you still have to explain where did that $200 come from, of i sell 2000 accounts, that would be VERY hard to explain.

      Stupid and rich kids and greedy people, i do believe, money laundering i do not see it

      --
      Higuita
    2. Re: Money Laundering, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You buy a skin for $400 and it looks like a legit transaction. They are setting up dummy accounts and selling the skins to themselves to make it look like they are getting paid from a legitimate source. When in reality all they are doing is tranferring money.

    3. Re:Money Laundering, too by Kvathe · · Score: 1

      As Higuita indicated, they sell the $400 item to themselves on another account. Then, they can buy some expensive item or game and resell it on third-party sites like g2a or opskins, where users buy steam items for real money. This can be done with stolen credit cards as well as for money laundering, although Valve has made that a lot more difficult recently with trade restrictions and 2FA.

    4. Re:Money Laundering, too by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      As Higuita indicated, they sell the $400 item to themselves on another account. Then, they can buy some expensive item or game and resell it on third-party sites like g2a or opskins, where users buy steam items for real money. This can be done with stolen credit cards as well as for money laundering, although Valve has made that a lot more difficult recently with trade restrictions and 2FA.

      True enough about the 2-factor authentication. And also the waiting period sometimes imposed before selling a newly acquired item.

  13. Re: Please protect us from ourselves, Big Brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know if this is applicable but valve does take a 10% cut on any item sold through their store to other users. But they don't take a cut from third-party trades.

  14. Dota by phorm · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and to be frank I've been pretty surprised to see where DOTA is going lately. They have an active "betting" system where you can bet on games, which is heavily advertised with casino-esque characters. Yes, betting doesn't directly involve money, but the tradeable items and background mechanics with such *do*.

    I'm surprised nobody at Valve went "erm, are we sure this is legal"

    (or maybe they did and don't give a f***)

    1. Re:Dota by Pubstar · · Score: 2

      You are completely off the mark. There are two betting systems - One you bet on games to earn tokens to level up your Compendium (which gives non-tradeable, not marketable items), or you get charms that you get 3/5 matches right, you get a pretty cheap (read: worthless) skin. Neither of these systems net you anything other than crap to your account.

    2. Re:Dota by phorm · · Score: 1

      IIRC, compendium stuff is tradeable, just not immediately (usually after the season).

  15. Why is gambling illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Serious question for the Americans here:

    Why is gambling illegal?

    It seems so very odd to me as to why this is so...

    1. Re:Why is gambling illegal? by lgw · · Score: 2

      In the early days: because the Bible says it's bad. These days: it's not outright illegal, but it's highly regulated, as it should be given the long history of scamming by gambling houses. Plus, many states want their state lottery to be the only legal betting: no one else gets to milk the gambling addicts.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re: Why is gambling illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not American but in many countries including the US gambling is not illegal, it's just heavily regulated.
      While there can be many reasons the main ones are because gambling is addictive and destroys lifes.

    3. Re:Why is gambling illegal? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 0

      The bible doesn't say anything about gambling at all. Zip. Empty.

      It does restrict the charging of interest on a loan though. It's OT law, and it only applies between believers (Originally Jews, later reinterpreted to include Christians before being abandoned). Charging interest to a nonbeliever is still ok.

    4. Re: Why is gambling illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet alcohol is legal?