Slashdot Mirror


Can Tech Workers Skip The Olympics As Easily As Athletes? (networkworld.com)

netbuzz writes: [Network World reports:] "Golfer Jordan Spieth announced this morning that he will not play in the Olympics, citing Zika, meaning the world's top four players in his sport have now opted out of going to Brazil. They're self-employed and answer to no one. But what of the rank-and-file employees who work for major technology companies sending large contingents to Brazil? Are they being asked -- or compelled -- to ignore the risks? Conversely, could women of child-bearing age be denied the opportunity to go at an employer's discretion?" Major vendors like Cisco and GE say they're not making anyone go, though at least one expert says that doing so wouldn't necessarily be a violation of employment law. When asked if anyone declined to go, a Cisco spokesperson said via email: "We're not in a position to confirm whether employees have opted out (that is between them and their manager), but we provide for that option." GE provided a similar response, saying, "No GE employees have opted out of going, but GE employees are free to opt out at any time." Patricia Pryor, an attorney at Jackson Lewis P.C. in Cincinnati who has addressed these issues in a piece for The National Law Review earlier this year, was asked by Network World as well. She says: "Employers are wise to be flexible with travel requirements to Zika-infested areas when they can and when doing so is reasonable. However, there are some jobs where the purpose of the job/or the essential functions of the job require travel to these areas. If it is not reasonable or possible to delay travel to the area, an employer generally can require employees to travel."

93 comments

  1. Article answers its own question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm confused, the question seems to have been answered quite neatly in the summary. if you have a question, and the answer, why do you ask the question again.

    yes apparently they can opt out

    1. Re:Article answers its own question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you know about advertising? Are you in the business? Hits, man! It's about hits... click clickety click click click!

    2. Re:Article answers its own question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, dumb story.

      Should have gone with a 'Is the Olympics a huge waste of money?' angle: http://www.theatlantic.com/bus... http://www.businessinsider.com... http://money.cnn.com/gallery/n... http://www.thenational.ae/spor...
      Answer: No, if you're a pork-barrelling supplier, a politician or Olympic hanger on partying at the tax payers expense. Yes, if you're one of Brazil's poor threatened with poverty http://riotimesonline.com/braz... crime http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/o... and disappearances http://www.ibtimes.com/road-ri...

    3. Re:Article answers its own question.. by bondsbw · · Score: 2

      yes apparently they can opt out

      Except that if they were hired to go, and they then refuse to go, they shouldn't expect to remain hired.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    4. Re:Article answers its own question.. by bondsbw · · Score: 2

      It's a dumb premise anyway. The Olympians get "paid" in medal bonuses and sponsorships. Obviously if they refuse to participate, they no longer get "paid" in those ways.

      What's actually different?

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    5. Re:Article answers its own question.. by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Yes, the employees are free to opt themselves to the top of the 'people in line for rightsizing' list.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  2. Zika or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't step foot in Rio or anywhere in Brazil for that matter.

    1. Re: Zika or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rio is an amazing city. One of the best places I've ever spent time in. Why would you say that?

    2. Re:Zika or not by laie_techie · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't step foot in Rio or anywhere in Brazil for that matter.

      I spent two years in São Paulo state (plus additional time traveling to other states). Trust me, Brasil doesn't want people like you. It's an amazing country with rich culture and amazing natural wonders. Granted, there are places that a gringo should avoid (just like any other country), but it is easy to keep safe.

    3. Re:Zika or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't step foot in Rio or anywhere in Brazil for that matter.

      I spent two years in São Paulo state (plus additional time traveling to other states). Trust me, Brasil doesn't want people like you. It's an amazing country with rich culture and amazing natural wonders. Granted, there are places that a gringo should avoid (just like any other country), but it is easy to keep safe.

      I thank you, as a Brazilian. These displays of indiscriminate ignorance appalls me on Slashdot.

