Slashdot Mirror


Do We Need A Better Private Browsing Mode? (networkworld.com)

Network World's Alan Zeichi recently argued "We need a better Private Browsing mode." Slashdot reader Miche67 writes: As this writer says, Chrome's Incognito Mode "doesn't offer strong protection at all." [Incognito mode "only prevents Chrome from saving your site visit activity. It won't stop other sources from seeing your browsing activity."] And Firefox's Private Browsing with Tracking Protection -- while stronger than Chrome -- is an all-or-nothing option. "You can't turn it off for sites you trust, but have it otherwise enabled by default."
The submission ends, "Every single link to non-trusted websites should open, by default, in a Private/Incognito window. C'mon, browser makers, get this done." This raises two questions. How do Slashdot's readers browse? And do you think we need a better private mode for web browsing?

3 of 126 comments (clear)

  1. Re:We dont need a better private mode-- by Voyager529 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Eternal September was the death of the internet. What we have now is a superhighway of advertisements directed into your eyeballs, and automated grabber arms reaching for your banking information.

    In a somewhat-amusing irony, Usenet is much more usable now and has basically-no spam anymore.

  2. Re:i use tor by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Have you actually tried browser fingerprinting with the TOR Browser? If you set it up right (I recommend Tails) it doesn't work. It can't separate you from many, many other TOR Browser users.

    Go try it right now, with the Trails live CD. They fixed this years ago.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  3. Re:No, we need to stop doing illicit things online by KiloByte · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What's that "free country" you're talking about? While in countries other than North Korea, Russia, China, Saudi Arabia you can often get away with criticizing the government on superficial matters, there isn't a single country that won't punish you for revealing news that truly hurts those in power.

    Case in point: Assange -- Sweden tries to pass as a free country. Or, show me those "free countries" supporting Snowden; Ecuador and Russia stepped up because of a grudge against USA rather than of good will.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.