Slashdot Mirror


Bird-Shaped Drone Symbolizes New Forms Of Covert Surveillance To Come (mirror.co.uk)

One security writer in Somali recently discovered a downed metal drone that had been carefully disguised as a bird, a reminder that drones will bring powerful new forms of surveillance. Slashdot reader Stephen Sellner also shares an article by the CEO of one unmanned systems company who's predicting that the commercial drone industry will create more than 100,000 new jobs and generate more than $82 billion for the U.S. economy, and suggesting "security of industrial areas (shipyard, storage facility, etc.) can now be augmented by drones to provide a quick eye in the sky."

But it may be inevitable that drones will be used in a variety of unexpected ways. Airbus is also testing the use of drones for quality inspections on their commercial aircraft. In Iowa, a drone helped lead first-responders to a man suffering from a heart attack. And the U.S. wildlife service is planning to drop peanut-butter pellets onto northeastern Montana to deliver vaccines to prairie dogs -- so that they can then in turn be eaten by Montana's population of endangered black-footed ferrets. Any predictions about drone news we'll be seeing in the future?

95 comments

  1. Farnborough 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yesterday (Fri), I was watching live feed from airshow @ Farnborough (it's available on YouTube, just look it up) and in first 10-15 minutes there were drones flying.
    At some point they've catapulted a robot that looked like some sort of bird of pray and it was flying (propelling) and gliding using its wings like a bird.
    That was surreal.

    1. Re:Farnborough 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Did you perhaps mean "bird of prey"?

    2. Re:Farnborough 2016 by reboot246 · · Score: 2

      No, he meant a religious bird.

    3. Re: Farnborough 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are catapulting nuns?

    4. Re:Farnborough 2016 by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      I skimmed through the first 20 minutes of this video:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      which I assume is the right one, because all you said was "look it up" when you could've been a bit more helpful and given us a link.

      Anyway, I skimmed through the first 20 minutes and all I saw were drones that look like planes.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    5. Re:Farnborough 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a dove then.

  2. Get a beer from the fridge? by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1
    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  3. One more reason ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that it needs to be perfectly legal to bring down a drone by any means if it is flying over your property without your permission!

    1. Re:One more reason ... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      How do you tell if something that appears to be a bird is really a bird or a drone disguised as one? If you feel that doesn't matter, what if it is disguised as a bird that is illegal to shoot at, and the excuse that "you thought it was a drone" wouldn't matter one iota if it turned out to be a real bird?

    2. Re:One more reason ... by Khyber · · Score: 2

      "How do you tell if something that appears to be a bird is really a bird or a drone disguised as one?"

      For starters, the only bird type that can hover in one spot is the Hummingbird. If you see a large bird hovering perfectly still in one spot, you can bet your ass it's a drone.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re: One more reason ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Waterhouse with jet setting.
      Won't hurt a real bird but drones hate it.

    4. Re:One more reason ... by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For starters, the only bird type that can hover in one spot is the Hummingbird. If you see a large bird hovering perfectly still in one spot, you can bet your ass it's a drone.

      Well if you bothered to properly disguise your drone as a bird I'm sure you'd have a program to fly in gentle circles like a bird searching for pray to "hover" over an area. Otherwise it'd be kinda obvious.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    5. Re: One more reason ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kingfishers can hover

    6. Re: One more reason ... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Kingfishers cannot hover in one spot like a hummingbird, and you wouldn't see a kingfisher hovering way overhead in the air like a hummingbird.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    7. Re:One more reason ... by mrbester · · Score: 1

      Bad luck for all those kestrels then, being misidentified as drones the world over...

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    8. Re: One more reason ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or a kestrel

    9. Re:One more reason ... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Kestrel.

    10. Re: One more reason ... by mark-t · · Score: 2

      Presumably, as another comment has noted, if one were trying to disguise their drone as a bird so that it would not be recognized as a drone, one wouldn't employ flight maneuvers that were obviously impossible for the bird it is disguised as in the first place.

      One could employ a gentle circling pattern to achieve a hover-like effect, just as some birds actually might do in nature.

