Slashdot Mirror


Pokemon Go Doubles Nintendo's Stock Price (reuters.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report form Reuters: Shares of Japan's Nintendo Co soared another 14 percent on Tuesday, more than doubling the firm's market capitalization to 4.5 trillion yen ($42.5 billion) in just seven sessions since the mobile game Pokemon GO was launched in the United States. The phenomenal success of Pokemon GO -- now available in 35 countries, the majority in Europe, and most recently in Canada -- has triggered massive buying in Nintendo shares, surprising even some seasoned market players. Nintendo shares ended Tuesday up 14.4 percent at 31,770 yen, bringing its gains to more than 100 percent since the launch of the game on July 6. Turnover in Nintendo shares hit 703.6 billion yen, surpassing the record for trading turnover in individual shares it set on Friday, of 476 billion yen. Trading in Nintendo shares roughly accounted for a quarter of the entire trading on the Tokyo Stock Exchange's main board. The success of Pokemon GO, unforeseen even by its creators, has boosted hopes that Nintendo could capitalize on a line-up of popular characters ranging from Zelda to Super Mario to strengthen its new foray into augmented reality. Pokemon GO is now the biggest mobile game of all time in the United States.

108 comments

  1. Let's play... by Arkh89 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... Bubble Bobble!

    1. Re: Let's play... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather see "Frogger Go"

      Let's see how good they are at dodging traffic.

    2. Re:Let's play... by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 3, Funny

      later lets play global thermonuclearwar

    3. Re: Let's play... by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      need a live top down shot like this.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    4. Re:Let's play... by jmcvetta · · Score: 1

      Alas, there seem to be no stock options available for Nintendo. Nor is it possible (thru Thinkorswim, at least) to sell short. Lame.....

    5. Re:Let's play... by subanark · · Score: 1

      Too similar? Really the only difference is that when you entrap a monster in a sphere, you enslave it in Pokemon, while in Bubble Bobble, you simply kill it. Seems like a shoddy knock off too me.

    6. Re:Let's play... by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Bubble Bobble is one of the included games in the Mini-NES coming out later this year.

      Otherwise, the Bubble Bobble Revolution game for DS also contains a copy of the original NES game. I just played that through and avoided the Revolution game altogether.

    7. Re: Let's play... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are wrong my friend, it's right there on the FAQs page of Nintendo. It is a publicly traded company after all.

    8. Re:Let's play... by slew · · Score: 3, Funny

      A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.

    9. Re:Let's play... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I hug you?

  2. And yet nothing of value was gained. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, who plays that game and why?

    1. Re:And yet nothing of value was gained. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...

      Have you not gone outside in the past week? Seriously?

    2. Re: And yet nothing of value was gained. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I asked a colleague of mine today. He just mumbled something like "yeah, I know it's idiotic, but...", then ran off starring at his mobile.

    3. Re:And yet nothing of value was gained. by richy+freeway · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Purely anecdotal, but from what I've seen it's people aged 4 to 40+.

      And a fuck load of them at that. Also it's good to see groups of kids out and about walking and riding places rather than just loitering around with "nothing to do".

    4. Re:And yet nothing of value was gained. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      1. It's summer
      2. It's social
      3. It's Pokemon

      It's a geolocation MMO built with an extremely popular franchise on top of it. The game is based on Ingress, which had something like 7 million players as of last year and even then a lot of people hadn't even hard of Niantic before Pokemon Go. Most of the important locations were generated from Ingress and/or data collected from Ingress players.

      I don't think that either Nintendo or Niantic were quite prepared for the rush that is happening right now, I mean they knew it would be big but not quite this big.

      And sure, it may be a fad but damn, it's pushing a lot of downloads / new phone purchases

      People will look back at this the same way we look back at the hula hoop craze, another frivolous toy that caught on and got people moving... you know, for kids!

    5. Re:And yet nothing of value was gained. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...

      Have you not gone outside in the past week? Seriously?

      There's nobody outside. Must be the heat. It's sweltering out there.

    6. Re:And yet nothing of value was gained. by tlhIngan · · Score: 0

      And a fuck load of them at that. Also it's good to see groups of kids out and about walking and riding places rather than just loitering around with "nothing to do".

