Slashdot Mirror


Skype Meetings Is Microsoft's New Free Video Conferencing Tool For Small Businesses

Microsoft is launching a free tool to make it easier for people to make video conference calls. The company on Tuesday released Skype Meetings, which is largely similar to using the traditional Skype app, but comes with features that make it easier to set up video calls and collaborate with colleagues. TechCrunch reports:The more fully featured Skype for Business product allows you to host meetings with up to 250 people and it's deeply integrated into Outlook, Word and PowerPoint. Skype Meetings, on the other hand, only allows for PowerPoint collaboration (screen sharing, laser pointer, etc.) and screen sharing. Video calls are also limited to a maximum of 10 people during the first two months. After that, the maximum number of participants drops to three people. Participants can join Skype Meetings from virtually any device with the help of a personalized URL and the calls are powered by the same technology as Skype for Business calls. That means you will get to take advantage of Skype's head tracking feature, for example, which ensures that a face will always be in the center of the screen, no matter where it is in the actual video image.

56 comments

  1. Re:What's a "free" ? by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    the number before for?

  2. I can see where this will go... by surfdaddy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Put it out free and lean, get a lot of users, then crap it up and start charging a subscription fee for it....

    1. Re:I can see where this will go... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      I can see where this will go...

      uh...

      Put it out free and lean, get a lot of users

      They already did that. It was called skype...

      then crap it up

      and then microsoft purchased it.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re:I can see where this will go... by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      It was called Lync. Which Microsoft canned, so that they can push this shit onto people.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:I can see where this will go... by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      Put it out free and lean, get a lot of users, then crap it up and start charging a subscription fee for it....

      In clippy^W Cortana mode:

      It looks like you are trying to make a video conference call. Shall I apply your credit card ending in 1234 to cover all charges?

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    4. Re:I can see where this will go... by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      What they call "Skype for Business" now is basically Lync. Same program, same protocols, they just rebranded it to capitalise on the brand recognition.

    5. Re:I can see where this will go... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Ha no!

      I used Lync, and it was shit. Basically they bought Skype because Lync sucked. But they decided to make Skype suck too because Microsoft.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    6. Re:I can see where this will go... by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      and then microsoft purchased it.

      I think GP was comparing it to the SharePoint strategy - give it away for free, but if you want to use it for reals, it'll cost you for the Enterprise licensing, then the SQL Server and OS licenses (because you ain't gonna run this shiz on a Linux box with Postgres, that's why!). Eventually only HR bothers using it, but since they're entrenched in any given corporation, you're stuck with the cost (and an FTE SharePoint developer) forever...

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    7. Re: I can see where this will go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let the idiots keep using MS and Google products. It's a self-regulating process.

    8. Re:I can see where this will go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny... lol... still lol... Skype is crap!, Lync was crap! None of MSFT collaboration stuff works well. You are 100% right... MSFT buys it and then makes it suck ass!!

    9. Re:I can see where this will go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Skype for Business is essentially Lync 2013 "R2". The product is bigger than just the client you see, which is also the same client and actually had the ability to use EITHER UI. The same people that built Lync built Skype for Business...the Skype team only really worked on the UI.

    10. Re: I can see where this will go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hate to break it to you, Skype sucked long before the buyout, marrying it was the best video calling software at some point in its history, but it was years before they got bought by Microsoft.

      There buyout just confirmed it would never improve.

    11. Re:I can see where this will go... by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      You have no idea of the value of insider content. So run skype passing through M$ servers on Windows anal probe 10 and M$ can sit in on and anal eyes (heh heh) everything you say or every document you share at every business meeting you have. The bigger your company, the greater the value of you information to M$ and their inside investors. The subscription fee will well and truly be paid in stolen commercial and industrial secrets and hugely advantaged insider share transactions.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  3. Re:What's a "free" ? by tripleevenfall · · Score: 4, Funny

    The grammar used in the summary works about as well as Skype.

  4. Seems useful by tripleevenfall · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Video calls are also limited to a maximum of 10 people during the first two months. After that, the maximum number of participants drops to three people."

    Well, what business won't be lining up around the block to use such a helpful product? ::eyeroll::

    1. Re:Seems useful by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 2

      My last lot used Zoom.us

      Upside : free, works on all three big desktop OSs and both big phone OSs (I think Windows Phone too..), 50 participants in the free plan, up to 40 minute meetings in the free plan (TBH - this is a feature! Who wants to webconf for more than 40 minutes....)

      Downside : not all the features work on Linux.

      You'd have to be nuts not to be thinking about using a WebRTC client though.

