Slashdot Mirror


Isolated NASA Team Ends Year-Long Mars Simulation In Hawaii (bbc.com)

An anonymous Slashdot reader quotes the BBC: A team of six people have completed a Mars simulation in Hawaii, where they lived in near isolation for a year. Since August 29th, 2015, the group lived in close quarters in a dome, without fresh air, fresh food or privacy... Having survived their year in isolation, the crew members said they were confident a mission to Mars could succeed. "I can give you my personal impression which is that a mission to Mars in the close future is realistic," Cyprien Verseux, a crew member from France, told journalists. "I think the technological and psychological obstacles can be overcome."

The team consisted of a French astro-biologist, a German physicist and four Americans -- a pilot, an architect, a journalist and a soil scientist... the six had to live with limited resources, wear a space-suit when outside the dome, and work to avoid personal conflicts. They each had a small sleeping cot and a desk inside their rooms. Provisions included powdered cheese and canned tuna.

176 comments

  1. Send six women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Send six women to Mars and see how long before they start trying to kill one another. Or five women and one man, to study the most-nagged human in history.

    1. Re:Send six women by Grishnakh · · Score: 0

      Send six women to Mars and see how long before they start trying to kill one another.

      This is completely unfair and stereotypical.

      If you send female scientists, I really don't think there will be a problem.

      However, according to my wife, if you send women who work in law offices, you can absolutely expect murder to happen, or at the very least a lot of fighting and back-stabbing. And from what I've seen, you can probably expect similar results if you send women who work in HR.

  2. Provisions by tomhath · · Score: 0

    Provisions included powdered cheese and canned tuna.

    And the knowledge that if anything went wrong the "experiment" could be ended in a matter of minutes.

    1. Re:Provisions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How about connectivity to the outside world? Was there a reasonable simulation of the delay in communications and limited bandwidth, or were they on broadband watching Netflix and video conferencing with their families?

    2. Re:Provisions by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 2

      Yes, there was a 20 minute delay on communications with the outside world. I believe they were also only provided with whatever entertainment they brought along with them, no new stuff brought in.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    3. Re:Provisions by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      Yes, there was a 20 minute delay on communications with the outside world. I believe they were also only provided with whatever entertainment they brought along with them, no new stuff brought in.

      Not hard to imagine that NASA did that part properly. It's very simple: Nothing in, nothing out.

      OTOH I wonder if they put a large source of ionizing radiation in the roof.

      --
      No sig today...
    4. Re:Provisions by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1, Interesting

      They didn't care enough to vary the communication delay to match orbital positions?

    5. Re:Provisions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Provisions included powdered cheese and canned tuna.

      And the knowledge that if anything went wrong the "experiment" could be ended in a matter of minutes.

      If you do the test with all the risks of the real mission you might just as well do the real mission.
      The point of a test like this is to make sure that you didn't forget to pack something, not to do the real mission without accomplishing anything.

    6. Re:Provisions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should tell NASA about variable length communications delays? I'm sure they NEVER would have thought about that.

    7. Re:Provisions by hansraj · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Wanted to mod you insightful but accidentally modded you redundant. Commenting to undo mod.

    8. Re:Provisions by elrous0 · · Score: 0

      Hey don't knock it. This experiment didn't accomplish anything that will get us any closer to Mars. But it did accomplish its primary goal of getting NASA a week of good PR.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    9. Re:Provisions by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 1

      If you do the test with all the risks of the real mission you might just as well do the real mission.

      Even with many of the risks of a real mission, it's still worth doing a dry run to find out what works and what doesn't, while avoiding the COST of a real mission.

    10. Re:Provisions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I CALL BS on this whole "simulation" in Hawaii.
      Hawaii is nothing like Mars. Just sayin'

      CAP === 'bluebird'

    11. Re:Provisions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even with many of the risks of a real mission, it's still worth doing a dry run to find out what works and what doesn't, while avoiding the COST of a real mission.

      Unless a death or two creates enough negative publicity to put the mission on hold for a couple of decades.

    12. Re:Provisions by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know why entertainment would have to be that limited. A mars mission is going to have a radio link. Even at that distance, the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter has a connection peaking at 2Mbit/s under good conditions, and a manned ship could carry a larger receive antenna and more powerful transmitter. That's enough to send ebooks, audiobooks, music, and even TV programs and movies. They might have to wait a few days for the latest movies and TV though, as it would have to be a low-priority task when the transmitter isn't needed for more important things.

