Slashdot Mirror


Google Is Adding a VR Shell To Chrome To Let You Browse the Entire Web In VR (roadtovr.com)

An anonymous reader writes: While it's possible to create and view specially built virtual reality 'WebVR' websites through today's browsers, traversing the web in VR means taking your VR headset on and off as you come across VR websites and non-VR websites. Google is working to fix this by adding a 'VR Shell' to the Chrome browser that will render non-VR websites in a virtual environment, and allow seamless transitioning from them to WebVR sites. Recent developer builds of Chrome on Android reveal both the WebVR API and VR Shell directly integrated into the browser. The company is also working on adding support for headsets like the Oculus Rift and HTC Vive on desktop.

59 comments

  1. Ah by fubarrr · · Score: 0

    Sergei found out bout a VR pr0n?

  2. visual browsing? by VolciMaster · · Score: 1

    Sounds like Disclosure or Jurassic Park Who wants to browse the web visually?

    1. Re:visual browsing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm quite sure a 2D image counts as visual.

    2. Re:visual browsing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We demand a sound-based web!

    3. Re:visual browsing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smell, baby. We want to smell it.

    4. Re:visual browsing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People with eyes, I'd imagine?

      Another fucking stupid comment Myers, maybe you should go back to what you do best. Nothing.

    5. Re:visual browsing? by JDeane · · Score: 1

      Smell, baby. We want to smell it.

      That would kick up Brazilian fart porn a notch... lol

    6. Re:visual browsing? by butchersong · · Score: 1

      Well, I think everyone wants to browse their OS and the web visually. The problem is it has never worked in the past. I would love to see this work this time but given the fact that most people can't stand to be in a VR headset for more than 30 minutes at a time, I have my doubts.. at least until an something to magic leap actually makes it into the market. Still, I can't help myself. I love this kind of thing and will definitely try it out.

    7. Re:visual browsing? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Who wants to browse the web visually?

      Uh... how do you do it?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    8. Re:visual browsing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stephen Hawking reads pages out to me.

    9. Re:visual browsing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will you do searches using a virtual Google? Will it do virtual tracking of your browser history?

      Sounds like Disclosure or Jurassic Park

      or does this mean we'll be chased by hungry dinosaurs?

    10. Re: visual browsing? by WarJolt · · Score: 1

      That's a thing?

    11. Re: visual browsing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a thing. And I assume a reference to this southpark bit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VnrIjzesTAk

    12. Re:visual browsing? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      We demand a sound-based web!

      I want my web experience to be rendered in Morse Code.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    13. Re:visual browsing? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Wait, on second thought I'll just call the sysop and have him tell me what's on the screen.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    14. Re:visual browsing? by Zalbik · · Score: 1

      Sounds like Disclosure or Jurassic Park Who wants to browse the web visually?

      No kidding. I browse the web nasally.

      It stinks.

    15. Re: visual browsing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watching stereoscopic 3D youtube videos is really cool if you have a 3D monitor (aka nVidia's 3Dvision). Unfortunately there aren't any laptops with this feature, so the next best thing is a smartphone.

      Samsung have their own browser within ghettos Oculus Rift menu system. That allows for watching 360 degree videos as well as regular ones. Though some we pages take ages to load.

    16. Re: visual browsing? by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Brazilians are all about the bass, not much treble.
        Not only is their female ideal bigger in the butt & smaller in the chest that typical NorthAm beauty standards but I've heard it's the place where you're most likely to have anal sex *on the 1st date* and their idea of lesbian porn ( well, for hetero male audience ) isn't much more than 2 or more women performing analingus on each other for 1/2 an hour

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    17. Re: visual browsing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rule 34.

    18. Re:visual browsing? by istartedi · · Score: 2

      We demand a sound-based web!

      I had that back in the 90s. It sounded like "EEE,EEE,EEE,EEE,EEE,SSHSHSSHSHSHSHSHSHSHSHS, be-BONG, be-BONG, RRRRRR, RRRRRR." Then silence.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  3. Again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ahhh! It's VRML all over again!

    1. Re:Again? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      /thread. Also, I feel old now.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  4. Mostly a bad idea by Iamthecheese · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most information on the internet is best presented as text. Some is best as audio, and some as video. It's delightful that the latter two (and now VR format) are available. But the medium should be chosen by the type of information, not because it's new and shiny.

    I've ranted before about Youtubers posting videos for every kind of thing they may want to communicate. A video of a static image. A video of a slide show. A video of a graph. A video of a man reading a paragraph of text. Only in that last format is it even possible for the video format to add value. And I've seen game reviews where the person is just reading his review text with completely unrelated and detached gameplay in the background. They don't do it because video is the ideal way to absorb the information. They do it because they can get ad revenue.