    2. Re:Seems useful by nadaou · · Score: 1

      http://meet.jit.si/ for the WebRTC win!

      --
      ~.~
      I'm a peripheral visionary.
  5. I wonder what features it has? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    If the main feature it has is "not being a pile of shit" then I'm all over it! Seriously, Skype seems to be sucking more and more by the day. I also mostly stopped spending money on it when it could no longer do voice calls over 3G. I think that was when they introduced the HD codec, which is all fine and dandy but it would be nice if it reverted to standard quality rather than giving me occasional snippets of HD audio with long gaps in between.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
    1. Re:I wonder what features it has? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In typical MS fashion it sucks on purpose.

      This is from the company that brought you artificial"memory limits" in the various versions of its OS.

      Fuck M$. Whoever is running the company now is certainly returning it to the glory days of yore at a hell of a pace.

  6. OS Support? by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 2

    I feel silly for asking this because I assume the answer is none, but does it support any OSes other than Windows? The 'deeply integrated' comments pretty much assure it doesn't, but I need to ask. I do recall when Skype was a useful tool worth paying for regardless of OS used but those days are long gone. SIGH.

    1. Re:OS Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      probably not

    2. Re:OS Support? by The-Ixian · · Score: 4, Informative

      The "deeply integrated" comment is a little misleading.

      Skype (all versions) is a stand alone product that does not require any other office product to function.

      No, you do not *need* Outlook to run Skype (even the business version) or vice versa. Yes, they all query each other's APIs for status and stuff. But even the Outlook "integration" is nothing more than a standard plug-in (not integrated into the Outlook app itself).

      As for cross platform. If you have an O365 subscription, almost all of their desktop apps (and Skype for sure) have web-based versions.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    3. Re:OS Support? by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Works on OSX: https://www.skype.com/en/downl...

      Now how *well* it works? Well...

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    4. Re:OS Support? by mcl630 · · Score: 1

      Windows, OS X, Linux (I think, but couldn't find out definitively), Android, iOS, and Windows Phone.

    5. Re:OS Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "deeply integrated" comment is a little misleading.

      Skype (all versions) is a stand alone product that does not require any other office product to function.

      No, you do not *need* Outlook to run Skype (even the business version) or vice versa. Yes, they all query each other's APIs for status and stuff. But even the Outlook "integration" is nothing more than a standard plug-in (not integrated into the Outlook app itself).

      As for cross platform. If you have an O365 subscription, almost all of their desktop apps (and Skype for sure) have web-based versions.

      the web based version of skype is severely limited, though better than the Linux version in many aspects.
      It's by no means a good version for anything more than casual home use and even at that, it only makes it possible to use skype on a chromebook.
      Hangouts is much more cross platform capable.

    6. Re:OS Support? by theurge14 · · Score: 1

      The currently supported Mac version is the antiquated Lync 2011.

      The Skype for Business for Mac is supposed to come out 3Q 2016.

      Anyone can join the preview program here: https://www.skypepreview.com/

  7. 3 users... sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We use google hangout, for which I had to get a google+ accout (I know, it was terrible) but we are constantly breaking the 10 user limit and having to stream to everyone else on youtube live, still haven't found a better low cost solution. And to every smart Alec that thinks they know better, I have tried even writting my own web RTC io software, so I know I am pretty much bang on here.

    1. Re: 3 users... sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy a low end O365 subscription which will give you Skype for Business meetings up to 250 participants. The only user that needs a license is the organizer. There are no usage limits or meters. It's a pretty good deal all things considered, esp when comparing to WebEx or the shit show that is Hangouts.

  8. In other words by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Video calls are also limited to a maximum of 10 people during the first two months. After that, the maximum number of participants drops to three people.

    They probably should've named it "Skype: Starter Edition".

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re: In other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good one. Or Skype RT.

    2. Re:In other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Choker edition seems to be a more appropriate description.

  9. Microsoft hasn't changed at all by H3lldr0p · · Score: 1

    They bought a company, not for it's technology, but for it's brand and then decided to run that brand into the ground. It's the same pattern they've had for years.

    Nothing new to see here, just history repeating itself.

  10. Linux support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    waaaahhhhh!

    1. Re:Linux support? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Heh. Yeah I'd love to see someone successfully get one of the PHBs that use these sorts of tools to do so on a Linux machine.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  11. Perhaps they should have called it Bruce by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

    Just to keep it clear.

    Another option would have been to call it LyncPersonal... again... to keep things clear and differentiated...

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  12. Its more believable.. by ADRA · · Score: 1

    when the OP doesn't read like a commercial.