    13. Re:Provisions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kinda like testing aerospace designs on computers before building them so their "experiments" don't waste millions of dollars. Totally lame idea right.

    14. Re:Provisions by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      That's actually quite impressive, I hadn't thought about that.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    15. Re:Provisions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a physical cap of 4Mbps (but I've never felt it, even streaming Netflix) Figures they can get better internet connection to Mars than here...

    16. Re:Provisions by tomhath · · Score: 1

      Someone modded me Troll? Seriously, you don't think that knowing the experiment can be ended makes a huge difference in the subjects' stress level?

      As mentioned elsewhere here, sailors in any ocean voyage prior to the early 20th century, or some of the early Arctic or Antarctic explorations are far better examples. Even in recent times a long ocean voyage can drive a person crazy

    17. Re:Provisions by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Or they could just take along a few hard drives. With modern storage you can cram a lot of entertainment onto a pair of 8TB drives, and by the time the ship is built there will be much larger drives available. Sufficient to hold enough entertainment to last many years. The most difficult part would be copyright negotiations. I don't think any copyright lawyers have had to negotiate interplanetary distribution rights before.

    18. Re: Provisions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wont happen. Our overmasters are trying to force us into using streaming services for everything in line with their commi agendas. I dont believe a mission to mars will go ahead. Power has been consolidated by the psychopaths. But I have no doubt it could succeed. For me, livining isolated in a tin bix on earth as an experiment would be far more demoralising than the real thing. The real problem would be the logistics of it given the dangers of meteors and other debris as well as solar radiation etc.

    19. Re:Provisions by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      True, but referring strictly to the psychological component, where the crew member said he was confident they could do it, he also had in the back of his head that he wasn't really trapped on a spaceship or planet whose atmosphere -or lack of one- would kill him dead in minutes, so the stress isn't exactly the same. Still, agreed it's a good, necessary step.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    20. Re: Provisions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "OTOH I wonder if they put a large source of ionizing radiation in the roof."

      Good point. How else will they test the use of human travelers as radiation shielding for the delicate electronics? Sort of like in: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scanners_Live_in_Vain

    21. Re:Provisions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you do the test with all the risks of the real mission you might just as well do the real mission...The point of a test like this is to make sure that you didn't forget to pack something

      As far as "do the real mission", no country has that capability, and none will for a long, long time.

      This experiment has nothing to do with preparing for an actual trip. What it does do is give NASA some publicity when the experiment succeeds (of course it will), and it throws a bone to the space nutters who think a manned mission to Mars is a good idea.

    22. Re: Provisions by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Once you get out past the pollution of earth orbit, space is pretty empty. There's just practically nothing to hit in the interplanetary void. Radiation, however, would be an issue. The only way to protect against that is with a lot of mass, and that's very expensive. The astronauts, assuming they got back alive, would have substantially reduced life expectancy on earth.

      The technology to go to mars exists right now. It would just be ridiculously expensive. The technology to colonise mars almost exists now too, the only reason no-one is seriously proposing that is because doing so would probably be the single most expensive project in all of human history.

  3. Worst part... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I thought it didn't sound like that difficult of a scenario to endure, until I read that their food was powdered cheese and canned tuna. If that's all I could eat for a year, cannibalism would start to sound really good.

    1. Re:Worst part... by DirkDaring · · Score: 1

      It said it 'included' powdered cheese and canned tuna. It could of also had literally anything else.

    2. Re:Worst part... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      could of also?

    3. Re:Worst part... by elrous0 · · Score: 2

      As part of the strict scientific nature of this rigorous experiment to get us closer to a manned mission to Mars, participants were limited to only ordering pizza no more than once a day, and only allowed to leave the facility when they couldn't find a sitter and on family movie night. They were also under strict orders to pretend the gravity was two-thirds lower.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:Worst part... by GrumpySteen · · Score: 2

      They had other things too, though they were mostly kinda crappy because they had to be shelf-stable for at least a year without refrigeration, which translates to a lot of powdered and freeze dried foods (though they did grow some fresh vegetables to supplement). Here's a blog entry about the food from Cyprien Verseux's blog. The six legged reconstituted freeze dried turkey is both innovative and horrifying.

    5. Re:Worst part... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 3, Funny

      It said it 'included' powdered cheese and canned tuna. It could of also had literally anything else.

      They counted themselves lucky. The previous simulation included canned cheese and powered tuna.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    6. Re:Worst part... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you have against Cougar Gold and katsuobushi?

  4. Eh, was this necessary? by Ecuador · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Was this really necessary? We've had people on ISS go on for almost a year, the Russians made a ground-based test lasting for a year an a half and if you want to go to even harder simulations of solitary missions, we've had many Slashdot members go on for years isolated in front of a screen (let's call it mars spaceship control center) without fresh water or fresh food (only carbonated sodas and reheated pizza)... right there in their mom's basement. And actually many of them were in a ground-braking 2-level simulation, as they were simulating a mission to mars through KSP at the same time!

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:Eh, was this necessary? by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Funny

      You do understand that the point is that those people should come out without debilitating psychological disorders, right?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    2. Re:Eh, was this necessary? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What about Antarctic Research Station 1?

    3. Re:Eh, was this necessary? by idji · · Score: 2

      Plus the 16-19th century was full of many time long term boat trips in confined spaces.

    4. Re: Eh, was this necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that's the analogy for Mars missions, I don't have high hopes. Once people realize there aren't any martians to steal from and kill, interest in going there will rapidly go to zero.

    5. Re:Eh, was this necessary? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2

      Also, we expect some level of productivity / social value our of our astronauts.

    6. Re:Eh, was this necessary? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's a good analogy, but on a boat you at least have open-air - and even if you don't jump overboard and take a swim for a year, you could if you really wanted to.

      I think a nuclear submarine is a better analogy, though they (and long boat trips) tend to have much larger crews and more living space.

    7. Re:Eh, was this necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did the crew members wear "Make America Great Again" baseball caps at the post-simulation press conference?

    8. Re:Eh, was this necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still warmer, wetter, brighter, and closer to a breathable atmosphere than Mars. But a good point, if we can run a standalone habitation complex in Antarctic conditions, we are closer to being able to handle Martian conditions.

    9. Re:Eh, was this necessary? by hey! · · Score: 1

      Well, it depends on what your research objectives are. ISS is in some ways a better model, in some ways a worse one. It's better in that it's in space with microgravity, but ISS crew members rotate in and out. Even if individuals spend the equivalent time of a Mars mission on the ISS there will be new faces, a constantly changing research workload, and the ever-changing panorama of the Earth below.

      So it's not a very accurate model of the social dynamics of a Mars mission where people are cooped up in a can with the same faces, same scenery, and nothing but busy-work to keep them occupied. Let's say we lick the radiation and microgravity problems; the question then becomes what kind of people can successfully negotiate the trip to Mars, arriving ready to work successfully there?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    10. Re:Eh, was this necessary? by hey! · · Score: 1

      ... or you may find out the people best adapted to a Mars mission are people with characteristics which are seen as socially debilitating.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    11. Re:Eh, was this necessary? by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Somehow I suspect a half-dozen socially debilitated people forced to live together in a single small habitat for a year or three with no real options for escape or privacy would *not* turn out well...

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    12. Re:Eh, was this necessary? by hey! · · Score: 1

      Depends on the nature of the "disability". We judge disability by how well people function in society as it currently exists. It doesn't mean that they can't function in an artificially engineered society (e.g. one consisting of autistic spectrum people).

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    13. Re:Eh, was this necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No its actually a complete waste of time - Mars has no magnetic field, living on Mars you'd need to be 6ft or more underground most of the time to avoid deadly space and solar wind radiation.

      Those guys appear to have been in a dome on the surface. Fail.

    14. Re:Eh, was this necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still warmer, wetter, brighter, and closer to a breathable atmosphere than Mars.

      In the winter South Pole Stations is not warmer or brighter than Mars. It is more breathable, even if the air will freeze your lungs, it is still much more breathable. With so little air pressure, Mars would actually feel much warmer than it really is.

