Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

When It Comes To China, Google's Experience Still Says It All (backchannel.com)

Posted by msmash on from the when-in-China dept.

Uber's defeat by its local competitor in China was the latest of a string of such cases, and Google's experience trying to establish itself there is illustrative of the challenges facing all American tech companies that aspire to dominate in that market, writes reader mirandakatz. Steven Levy writes at Backchannel:Perhaps because its market share never rose high enough, Uber did not experience the brunt of China's regulation. Still, who's to say what would have happened if Uber had managed to outperform Didi? If Uber's market share topped fifty percent, would the government have sat by as a neutral observer? Would the Uber app start experiencing slowdowns? Would its drivers be stopped? Would airports welcome Didi cars and not Uber? My bet is that, mixed with disappointment at not winning the country, Uber executives might be feeling a bit relieved that such worries are now off the table. As it is, Uber has become one more casualty in China's other wall, a towering fortress of restrictions, regulations and unfair play that keeps down American internet companies.

5 of 112 comments (clear)

  1. reciprocity by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If US companies can't operate under fair rules in China, should Chinese companies be permitted to operate in the US without restrictions?
    We can still trade, but do we necessarily have to allow service oriented businesses operate on each other's soil?

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:reciprocity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would say yes. Having an open, unrestricted economy benefits us. China just doesn't realize that yet.

      Do you have any serious actual real experimental evidence supporting this, or is this just an ideologically based belief?

    2. Re:reciprocity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is not about open and unrestricted. It is about an even playing field. A Chinese company coming to the west mostly finds that even playing field. A western company going to China finds that he not only competes against his competitors but also against the Chinese state.

      There is no way this can be construed as benefiting the west. It does not and never will. It is unfair competition and it cannot endure if you want a thriving, open, unrestricted economy.
      It is just like one country throwing up tariff-walls and the country not . That is only good for one country.

  2. Unfair? by Zaelath · · Score: 3, Insightful

    America wouldn't know fair if it kicked them in the balls, what you're actually seeing is when you become number 2.

    Number 1 gets to decide what's fair.

  3. Re:Regulatory enviornment is only a small factor by johanw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Intellectual property" is an stupid "invention" that has gone too far and is reducing inventiveness. The Chinese are wise to ignore that bullshit.