    Now I don't have anything against VR as a medium. I love it! But converting static text to video format is as useless as converting video to VR format. If it doesn't need 3-D visualization, you're wasting bandwidth and making it harder to take in the presented information.

    It's very simple. If you have formatted text with topics, text, and bullet points use a text medium. If you want to include links to related pages, use hyperlink medium. If you need to present things that should be heard (either for ease of understanding or because text doesn't easily translate to the sound) use audio. If you need to show visual information that doesn't change dynamically, use a picture. I don't think I need to go on. If and only if 3D pictures or video is ideal, use VR. Otherwise you're just getting in the way.

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    1. Re:Mostly a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is Google, so I'm sure their solution is as braindead and shortsighted as can possibly be, but the real problem does exist. If you are in VR, and you are trying to browse a non-VR website, you will need some sort of wrapper or "shell" to make it seem natural. This is about making it more useful than a floating 2d rendering of a computer screen when viewing non-vr enabled sites.

    2. Re: Mostly a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're missing the point. The idea is not to browse text in VR (though that is possible if you really want to), but to facilitate getting from one VR website to the next.

    3. Re:Mostly a bad idea by ortholattice · · Score: 2

      A video of a slide show.

      Of all the pointless YouTube uses mentioned, this is the one I hate the most. There is nothing that is a bigger waste of time, especially if you want to see a few of the pictures but don't care about the rest. What the world needs is a browser add-on that converts YouTube slideshows to a directory of jpegs.

    4. Re:Mostly a bad idea by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      For me, videos are good for tasks involving motion - especially where it's you or part of you that's moving - like using tools or sports/martial arts moves.

      They're worst for showing you how to do something on a computer. You invariably miss a bit, try to go back but go back too far, try to jump forward a bit to save time but jump forward too far, jump back too far again and just run it from there. Of course because you're going through stuff you already did your attention wanders and then you miss it again and you try to go back a bit but you go too far...

      It ends up taking three times the length of the video, which is twenty times as long as it would reading screenshots or even a decent textual explanation.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  5. Oooh- lookie! by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    I'm surfing the web on a computer in VR!

    I'm surfing the web... in a movie theater!!

    I'm surfing the web while white water rafting! Whoa! Look out for that log while I'm composing this message! Heh heh! :rollseyes:

  6. Is today 4/1? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2

    Really? Is it April Fools Day?

    Do not want VRML or whatever this new 3d crap is. Do not want auto-video. Want per-tab audio on/off controls. In general, don't follow Firefox's path to Bloatville and we'll still respect you in a few years.

    1. Re:Is today 4/1? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Do not want VRML or whatever this new 3d crap is. Do not want auto-video.

      Come now, Citizen, do not deny that Teh Great Google knows what's best for you.

      You will consume media as they wish it to be done, and you shall enjoy it. Do not be disharmonious with their Advertising, lest ye be cast into the Pit Of Internet Explorer, where ye will writhe in the Flames of HTML 1.0 forever and ever!

      Teh Great Google has spoken!

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    2. Re:Is today 4/1? by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      I doubt it's going to be mandatory that you wear a VR headset to use Chrome so I don't see why you care that it supports it. Basically other people should have what you don't want?

    3. Re: Is today 4/1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Per-audio tab muting has been here for a while, try and keep up.

  7. Anybody remember VRML? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We did this once. It didn't work. Had some neat ideas but way ahead of it's time. Maybe the "bookmarks as a mall" idea will return.

    1. Re: Anybody remember VRML? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with VRML was that it couldn't keep up with the changes in PC graphics hardware, and you had to throw *everything* into the VRML world file. Someone who had a fast 486/586/Pentium with a SVGA card could run a world at a decent speed. Someone with a clunker of a 386 with software rendering just got 1 frame/second.

  8. VRML? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Didn't people want to do this in the 90s?

    1. Re:VRML? by Adriax · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but brick and bag style cell phones were horrible for vr headsets. And strapping a 30lb CRT to your head was put of the question.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
  9. What? by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 1

    Just use VirtualDesktop or BigScreen Beta?

    Your entire desktop is in VR, then.

    --
    You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
  10. Well duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's a UNIX system.

    1. Re:Well duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how do you know this?

  11. Young dipshits in Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doomed to waste copious amounts of investor cash repeating the same stupid ideas every 20 years.

    Also aging alzheimeric venture capitalists. Doomed to keep funding the aforementioned young dipshits.

    I'll be happy when California floods.