      It seems the same to me. Before they loitered about with their eyes glued to their phone screens. Today they're loitering about with their eyes glued to their phone screen. Granted, at pokestops it's usually much more loiterers, but they all are still glued to their phone screens, like a bunch of zombies.

      Reminds me of the cartoons where everyone texts each other even though they're sitting down at the same table.

      I guess the difference is some people are getting some fresh air and a few others are getting some exercise. But it looks a lot like a zombie scene, to be honest.

    7. Re:And yet nothing of value was gained. by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Seriously, who plays that game and why?

      I went to a nearby closed food store and meet three male kids walking with their phones up talking about where they should go. ... maybe they were just taking a stroll and had to discuss where they should go next and held their phones like all kids do .. or they played the game.

    8. Re:And yet nothing of value was gained. by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Many people, and none of them owe you an explanation.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    9. Re:And yet nothing of value was gained. by JazzXP · · Score: 2

      I'm playing it. It's stupid, it has no depth, I didn't even grow up with Pokemon (I'm about five years too old), but it's actually quite addictive. Not something I'd ever spend money on though.

    10. Re:And yet nothing of value was gained. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      ," said tlhIngan, staring like a zombie at their terminal mindlessly typing slashdot comments like a SHEEPLE

    11. Re:And yet nothing of value was gained. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When I play Pokemon Go, I am looking around at the world. Because my phone vibrates when a Pokemon is in range, so I don't need to stare at it continuously.

    12. Re:And yet nothing of value was gained. by Stinky+Cheese+Man · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm 50+ and I love Pokemon Go. I had lost interest in computer games because I spend all day sitting in front of a computer and don't want to spend my spare time doing that too. I like to get out of the house for fresh air and exercise. But thinking "I have to do two miles today", every day, makes it feel like a chore. Pokemon Go makes it fun.

    13. Re:And yet nothing of value was gained. by Angeret · · Score: 1

      52 here and very much in agreement. I bet there's plenty older too.

    14. Re:And yet nothing of value was gained. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be nice if they were walking and riding places, while "looking around them at the real world" rather than having their eyes glued to their screens. My first reaction was "awesome, this should get the young ones to exercise in a more fun way, and discover the city where they've lived all their lives". After seeing the reality of the thing I now think it's a real menace. People of all ages are behaving like addicts, not looking at all at the world around them. I've seen a few near misses already and the game was just released here. It needs to come with frequent interruptions and reminders for people to look around them.

    15. Re:And yet nothing of value was gained. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, who plays that game and why?

      Mostly childhood brainwashing and a society which discourages socialization every other way.

  3. Unforseen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I still can't figure out why people are so dense when it comes to the potential of augmented reality.

    1. Re:Unforseen? by ledow · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What is the potential of AR?

      Because, to be honest, I can't really see it.

      You can project shit over your car windscreen. Or you could just have a pane of glass and have all the shit you need to look at slightly below it. Thus, you can see all the road AND all the instruments. Why do you want or need one obscuring the other?

      I think the same of AR. I can point my phone at the Eiffel Tower and see... what? The Eiffel tower behind lots of shit that I may or may not want, that I could still read if I just pressed the button and held the phone facing down like a normal person reading stuff.

      What does AR give you over anything else? So far the biggest usage is imprinting "hidden" cartoon characters over your high-res image of the thing ACTUALLY IN FRONT OF YOU.

      I work in schools. They have "AR" books. In reality, it's an app that shows a 3D object hovering over the top of a bar-code like thing in the book. It would be easier, cheaper and more useful to have a) the 3D object showing in an app and no book, or b) a book and no 3D object depending on the information.

      I'm honestly struggling for what information you'd want to overlay over reality that you can't get quicker, easier and less obtrusively by just holding the same device in your hand and looking at it.

    2. Re:Unforseen? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Augmented reality and market capitalization are the same thing. We got another unicorn here..

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re:Unforseen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding me? AR has way more potential than VR could ever dream of. VR I have no idea why it's being pursued so heavily. Who wants to wear a damn headset for hours?

    4. Re:Unforseen? by Nkwe · · Score: 1

      What is the potential of AR?

      I agree that the cases you listed are not too exciting. The one case that I have seen that is pretty exciting and useful is text translation. Nokia has (had?) a pretty slick translation application where you could point your phone at some text and it would translate it on the fly, in place. Works great when pointing it at a menu or something where you want to see the translation alongside pictures and other positionally useful information. It would translate and overlay the translations it could do, and left the rest of the image as is.