    11. Re:One more reason ... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      For starters, the only bird type that can hover in one spot is the Hummingbird.

      a) Or the kestrel.
      b) Who says a drone disguised as a bird would have to hover?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    12. Re: One more reason ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've watched kingfishers stay in one place while flying, looking down into the water. I think that would be hovering..,

      http://besgroup.blogspot.com/2006/12/common-kingfisher-hovering.html?m=1

      "On the morning of 21st November 2006, KC Tsang was admiring a Common Kingfisher (Alcedo atthis) quietly perching on a branch of a tree. He had his camera setup ready and so took a shot of the bird (above). Then suddenly it flew off and hovered above the ground, âoelike a helicopterâ he wrote (below). The bird then swooped down on the grass below and caught an insect. "

    13. Re: One more reason ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er,have you never heard of the raptor,called a KESTREL.
      also called a windhover,but they can hover perfectly well in still air.
      There are also skylarks,they also can hover perfectly well in still air..
      In even a minute head wind,there are several dozen species that can hover perfectly well,seagulls,lots of corvids,etc etc,raven can point hover brilliantly in a upwards vertical wind draught...
      I suggest you go find out more about birds...

    14. Re:One more reason ... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      That's not hovering, that's gliding on an updraft. It couldn't "hover" inside a gymnasium, a hummingbird could.

      Here are some other birds that can hover:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    15. Re:One more reason ... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      That's not hovering, that's gliding on an updraft. It couldn't "hover" inside a gymnasium, a hummingbird could.

      I don't think it's gliding on an updraft, it's just facing into the wind (which is what I think the harrier in your second video is doing).

      Anyway, apparently kestrels can hover indoors:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    16. Re:One more reason ... by hairykrishna · · Score: 1

      Lots of birds can hover with a small amount of wind. A drone disguised as a kestrel would look perfectly natural hovering over my house.

      --
      "Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation." -R. Feynman
    17. Re: One more reason ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Birds circle in a thermal in order to climb. So, a circling buzzard that stays at the same altitude is probably as drone.

    18. Re:One more reason ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A kestrel must keep flapping wings in order to hover, right? If yes, then there's no way to confuse them with a drone.

  4. Clearly by rmdingler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    These machinations will get better and better, until a roach or mouse sighting will cause alarm on the order of a new level of revulsion.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:Clearly by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      These machinations will get better and better, until a roach or mouse sighting will cause alarm on the order of a new level of revulsion.

      When I read your comment, I immediately thought of the surveillance cockroach used by one of Zorg's underlings in The Fifth Element. Hopefully future real-world iterations will all meet with the same fate.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  5. Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is old news. There are even better drones than this one that not only look like birds but flap their wings like birds too.

    1. Re: Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On one of the UK'S children's programs, they were releasing launching paper gliders that looked like flapping birds. Hundreds of viewers called in to complain about animal cruelty.

    2. Re:Old News by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      This is old news. There are even better drones than this one that not only look like birds but flap their wings like birds too.

      But do they move through the air like birds?

      I would think an easier task would be to mimic a robin or other bird which spends a lot of time on the ground - that would be more easily ignored by the target.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Old News by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Yes they do, they're called ornithopters. I have one but it looks like a giant dragonfly.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    4. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The one in the photo doesn't. It clearly has propellers at the knuckle of each wing.

      There are omnithorpes that do, however they suffer from poor flight behavior. One might imagine that over time one could improve this with engineering effort. So far (not a good indicator of the future) most airlines and model makers have adopted a fixed wing setup since other setups are less stable in the air.

      If they go that route, there better be some excellent anti-shakycam software, or the operators will be seasick in no time (Blair Witch Project motion sickness style).

  6. Assassination drones by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 1, Interesting

    A friend who does a lot of contract work for the government(*) told me that we, the US, are developing a small gliding-bird drone that can deliver poison through a dart where a normal bird's beak would be.

    The use-case is for the bird to perch somewhere waiting (possibly hanging and recharging from power lines), then when the victim is spotted it glides silently towards the person and sticks beak-first into the neck.

    It's got perfect deniability - even if someone catches the drone, it doesn't have "made in the USA" anywhere on it, and even if it did you'd still never find out who was controlling it.

    It's one facet of our "asymmetrical warfare" plans.

    (*) This is a 2nd hand rumor from someone you don't know on the internet, take it with a grain of salt.

    1. Re:Assassination drones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why use a stealthy, untraceable drone that kills just the target when we can bomb the target, kill dozens of innocent bystanders, and then classify the report?

    2. Re:Assassination drones by gweilo8888 · · Score: 2

      "Even if someone catches the drone" -- well, that seems pretty much like a 100% certainty, for a drone whose stated goal is to crash head-first into something every single time it is used.

      Frankly, this sounds like a laughable idea borne in tinfoil hat country. There are much simpler, stealthier ways to kill someone.

    3. Re: Assassination drones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in China you can buy remote control bats that only weigh 14g

      http://www.diytrade.com/china/pd/8407957/RC_helicopter_flying_toy_Bat_Ornithopter.html

    4. Re:Assassination drones by Deadstick · · Score: 2

      (*) This is a 2nd hand rumor from someone you don't know on the internet, take it with a grain of salt.