      Zika-infested areas? Well there is no such things. There are mosquito-infested areas [not so much this time of year and some 3000 km away from Rio, in the distant Northern states].

      Oh, by the way, has anyone seen Brazilians running to the hills, or the-sky-is-falling jumping off-cliffs? Mass-suiciding? Well, from my point of vantage, looking though the window of a high rise, on the hinterland of São Paulo state, it is a splendid winter day. A cool breeze and a beautiful light take my thoughts away. The economic prospects for next year are good. New elections are going to end the political mess of recent years. Yeah, life is good and I can only be sorry for the weak-minded and ignorant elitist golfers.

      Cheers from Brazil, land of pleasure and plenty, the promise of the 21st century. :)

      Captcha: Sympathy

  3. Indochina by pete6677 · · Score: 1

    Couldn't they just send employees from India or China, which they would likely do anyway? What's a Chinese employee going to do, say no?

    1. Re:Indochina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      or HIRE LOCALS?!

      woah

    2. Re:Indochina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chinese employee can deliberately fail their visa applications, lost their passports, and so on.

  4. Are you software or hardware? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1, Funny

    If you're hardware, no, you gotta go.

    If you're software, your employer is trying to do you a favor and give you a way to go to Rio and have fun!

    Now go have fun!

    It is mandatory!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  5. Risk of contracting is so low by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US media severely overplayed the hype

  6. Dumb article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Of course, you don't have to go to Brazil.

    Of course, you will have to accept the consequences of your choice. You don't own your job (unless you own the company), and you have no right to it (in spite of what the SJW idiots may say).

    I once was "encouraged" to move to New Zealand for a 6-month contract (which probably would have actually gone on 1-2 years). I'm sure NZ is a lovely place, and I would have jumped at the chance to go for a couple of weeks. But I told my boss that if that was my only choice with his company, that I would quit.

    I didn't lose my job, and I suspect if you're a good-enough employee that they want to pay to have you travel the world, they probably won't want to lose you. Unless, of course, international travel was part of the original employment contract and you've had a change of heart.

    1. Re: Dumb article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's a really stupid premise.

      Olympic teams don't employ athletes. They compete as volunteers who qualify for the team. Tech workers, however, are employees. A better analogy would be an NFL player not wanting to travel to London to play in an NFL game there. However, because he's employed by an NFL team that's scheduled to play in London, he can't opt out of traveling to the UK. Athletes can't opt out of doing their jobs. Tech workers shouldn't get to do so, either.

    2. Re:Dumb article by Calydor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wouldn't it fall under OSHA laws, though? Can an employer legally expose his employees to pathogens under threat of being fired if they refuse?

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    3. Re:Dumb article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Previous factory worker here. The answer is maybe!

      If the exposure is necessary to do the job and common practice, then yes. If the exposure is necessary to do the job and "reasonable" personal protective equipment is required, then also yes. That includes if you as the employee have to furnish your own PPE even if you could not afford the equipment on what they pay. That is one of the dirty tricks to get people fired: transfer them to a more dangerous area but don't increase their pay enough to cover equipment.

    4. Re:Dumb article by Sarten-X · · Score: 2

      You mean like hospital IT workers do every day?

      There are mitigation and management strategies already, and if the risk is deemed significant enough, there is hazard pay and insurance coverage available to mitigate the discomfort such a pathogen may cause.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    5. Re:Dumb article by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Your loss.

      Kiwis are wonderful people and you missed out on a great life immersing experience of working in the South Pacific.

    6. Re:Dumb article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is, hospital workers will often be exposed, it's a reasonable expectation of employment AND they have training on exposure protocols and risk management. Tech folks very rarely will come across anything more than they would from going to a grocery store, and are not generally expected to know things like that.

    7. Re:Dumb article by guises · · Score: 1

      Employees are exposed to pathogens every second of every day. The question is whether this one represents a greater threat, and... it certainly doesn't seem to. The WHO says there have been fewer than 1700 cases of microcephaly in Brazil which "may have been caused by the Zika virus," and further: apparently this poses very little threat to anyone who isn't planning on having children within the next six months after exposure.