    5. Re:Unforseen? by godrik · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ok, I'll bite.

      What about indicating in a super market what are the objects that you want and which are the ones that you don't. That information could come from a master list of what you want to cook this week and what is currently on sales.

      This similarly applies to clothing stores: your niece would love that dress and her birthday is in two weeks.

      Or in book stores, you could pick up the book and have typical reviews show up around it.

      In games, the alien demo from MS hololens was awesome. A colleague of mine has one of the dev kits, and the game was fun and exciting. If it is cheap, I'd buy one.

      Once again for board games, like warhammer 40k, you could use VR to make the actual rules of the game using a computer and keep track of the status of a unit, show movement, ...

      There is potential in virtual art. I think there was a book of gibson (doctorow?) that integrated the concepts. Though it is somewhat similar to pokemon go.

      You could do interesting things in recalling tracking from the past. Maybe you have a room with cameras that constructed a 3d model of the room over time, and you could roll back what happened in the room while being in the room. Gives you a different perspective on event. Could be useful for law enforcement for instance.

      I see lots of potential applications of VR. now, holding the phone in front of you has definite drawbacks, but a hololens like device could apply to many things.

    6. Re: Unforseen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of AR as markup for Reality. Or just go read Vinge's Rainbows End.

    7. Re:Unforseen? by farble1670 · · Score: 2

      I think the same of AR. I can point my phone at the Eiffel Tower and see... what? The Eiffel tower behind lots of shit that I may or may not want, that I could still read if I just pressed the button and held the phone facing down like a normal person reading stuff.

      You didn't have to search for "eiffel tower". If there are geograhically relevant markers, they are contextual to your orientation to the object. Think about a typical indoor map. Instead of finding the "you are here" marker and trying to figure out which way you are looking, AR can project an arrow pointing you to where you want to go.

      What does AR give you over anything else? So far the biggest usage is imprinting "hidden" cartoon characters over your high-res image of the thing ACTUALLY IN FRONT OF YOU.

      Yes, sort of like if you were looking at a sign in front of the Eiffel tower, it would imprint a high res sign over the Eiffel tower. The idea isn't to stare into your AR goggles 24x7. Think of it like a map where you you reference it to get meta information about your location that isn't otherwise accessible.

    8. Re:Unforseen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The AC is going to be the type of person who sits in their parents basement grumbling about how dumb AR is while everyone else is out doing cool stuff.

    9. Re:Unforseen? by cryptizard · · Score: 2

      Google translate does that. It matches the font and color of the text too, pretty cool. I've only used it for German and Spanish but it worked really well.

    10. Re:Unforseen? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Nokia has (had?) a pretty slick translation application where you could point your phone at some text and it would translate it on the fly

      Google Translate does this now.

    11. Re:Unforseen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Augmented capitalization, perhaps?

    12. Re:Unforseen? by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      I mean, it depends on what's on the screen of the headset. But in general, you are correct. More importantly, they are completely different. VR will have use in gaming, experience-based scenarios, and design. AR will have applications in daily life, and possibly in industry.

    13. Re:Unforseen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Cool stuff" = walking around staring at your phone like a moron?

    14. Re:Unforseen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh no. Walking around with a head mounted display like a genius.

    15. Re:Unforseen? by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 2

      When done correctly it is very useful, it's just hard to do it correctly. Pokemon GO is not actually using augmented reality. It just calls what it is doing augmented reality, but really it is just super imposing cartoon characters on top of video from your phone's camera. There is a but of integration with your phone's accelerometers, but this is pointless, and most people just turn it off.

      Augmented reality when it is done correctly will become an essential piece of technology. Imagine walking around with something resembling google glasses and having a poisonous snake identified and highlighted in your field of view. Not only can you run away in the correct direction, but you will know what kind of anti-venom to use if you do get bit. Or just imagine how fun it will be to walk around the zoo, having your AR freak out at all the poisonous snakes it identifies.

      This is a pretty specific example that I thought of while at the zoo. There are countless applications for AR.

      Some more mundane examples. Having your car show up in your glasses while walking in a parking lot, rather than having to correlate a gps position on your phone to a location in real life. Imagine having the names of everyone you see be super imposed on a virtual name tag, so you don't have to be embarrassed by forgetting their name.

