Slashdot Mirror
Sir Tim Berners-Lee Makes a Last-Minute Plea To Save Net Neutrality in Europe (theverge.com)
An anonymous reader shares a report on The Verge: Sir Tim Berners-Lee, the man who created the world wide web, is calling on regulators in Europe to protect net neutrality and "save the open internet." In a letter released this week, Berners-Lee, Stanford law professor Barbara van Schewick, and Harvard law professor Larry Lessig urged European regulators to implement guidelines that would close loopholes in net neutrality legislation that the European Parliament approved in October 2015. They also called on internet users to voice their opposition online, before the public consultation period on the guidelines ends on July 18th. "Network neutrality for hundreds of millions of Europeans is within our grasp," the letter reads. "Securing this is essential to preserve the open Internet as a driver for economic growth and social progress. But the public needs to tell regulators now to strengthen safeguards, and not cave in to telecommunications carriers' manipulative tactics."
Well we've already lost an open web due to Encrypted Media Extensions. Do we even need net neutrality any more?
SURELY NOT!!!!!
Remember when Colin Powell got up before the UN and said Iraq had WMDs? I do because that was the day I lost all respect for Powell.
Berners-Lee had his Colin Powell moment when he said DRM should be part of the HTML standard. I agree with his points about network neutrality, but he no longer has the moral standing to champion the ideals of the open internet.
Many ISPs are publicly subsidized in order to roll out Internet access to rural areas. Why should they have gotten so much of the tax payer's money in order to screw them over with censorship and racketeering?
Most people don't want "neutrality", they want priority...
Net neutrality means dumb pipe. If your bits aren't getting through fast enough, you get a fatter pipe, not restrict other peoples' traffic.
“He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
Be angry at the government, not the ISPs.
Why should people who live together in the city subsidize the lifestyles of people in the country?
Network Neutrality (the poem)
All MY networks are neutral
Though my cables are red and blue
All my thoughts and feelings
Are networkly neutral too
Comcast wants to slow down my Netflix too
Even though I paid for the bandwidth I use
Google and Facebook like to hate on Donald Trump
Whose daughter he himself would even like to hump
Some would like to make visiting websites
A very serious crime
Have you seen your snapchats?
Here's some junk of mine.
And now we need legislation
That is networkly neutral too
And now the corporations
Are... slowing... down... my... poems........too.
Even in the cities ISPs use public right of way for their access and equipment. If they had to buy/lease that land it would cost them many billions. Once companies start paying for the COMPLETE cost of doing business we won't ask them for anything.
The laws preventing local ISPs/community ISP's and competition are rampant in the US. Therefore competition is stymied from the onset. Remove those barriers to competition and then what you are asking is valid.
We could solve more than half of the internet poop being dealt by declaring that ALL of the internet companies are utilities.
Regulation of fees, investigation of company claims, control of any and all tax breaks,
part of the public service commission devoted to utility problems handling comsumer complaints,
Declaring null and void any localized monopoly contracts.
When?
False question. The question isn't whether bureaucrats should be allowed to shape traffic, the question is whether ANYONE but the two endpoints should be allowed to do so. Net Neutrality means exactly that NOBODY meddles with the flow of bits, which includes that ISPs are just transporters of bits and not arbitrators on whose bits go where with what priority.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
Whether your note gets heeded by EU parliamentarians is mostly dependent on how many other notes you attached to it, and what denomination those notes have.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
Clearly, the answer to your question is "YES"; the owners of the capital between the 2 endpoints have a right to decide how their capital is allocated.
Do the bureaucrats have a legitimate claim to ownership of that capital? Maybe they do, but that's irrelevant to the point.
I know that Tim Berners-Lee is on his way to not being an EU citizen anymore, but as long as he is one, he should remember his place: EU citizens do not and should not ever challenge or discuss the directives of the EU Commission. Even entertaining the thought is treasonous. I want to make absolutely clear that as a loyal citizen of the European Union I will never, ever question the decisions of our leaders in the EU Commission. I am deeply upset by the british treason of the great European ideals and I am ready and willing to lay down my life and the life of my whole family in order to redress this horrible turn of events. I feel that the english people must be harshly punished for their actions but I will wait for orders from Brussels, as any loyal European citizen should do. Hail Europe! Hail the European Union!
They almost all use easements over private land. Same as many roads. The ISPs and power companies do pay to maintain the posts and wires.
You (the homeowner) don't get paid for easements, the original developer didn't ether. They are there because otherwise you couldn't get power to your house. It's in your self interest to allow the easements.
John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
QoS is allowed under every net neutrality law I'm aware of.
And it should be. VOIP packets are higher priority than torrents etc.
The problem is net neutrality has tricky implementation details. Which are now under regulatory capture.
Increasing competition would have been a much better way to fix this. Now we've got the usual suspects fucking up laws on NN.
John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
"Securing this is essential to preserve the open Internet as a driver for economic growth and social progress. But the public needs to tell regulators now to strengthen safeguards, and not cave in to telecommunications carriers' manipulative tactics."
Rallying supporters to communicate their opinions to regulators is itself a manipulative tactic. It gives the regulators a skewed view of the public support/opposition of the proposed net-neutrality rules.
Also, I debate that net neutrality is "essential to preserving the open internet". As a tech-minded individual not connected to any of the telecoms, I oppose net neutrality as I oppose all forms of regulatory overreach and fascism and defend economic freedom. I do this with the full knowledge that while I personally value an open internet (and therefore will pay more for such a connection), most people don't and will prefer, for example, a cheaper, Netflix-focused connection. I will not support the use of coercion to "tell the masses what's good for them" to skew the market to my advantage.
EU does not care about elections (Remember referendums in France, Netherland, Ireland, Greece?). Mr Junker even openly said there was no democratic alternative to EU treaties.
So why EU would care about public opinion from a public consultation? Be sure they will discard anything they did not want to hear.
So much undue credit is given to Tim-Berners Lee and CERN.
It's like being the OS contributor who decided to have a nice little clock in the bottom-right corner of the screen and being celebrated as the man who invented the GUI. Or like being Steve Jobs.
Sorry, but what "capital" are you talking about?
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.