      I don't know what OSHA's rules are, but unless my employee was actively seeking children there doesn't seem to be much cause for concern here. At least on an individual level - the main thing that the WHO is afraid of is the disease spreading to other countries, and the Olympics could certainly represent a problem in that regard.

    8. Re:Dumb article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "unless my employee was actively seeking children" - how would you legally know this? It's protected information.

      In fact, ordering an employee to Rio might already be troublesome, as it might be viewed as a way to determine which employees are considering to have children.

    9. Re:Dumb article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is hazard pay and insurance coverage available to mitigate the discomfort such a pathogen may cause.

      Referring to a lifetime of caring for a microcephalic child as "discomfort" doesn't really do justice to the risk. Personally I just had my first baby and plan to have the second soon, and they'd have to pay me millions of dollars to take that risk or put my life plans on hold.

  7. Tech workers are crybabies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Athletes aren't employed to compete in the Olympics. National teams aren't employers. For example, soccer players are employed by their respective clubs and have to be released by those clubs to participate in international competition. There's also risk that suffering an injury in international competition could inhibit an athlete's ability to perform in his or her job. Participating on an Olympic national team or any national team isn't a player's job. However, if you're a tech worker and your job is to provide tech services at the Olympics, that's your job. You can't skip that any more than an athlete can refuse to attend training camp or appear in games for the team they're signed to play for. That's their job. Stop being crybabies. Athletes don't get to skip out on their jobs, so neither should you.

    1. Re: Tech workers are crybabies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go back to trolling about how Republicans supposedly hate you and want you to die. You're also the same jackass who trolled about Joe Paterno and defended him a couple of months ago. You're an asshole.

    2. Re: Tech workers are crybabies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey now, the guy already apologized for trolling the person who got raped. Let's not attack him for turning over a new leaf, shall we?

    3. Re: Tech workers are crybabies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same AC here. As you can see in the comments, my usual trolling is about Republicans. I made this story up about rape because I thought it was funny. I didn't get raped and I've never even been to Brazil. However, there are people who do get raped and I've realized my post was incredibly insensitive and offensive. I sincerely apologize for my behavior. Moderators, please moderate the parent post, which I also made, down to -1. I deserve the troll mod and I'd like my post to be at -1 so fewer people have to read my incredibly offensive post. Rape isn't funny and I'm very sorry for making up this story and trolling about it. I fucked up. Please mod me down.

    4. Re: Tech workers are crybabies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody posting in this thread was raped. STFU, troll.

    5. Re: Tech workers are crybabies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been raped before, know how it feels man. Don't let these trolls try to belittle you, you are strong.

    6. Re: Tech workers are crybabies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. It sucks when you try to share and people harass you for it. Wasn't my rape enough for them?

    7. Re: Tech workers are crybabies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, by the way, I lied and I'm back to posting fiction about being raped. LOL! Rape is hilarious and I think I'll claim in more articles that I've been raped. LOLOLOLOL!

    8. Re: Tech workers are crybabies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOLOL! Mod me up for my creative fiction about being raped! I can't believe the moderators don't care enough to mod up my story. LOL!

    9. Re: Tech workers are crybabies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course. The moderators are Republicans. Therefore they hate us and want us to die.

    10. Re: Tech workers are crybabies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pukianz raped my family, too. Their kind hates us and wants us to die.

    11. Re: Tech workers are crybabies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOOOOO cow.

    12. Re: Tech workers are crybabies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last I went there for tech work I was raped. I walked out of the airport and three guys jumped me and held me down while a fourth raped me. Right in public in front of everyone. I screamed for help but no one did anything. They kept trading places and raped me for about 90 minutes.

      This is what Brazil is like. You don't know anything....you don't know what it's like to be raped in a country with no laws, no moral codes. Fuck you!!!