      Here is an application that is actually in use right now. Realtime translation. You can use your phone's camera to look at text in a foreign language and have it translated into your native language right on the object itself. This is super useful when in a foreign country.

    16. Re:Unforseen? by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Really? I see massive possibilities and the only limiting factor is the form factor of the device at the moment. If you could imbed the AR into a set of normal looking glasses it becomes huge.

      Ignore for a second the privacy issues and the creep factor and just think on whether these things would be useful or not. Names of people floating over their heads, bread crumb navigation dots, interactive points for information when visiting places, being able to pin reminder points.

    17. Re:Unforseen? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The AR component of Pokemon Go isn't really a key feature. It doesn't even work on phones that don't have a hardware gyroscope, and that means a majority of the Android phones. It's actually easier to 'catch' a pokemon with the AR feature disabled, and many people play the game that way.

      The key features of Pokemon Go is the GPS, that objectives are hard physical locations in the real world, and that logging kilometers of walking is one of the objectives in gameplay.

      The AR part is, kinda, just a shiney bit.

    18. Re:Unforseen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You can project shit over your car windscreen. Or you could just have a pane of glass and have all the shit you need to look at slightly below it. Thus, you can see all the road AND all the instruments. Why do you want or need one obscuring the other?

      Because if it is done correctly, the instrument panel readings and GPS directions aren't obscuring the road. I can ignore them when I don't care about them, and glance at them much more quickly when I do care about them.

    19. Re:Unforseen? by ledow · · Score: 2

      Alright, you're the current leader on this thread. All the rest are tripe and nonsense (identify poisonous snakes, my arse).

      I've used Google Translate to do exactly this for my Italian girlfriend and her family. Shall I tell you the problem, however? The translation still sucks.

      And making it same colour and "augmenting" it into the picture of the menu is nowhere near as useful as just translating it. Honestly, the movement and positioning and losing the translation just as you slide the device over to them, and the translation shifting and jumping all over the place and even changing the words when you're holding the phone relatively still - it doesn't help at all. And though it does a fairly clever job of trying to put the text in the right colour at the right place, it makes a mess of it.

      Honestly, after two seconds of "gimmick show" that we did with it, it was then back to human translation and/or just getting the one word to translate without having to type it in.

      But, in terms of something that 30 years down the road might be potentially useful if we solve all the other problems with it, you're currently in the lead.

      As always, however, the simpler service of just recognising the text and putting up a list of the translation as static text rather than trying to superimpose it on a real-time camera image will still probably win in terms of effort, legibility and speed once the initial gimmick wears off.

    20. Re:Unforseen? by _UnderTow_ · · Score: 1

      You sound old.

    21. Re:Unforseen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, I'll bite.

      1. Cars. When you are driving in your car you look out the wind shield as usual, only the road that you want to follow is painted green. No looking down to the GPS or listening to the voice. Plenty of time to plan any exits etc.

      2 Cars again. As you drive through the woodlands a Deer is approaching from your left. The infrared camera has already picked it up and painted it red for you even though it is still obscured by by trees.

      3. Engineering. As you walk up to the faulty piece of hardware you immediately have access to manuals as well as service logs for each equipment. There is no hassle for you to decided how to explain which part of the machine you mean in your report because you just painted that part yellow and posted a sign there for your friendly electrician coming in two hours later.

      4. Pricing. Next to every item in the store a price is floating, combined with price statistics from the next 10 closest stores and price history. It is also marked green if it's in your shopping list.

      5. Step by step instructions. Ever wondered how to change the break pads on your old Ford Taurus, well I have. And now I don't need to try to watch a video while my car is jacked up and my hands are oily (ok, you got me there, I don't actually know anything about cars, but lets pretend I do, this is Slashdot after all). Instead a step by step animated instruction is showed just next to the parts I'm working with.

      6. Finding points of interest. As you walk down central Prague you realise that it is time for dinner. Just activate the filters you want and every suitable establishment is outlined in the world around you.

      7. Information posts. Can't read Cantonese? Well lucky that every sign post has the relevant message posted in AR in any language where translation is possible. You can even set the information to be opaque and cover the original sign.

      While we are still a way off from practical AR and there definitely are serious risks for information leakage, government control and excessive commercialisation I would still argue that AR has potential.

