New York Governor Bars Sex Offenders From Playing Pokemon Go (theverge.com)
Adi Robertson, reporting for The Verge: At the direction of Governor Andrew Cuomo, New York's correctional department has made playing online games a violation of parole for sex offenders -- particularly Pokemon Go. In a statement, Cuomo said that people on the sex offender registry are now banned from "downloading, accessing, or otherwise engaging in any internet enabled gaming activities, including Pokemon Go." He also published a letter that he sent to game developer Niantic, asking for its cooperation in preventing registrants from signing up. The decision is based on a report from two New York state senators, released last week. Jeffrey Klein and Diane Savino visited the locations of 100 registered sex offenders in New York City and found 57 pokemon and 59 pokestops and gyms within half a city block. They were particularly worried about the "lures" that draw pokemon -- and thus players, including children -- to a location. While criminals have used pokestops and lures to attract and rob players, there are no known cases of sexual predators using them so far. Nonetheless, Klein and Savino have crafted bills that would ban sex offenders from playing the game and require Niantic to remove any Pokemon Go-related items or locations from near their homes.
Can the governor really just declare what is and is not a parole violation? Also, what communication ensures the parolees get the memo?
I'm skeptical that the governor can unilaterally change the terms of probation and/or subsequent registration requirements and rules without the Legislature changing the law, unless New York has a King for Governor.
When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
Can a minor who publically urinates in AZ be convicted as a sex offender for exposing himself in view of a minor (himself)?
This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
Stuff like that happens because this country was actually based on the concepts of Hobbes who believed that the state should have absolute power. The founders justified their revolution based on a variation of Hobbes done by Locke, but they still believed in the basic principle. People keep recommending to me to read the Federalist Papers and act like they understand them and I haven't made it all the way through, but if you don't understand that a big part of the first two papers is the author playing the age old confidence game of telling the reader that only he knows what's best for them and anyone else is in it for themselves, then you don't understand the Federalist Papers.