      Ask me how I do know you ARE lying.

  8. Zika or Money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The golfers aren't pulling out because of the health risks. The golfers are pulling out because they play 20+ tournaments a year and they're not getting paid for this one.

    1. Re:Zika or Money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good excuse to go for vacations somewhere else and screw their flag..

    2. Re:Zika or Money? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I did wonder about that. Especially as several male ones pulled out[1] and, AKAIK, no male has as yet given birth to a pinhead baby.

      [1] Must be Catholics.
      [2] Look on the bright side, at least it makes it easier to put their sodding jerseys on.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re: Zika or Money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's somewhat remarkable that professional athletes play for Olympic national teams at all. A couple of years ago, Paul George suffered a gruesome injury playing for USA basketball as they wreaking cuts to determine the final roster for an international tournament. The broken leg he suffered kept him from playing for the Indiana Pacers for a lengthy period of time. The team invested tens of millions of dollars in one player, who could be kept out of action or even have his career ended (as some speculated George might not be able to come back from the injury) as a result of competing internationally. I'm glad it wasn't the end of NBA players competing internationally, though many speculated it would because teams wouldn't want to risk their investments.

    4. Re: Zika or Money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least for basketball it's about building a global brand. For example, Kobe Bryant made a ton of money off selling shoes to the Chinese.

    5. Re: Zika or Money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, sure, absolutely the sponsors love when athletes they've signed to endorsement deals compete in the Olympics. And you're right that there's a lot of money in those deals, which can exceed what the professional teams pay the player. Those professional contracts often include language that allows them to be voided if a player is injured in the course of certain activities away from the team. I don't know the specifics of the NBA's collective bargaining agreement, but unless the CBA prohibits such language, teams could add language to contracts to prohibit players from competing internationally.

    6. Re:Zika or Money? by eddy · · Score: 1

      This. It's well known by everyone but the OP apparently.

      The amazing thing is that they feel they have to use this excuse at all, I don't get why they're all afraid to just say 'Nah, not enough status'. Bunch of losers.

      --
      Belief is the currency of delusion.
    7. Re:Zika or Money? by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As I recall, there's reports of sexual transmission of Zika so they would have the worry of infecting a female partner--especially if they're having unprotected sex because they're attempting to make a baby.

      But if you've paid attention to the news, Zika is only one of Rio's problems: Rio just plain doesn't have the money for this. The state of Rio (not quite the same as the city) ran out of money, they've not been able to pay hospital workers, ditto firefighters, ditto police, there's already been a few fun games of Find the Corpse (Some Assembly Needed) on the site of the Olympics itself...and, well, the general problems that could be summed up as 'being Rio' due to just how long-term they've been a problem--and thus they should have been known to the Olympic committee back when picking the city for the 2016 Olympics... Even before Zika, there were Questions about if Rio was really up to this.

      There's a lot of reasons to not go to this year's Olympics, really.

    8. Re:Zika or Money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm starting to believe that Russia paid off the Olympic committee to pick Rio in order to make the Sochi olympics look good in comparison.

    9. Re:Zika or Money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are not dancing bears waiting for you to clap your hands to entertain you, quit being so fucking entitled.

      Should they work for free for the 'prestige' of being in the Olympics?

      Have you even been paying attention at how morally corrupt an organization the IOC is?

      Get the fuck over yourself.

    10. Re:Zika or Money? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      As I recall, there's reports of sexual transmission of Zika so they would have the worry of infecting a female partner--especially if they're having unprotected sex because they're attempting to make a baby.

      As I understand it, there's one report - and it's uninstantiated.

