Slashdot Mirror


US Patients Battle EpiPen Prices And Regulations By Shopping Online (cnn.com)

"The incredible increase in the cost of EpiPens, auto-injectors that can stop life-threatening emergencies caused by allergic reactions, has hit home on Capitol Hill," reports CNN. Slashdot reader Applehu Akbar reports that the argument "has now turned into civil war in the US Senate": One senator's daughter relies on Epi-Pen, while another senator's daughter is CEO of Mylan, the single company that is licensed to sell these injectors in the US. On the worldwide market there is no monopoly on these devices... Is it finally time to allow Americans to go online and fill their prescriptions on the world market?
Time reports some patients are ordering cheaper EpiPens from Canada and other countries online, "an act that the FDA says is technically illegal and potentially dangerous." But the FDA also has "a backlog of about 4,000 generic drugs" awaiting FDA approval, reports PRI, noting that in the meantime prices have also increased for drugs treating cancer, hepatitis C, and high cholesterol. In Australia, where the drug costs just $38, one news outlet reports that the U.S. "is the only developed nation on Earth which allows pharmaceutical companies to set their own prices."

6 of 396 comments (clear)

  1. All these pharma/insurance stories by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And still insufficient demand for universal health care. And don't blame the politicians. With the upcoming 95% reelection rate (and 100% republican/democrat monolith), there is no incentive for them to change anything. The only issue monopolizing the media is *he who shall not be named*

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  2. Re:Logic Says It Should Be Legal by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Your resident crazy libertarian here:

    Indeed there doesn't seem to be any good reason to prevent importing anything from international editions of books (save money for college students) to pharmaceuticals. There may be some merit to that argument for places like Mexico where quality controls are quite poor, however that should be a judgement call left up to the consumer. Likewise, I think the idea of tariffs, embargos, and other forms of mercantilism ultimately cost a domestic economy much more than they supposedly preserve.

    Nevertheless, I don't think that's quite the root of the problem. This isn't, by any definition whatsoever, a free market. This is in fact a government granted monopoly. You cannot have both a free market AND a monopoly in most cases. That said, I don't quite understand why we give i.e. patent holders, copyright holders, etc free reign on how, when, where, and how much they can charge for anything with the sky being the limit. There probably should be some system in place whereby if they opt for government protection, then they must follow certain pricing and trade rules in order to keep that protection.

  3. Re:Ban drug ad's like most developed nations do! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I left the US right about when they were starting to be allowed. Now when I go back it's pretty disconcerting, bordering on revolting, to see how much tv space is taken up with drug ads.

    There is no reason for drug ads. Period. Drugs should be allowed by efficacy and safety, priced honsetly and prescribed by qualified unbiased doctors for the conditions they treat best. None of that is true in the modern US of A

  4. Re:Logic Says It Should Be Legal by jenningsthecat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Many on the left love protectionism...except when they don't.

    Many on the right hate protectionism...except when they don't.

    Corporations just love having unfettered access to other markets for their products. They also love unrestricted access to supplies of (cheaper) materials and labour in other countries; but let their customers demand the same, and all of a sudden the hypocritical bastards lobby for protectionism, and start spreading FUD about the supposed dangers of products from other countries. Their idea of a 'free market' is really a 'captive market' - one that is kept captive by the legislation they buy, the lies they spread, and the dirty deals they strike with their counterparts in other countries.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  5. Re: IP law has nothing to do with logic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Um. Dude. You might want to look around, this site is largely due to the existence of free software. FREE. People do it and give it away for FREE.

    You just can't fathom value being non-monetary which makes your economic-fu weak. Homo econicus ain't no fool, Homo Economicus has gradients of preferences, in relation to and driven by a variety externalities, which regardless of your mental capacity to comprehend them exist. Right now. In you, your inner homo economicus, is erupting with complex value calculations that you are probably to ignorant to clearly understand.

    You should stop being so hung up on money, and let your inner homo economicus run free. Enjoy all your preferences, not just the ones society shows you will satisfy you.

    A big secret I learned a long time ago, that sort of makes this all work, is that by helping each other (think free shit) we get along better in the universe. It actually makes us happy and fulfilled. What?! That is our most selfish center is, is best satisfied by caring about helping other humans?

    That sounds fucked up. Real fucked up... But shit that does make some fucking sense. It's probably our evolutionary edge, because there ain't no fuckin way we out predator'd everything else on this planet lone wolfing it for a few million years... That and thumbs.

    Thumbs are no fucking joke.

  6. Re:IP law has nothing to do with logic. by nbauman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As an example, my wife's kidney dialysis sessions are billed out at $3,925 each, for a total of about $600,000 per year. The insurance company's "real price" is $290 per session.

    Well, the original intention of Congress was to have free market competition in kidney dialysis, to bring the price down, but that didn't work. There were a lot of small providers but a couple of big companies took over the industry and turned it into a monopoly. You can't negotiate prices with a monopoly.

    It seems that in the modern economy, the free market doesn't last long as many industries turn into monopolies. Amazon is a book-selling monopoly. Google is an internet advertising monopoly.

    If we must have a monopoly, we might as well have the government running it.