      Pass the salt. Hold the rumor, please.

    5. Re:Assassination drones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eventually they'll be so small they don't have to be disguised as birds, they can just hide in the hotel furniture...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bIVzK-h6qao

    6. Re:Assassination drones by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Their stealth and untraceability makes them ideal to murder a state's own citizens.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    7. Re:Assassination drones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (*) This is a 2nd hand rumor from someone you don't know on the internet, take it with a grain of salt.

      Pass the salt. Hold the rumor, please.

      And die of hypertension? I see your dastardly plans...

    8. Re:Assassination drones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might have deniability, but it'd be far from "perfect deniability" given the limited number of governments with the resources and inclination to create high-tech disguised killing machines instead of more straightforward and reliable means of assassinations. About as deniable as when Putin claimed that the Russian soldiers in Crimea were totally just there on their own.

      Can't prove it, but there's often no doubt where to point the finger based simply on who would have the most to gain from the situation -- short of a false flag operation.

    9. Re:Assassination drones by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Frankly, this sounds like a laughable idea borne in tinfoil hat country. There are much simpler, stealthier ways to kill someone.

      What's simpler than pushing a button? Stealthier, yes. You could shoot them with a poison pellet, for example. But this is frankly toy technology, and it's precisely what futurists have feared since the invention of robotics. It costs quite a bit of money to put boots on the ground to kill people, and those people run the risk of detection or capture.

      Does this mean it's happening? No. But I would be shocked and amazed if our government wasn't working on small killer drones. It's just too tempting a weapon to ignore.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Assassination drones by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      But I would be shocked and amazed if our government wasn't working on small killer drones. It's just too tempting a weapon to ignore.

      Just the government? I'd say it's too tempting for anyone who wants to kill someone. Terrorists, hitmen, you name it.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    11. Re:Assassination drones by gweilo8888 · · Score: 1

      Except it's not just pushing a button. It's designing, testing, manufacturing and piloting the drone to its target, all of which require a significant investment in new tech for new tech's sake.

  7. Jobs and revenue by bjwest · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Too bad 99% of those jobs will be in overseas manufacturing and the vast majority of that $82 billion will be into the bank accounts of the wealthy.

    Oh, don't fret little man, the drones will be used on you so you'll not be left out of the loop.

    --

    --- Keep the choice with the user..
    1. Re:Jobs and revenue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. The Republicans always win while the rest of us starve and die.

    2. Re:Jobs and revenue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You type well for someone that the Republicans have starved to death.

  8. Honestly, officer! by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    I was thinking it's a crow about to damage my crops!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Honestly, officer! by Panoptes · · Score: 2

      "I was thinking it's a crow about to damage my crops!"

      Just turn the logic round, and here's the obvious use for a bird-drone - a scarecrow.

    2. Re:Honestly, officer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I was thinking it's a crow about to damage my crops!"

      Will now be a criminal offense because what you shot was a cop ('s telepresence).
      You're a cop('s telepresence rig) killer.

    3. Re:Honestly, officer! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      They're already used for this - ornithopters made to look like raptors are used at airports and other areas where bird traffic is undesirable.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    4. Re:Honestly, officer! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So... essentially finding the cop controlling the bird and shooting him carries the same jail time? Just asking, no reason...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  9. Beetlemania by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That beetle is looking at me kinda funny...

  10. Don't get too excited about this yet by PapayaSF · · Score: 1

    A drone-expert friend tells me that it's a commercially-available toy, not some super-duper cutting-edge technology.

    --
    Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    1. Re:Don't get too excited about this yet by starless · · Score: 1

      This one looks different, but is along the same lines and apparently has been around since at least 2011.
      http://www.prioria.com/maveric...

      Maveric is a lightweight, single-person portable unmanned aircraft system (UAS) capable of fully autonomous operation.
      [...]
              Single-person portable and operable
              Rugged carbon fiber composite airframe
              Camouflaged bird-like profile

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    2. Re:Don't get too excited about this yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's actually even more worrying.

    3. Re:Don't get too excited about this yet by Slugster · · Score: 1

      Your friend is a good person but is at once fooled, since many clever countries as the US, Russia, China, India and many others have always hoped to reach the vast wealth and resources of Somalia

      (It may have been used by somebody to spy on somebody, but it's probably a totally-local issue)

    4. Re:Don't get too excited about this yet by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      Why? Hobbyists have been building similar things for ages. Only back then they were called R/C aircraft or model aircraft, not drones.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  11. 'Physical' Cost, Political Cost, Social Cost. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 'bird assassin' is not doubt quite expensive and intended for use on politically sensitive targets (Say a leader of an unspecified Middle Eastern nation, who is about to cozy up to Russia instead of the US. Or vice versa.)

