Slashdot Mirror


Second Tesla Autopilot Crash Under Review By US Regulators (time.com)

An anonymous reader writes: The Wall Street Journal and many other publications are reporting that U.S. auto-safety regulators are currently reviewing a second crash that occurred while Tesla's Autopilot mode was activated. The Detroit Free Press reports that a Michigan art gallery owner told police that he survived a rollover crash that happened when his Tesla Model X was in self-driving mode last Friday. The newspaper didn't disclose any additional details regarding what led up to the accident and whether or not the driver was to blame. Last week, it was reported that U.S. regulators were investigating Tesla after a fatal crash occurred involving a vehicle using the Autopilot mode. Tesla said in a statement after that incident, "This is the first known fatality in just over 130 million miles where Autopilot was activated." They also said Autopilot "is an assist feature that requires you to keep your hands on the steering wheel at all times."

4 of 392 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    autopilot is an add-on (something like $5k) depending on whether or not your car already has the needed sensors. You don't HAVE to buy it. You can have a "normal" electric Tesla.

  2. Re:On the contrary by bondsbw · · Score: 1, Informative

    No, "autopilot" would imply that it performs a similar role to autopilot in aircraft. Which is to say, the plane is NOT fully autonomous and requires the driver (pilot) to stay alert and attentive.

    Or that's what it should imply, a reasonable analogue to the proper usage of the terminology. But typical modern television and movies exaggerate this function to the point that the general public thinks that planes basically fly themselves. But this isn't true at all, it's mostly just a glorified cruise control system that requires the flight crew to remain alert and ready to take manual control at a moment's notice.

    --
    All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
  3. Strict liability? by sjbe · · Score: 4, Informative

    They also said Autopilot "is an assist feature that requires you to keep your hands on the steering wheel at all times."

    Here's the problem with that. The folks at Tesla HAVE to know that at least some of the people who use the technology are going to take their hands off the wheel. If they don't then they are weapons grade stupid and that seems unlikely. IANAL but it may not matter that Tesla warned people to keep their hands on the wheel given that it is reasonably foreseeable that some portion of the drivers would ignore those instructions. After all, they called it Autopilot for crying out loud... If strict liability is applied there is no need to prove fault, negligence, or intention. See Escola v Coca-Cola Bottling. Now maybe strict liability doesn't apply here but the point remains that manufacturers tend to be responsible for reasonably foreseeable consequences of the features of their products. I have a feeling that the autopilot features may have been released prematurely regardless of the claims of Tesla to the contrary. I love that Tesla is pushing boundaries but they need to tread carefully when it comes to safety.

    1. Re:Strict liability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      A recent Ars Technica article covers some of the details of this:

      Keep your hands off the wheel for too long (about 90 seconds) and the car will sound an alert tone and display a dialog on the centre console asking you to please grasp the wheel. If you ignore the warning, the car sounds another. If you ignore that one, the car will disengage the auto-cruise and auto-steer and slow to a stop (apparently on the assumption that you’re incapacitated, dead, or otherwise unable to grab the wheel).

      So the system does actively nag the driver to put their hands on the wheel.