  12. Something like this? by Phishcast · · Score: 2
  13. snowcrash? by Crispy+Critters · · Score: 2
    Snowcrash here we come. We are my sword and motorcycle?

    (I like the idea of moderating /. with a katana.)

  14. It's 1996 all over again by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Will it support VRML?

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  15. Time for another sequel by drew.kroft2490 · · Score: 1

    Lawnmower Man 3

  16. VRML all over again by HumanWiki · · Score: 1

    Hopefully this time the rendering will be better due to more modern tech. The VRML sites I messed with back in the 90s were awful and took forever to load due to the size of the data.

    1. Re: VRML all over again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VRML files were entirely text based and needed to be parsed. Not that every viewer supported the entire specification either. You would be lucky if your PC supported a particular game controller, never mind the Web browser or the VRML plugin.

  17. Jesus Wept! by brianerst · · Score: 1

    Did they hire Elroy Patashnik?

  18. Glad you included the last paragraph by raymorris · · Score: 1

    That last paragraph is key.

    Sure, don't post pictures of text* and videos of pictures. On the other hand, just as a picture can be worth a thousand words, a 3D model can be worth a thousand pictures - in some circumstances.

    * Come to think of it, "pictures of text" also have their uses, such as database diagrams, flowcharts, etc.

  19. Did they just say "seamless"?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bingo!

    As in, it seamless trouble at the time, so we decided to greenlight it, and bring this product forward, said the pointy-headed man.

  20. I'm fine with it by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    I'm fine with it as long as there's a way to turn it off. Or am I being to optimistic or naive?

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:I'm fine with it by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      There will be a way to turn it off. Until it's old news. Then, "support for a legacy option used by less than 1% of users, has been removed" will be a single item in a changelog.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  21. I'm not really looking forward to the porno popups.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re: Pop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? That's the best part. I can't wait to see:

      "Small dick? Pop these pills."

      With a huge before and after boner in my face.

      The future can't get here fast enough :P

  22. The most important feature: by bistromath007 · · Score: 1

    Will this interface allow me to grab a website, tear it to shreds, light the shreds on fire, and sweep the ashes into a dustbin? I'd like to start with Slashdot Beta.

  23. VR Browsing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And, later this week, maybe next week, HR people will suddenly begin posting for positions to program for this,
    requiring '3+ years experience' and 'architech-level understanding of the synergy'.....
    HA.
    AAAAHHHH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

  24. I can't wait. by jimbob6 · · Score: 1

    Man Slashdot is going to be so cool in VR. I mean it will be like I'm right there.

  25. Samsung Internet for Gear VR by jaminJay · · Score: 1

    Is this new chrome for Chrome, or are they merging Samsung's additions to their Chromium build for Gear VR?

    --
    Leela: "Is all the work done by children?" Alien: "No, not the whipping."
  26. FRY YOUR BRAIN with Ergonomics of Doom by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 1

    Sit up straight. Get your eyes the proper distance from the screen. That leaning forward slightly is killing your spine.
    Sure your eyes are OK? You might need corrective lenses to do this all day without eyestrain.
    Screen is a little sharper and brighter. Now it's bigger.
    Got that CRT scan line refresh flicker and jitter out. Great!
    Keyboard the proper height? Mouse fite comfortably? (Everyone should try a trackball at leastonce, works better for some)
    Alright, now lets get onto fonts. Choose a good one as default that lets you skim text quickly without strain.
    Choose your default base size based on the acuity of your vision.
    Now you have paragraphs of text laid out and --- despite the dangers of a sedentary lifestyle --- you have hedged your bets as well as can be done.

    If the Internet were a saxophone, it would now be at the precise angle to maintain embouchure and you'd be ready to play.

    Well BLOW ME DOWN! IT'S ALL EXPLODING NOW AND SKIDDING OFF INTO SPAAAAACE! I'm surrounded by words and to achieve the cheesy 3D effects their skidding around and changing perspective. Everything is in distorted orthographic rectangles! More than half the shit is too small to read! Stupid Elements Of Style are so big right now and the content is small! There is lots of empty space (just like real space!) that is wasted to maintain this stupid illusion. Half the time I'm looking up into the 'sky' or having my shin hit my chest. No markup on the web means it all devolves into simple distorted rectangles... it's as pointless as using your computer by standing in the doorway of the room at some ridiculous angle to the screen and squinting just to make out headlines. Turn it off. TURN IT OFF!

    Think I'll just read a book for awhile.

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
  27. Hear that? by ssufficool · · Score: 1

    It's the sound of inevitability. It's coming on/before the year 3000: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...