      However, if I was in with a chance of competing in the Olympics foh mah countrah, I'd say wearing a rubber Johnny for a few months after I got back would be a small price to pay. Heck, if her clock's a-tickin' knock her up before you go or jizz in a yoghurt pot and stick it in the freezer.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  9. You're going to Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you're an adult male, you're going if your company sends you. And you should probably be fired if you refuse except in a few rare situations. (if you're on immune suppressants and traveling you probably have bigger worried than zika)
    The consequences of catching Zika are generally mild for an adult. Don't have sex for a week after you return to avoid transmitting it to your potentially pregnant partner. If you've been in Brazil for 3 months, and your partner is less than 3 months pregnant when you return, then you have some non-medical issues to sort out.
    Statistically speaking, it would be more dangerous for you to catch the wrong strain of bird flu.

    1. Re:You're going to Brazil by Chrontius · · Score: 2

      The radio program on NPR today said it was more like six months of no sex. Did you know the inside of the testicle is "immunologically privileged?"

  10. Olympics unfair to tech workers! by Chelloveck · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, tech workers can't opt out as easily as athletes. And if they do go, they can't get laid as easily as athletes, either. Life is unfair on so many levels.

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    1. Re:Olympics unfair to tech workers! by guruevi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      However if they do go and they do get sick/injured, the company would be liable for 'knowingly' exposing their employees.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  11. funny thing by sunking2 · · Score: 1

    It's only the professionals who are opting out of what used to be the games to find the best non professional athletes.

  12. In my experience this is a reward post by Snotnose · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As in, "Hey, you're a great employee, wanna go to Rio for a few weeks?". The employee can then yay or nay, with a nay having no negative consequences.

    Now, if you said yay 6 months ago, but at this late date say "ummm, about that....", I can see how companies can be upset.

    Me? I wouldn't go anywhere near Rio. Between the raw sewage on the beaches, to the crime on tourists, to the cops not being paid, to the very real possibility these games will be a fiasco, no thank you.

  13. Please stop spreading the myth by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 0

    Golf is not a sport. It's a game. Take a look at the physical shape of the top athletes in the sports at the Olympics and then take a look at the physique of the top golfers. You will notice a huge difference. What's next for the Olympics? Darts? Snooker?

    1. Re: Please stop spreading the myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a moron. Table tennis, badminton, and curling are Olympic sports. Golfers are as well conditioned as any of the athletes in those other sports.

    2. Re:Please stop spreading the myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seen archery athletes? Some of them have huge bellies.

    3. Re: Please stop spreading the myth by zhouray · · Score: 2

      I play both badminton and golf. If you think top badmintion players have the same physique as top golfers, you are highly mistaken. The amount of endurance required in a male single badminton game is greater than tennis, despite the smaller court.

    4. Re: Please stop spreading the myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Badminton athletes don't have the endurance of top cyclists. And while we're discussing this, Usain Bolt doesn't have the endurance of a marathon runner. So what? Different sports require different skills. Some require endurance, some require power, and some require precision. I actually think something like biathlon is tougher overall because it requires endurance and some power to get over climbs. But then it requires precision shooting while an athlete's heart rate is still really high. Golf requires power and precision. And then you have something like table tennis, which I'm not sure requires extreme levels of any of the three skills but does require ridiculous reflexes. I'll get a shit for this, but I'd like to see more sports in the Olympics, especially motorsports. People say motorsports aren't sports, but they're wrong. The skills required to drive a car in Formula 1 are ridiculous. All of the aforementioned things really are sports and probably should be in the Olympics. Now poker... that's not a sport.

    5. Re: Please stop spreading the myth by tsqr · · Score: 1

      You're a moron. Table tennis, badminton, and curling are Olympic sports. Golfers are as well conditioned as any of the athletes in those other sports.

      To qualify as a sport, a game must include spectators that drink excessively, blast air horns, wave noodles and foam fingers, shout obscenities at the referees, spill beer on one another, and (optionally) riot when their team loses or get mugged in the parking lot.

    6. Re: Please stop spreading the myth by zhouray · · Score: 1

      I did not say golf isn't a sport. But it shouldn't be compared to badminton in the realm of physical requirement because they are not in the same class.

