Tesla Is Buying SolarCity for $2.6 Billion (thenextweb.com)
Tesla Motors announced Monday that it has reached a deal to buy SolarCity (San Mateo-based provider of energy services), the next step in Elon Musk's plan to combine his electric-car and solar-energy companies. It's already a family affair: Musk, Tesla's chief executive, owns about 21% of SolarCity and serves as chairman. His cousins Lyndon R. Rive and Peter J. Rive are SolarCity's chief executive and chief technology officer, respectively. The independent members of both companies' boards approved the $2.6-billion all-stock deal, Tesla said. Tesla said it expects to have cost synergies of $150 million in the first year after the deal closes. Tesla said it expects the deal to close in the fourth quarter, although the proposal must still be approved by a majority of the disinterested shareholders of Tesla and SolarCity and requires regulatory approval. It also contains a "go shop" provision that gives SolarCity 45 days to "solicit, discuss or negotiate alternative proposals from third parties."
What Musk is getting done in one lifetime is surreal. An old gf of mine thinks Musk is an alien and enlisting humans to help him build the technology he needs to get back home.
I came to the datacenter drunk with a fake ID, don't you want to be just like me?
Or maybe Musk is a better entrepreneur than you are. Naaah - can't be! We all know you are way better at making electric cars and rockets.
Yeah, because there is absolutely no synergy between a company that produces electric cars, and a company that empowers people to produce their own electricity at home... where they keep their car.
Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
Or maybe Musk is a better entrepreneur than you are. Naaah - can't be! We all know you are way better at making electric cars and rockets.
And what does that personal speculation of yours have to do with anything? If you'd like to offer a deeper explanation of your take of the transaction, I'm all ears.
It takes 3 or 4 phone calls, and some "do not disclose" paperwork in order to find out that you won't save any money, and you won't own anything.
Synergies don't require acquisitions to work. In fact, one could argue that Tesla has restricted their supplier options by this move. What does Solar City really bring to the table that they could just get as needed?
If you think it is all about synergies and not about shareholder value you are fooling yourself. Solar City has been struggling due to tight margins in that competitive industry, and the future doesn't look any better with reductions in subsidies and tax assistance going forward. Its a remarkably convenient time to be getting a premium price for such a company. I am sure that Solar City shareholders unanimously support the move, whilst some Tesla shareholders will have concerns.
"What does Solar City really bring to the table that they could just get as needed?"
The ability to provide an Apple like end to end ecosystem and the attendent lock-in. Solar hardware and storage optimized for your Tesla. Go ahead, laugh, but people will buy it, just like they buy Monster HDMI cables because the bits are cleaner.
Then again, maybe it's not bad. Imagine a person that would like to go solar and get an EV, but man that crap is expensive. What if Tesla/Solar City could give you a bundle deal? Maybe even amortize your Tesla payments out over the 20 years they estimate for a Solar City installation? Do an iPhone-like upgrade program, maybe every 5 years, you pay a fee and get a new car? Damn it, now I'm starting to get myself interested.