    22. Re:Unforseen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The AR isn't just the catching pokemon with the camera on bit. The layering the existence of Pokemon and Pokestops over the real geography using GPS that you mention is also AR. Personally, I turn off the AR bit of the catching because, like you say, it's just a shiny option and it makes my phone run slow as shit.

    23. Re:Unforseen? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Laser tag + augmented reality + first person shooter. You think old farts get annoyed by Pokemon, just wait.

    24. Re:Unforseen? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      What about indicating in a super market what are the objects that you want and which are the ones that you don't.

      How about providing product information for supermarket items in AR rather than sifting through mountains of labels which all have a tiny logo followed by most of the packaging describing daily intakes, salts, sugars, chemicals, GMO warnings, recycling information, alcohol content, allergen content, halal certification, ... I'm sure I've left some out.

      In related news I picked up a packet of peanut brittle which on the front had a warning that it contained peanuts as if the title wasn't warning enough. We can barely see the products anymore under all the worthless crap that they print on the front and change every year because they figures out the previous advice was wrong.

    25. Re:Unforseen? by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

      What is the potential of AR?

      Because, to be honest, I can't really see it.

      Just wait for Virtual Girlfriend 1.0

    26. Re:Unforseen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is these are all things looking for a problem.

      It *sounds* nice - but what is really the difference between me walking into a store and using my phone to *look up the things I want to see*.

      The problem in my mind - is I hear all these great "use cases" to be a google glasshole, but how would the AR even know which one I want ? And all I can imagine are 1,000 overlays - some telling me about the furniture, some telling me about the book (or specifically for the book, overlays about the author, overlays of reviews, overlays of online prices, overlays for sequels, I'm sure I could come up with more after my morning coffee ...)

      And I really just have no problem pulling out my phone for things *I actually care to find out about*.

    27. Re:Unforseen? by JustSomeProgrammer · · Score: 1

      One of the funniest ironies in video games to me was a line from Star Ocean on PS2. The main character is a HUGE game fanatic. And that's why he is incredibly fit. Because in that world all the video games were developed for a system that's like a holodeck. I did not consider that an implausible future.

    28. Re:Unforseen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like a complete faggot

    29. Re:Unforseen? by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      I'm honestly struggling for what information you'd want to overlay over reality that you can't get quicker, easier and less obtrusively by just holding the same device in your hand and looking at it.

      Wow, then you REALLY need to get a bit more imaginative. Big hint: don't just think of basic GPS, think about all possible sensory inputs to drive the AR data.

      Here's a scary but entirely possible scenario in the near future: you hold up your phone and use the camera to scan the room. It automatically recognizes everyone you point at via facial recognition (Facebook already has something like 500M+ people's faces that it can use, and growing). That will tell you at *minimum* their name (which is highly useful in itself) and likely a lot more - possibly showing who in the group knows each other, whether they are married or dating, their musical or other tastes, political leanings, job, etc.

      Less creepy but also useful, you could point at a business and it could instantly show you a detailed description, Yelp review, restaurant menu, hours, etc.

      There ya go. And that took me a few minutes to come up with. I'm sure in an hour I could write a small book on potential AR ideas.

  4. At least here Pokemon GO gets free advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    After the US launch there was a constant trickle of news articles about Pokemon GO. Since it was released a week a go that trickle became a huge wave. Every day there are new articles about people playing - mostly positive nostalgic pieces. This publicity is something that money just cannot buy.

    Meanwhile the game is so overloaded that my daugher cannot get it to work on her phone. The whole thing is just crazy.

    1. Re:At least here Pokemon GO gets free advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for telling us what we already knew. And keep your kids off the internet, they're ruining it.

    2. Re:At least here Pokemon GO gets free advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If anything's objectively ruining the internet, it's that swollen mass of streaming that clogs more tubes than anything else.

      If you just want people exactly your age and up online, well, everyone reading these posts has wasted their time.

    3. Re:At least here Pokemon GO gets free advertising by Solandri · · Score: 2

      They don't need advertising. Just go outside and you'll run into people playing it. The press could be absolutely silent about it, and it'd still be a huge hit because of this "word of mouth" advertising.

      The game has succeeded not only in bringing augmented reality to the public's attention, but at inverting the whole concept. It's turned players (walking around staring at their phones) into real advertisements for a virtual game - kind of an augmented virtuality.

