Slashdot Mirror


Linux Developer Loses GPL Suit Against VMware (itwire.com)

An anonymous Slashdot reader quotes ITWire: Linux kernel developer Christoph Hellwig has lost his case against virtualisation company VMware, which he had sued in March 2015 for violation of version 2 of the GNU General Public Licence... The case claimed that VMware had been using Hellwig's code right from 2007 and not releasing source code as required. The Linux kernel, which is released under the GNU GPL version 2, stipulates that anyone who distributes it has to provide source code for the same...

In its ruling, the court said that Hellwig had failed to prove which specific lines of code VMware had used, from among those over which he claimed ownership.

In a statement, Hellwig said he plans to appeal, adding that "The ruling concerned German evidence law; the Court did not rule on the merits of the case, i.e. the question whether or not VMware has to license the kernel of its product vSphere ESXi 5.5.0 under the terms of the GNU General Public License, version 2." The Software Freedom Conservancy has described the lawsuit as "the regretful but necessary next step in both Hellwig and Conservancy's ongoing effort to convince VMware to comply properly with the terms of the GPLv2, the license of Linux and many other Open Source and Free Software included in VMware's ESXi products."

4 of 162 comments (clear)

  1. Verdict sound legitimate by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Since "Hellwig had failed to prove which specific lines of code VMware had used", the verdict doesn't sound unfair.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re: Verdict sound legitimate by Luthair · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Obviously I'm not a lawyer but what about discovery? Shouldn't he have to opportunity to to grep their source code repository?

    2. Re:Verdict sound legitimate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well AFAIK the vmkernel is 100% built within VMware. Also IIRC there is some layer allows it to use open source drivers for hardware. There's also the Service console which was a privileged VM to allow for some admin tools. This used to be Redhat Enterprise Linux and now it's BusyBox based. Smaller footprint for ESXi but not completely gone.

      Anyways I'm still not clear on what he thinks they did wrong. AFAIK VMware hasn't done anything that's not above board here.

    3. Re: Verdict sound legitimate by buchanmilne · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Also IIRC there is some layer allows it to use open source drivers for hardware. ...

      Anyways I'm still not clear on what he thinks they did wrong. AFAIK VMware hasn't done anything that's not above board here.

      Really, you missed the part where they copied GPL drivers into a proprietary kernel? How would that not be wrong?

      As far as I know, VMWare has admitted to copying Linux drivers, but they claimed that their kernel "wrapped" the Linux kernel in such a way as to not infringe. This claim alone should be sufficient for discovery.

      (Apologies in advance for any formattung issues, still no preview on the mobile interface.)