    7. Re: Please stop spreading the myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The skills required to drive a car in Formula 1 are ridiculous (...)

      If he only managed to keep driving a racing Kart for 15 minutes he would definitely be convinced of what it takes to drive an F-1.

    8. Re:Please stop spreading the myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only a game until someone loses an eye.

      Then it's a sport.

  14. We can find some to work for the Brazil min wage by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    We can find some to work for the Brazil min wage way less then even what we pay our H1B's and we don't have to play HR games.

  15. Males have a bigger risk factor by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Zika virus apparently can remain in sperm for some time after an infection and recovery, thus the risk of an infected baby could be higher for a male than a female. A women can delay pregnancy until she is free of the virus but if her partner is infected it would still be possible to pass the infection to the baby, per an NPR report.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    1. Re:Males have a bigger risk factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Zika virus apparently can remain in sperm for some time after an infection and recovery

      Given that most men masturbate frequently and the rest lie about it, that's rather hard to believe.

  16. Good luck to the workers on that one by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    The job market is still very strongly titled to the employers, in spite of what various news sources claim. If one employee doesn't want to do it, the employer will find a convenient reason to fire them and replace them with someone who does.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  17. Why ask about just tech workers? by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

    Why not ask about all non-athletic employees?

  18. PROFESSIONALS by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 2

    Sod the Zika virus why are PROFESSIONAL sportsmen going to the Olympics?

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    1. Re:PROFESSIONALS by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Sod the Zika virus why are PROFESSIONAL sportsmen going to the Olympics?

      Because the Olympics is no longer restricted to "amateurs". The restriction was not initially designed to prevent "professional sportsmen" from competing, but to keep out anyone who had ever worked for wages. It was designed to keep the working class from mixing with their social superiors. The orginal definition of "amateur" was "who is or ever has been by trade of employment for wages a mechanic, artisan or laborer or engaged in any menial duty."

  19. You are most likely to get shot by a stray bullet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a recent article here on Brasil that portrayed the actual scientists which are dealing with the Zika virus on a daily basis. And they put together the odds of someone being infected with it during the games. It is low. 3 in every 100k. The odds of being shot by a stray bullet on Rio is 3,8 in every 100k. So, quit the fear mongering and come play on this ridiculous thing that is the Olympics.

  20. Re:We can find some to work for the Brazil min wag by laie_techie · · Score: 1

    We can find some to work for the Brazil min wage way less then even what we pay our H1B's and we don't have to play HR games.

    Minimum wage in Brasil is about 800 reais per month (yes, it's defined per month instead of per hour). Last time I checked the US dollar is worth R$3.20. US$250 would be a great price for companies to pay. My tourist visa to Brazil cost that alone, not to mention airfare (about a grand), hotel, etc. Additionally, good jobs should lower the number of Brazilians in poverty.

  21. Re:You are most likely to get shot by a stray bull by laie_techie · · Score: 1

    There was a recent article here on Brasil that portrayed the actual scientists which are dealing with the Zika virus on a daily basis. And they put together the odds of someone being infected with it during the games. It is low. 3 in every 100k. The odds of being shot by a stray bullet on Rio is 3,8 in every 100k. So, quit the fear mongering and come play on this ridiculous thing that is the Olympics.

    You forgot the other exotic diseases like yellow fever and dengue - much more prevalent and easier to catch. I needed 10 vaccines in order to spend two years in São Paulo. Oh, and that worm medicine every 6 months. If you're just spending a couple weeks to a month there, you should be able to avoid most of the medical perils by following simple rules (most importantly, don't drink tap water). Athletes are at much greater risk than spectators (spectators shouldn't accidentally get splashed by water from the lagoon, for example).