  5. I want to say I knew this would happen by madwheel · · Score: 2

    But if I did, I would have bought some damn stock.

  6. Fuck that, buy CAPCOM shares by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

    Two words: Street Fighter GO!

    Can you say Hadouken?

    1. Re:Fuck that, buy CAPCOM shares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holding out for Carmageddon GO! personally....

      That stock price is just insane. It's like this craze will continue for 40 years for that to pay off. I find that rather doubtful to say the least.

  7. Let get Cannon Fodder going by future+assassin · · Score: 0

    should clean up the streets pretty fast.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  8. pokemon NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    n/t

  9. Don't knock it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand all the vitriol towards this game here. It's fun as heck (and very addictive).

    1. Re:Don't knock it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm addicted to it but I think the game is pretty lame to be honest.

  10. Still offline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Been offline for at least the past 90 minutes.

    Not sure if they're getting DDoS'd again or what.

  11. Obvious? by avandesande · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's been pretty obvious to me that Nintendo's value is in it's IP, not it's hardware. Games on other systems, movies, tv etc. are where the growth is.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
    1. Re:Obvious? by aliquis · · Score: 2

      It's been pretty obvious to me that Nintendo's value is in it's IP, not it's hardware. Games on other systems, movies, tv etc. are where the growth is.

      It has been suggested before:
      25 Jan 2007: http://www.cnet.com/forums/dis...
      28 April 2012: http://www.slashgear.com/why-n...
      20 Aug 2013: http://www.ign.com/boards/thre...
      2 years ago: http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards...
      7 Oct 2014: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
      21 Nov 2014: http://www.polygon.com/2014/11...

      http://www.thetoptens.com/reas...

    2. Re:Obvious? by del_diablo · · Score: 1

      I am not sure I agree the value is in the IP. You could argue SEGA, for a while, by copying the times trends during the age of the Megadrive and its succesors, had many strong IPs.
      It turns out IPs are worth almost nothing by themselves. They need to be backed by released, commercials, and SOME SUCCESS. The latter is the hardest.

      So what do I mean by this? Well, during the early 90s, Nintendo did license out some of their IPs over low threshold. The results is things like CD-i Zelda(3 shit games), Mario Teaches Typing(MS-Dos, developed by INTERPLAY !!!).
      As we sorta can see, IP's are not worth shit by themselves. They need to be backed up by current or former media, to even exist.
      And so far, even if Nintendo is a backwards company led by old Japanese men, with foreign sub branches filled with weird people, the fact is, they do own their IPs. But since the IPs are not worth anything by themselves, a Nintendo game tends to be a game that has some threshold of better production value.
      It could be anything from smoothing over the mechanics, to removing tons of story elements to smooth up gameplay, or it could be raw quality.

      I don't think Pokemon GO is a bad use of the IP.
      Even if GO is in many ways a total converison of Ingress, the point still stands: GO has better goals than Ingress ever had. And GO's goal synergy enough with what Pokemon as a IP is, to allow GO to become the current hit.
      I've seen installation projections for Android, that claims GO has a install base of over 5%, compared to 2-3% for other very popular apps(Twitter, Snapchat, etc). Go is insanely popular.

    3. Re:Obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because a mobile game caught lightning in a bottle doesn't mean it's suddenly a good idea to put Zelda on your fucking Playstation, LOL. It's not gonna happen kid, no matter how much you whine and have whined over the past decades. I'm sorry. :)

    4. Re:Obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been pretty obvious to me that Nintendo's value is in it's IP, not it's hardware. Games on other systems, movies, tv etc. are where the growth is.

      Pokemon Go has very little potential for monetization as a game - too much "pay to win" and they will just kill the brand. They will only really be able to capitalize on it by selling the data from all the people wondering around with cameras (sort of the way Google Glass was designed to spy on people.)

    5. Re:Obvious? by catprog · · Score: 1

      Business buying lures, I think are the biggest monetization option.

      --
      My Transformation Website
      Kindle Books http://www.catprog.org/rev
      Interactive CYOA http://www.catprog.org/st
  12. plot to brainwash kids into attacking pearl harbor by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 0

    Just wait for them to have an pokemon camp where it's really a place to pump out brainwashed child soldiers.

