Europe's 'Net Neutrality' Rules Fail to Ban BitTorrent Throttling (torrentfreak.com)

Europe has finally agreed on a set of net neutrality rules. According to a report on TorrentFreak, these rules offer improvements for some individual members states, various activist groups and experts. But the current language would also allow ISPs to throttle BitTorrent traffic permanently if that would optimize overall "transmission quality." From the report (edited):"Europe's new net-neutrality rules should ban throttling BitTorrent, but they don't. They leave ISPs a loophole," said Holmes Wilson of Fight for the Future (FFTF), one of the driving forces behind the Save Net Neutrality campaign. "ISPs can say they're doing it for 'traffic management' purposes -- even when their networks aren't clogged, because the rules say they can throttle to 'prevent impending network congestion,'" he adds. In addition to file-sharing traffic, the proposed rules also allow Internet providers to interfere with encrypted traffic including VPN connections. Since encrypted traffic can't be classified through deep packet inspection, ISPs may choose to de-prioritize it altogether. In theory, ISPs may choose to throttle any type of traffic they want, as long as they frame it as a network congestion risk. "So if your ISP is lazy, or wants to cut corners and save money, they can throttle BitTorrent, or VPNs, or Bitcoin, or Tor, or any class of traffic they can identify," Wilson says.

Comments

Truth in Advertising

[Tokolosh]

If an (I)SP prioritizes traffic by type, blocks ports, performs DPI or otherwise fools with bits, then they are not providing an internet service. They should be prosecuted under truth in advertising laws and be forced to call themselves AOL or Compuserve.

Politicians and bureaucrats cannot count these "service providers" when assessing internet availibility and competition.

Re:They rules are doing what they "should", ruling

[SuperKendall]

The point there is not how well off I may be, but how in general there's a class of people making these rules that are immune from the effects so they literally do not have to care about how everyone else suffers.

I also say that to explain that I have some distance from the outcome, so that I can be more truly neutral about it than others would be.

If I came off as an asshole it's because I am extremely pissed off at much of the technical world making everything worse while pretending to make things better. Sometimes being an asshole is needed to shock people into waking up.