    --
    Bye!
  13. Re:What's a "free" ? by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

    So if we pay Slashdot, we get better (yet not perfectly usable) grammar?

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  14. Re:What's a "free" ? by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

    If we pay Slashdot we'll get many more types of grammar that we'll rarely use, but no improvement to that which we are using.

  15. Not what Skype needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess what, there are already plenty of tools that help businesses do this.

    You know how Skype can help businesses? Bring back the damn transfer call feature.

  16. Why exactly should I switch away from appear.in? by Aviation+Pete · · Score: 1
    Let's see:
    • - Runs in a browser. A good one like Firefox or Chrome, not Explorer.
    • - Free
    • - Super simple to setup and just works. You sent the other side a link, they open it and the conference starts.
    • Just because it is Microsoft's tool doesn't make it my preferred tool. Actually, just the opposite.

    --
    You know it's time for the next revolution when your rulers' names end with roman numerals.
  17. This just in by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Microsoft comes late to the party and presents a sub par product that is inferior to anything on the market.

    Ok, seriously, what's the news?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  18. I can see it now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Bill will give us the quarterly report now, on Skype."
    (Bill cylons and freezes)
    "OK, moving on.."

  19. Friends win10 upgrade nags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Weird, all my friends are suggesting I upgrade to windows 10 now, just click here.

  20. Gay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Meetings with 250 people"

    You have too many managers if you think that many people are needed for a meeting.

    1. Re: Gay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only here does a product get criticized for providing features and scale that exceed what's needed in most situations. Nobody said you have to invite 250 people to every meeting dickhead. It's just nice to know that you don't get the shit sandwich experience of Hangouts when you hit the 11th person.

  21. Re:Why exactly should I switch away from appear.in by Parker+Lewis · · Score: 1

    Same here. Team started with Hangouts, but it had 2 major issues: eventually it goes crazy and someone in the team cannot join it; the UI to start a Hangout and send the link to someone join it's really a pain.

  22. Best solution for LARGE videoconferences by TheSync · · Score: 1

    I'm often involved in standards development operation conference calls with 20-30 people. It would be great to have a WebEx like experience with screen sharing and video conferencing however only the current person/people speaking should have their headshot appear on the screen (at full size, anyway). What is the best solution for this?

    1. Re: Best solution for LARGE videoconferences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same answer I gave the guy above. Seriously, if you can get over the MS hate, it's a great deal -

      Buy a low end O365 subscription which will give you Skype for Business meetings up to 250 participants. The only user that needs a license is the organizer. There are no usage limits or meters. It's a pretty good deal all things considered, esp when comparing to WebEx or the shit show that is Hangouts.

    2. Re: Best solution for LARGE videoconferences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Skype starts to suck since Microsoft is handling it.

      Before you could send large files, now it stores it in the "cloud" and are limited to 30mb. I can even email larger attachements.

      Images get recompressed and resized, a screenshot becomes unreadable.

      You have to switch off and on the video before it works.

      Video quality became worse than facetime.

      Idiotic large animated smilies.

      Cannot call to Skype phones anymore!!! After 5/10 seconds codec changes to unsupported codec and other side does not hear you anymore. My GE Dect 6.0 phone became useless.

      Constantly pinging home even when not in use.

      CPU consumption is now 100%.

      The only option now is to find an old version (6.19) as long as the servers support it.

      It nowadays seem to have many outages, people I know who are online it does not start to ring.

  23. Correct grammer by invictusvoyd · · Score: 1

    Video calls are also limited to a maximum of 10 people during the first two months. After that, the maximum number of participants drops to three people

    Mohter Fukcers !

  24. Re:What's a "free" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only as well as Skype for Business, which is not really Skype. It's a pretty poor and unreliable webapp.

  25. Better alternative and works great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used Skype with my family and friends for years. Lately we have switched to a new product called "Spark". It has really, really, really great audio and video calling as well as document sharing. My 13 old daughter has all her friends using it at school now. They have a "free" version and a paid subscription if you want to moderate your own site. The freebie for us works perfect. Worth a look for anyone who has used a product like Slack or Hipchat. I'm curious to what others think?

  26. Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it has no end-to-end encryption that makes it not visible to Microsoft, then no thanks. Skype security was ripped out when Microsoft bought it.

  27. Product different from Skype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft has a product called Lync, that they rebranded to Skype For Business.
    It has similar functionality as Skype, but is a completely separate application.
    My company is official using Skype for Business, but lots of my colleagues still prefer to use Skype, because it tends to work better....