Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Develop Electronic Nose To Sniff Out Pesticides and Nerve Gas (phys.org)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Phys.Org: Researchers from KU Leuven have now built a very sensitive electronic nose with metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). "MOFs are like microscopic sponges," postdoctoral researcher Ivo Stassen explains. "They can absorb quite a lot of gas into their minuscule pores." "We created a MOF that absorbs the phosphonates found in pesticides and nerve gases. This means you can use it to find traces of chemical weapons such as sarin or to identify the residue of pesticides on food. This MOF is the most sensitive gas sensor to date for these dangerous substances. Our measurements were conducted in cooperation with imec, the Leuven-based nanotechnology research centre. The concentrations we're dealing with are extremely low: parts per billion -- a drop of water in an Olympic swimming pool -- and parts per trillion." The chemical sensor can easily be integrated into existing electronic devices, Professor Rob Ameloot adds. "You can apply the MOF as a thin film over the surface of, for instance, an electric circuit. Therefore, it's fairly easy to equip a smartphone with a gas sensor for pesticides and nerve gas." Professor Ameloot continues, "MOFs can measure very low concentrations, so we could use them to screen someone's breath for diseases such as lung cancer and MS in an early stage. Or we could use the signature scent of a product to find out whether food has gone bad or to distinguish imitation wine from the original. This technology, in other words, offers a wide range of perspectives."

23 comments

  1. Fruit pickers by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    one of the things keeping robots from taking over fruit picking is that they can't tell when something's ripe. Won't be long now..

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Fruit pickers by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 2

      When robots will detect ripe fruits, they will be advanced enough to eat them as well, leaving nothing to us!

  2. Peak of ovulation by invictusvoyd · · Score: 4, Funny

    peak of ovulation ?

    1. Re:Peak of ovulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ha, ha, ha, like one needs a meter to find that out.

      Just wait for the chocolate and fashion magazines to come out, that's the tell, no fancy gear needed.

  3. Robots Learn To Be Aloof. by zenlessyank · · Score: 1

    Walk around with their noses in the air.

  4. Once more, necessity breeds innovation. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

    Thanks to this great advancement and careful analysis of the "nerve gas" in a contaminated area, an ashamed Professor Zimmerman is now prohibited from dining at the local Taco Bell. ;)

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  5. great ! by swell · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So . . . When this is part of my next smartphone: Google, the NSA, Amazon, the local police and everyone will know what I had for dinner, how much I had to drink and whether I used any illegal substances each day. Combined with the knowledge of where I've been, who I've been in contact with, what purchases I've made and what web sites I've visited... What could possibly go wrong?

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
    1. Re:great ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CITIZEN! if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear. Phone Scan Complete. Please exit using door number 2. And remember the state cares for and loves you.

    2. Re:great ! by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 1

      Given the kind and quantity of junk food eaten by the average american, having FDA, CDC and EPA snooping from the smartphone into our lunches wouldn't be that bad, after all.

    3. Re:great ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't such phones also provide the ability to smell the proximity of explosives and whether or not you have cancer or your blood sugar is too low?

    4. Re:great ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >... What could possibly go wrong

      You could pick up the wrong phone? (or is that a good thing!)

  6. Lifespan? by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can imagine something like this being effective in the lab and when new, but I wonder how long it takes for its performance to degrade. It presumably relies on very sensitive chemical reactions which assume zero contamination. After a few minutes exposed to street pollution, does it still work? Even if my concerns in this area are well founded, the technology will still be useful, but I am pretty skeptical about it becoming a standard smart phone feature.

    1. Re:Lifespan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on whether it has a recycle phase to burn-off/expel already sensed molecules.

    2. Re:Lifespan? by RingDev · · Score: 1

      Hell, even if I have to buy a new couple $ MOF strip to slide into my phone every couple of months, the potential to have an on-demand, low cost, non-invasive, early stage lung cancer detector is huge!

      My brother in-law, a competitive bicyclist who never smoked and rarely drank died of lung cancer at 33. He wasn't diagnosed until he was Stage 4 as it just seemed like a nasty cold or potentially a fungal infection.

      Getting this technology to be widely available, cheap, and easy would potentially save 150,000+ lives a year just from early lung cancer detection

      -Rick.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  7. Richie Rich's prof. Keenbeam invented it first! by azrael29a · · Score: 1

    Remember Richie Rich (the film)? Prof. Keenbeam invented such a device in it, called Sniffer. They used it to detect bombs, https://www.youtube.com/watch?... It could be very useful in real life to sniff out bombs at the airport.

  8. While olfactory sensors aren't new. . . by Salgak1 · · Score: 2

    . . . . ten years ago, similar capability required roughly 2 cubic meters of equipment, not a thin film on a sensor.

    Only reason I know this, is I was working IT on a program that was developing a sensor unit ~ 2005. . .

  9. No real news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is great for a research paper, but in the end this is nothing new. Researchers have been making electronic noses for years with this level of sensitivity.

    Here's a carbon nanotube one from UC Riverside in 2008: http://newsroom.ucr.edu/1885
    Here's one from 2011 that uses graphene, nanotubes, and carbon nanowires: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6127182&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D6127182

    There are lots of ways to make these unique materials into an electronic nose; that's actually the easy part. The hard part is now go make 1,000,000 sensors per year with at least 80% preferably 95% manufacturing yield where every batch you make is consistent from one to the next; transferring this to industrial production is the hard part and MOFs are really hard to make at scale with consistent properties. Until then, this is just another press release about someone's dissertation and published paper that will sit on a shelf with no change to the world.

  10. Pool by LeadSongDog · · Score: 1

    a drop of water in an Olympic swimming pool

    s/ic/ic\-sized/p Fixed that for ya.

    --
    Oh, I'm sorry sir, I thought you were referring to me, Mr. Wensleydale.
  11. A few years later... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Today we are proud to announce our new project and partnership with CUNTT, the Citizens United Nose Test Trust. We will be delivering a MOF-based solution as an American Flag lapel pin and an accompanying smart phone app to all politicians," said Cam L. Spitts, CEO of MOFIA, the MOF Innovations Alliance.

    "We have gotten much support for this project from the many super PACs. The device, which we have dubbed "The Bernie" after the late Bernie Sanders, will beep if the level of bullshit spewed by a politician exceeds 10000 PPM and noisily if they hurl bullshit at concentrations exceeding 1000000 PPM. We have 110% confidence in the device's ability to detect bullshit based upon our thorough testing."

    "Our super PAC investors are delighted by this new device and app being added to the IoT. Their hope is to ensure the money they spend on these politicians is put to good use. With the device beeping loudly enough to drown out most politicians today, it will ensure they are unable to contribute to the modern media noise machine. We don't expect politicians to change their habits overnight, but eventually we expect their lapels will beep less as they learn to better communicate with their communities in the coming years and ensuring better bang for the super PAC buck", he finished, wiping drool off his cheek.

    When this reporter caught up with Cam after his prepared statements, I asked him about why it was called "The Bernie" when his sponsors didn't like Bernie Sanders. He replied, "It's true our sponsors were no fans of Bernie Sanders, but they knew the public would trust something named Bernie when it came to dealing with super PACs. So the name stuck," said Cam, as he chewed on a mouth full of grass roots.

  12. Down to earth by Bristol_92 · · Score: 1

    In common, electronic noses typically are large and expensive. They are priced out of reach for ordinary person. Devices must be smaller, less expensive and more sensitive.