Slashdot Mirror


Google's New Emoji Aimed At Promoting Gender Equality Are Coming (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Based largely on a proposal from Unicode Consortium member Google, Unicode Consortium has announced plans to support new emoji aimed at promoting gender equality. There will be "11 new 'professional' emoji [that] will depict both men and women performing different jobs, and there will be both male and female versions of 33 existing emoji that currently depict either a man or a women but not both," writes Ars Technica. "The new professions include, in the Unicode Consortium's words: a farmer, welder, mechanic, health worker, scientist, coder, business worker, chef, student, teacher, and rockstar." What's unusual about the new emoji is that they're created using combinations of existing emoji to avoid waiting for Unicode version 10.0 to be finalized in June of 2017. By using a special "zero-width joiner" (ZWJ) character between two or more emoji, operating systems that support it know to put out a different composite emoji rather than a series of separate emoji. "The new emoji for professions start with either a man or woman emoji, then a ZWJ character, then another character related to the job," reports Ars. "Emoji that were previously one specific gender (the dancing woman or the man running) can be joined to a male or female symbol with a ZWJ character to create emoji of either gender. And all of these emoji can be combined with the existing skin tone modifiers to produce diverse versions of either gender." We may see these combined emoji before the end of the year as software companies begin to integrate them into their operating systems.

3 of 200 comments (clear)

  1. Gender equality doesn't mean anything by axewolf · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's an excuse for tyrannical social doctrine. You would think it would lose steam after men and women clearly have equal opportunities in general, but some people become addicted to beating the horse and keep doing so long after its dead.

    You would think more people would stand up and call as it is, but I guess the kind of people who think for themselves are insecure about their love lives or something and fear for the possible consequences of being labelled a "close-minded misogynist bigot".

    1. Re:Gender equality doesn't mean anything by labnet · · Score: 0, Troll

      I have to agree with you.
      As Hylandr says below.

      Gender is not a social construct. Mental illness on the other hand is.

      The trouble is, disagreement is now seen as hate?

      --
      46137
  2. Re:But gender is a social construct by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Troll

    Ugh... Slashdot's transphobic brigade are absolutely the worst aspect of this site, and they seem pretty organized with their mod-points.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC