Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

EU Copyright Reform Proposes Search Engines Pay For Snippets (thestack.com)

Posted by EditorDavid on from the pay-to-paste dept.

An anonymous Slashdot reader reports that the European Commission "is planning reforms that would allow media outlets to request payment from search engines such as Google, for publishing snippets of their content in search results." The Stack reports: The working paper recommends the introduction of an EU law that covers the rights to digital reproduction of news publications. This would essentially make news publishers a new category of rights holders under copyright law, thereby ensuring that "the creative and economic contribution of news publishers is recognized and incentivized in EU law, as it is today the case for other creative sectors."

4 of 172 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Death to publishers by macklin01 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, thats easy to solve:

    When we get the right to demand money for whatever we deem is our interlectual property, the next step is to demand that companies like google are not allowed to make their own decisions in regard to what they return as search results. We'll put that under something like "no discrimination" or something.

    Sounds like Spain tried to do this almost verbatim:

    The Spanish Newspapers Publishersâ(TM) Association (AEDE) is now asking that the Spanish government and EU competition authorities stop Google News from shutting down its operations in the country, âoeto protect the rights of citizens and businesses.â

    The media lobby group announced that an end to Spanish Google News would represent âoenot just the closure of another service given its dominant market position,â identifying that the closure would âoeundoubtedly have a negative impact on citizens and Spanish businesses.â

    source: [thestack.com]

    --
    OpenSource.MathCancer.org: open source comp bio
  2. What will the news orgs pay out? by physicsphairy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Journalism is almost entirely taking "snippets" from other people in the form of quotes and information and compiling them into a story, so I must assume the newspapers will also be paying out royalties on their articles to anyone they interview, mention, or quote (including when they search for comments on twitter and facebook as they like to do now).

    --
    When things get complex, multiply by the complex conjugate.
  3. Re:good luck with that one... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why does "copyright reform" always mean increasing copyright

    It doesn't. Around two years ago, the UK government passed a law that created a private copying exception, thus finally legalising things like format shifting or using cloud services as long as someone had a legitimate personal copy and it was not being shared around.

    Of course, less than a year later, that law was struck down after a judicial review, because EU.

    And that wasn't an isolated incident, as we see here. The EU is fast turning into global enemy #1 for progressive copyright reform. It's a huge supporter of big rightsholders at the expense of everyone else.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  4. Re:good luck with that one... by augustw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    because EU.

    No, not "because EU". Only one of the claimants' several arguments concerned EU law. What the judge called "Issue VI" -- which was "Does the introduction of Section 28B constitute unlawful State aid within the meaning of Article 107 TFEU which was not notified to the Commission under Article 108(3) TFEU and so is unlawful?".

    And that argument failed. Paragraph 302, onwards: https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/w...