  13. Of All The Useless Things You Could Do by zenlessyank · · Score: 0

    this is by far the most useless there could be. The only good side is we have an easier way of detecting idiots.

    1. Re:Of All The Useless Things You Could Do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting people up and moving isn't useless. Or do you think it would be better if they were sitting their asses in front of their TVs, absorbing an endless diet of violence and belittlement?

      Or maybe they'd be better if they'd be sitting their fat asses on Slashdot and moaning about other people having a good time? Eh?

    2. Re:Of All The Useless Things You Could Do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't know. A webforum post bitching about the game might be even more useless...

    3. Re:Of All The Useless Things You Could Do by friedmud · · Score: 1

      Yep. It's definitely a good way to detect idiots... by finding all of the posts like yours from people who rage against a simple phone game.

      People love to spend their time on all kinds of inane stuff... no reason to get so upset over it.

    4. Re:Of All The Useless Things You Could Do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see. Perfectly understandable now, sir... you're a raving asshole who thinks that being out in the open is an invite to get children raped.

      I seriously hope someone snips off your balls before you every have children. I'd hate to see you passing this kind of bullshit on to another generation.

      Now go fuck yourself, bitch ass fucktard.

    5. Re:Of All The Useless Things You Could Do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might want to look in the mirror when it comes to detecting idiots.

    6. Re:Of All The Useless Things You Could Do by Pubstar · · Score: 1

      And yet you're here. Posting on /. not contributing anything more than opinions on things that, in the long run, don't matter. Speaking of all the useless things you could do....

    7. Re:Of All The Useless Things You Could Do by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Hey! Get back to curing cancer.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    8. Re:Of All The Useless Things You Could Do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I found it to be a nice change of pace to my usual walk.

      Walked about 27km today instead of the usual 4.

      Sure the new car smell will wear off in about a week and then I probably will only fire it up once or twice per month.

    9. Re:Of All The Useless Things You Could Do by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      You seem really smart... Please tell us what all your hobbies are so we can be as awesome and smart as you.

    10. Re:Of All The Useless Things You Could Do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Michelle Obama has been trying to get kids to go outside and be active for 8 years. Nintendo did it in a day.

    11. Re:Of All The Useless Things You Could Do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spot the Daily Mail reader. Protip - how about you wait until this happens before you rant about it.

  14. I welcome it by Dirk+Becher · · Score: 1

    Hopefulls it helps them recover from the low Wii U sales and enables them to provide many more enthralling games in the future.

  15. Glimpse of the future? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After the robots take all of our jobs, will this be how we spend our days?

  16. But remember... by OakDragon · · Score: 1

    ... Nintendo is in danger of dying! /sarcasm

    1. Re:But remember... by slew · · Score: 1

      ... Nintendo is in danger of dying! /sarcasm

      Netcraft has confirmed it ;^)
      Just google "Netcraft has confirmed: Nintendo is dying." if it is on the internet it must be true...

  17. "Pokemon"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pokémon

  18. Re:plot to brainwash kids into attacking pearl har by cfalcon · · Score: 1

    For the swarm!

  19. As the stock soars.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it makes you wonder if Nintendo will cave into the pressure of in-game Ads. They're sitting on a gold mine with millions of eyeballs at their disposal. Let's all keep our fingers crossed Nintendo doesn't give into the dark side.

  20. Re:plot to brainwash kids into attacking pearl har by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

    Who the hell needs child soldiers? Poor countries that don't yet have robots (i.e. not Japan).

  21. DUMP IT! by p51d007 · · Score: 0

    If you have it, DUMP IT. If you don't have it, DON'T BUY IT. Once this fad wears out, and/or once the weather changes from summer to WINTER, you think people are going to wander outdoors to play this silly game? Plus, once they have as many on the hook for this fad, you know they will start PUSHING ADS. That will kill it for good. Start playing it, every mile, or certain time frame an ad pops up you have to wait for to finish, before you can continue. It's like a drug dealer setting up in a new neighborhood...start off at a reduced price, get em hooked, then jack up the price.

    1. Re:DUMP IT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exclusive holiday pokemon you can only catch during xyz months will have people wandering around outside no matter what the climate.

