Slashdot Mirror


Facebook To Shred 'Paper' News-Reading App On July 29th (theverge.com)

An anonymous reader writes from a report via The Verge: Facebook's Paper app for iOS is scheduled to shut down on July 29th. While the app impressed critics, it failed to impress the general public. The Verge reports: "The app transformed the core Facebook experience into a kind of newsreader, with customizable sections for politics, technology, food, and other subjects. When it was introduced in January 2014, Paper signaled the beginning of a design renaissance at Facebook. The look and feel of the app were orchestrated by Mike Matas, whose design firm Push Pop Press was acquired by Facebook in 2011. Paper was notable for the novel animations it used to guide you through the app -- tap on a link and it would unfold like a letter; pull down on the story and it would fold back up, returning you to the feed. But despite the enormous growth of Facebook, which surged to 1.09 billion daily users this year, Paper has not been among the 1,500 most-downloaded apps since December 2014, according to research firm App Annie. It never came to Android, and the iOS version was last updated in March 2015. Facebook says that ideas from Paper have made their way into other Facebook apps, most notably Instant Articles, the fast-loading story format that the company introduced last year. Instant Articles borrowed several design elements from Paper, including full-bleed images and custom designs for individual publishers' articles."

23 comments

  1. Oh Paper! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I forgot that app was still around.

    1. Re: Oh Paper! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny you mention that. I forgot toilet paper was still around. I've been spraying my ass with a garden hose for 3 years now.

  2. That is new to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Facebook relentlessly feed me Instagram ads and crappy games updates from grandma even if I fucking block them all when possible. This news thing would be something I like and yet I first knew about it when they pull the plug. Talk about misguided marketing. Not everyone on Facebook still lives with parents and like Justin Bieber.

    1. Re: That is new to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You too? Every day in the fb Android app I get these giant fucking Instagram ads. They get bigger every day, I swear. I'm not sure how but I finally got the 300 daily game/app requests blocked.

  3. Really? by johnsmithperson123 · · Score: 1

    "Never came to Android" explains a lot.

    1. Re:Really? by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

      It explains more about Android than it does anything much about the success of the app, or lack thereof.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    2. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does it explain about Android, Mr Clever? Or just a meaningless anti-Android jab from yourself?

    3. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While there is a case to say that iOS is more profitable for paid apps, that isn't Facebook's business model. Facebook uses it's services to sell ads, which as a business model works well with Android.

      What this tells me is that this app wasn't liked enough within Facebook to push out an Android version. Nothing more or less than that.

    4. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's bitztream, the autism-hating Slashdot troll!

  4. 1.09 billion? by Nunya666 · · Score: 3, Informative

    1.09 billion daily users? Or registered users?

    Their marketing team probably says "daily users" but reality probably says "registered users." Like a deleted AC post already said, the first I hear about this feature is when they pull the plug. Such lousy marketing is one reason so many "daily users" are becoming merely "registered users."

    1. Re:1.09 billion? by sittingnut · · Score: 2

      since facebook, google, etc are nothing more than ad pushers, and size of ad audience is what matters, its time they allow standard ways to measure their regular daily users that can be independently verified. meanwhile media should stop unquestioningly parroting the worthless garbage numbers(like this "1.09 billion daily users") they spout out.

    2. Re: 1.09 billion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the hundreds of millions fake accounts.

    3. Re:1.09 billion? by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

      Facebook, not the Paper App.

  5. novel animations by tomhath · · Score: 3, Interesting

    novel animations it used to guide you through the app -- tap on a link and it would unfold like a letter; pull down on the story and it would fold back up, returning you to the feed.

    Maybe a little animated paper clip would have made it more successful. Or maybe users just don't want crap like that wasting their time.

    1. Re:novel animations by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the kind of shallow pointless shit that hipsters love.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  6. You should do better yourself... by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    ...meanwhile media should stop unquestioningly parroting the worthless garbage numbers(like this "1.09 billion daily users") they spout out...

    While I [largely] agree with your statement, let me say the following: -

    Perhaps it would be better if you provided some authoritative figure(s) you think Facebook's daily users are. How about that?

    1. Re: You should do better yourself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      34

    2. Re: You should do better yourself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      42!

  7. Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Facebook doesn't shut down on July 29. Fuck, be even better if it had shut down on June 29

  8. Crap, there goes messaging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Paper was my way to avoid installing Messenger.

  9. Its all about the ads by montygreen · · Score: 1

    As one of those 1.09 billion users (not daily, but I do not use the Facebook app), I think the real reason behind the killing of the product was that they clearly could not monetize it. Paper has no ads. All I get are posts from my friends and family that I can easily swipe between. I oftentimes forgot there was a News/Headlines section. It was a brilliant way of reading Facebook without all the adds, in line videos, sidebar crap that populates the website now (and I use adblockers). Oh well, it was fun while it lasted, I suppose. =\

    --
    long time lurker, rare poster
  10. As others have said, it's about the money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Paper is (was) perfectly designed for a handheld, it couldn't be crammed full of ads.
    No ads!
    That's why they're killing it. I doubt anyone can convince me otherwise.