  22. zika is just one other reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL , i have a shit load of countries i will not travel for work , basically all dictatorships , north korea iran irak saudi barbaria UAE (actually make that all middle east) , biellorussia russia , USA (because of the rampant gun violence) , and i have even more companies that i will not cooperate with (cie from all countries above J&J (for their pedophile heir)

    1. Re:zika is just one other reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True story: I was shot at 16 times just on my way to work this morning.

  23. Re:You are most likely to get shot by a stray bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are stupid or what? Big cities do not have risk of yellow fever disease. And while dengue indeed has an infection factor higher than zika, it still is 5 to every 100k. We are on winter here in Brasil, in case you all don't know. If the Olympics were being played during the summer, then the rates would be way higher.

  24. Re:You are most likely to get shot by a stray bull by jtoj · · Score: 1

    Brazilian here, have lived in Rio, in Boston, and now in Belo Horizonte:
    - You CAN drink tap water in Rio, that wont kill you.
    - Stray bullets or carjacking are a more likely cause of trouble.
    - No, Zika wouldnt be a concern durign winter.

    And the beach...
    I wouldnt go to Rio. You shouldnt.

    --
    Jose T Oliveira Jr.
  25. Re:You are most likely to get shot by a stray bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a recent article here on Brasil that portrayed the actual scientists which are dealing with the Zika virus on a daily basis. And they put together the odds of someone being infected with it during the games. It is low. 3 in every 100k. The odds of being shot by a stray bullet on Rio is 3,8 in every 100k. So, quit the fear mongering and come play on this ridiculous thing that is the Olympics.

    You forgot the other exotic diseases like yellow fever and dengue - much more prevalent and easier to catch. I needed 10 vaccines in order to spend two years in São Paulo. Oh, and that worm medicine every 6 months. If you're just spending a couple weeks to a month there, you should be able to avoid most of the medical perils by following simple rules (most importantly, don't drink tap water). Athletes are at much greater risk than spectators (spectators shouldn't accidentally get splashed by water from the lagoon, for example).

    I take worm medicine every year, because industrial amounts of organic vegetables I eat. If you eat plenty of vegetables [especially leaves] you got to take vermicides, regardless of where you live.

    I think you are overstating your Sao Paulo problems. I get to doubt you ever stayed here.

  26. Re:You are most likely to get shot by a stray bull by laie_techie · · Score: 1

    You are stupid or what? Big cities do not have risk of yellow fever disease. And while dengue indeed has an infection factor higher than zika, it still is 5 to every 100k. We are on winter here in Brasil, in case you all don't know. If the Olympics were being played during the summer, then the rates would be way higher.

    Define "big cities". I was in Campinas which has millions of inhabitants. Also, there is "mato" close to many of the cities in Brazil where I stayed. My wife is from Fortaleza, so I understand that Brazil is on the other side of the equator, hence opposite seasons. Many of the cities in SP I visited during winter (June-August) were still hot enough for mosquito problems. Admittedly, it was February when I visited Rio, so maybe it gets colder than SP.

  27. Re:You are most likely to get shot by a stray bull by laie_techie · · Score: 1

    Brazilian here, have lived in Rio, in Boston, and now in Belo Horizonte: - You CAN drink tap water in Rio, that wont kill you.

    My experience in Brazil is limited to São Paulo state (Campinas region), Fortaleza, and a very brief stay in Rio. I was expressly forbidden to drink tap water from host families, them citing health problems. Maybe it won't kill you, but you could pick up worms - especially for gringos whose immune systems aren't developed for local pathogens.

    - Stray bullets or carjacking are a more likely cause of trouble.

    Yes, crime is a major concern, but you can avoid the favelas.

    - No, Zika wouldnt be a concern durign winter.

    Again, in SP, I saw mosquitoes all months of the year.

    And the beach...

    I saw many pristine beaches in Fortaleza; my travels didn't take me to the beach in SP. I was specifically referencing the lagoon where the canoe competitions will be held.

    I wouldnt go to Rio. You shouldnt.

    I avoid big events in general, so I'll go to Rio in an off season.