    The 'Bomb them' drones are meant to 'make an impact' both literally and metaphorically. You're putting the fear into the hearts of all the people that you can kill them at any time and fuck the collateral costs. These drones are also much cheaper and help finance a different sector of your military industrial complex.

    The third kind is surveillance drones. Making them look like animals helps evoke aversion to thought crime, and crime by association, but not normally real crime. The latter two are what the 'police state' portion of the current mechanisms need in order to conquer the minds and spirits, as well as the bodies (thanks to the above kinds of drones) of the populace.

    I was actually discussing something slightly different 10-15 years ago. The original Predator drones gave an important capability that was often overlooked: It could allow a minority of the populace to control the majority by minimizing the number of personnel needed to operate, rearm, manufacture, and maintain a fleet of drones to keep the majority of the populace in line. Combine that with the new generation of drones and a small group of people at the top, along with their loyalists can control any country on Earth, given a sufficient quantity of all these drones to ensure their doctrine is followed and have the ability to quell almost any unrest (imagine Turkey's recent coup if Erdogan loyalists had this technology and the populace hadn't been out in the streets supporting him.)

  12. I'm not worried, are you? by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    We'll get our hands on these things too. Better for watching the police, my dear. And without putting yourself within firing range. Sounds good to me..

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  13. Here's a thought by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With the exception of the occasional mad man anything evil that gets done is done for the sake of controlling access to or the use of wealth. People don't generally want to watch random blokes for the fun of it (rule 34 excepted). They're looking to hurt you because you're threatening either their money or their master's money.

    Rather than worry about a symptom of wide spread institutional evil ( surveillance ) why not attack root causes ( wealth inequality and the desire of a lucky few to preserve the privileges such a system grants them).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Here's a thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they don't want to watch random blokes. What they do want to do is collect everything possible so that when you go from "random bloke" to "person of interest" they have a pre-existing cache of information on you. They also want to use this data to generate profiles for people and if your profile matches a given pattern then you become a person of interest. The problem is that these profiles can get overly broad and end up dropping perfectly innocent people into surveillance or (much worse) on official watch/black lists. e.g. For a few years after 9/11 I was "randomly" selected for additional screening on almost every flight I took. I'm a white male, whose a US citizen and with no ties to any "radical" organizations, etc. etc. I was told, by more than one TSA agent at more than one airport, that I was picked me because I have a very long last name (anecdotal and I have nothing concrete other than being told by different people at different places). It stopped after about two years, I guess they refined the algorithm or policy, but the system is moving to speculation of guilt based on patterns instead of actual investigations and evidence. And yes, patterns do work and they are part of normal investigations but it used to be that there was a human involved making making a (usually) experienced judgement call going "that doesn't make sense". That filter is gone now but "expert systems" are no where near that level of sophistication. This is a dangerous shift in the legal system and process.

    2. Re:Here's a thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could it be because that is exactly what they are trying to stop?

    3. Re:Here's a thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anything evil that gets done is done for the sake of controlling access to or the use of wealth

      ...especially when it comes to government.

  14. In the news tomorrow... by MiniMike · · Score: 1

    Tomorrows headline: "Bird shaped tracking device dropped by drone leads military to insurgent headquarters"

    Or to random persons house. No problem, there's plenty of missiles...

  15. Truth and fiction by axlash · · Score: 1

    Strangely enough, I was watching 'Eye in the Sky', where such a drone was used.

    Even stranger, the drone in the film was being used to conduct surveillance on Somalis.

    I wonder if the film makers are privy to some informatation that we aren't?

    --
    Deal with reality - the world as it is - rather than ideality - the world as you would like it to be.
  16. Please, that huge thing? by geekforhire · · Score: 1

    I know of a local company that has one in production (for a while) that looks like a hummingbird..this hideous pigeon is old news and not news unless we are talking about antiquated hardware. This is nothing and since the hummingbird drone is not exactly a secret I am sure it is also 'old tech'.

  17. Security through obscurity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pteranodons would be more stealthy. No one expects to see any, so won't be looking.

  18. Cat copter by rfengr · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sorry, NOTHING beats the cat copter, well maybe the cat copter chasing the bird drone: https://youtu.be/uJfM23iChzs

  19. Sure thing by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    I would totally think that thing buzzing in the sky with propellers was a bird. Totally. /s

  20. This would be really bad for actual birds by Jeremi · · Score: 1

    In any conflict zone, anyone worried about drone surveillance would have a strong incentive to kill as many actual birds as possible, just in case any of them were drones (and to make any actual drones more easily detectable).

