Slashdot Mirror


The Pill Robot Is Coming (bloomberg.com)

Bloomberg has an article on a new project that MIT's Daniela Rus has been working on. They have developed a "robot," squeezed into an inch-long, 0.09-ounce pill, but it "unfolds like an origami after it's swallowed". This robot can be guided with a tiny magnet to remove a foreign object from the stomach or treat a wound by administering medication, the report says. The equipment to manipulate the robot is pricey, but its own components cost less than $100. The article talks about the next step in this project: Rus and her team have tested the robot in a silicon-molded prototype stomach and are seeking approval from MIT's animal care committee to try it in pigs. She says they're also looking to raise more money. "The experiments they've been doing are very promising," says Ken Goldberg, a robotics professor at the University of California at Berkeley. Until now, he says, "nothing has been able to essentially walk inside the body."

34 comments

  1. Nanobot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Already been done.

  2. You Mean Robot Pill. by zenlessyank · · Score: 2

    Eat me from the inside.

    1. Re:You Mean Robot Pill. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have a fix for that.

    2. Re:You Mean Robot Pill. by zenlessyank · · Score: 1

      I'm not clicking that.

    3. Re:You Mean Robot Pill. by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      The Matrix Removing the Bug Scene HD

    4. Re:You Mean Robot Pill. by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Eat me from the inside.

      This is Big Pharma's wet dream: an unfolding pill robot that rips its way out of your chest holding an enormous, bloodstained bill. For an amount more than you ever imagined was possible. Take that, Harvoni!

  3. There was an old lady who swallowed a fly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was an old lady who swallowed a fly. I think she'll die.

    CAPTCHA: surely

  4. An inch long pill. by Nutria · · Score: 1

    Does bloomberg realize how LARGE that is???

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    1. Re:An inch long pill. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Only large if you are accustomed to your gay boyfriend's small dick.

    2. Re:An inch long pill. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a lot smaller than an endoscope, and sounds better than opening up a toddler to pull out a watch battery.

    3. Re:An inch long pill. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good news! It's a suppository.

    4. Re:An inch long pill. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      And you insert it with a finglonger?

  5. This won't be cheap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    ... but its own components cost less than $100

    In terms of American healthcare, each such pill will cost about $200,000.

    1. Re:This won't be cheap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Come on, that's a little unfair. Using the cost of an aspirin as a metric ($25 per pill in hospital vs $0.10 from store) each robot pill should cost around $25,000. Now the rental time on the machinery to run it, that might get a little pricey.

    2. Re:This won't be cheap. by Memnos · · Score: 1

      Your comment has officially won the interwebs for the next 15.75 hours. Congratulations Sir. Your prize is a lovely ingestible diagnostic device.

      --
      I don't trust atoms -- they make up stuff.
  6. Will be billed at $1000-$5000 per use by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Will be billed at $1000-$5000 per use

    1. Re:Will be billed at $1000-$5000 per use by zlives · · Score: 1

      most likely around 3-5K when insurances accept it as a valid procedure. probably similar to the EUS bills

    2. Re:Will be billed at $1000-$5000 per use by captaindomon · · Score: 2

      What the market will bear, of course. Prices are not set on "what value do you put on owning that little robot". They are put on "What value to you place in having that sharp or poisonous metal shard removed from your digestive tract before it kills you". Willingness to pay, my friend, based on the service performed, not on the value of the tools.

      --
      Just because I can hook a shark from a boat, I do no offer to wrestle it in the water.
  7. Hold still Neo... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    We think you're bugged.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  8. 0.09-ounce? by mentil · · Score: 1

    That's 2.55 grams for those who like sensible measurements.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  9. "Robot" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That seems to be less of a robot and more like a magnetically guided piece of (in some cases medicated) gauze. I'm actually pretty surprised we don't have magnetically powered/guided robots with manipulators about the size of a pill and perhaps smaller that can do micro surgery by now. We know we can make micro electronics, micro robotics shouldn't be all that much different. The only issue would be power and processing, both of which could be done externally.

  10. Dupe Post by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

    Same topic (different article
    ) was submitted by myself on Friday May 13, 2016 @09:58AM

    The Washington Post article was longer and had more info, if not as much formatting.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  11. We have ways to make you talk, Mr Anderson by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Got bug?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  12. There was an old lady who swallowed a fly by tobiasly · · Score: 2

    FTFA:

    The only thing a patient would have to do, in theory, is swallow — a bit like gulping down a spider to catch a wayward fly.

    Probably not the most confidence-inducing analogy, as our childhood nursery rhymes have already taught us how that one turns out...

  13. I've seen this somewhere before. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    You could put Raquel Welch into one of these pills and send her in to wipe away the blockages. That would be a fantastic voyage. However I imagine she might not fit into a pill case these days.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  14. "animal care committee" - sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More like "animal torture committee", but then, you can't expect psychopaths who enjoy torturing animals to admit it in public, can you?

    Why can't this be tested in a human? What exactly is going to go wrong? Laughable.

  15. Why I welcome our robotic pill overlord by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    To anybody who has ever had one of those long metallic "snakes" shoved up or down an orifice for medical examinations while awake will likely welcome this technology. Trust, me, "the snake" is sooo f8cking uncomfortable. I won't ever do the snake while awake again unless my life is directly on the line.

    1. Re:Why I welcome our robotic pill overlord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are called endoscopes.

    2. Re: Why I welcome our robotic pill overlord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like "snake" better! :-)

    3. Re:Why I welcome our robotic pill overlord by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      It's so unpleasant, I didn't want to google its real name.

    4. Re:Why I welcome our robotic pill overlord by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      This is a little off topic, but I need to open some FoxPro databases. Do you have any suggestions on an API or library that can do that?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:Why I welcome our robotic pill overlord by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I haven't really been keeping up on that. There is CDBF for Linux shareware you can try. Also, older versions of MS-Access could open them. Older ODBC drivers may also allow access. Is this a one-time export, or continuous editing?

    6. Re:Why I welcome our robotic pill overlord by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Cool thanks. It's a one-time export.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    7. Re:Why I welcome our robotic pill overlord by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Update: I tried Ruby dbf....(this is the most significant program I've written in Ruby, and I think I like it better than Python), mainly because that library existed on Ruby. The library doesn't handle complex cases but it seemed to work ok here. The database also had some weird Microsoft Word columns; I don't know if that is common. I had to figure out how to parse an ancient version of the doc file format.

      Really sucks what Microsoft did with FoxPro: they should have made it open source if they weren't going to support it. Really though, Microsoft sucks all around. We need more people like Raymond Chen in the world.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."