Slashdot Mirror
Facebook Messenger Hits 1B Monthly Active Users, Accounts For 10 Percent Of All VoIP Calls (techcrunch.com)
Speaking of instant messaging and VoIP call apps, Facebook announced on Wednesday that Facebook Messenger has hit the 1 billion monthly active users milestone. The company adds that Messenger is just more than a text messenger -- in addition to the ambitious bot gamble, a digital assistant, and the ability to send money to friends -- Messenger now accounts for 10 percent of all VoIP calls made globally. Messenger's tremendous growth also underscores Facebook's mammoth capture of the world. The social network is used by more than 1.6 billion people actively every month. WhatsApp, the chat client it owns, is also used by more than one billion people.
TechCrunch has a brilliant story on the growth of Messenger from the scratch.
TechCrunch has a brilliant story on the growth of Messenger from the scratch.
Saves me some reading to find out.
I'm not exactly sure why Facebook owns both WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger. In any case, if I understand correctly, WhatsApp has end-to-end encryption by default, whereas for Facebook Messenger you have to manually opt for a "private" conversation to get EtEE. It would be best if they deprecated the latter in favor of the former.
Can the contents of your phone calls be used for ad fodder now?
Or complete and utter lack of them. Wake me when they start support xmpp/sip for txt and voice.
No sir I dont like it.
The summary has to link to the Skype story right below it?
I never in the World thought facebook would EVER be this powerful in the advertising business.
All those messages and everything - ADVERTISEMENT! Even if you don't see it - it's data.
Facebook Messenger Spies On 1B Monthly Active Users, Accounts For 10 Percent Of All Surveilled VoIP Calls
Facebook is your friend.
Facebook watches over you.
Everybody loves Facebook.
Trust Facebook.
We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
i know some old people who use it to call internationally for free to catch up or take care of some family matters like cleaning up grave sites. should they be afraid of the NSA as well?
It has 1 use.
Lets you filter your idiot friends, if they ask you to use it, you know they aren't worth knowing!
And reading the techcrunch arse licking, tells me they are not worth reading.
The number 1 problem is it takes over your phone, the nosy facefuckers are grabbing everything....
Must be exhausting being so superior all the time. I'm sure your friends appreciate your constant judgement of them.
TechCrunch has a brilliant story on the growth of Messenger from the scratch.
We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
1 less idiot here!
I closed my account a month ago.
That'll teach 'em!
Yeah what idiots using a messaging platform with voip, video chat, file sharing, all rolled into one that doesn't blow anywhere near as many goats as most of the alternatives. What where those 1billion people thinking!
Everyone should be afraid of the NSA. No exceptions.
The company adds that Messenger is just more than a text messenger
And don't understand why I would ever need a messaging app?
I'm sure your friends appreciate your constant judgement of them.
You're talking about a guy who dismisses 1/7th of the population of the world as not worth knowing. What makes you think this guy has any friends at all.
But it doesn't meet the exacting specifications of nerds, so therefore must be thrown out completely. 1 Billion users is irrelevant in this case.
Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
I'm always suspicious of the term "User" when people say they have X number of users. Does "user" mean unique people? Does it mean "account"?
Because I have a hard time believing that 1/7 of the world population is actively on Facebook and I also know full well that there are millions of bot accounts whose likes are purchased.
The situation is even worse:
They are in the process of destroying standards.
At some point in the past, Facebook used to have a XMPP gateway into their chat system. You could use it with (e.g.: Pidgin) and have the chat into your desktop computer (or phone if your smartphone supports XMPP, etc).
But eventually, Facebook dropped their XMPP support.
(Luckily for 3rd party support, pidgin developers have reverse engineered their JSON and XML based protocol used by the android application. So you can still use pidgin and any other application supporting libpurple plugins. But it's NOT a standard
And at least the Facebook company seems to be happy with this situation and let the pidgin dev continue their work).
WhatsApp is even worse. It *started* as a variant of XMPP/Jabber, then got progressively weirder (mainly, they use a different type of authentication protocole, and use a binary representation + phrase book to compress common XML structure to make it a binary ML). ...but WhatsApp (even after the acquisition by Facebook) seem to be on a cursade to sue as many developpers of alternative clients as possible, and to prevent any development by kick-banning any detected alternative clients and perma-banning the corresponding GSM number. (e.g.: see the complains around WhatsUp alternative client for Sailfish OS).
These modification to the basic XMPP Jabber have been reverse engineered...
And they are now further alienating their user base by forcing everybody to use only exclusively the Android or the iOS version.
By the end of the year, all other version (BlackBerry, Nokia, etc.) will be dropped, and their user left without any chance.
I undestand that they would like to concentrate effort on only the 2 most frequent platforms, which probably cover ~90% of their user base, but even it they don't develop an app, they could have left some API (e.g.: an XMPP gateway like facebook used to use before throwing it away) so that the "left behind" could at least use native 3rd party apps.
"Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
mmm, rather have 1 good intelligent friend than a 1000's dumb fucks who I don't really know telling me about the shit they had.
let alone being friends with, you're an indiscriminate, crowd-following social bug and/or just lonely as shit.
Maybe if you had better quality friends, you'd need less than 6/7ths of the world
if your software is making you blow goats, your doing it wrong
I used to be an ardent user of Hangouts for VOIP and video calls home. Depending on quality of the hotel wifi, it was spotty, but usually worked OK. One trip it was on the fritz, so I tried Facebook instead. The voice and video quality was noticeably better. I switched back and forth between thema few times after, and every time, Facebook had far better quality on average. I no longer use Hangouts at all. I am not sure if the difference is in the protocol stack or in the compression algorithm, but at the end of the day, as a user I don't really care - what I care about is seeing my family clearly and having them hear me clearly, and Facebook Messenger is pretty much the best alternative to Skype in this regard. The difference of course is nearly everyone in the world already has Messenger installed, whereas Skype is an extra thing to ask people to load.
Then your voice patterns are directly linked to your personal profile and all internet traffic. Finances, porn, etc. One stop spy shop.
No need to phone Google for voice pattern, just hey we have it ok thanks Agent Smith.
life's a bitch payback is a mother fucker.
The world population is 7.4 billion.
Facebook cannot have 1 billion active Messenger users.
I think they might be counting daily usage, so someone who is on Facebook every day will count as 28-31 "users".
they should be afraid of this http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/07/20/silver_tongue_hacker_shows_how_one_home_address_can_lead_to_ruin/