Slashdot Mirror


Baton Rouge Police Database Hacked In Retaliation For Killing of Alton Sterling (dailydot.com)

Patrick O'Neill quotes a report from The Daily Dot: Just days after the fatal shooting of a black man by Baton Rouge police prompted international outrage and a Justice Department investigation, the Baton Rouge city government's servers have been hacked and 50,000 city police records leaked including names, addresses, emails, and phone numbers. A hacker that goes by the name @ox2Taylor claimed responsibility for the breach, which was confirmed by security intelligence analyst at Patch Penguin, Jamie-Luke Woodruff. He told the Daily Dot that the administrators of the website had failed to implement proper security measures. When the hacker first announced the hack, he accompanied the tweet with three hashtags revealing the motivation: #AltonSterling, #Hacked, and #BlackLivesMatters. "The reason i did it is because of what that officer did to alton sterling," Taylor told the Daily Dot in a private message. "i'm sick of seeing police abuse their power and all the killings."

8 of 393 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Remember that by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1, Interesting

    2nd ammendment is a train that has long left the station.

    our little pee shooters are no match for the goverment's toys.

    what we have can't even stop the mafia (they still exist, right?).

    a well regulated militia was meant to protect the people against a rogue government, which, sadly is EXACTLY what we have now.

    but over time, we reduced our own rights to own 'serious' armor and so our ability to keep balance of power is now zero.

    I wish we could keep the government honest. if they feared us, they'd respect us.

    they don't, its too late, and that's that. revolution time. in the US v2.0, maybe we'll learn our lesson (oh, WHO am I kidding, sigh) ;(

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  2. Retaliation? by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Resisting arrest and wrestling with police while possessing a gun is not healthy - this can't be stressed enough.

    We have a gun loving culture and as such police having a hair trigger mentality is a survival advantage. A local cop in my area hesitated last year and paid the price, they got great body cam video of the criminal searching his dead body for another weapon.

  3. Re:there's a major problem... but how does that he by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the thin blue line stands together.

    they abuse together.

    let them hang together.

    what goes around, comes around.

    I have no sympathy for those that DAILY abuse citizens and get away with it. ZERO.

    let them all suffer. maybe then they'll change their act.

    its us vs them, and yes, its gotton to that. I could not care less about cop lives.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  4. Really? A paedophile with a history of violence .. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Get real, people. Sterling was a registered sex offender, with a long history of violent crime, spousal abuse, and had tried to disarm a police officer during a previous arrest. This is a guy who broke a wall to steal an old lady's goldfish so he could sell them for $20. Nothing was below him. He was well known to area police, and he's your typical punk thug who thinks that a gun makes him tough.

    Waves a gun around threatening to kill someone, the cops show up, he is MOST uncooperative because he's a gangsta with a gun, and don't have to take no shit from nobody, especially da man!

    It would have been (and has been) the same outcome if he had been white in Canada with a knife, as opposed to black in the southern US with a gun. You keep asking for it, eventually you'll get it. The world is a better place without him, and all other punk-asses. He doesn't get a pass just because he's black. Reverse discrimination is as bad as outright discrimination.

    As for him being shot 4 times, nobody's going to shoot only once and then wait for you to pull out your gun. People are making a big thing about that because carrying a gun is legal there. They seem to forget that making threats while waving a gun around isn't.

    This has nothing to do with race, and people shouldn't be giving a perp anything close to a pass just because of their skin colour.

    Now all you people who are so bent on being seen as so politically correct and pure that you can't see or think stright, flame on!

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  5. Re:And there it is, apologist for murderers. .. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He wasn't murdered. Get your head out of your ass. Murder requires intent. Also, convicted felons aren't supposed to have a gun on them, period.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  6. Re:karma's a bitch by IonOtter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Oh yes, let's blame the victim. Yay. Whoooo.

    "...used a gun to threaten someone outside a convenience store."

    The murder victim had been robbed several times, and it was a rough neighborhood. A homeless man came up and asked him for money, but the murder victim declined. When the beggar persisted, and continued to molest the murder victim, they allegedly presented their firearm in a non-threatening manner to warn them off. (Showed the assailant they had a gun in their pocket.)

    "... violent offenses..."

    Resisting arrest, obstruction of an officer, disturbing the peace. Gosh. Such violence. Wow. Those are like, consolation prizes in the game of Living While Black.

    "...possession of a controlled substance."

    Weed. A dimebag of weed. Less an ounce, maybe a few grams. But hey, I guess you already know that Louisiana has an absolute zero-tolerance policy to *any* amount of cannabis? At least, prior to 2015, anyway.

    So yeah. Take your KKK-brand dogwhistle and head for the door.

    --
    [End Of Line]
  7. Re:Remember that by ElectricHellKnight · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Agreed. What people don't seem to understand is that pro-2nd amendment people do not think that their AR-15s (by the way, not an "assault rifle") will be able to hold off the military. The military has tanks, drones, and nukes. However, they're not going to use that stuff on their own soil unless the shit really hit the fan. If they did that, there would be little to nothing left for a tyrannical government to govern.

    What the 2nd does do, is keep things like police-state door-to-door roundups and executions from happening. They won't do that if they know people can and will shoot back. We've already seen in the middle east (and before) how a giant and well-armed military can be held back by a small and determined group of fighters. At the end of the day, even for all the technology, wars are still won by men on the ground with rifles. (Shotguns and handguns don't cut it, they aren't effective over long distances, and most real life battles take place over 100+ yards, not in Call of Duty-esq tiny maps.)

    On another note, I find it interesting that we keep hearing in the news about this previously convicted sex offender who was illegally armed, had drugs, and was resisting arrest. Yet we don't hear so much about this poor fellow. Probably because he had his CC license and legal gun, and was lawfully exercising his constitutional right. If you ask me, this instance is much more indicative of racism in the police than Alton Sterling. Curious that the media drums up sympathy for the black criminal, but not the black responsibly and legally armed citizen.

  8. Re:karma's a bitch by penandpaper · · Score: 2, Interesting

    . First cops have the us versus them mentality

    I wonder why.

    Second cops are taught to maintain control of the situation to matter what.

    Must be that whole law and order thing, huh? Would you really want law enforcement not be able to maintain control of a situation they are responsible for?

    Tell a cop knocking on your door that he can't come in and what him flip out, kick the door in and pull a gun on you.

    Have you tried this? I will bet you haven't. If you don't know what your rights are or what the police can do that is really your problem.

    Why do cops get trials where a judge decides?

    You do realize you can opt to waive your trial by jury for a bench trial? So, you mean to tell me that a cop, much like the tax collector who is disliked by most, wouldn't want to be judged by a random bunch of emotionally driven citizens? Color me surprised.

    I am not trying to make the cops to be completely innocently in this, but their job is walking into an unknown situation with unknown risks and are required to gain control to enforce law and order. You are pretty quick to blame without all the facts of the situation.