    If you wanted a way to (further) incentivize the extinction of actual birds, I can't think of a better way then to disguise surveillance drones as birds.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    1. Re:This would be really bad for actual birds by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      See also: Using vaccination programs to collect terrorist DNA.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:This would be really bad for actual birds by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      See also: Using vaccination programs to collect terrorist DNA.

      A doctor friend of mine considers this one of the worst, and most unpunishable, war crimes of the afghanistan war. In entire regions of afghanistan and taliban controlled parts of pakistan even being suspected of being a foreign doctor is enough to get you assasinated now. As a result polio and numerous other things are running rampant in parts of the world again, and may well end up killing more people than the military conflict and world terrorism combined, unless the world health organization can figure out some way to to convince the locals they are not american secret agents.

      It was an evil piece of espionage that betrayed everything medicine stands for.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    3. Re:This would be really bad for actual birds by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1
    4. Re: This would be really bad for actual birds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not unpunishable - just no one is willing to do so. Trying the CIA head at the time in the Hague for it, abolishing the whole agency, hell even deciding on a Stalinesque purge and having the entire leadership assassinated are all possibilities of varying sanity.

  21. CIAdot against surveillance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard that.

  22. Where is that place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is Somali? Are they so hungry they ate an "a" from the end? Or was it an autocorrect and the place is Socali?

    1. Re:Where is that place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They rushed to act non-CIA coerced.

  23. Dragonfly drones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They were already deploying drones that looked like dragonflies 9 years ago: http://www.washingtonpost.com/...

  24. Clash of the Titans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I get one that looks like the mechanical bird Clash of the Titans?

    1. Re:Clash of the Titans? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Maybe this plus some silver and gold paint?

      https://www.alibaba.com/produc...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  25. Re: Can't Get This Dwelling in a Basement! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an inclination,
    To enjoy this insinuation.
    This needs an exclamation,
    But distracts from subjugation,
    Of solar excitation,
    Not meeting the expectation.

  26. Predictions? Within the decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Six suspected criminals killed after refusing to disclose all financial account pass-codes for civil forfeiture acquisition after reasonable suspicion on account of diminutive suspected criminals seen by remote-officer performing potentially drug-related transactions in front of the house using possible drug-paraphernalia ranging from "girl scout cookies" to the notorious "doctor barbie"

    Numerous sonic emissions of a hostile tone were directed at the remote-officer after initial location-suppression, who opened fire on the suspects before taking the fight to the criminals located within the home in response, stating "I believed I had reason to fear for my drone". Extended family of the downed criminals are expected to be fined under reinforced CFAA provisions, to cover the emotional and financial damages suffered by the remote-officer's operator in the pursuit of his legal duty.

  27. Just a thought by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    Could we make it unambiguously legal to shoot these things as long as they aren't actually in flight, then enact legislation requiring them to look like George Bush Junior and Tony Blair?

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  28. Eye in the Sky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://m.imdb.com/title/tt2057392/

    Real life catching up with movie science.

  29. Drones are not edible. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    We are going to see some very confused hawks.

    Someone needs to do a study on this. Bird do weird things - will they recognise 'not food' on the first attempted bite, or swallow a bundle of wires and snapped-off plastic bits? If birdlike drones become commonplace (as toys, I'd imagine) then it might have some ecological impact.

    1. Re:Drones are not edible. by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      This one doesn't look eaten:

      http://static.rcgroups.net/for...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  30. the disappointment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's still just another propeller driven airplane that's disguised as bird. As someone who expected to see ornitopter I was very disappointed...

  31. FESTO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FESTO already is way past that piece of crap - https://youtu.be/nnR8fDW3Ilo

  32. That's not the only one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a robotic falcon on demonstration at the Farnborough airshow this year. https://youtu.be/B2mR7q1M6j8

  33. Poor prairie dogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here prairie dog, prairie dog, prairie dog! Have a nice peanut butter treat... BAM!! Black footed ferret attack.

  34. in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone is designing 'drones' that mimic the ones in The Incredibles.

    http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=bird+drone+alarm+incredibles&view=detailv2&&id=1B73B0AC97883DCA6DA8ED68989F2F5F5CA03885&selectedIndex=0&ccid=%2bUxGVYl9&simid=607988682359702154&thid=OIP.Mf94c4655897d237eb99d765a96a8e5c5H0&ajaxhist=0

    News at 11.