  22. Re: plot to brainwash kids into attacking pearl ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cinpokemon

  23. Moreover... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At this point in time children ARE NOT a renewable resource in Japan, unlike in previous generations. Losing any of their current children would both reduce the genepool for future generations (potentially greatly, since I know of a number of Japanese families whose family registries are ending this generation.

    Combine that with current living costs in japan, women wanting careers and more sexual freedom, etc, and you've got a huge demand, rather than glut for the supply of the 'next generation'. Child soldiers are for countries which have plenty of children, a low life expectancy, and generally an unstable government (since most child soldiers are used in internal, rather than external, disputes.

  24. 12 years ago...on slashdot the PokemonGo ancestor by Ploulack · · Score: 3, Interesting

    https://games.slashdot.org/story/04/04/02/0113231/mogi-location-based-mobile-gaming-hits-japan

    I was part of that company. Talk about being too early...data charges for playing were ranging in the hundreds of dollars for the most active players.
    http://links.net/share/write/thefeature/Mogi__Second_Generation_Location-Based_Gaming.html

  25. Banana Software by treczoks · · Score: 2

    I tried it, and I'm wondering what the hype is about. Not because of the idea, which is nice, but the implementation, which totally sucks. Very regular and very annoying crashes that waste items, severe server problems, burning through the battery as if it was calculating PI to a gazillion digits (this app is the only one to make my phone *hot*!), etc.

    For some in-game advances (hatching pokemon-eggs) you have to walk certain distances. Ok, I know my regular morning walk distance, which is 2.4km. I had to restart this app eight times during this course, and it only "got" about 1.5km due to that fact that it does not count while being crashed (crashing is not that obvious, the display still follows your path on then virtual map, but the background process(es) that count distance, provide new pokemons, or allow intercations or item access is/are gone). Or you try to catch a pokemon - you spend a bunch of those "pokeballs" to catch it, and when you got it, the game freezes. The pokeballs are gone, and of course the pokemon is, too, after you restart the app. Well, and restarting (or starting in the first place) is just trying your luck. During the day it is "just" difficult to start, but after work or on weekends, the app does not even complete the loading screen. It usually hangs at the point where it connects to their server(s?) and thats it. As the server capacity problems have not been fixed after a week, I guess the server side simply does not scale (which perfectly matches the apps quality). That I get the game to start during my walk might be due to the fact that I walk while most of the teenagers are still in bed ;-)

    Worse of all, people complained about the loss of bought items (e.g. you can buy those pokeballs if you are to impatient to "harvest" them), so I and maybe some other, more cautious people will wait for the software to getting into proper production status before spending a single cent on anything).

    The version number of the app tells an developer that this software is basically not ready for production (0.29.2, a clear indicator for it being beta, if not alpha), and as unripe and buggy it is, it is an insult to the user. No reaction to the bug reports (they just generate an auto-answer that they won't reply to bug reports), and nearly 200k users giving that app only one star due to the bugs. And even those who give more stars more often than not complain that the app is buggy. I don't understand those idiots - If an app crashes regularly, why do they give five stars?

    All in all, a nice new gaming idea, but with a total failure of an implementation. I have not heard of the development company (Niantic, Inc.) before, but from this experience, I would not let them develop even a "hello, world!" program for me.

  26. Outdoor computer gaming is coming by jszpilewski · · Score: 1

    The concept of running outside directed by some content provided by a computer may go even further with advances in the Augmented Reality. Imagine for instance riding a real horse while the AR stuff makes you feel like hunting outlaws in the Wild West by creating their avatars and of course playing atmospheric music.

  27. The whole share market is in a massive upswing by DatbeDank · · Score: 1

    Nintendo and other large cap stocks have been on a massive upswing lately due to capital coming from Europe. While I'll attest that Pokemon Go is fun, claiming it is the reason behind the doubling of Nintendo's stock is farfetch'd. Very little of the "stock market" these days is driven by fundamentals.

  28. This is our future! by antdude · · Score: 2
    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  29. Hardware by phorm · · Score: 1

    They can still do hardware, but I'd suggest addons to other systems rather than a whole console line. Perhaps custom controllers, or if they're going to hook up with more VR games, a decent VR system consoles (although a Nintento AR system would be cool), an addon for smart devices, or a VR "ds"

  30. Star Trek predicted this by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

    Remember this episode? Not so futuristic or far fetched now, isn't it? Now we just need a resurgence of Google Glass type wearables.