    15. Re:Eh, was this necessary? by losfromla · · Score: 1

      I think the support team voted down that idea as not realistic enough. Support team's job being to monitor wave and bikini activities at all the beaches to ensure the safety and isolation of the crew.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    16. Re:Eh, was this necessary? by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      I think a nuclear submarine is a better analogy, though they (and long boat trips) tend to have much larger crews and more living space.

      NASA keeps designing Apollo over and over again. They're not even relevant anymore. Missions to Mars will be groups of up to 100 people preceded by approximately 2.5 million pounds of gear and supplies in cargo-only launches. Elon Musk is not planning on boots-and-flags missions. Elon Musk is not planning on a rinky-dink under-provisioned, ill-informed Plymouth Rock-style expedition that can barely do more than sit and starve. Elon Musk is planning on building a fully reusable heavy launch vehicle that will save him $450 million per launch over the cost of a Senate Launch System rocket, and spend the difference on the equipment a Mars colony needs to function.

      For comparison, the intended 2.5 million pounds of gear is approximately two thirds the mass of an Ohio-class nuclear submarine. In other words, Elon Musk plans to ship an entire nuclear submarine to Mars, sans nuclear missiles, for every launch of the Mars Colonial Transporter that carries people. Small, cramped crews, it ain't.

      What I'd like to know is how he intends to finagle permission to launch a nuclear sub's reactor as one of the payloads. That would be the sensible thing to do. Maybe he can get the US Navy to send a national security payload into orbit...

    17. Re:Eh, was this necessary? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Depends on the nature of the "disability". We judge disability by how well people function in society as it currently exists. It doesn't mean that they can't function in an artificially engineered society (e.g. one consisting of autistic spectrum people).

      And just think of the great parties they'd throw!

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    18. Re:Eh, was this necessary? by idji · · Score: 1

      Woman, children and slaves generally did NOT have access to open air even in the 1830s, but then they generally were on trips of up to only 5 months from England to Australia or New Zealand. I think jumping ship in the South Atlantic is not any different than stealing a spacesuit and leaving the airlock - you'll die in about the same time.

    19. Re:Eh, was this necessary? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking we want to deliver our astronauts to Mars in slightly better physical and mental condition than c1830s slaves and steerage passengers on ocean voyages to the penal colony.

  5. Arctic people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just hire some arctic people.
    Polar nights have pretty much done the job.

  6. How did the potato farming go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Who provided the soil bacteria?

    1. Re:How did the potato farming go? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The GERMan.

      (ba-dum-tis)

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  7. The only problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only problem is they knew the experiment would only last a year. Which in itself is a sufficient reassurance to help them overcome any psychological problems related to the isolation and lack of privacy. That is, it's hard, but you know it will be over and you are in fact safe. On Mars you don't have that luxury, therefore I doubt the relevance of this experiment.

    1. Re: The only problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that any of them can quit whenever they feel like it. None of them did, but knowing you can is reassuring.

      This sounds like a complete waste of taxpayer money.

    2. Re: The only problem is... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Who said they could? The very least I'd have had them sign is a paper saying that you don't get out alive before we say so, and it's going to be a year. Give or take.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re: The only problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So if one of them got a life-threatening injury, they're forced to die there? I don't think so. The LARP session will end and they'd be immediately airlifted to a hospital.

    4. Re: The only problem is... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      No, for that they'd have to do it in Russia.

      But outside of life threatening problems, there is zero reason for them to not only know when it ends but also to not be allowed to leave.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re: The only problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Outside of life-threatening problems"

      Then the illusion is broken. They need not worry about anything worth worrying about, because the safety net is there.

      This test is a failure in every way.

    6. Re: The only problem is... by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      They can quit on the real mission too. The airlock is RIGHT THERE. Just sayin'...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    7. Re: The only problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simulated combat seems to work fairly well for the military.
      There are differences from real combat but having the simulated experience in a safe environment is still better than sitting on your arse complaining that it is pointless.

      You get a good test of if the resources you planned to take with you are sufficient and a good test of what the isolation does to the group.
      The kind of life threatening situations that occur in the movies are not going to happen. The vessel isn't going to get a small bump that makes someone get pierced by a sharp object that causes strong bleeding without killing them or puncturing the ship.
      The likely danger is instant death on takeoff or landing, keeping cool won't help against that.

    8. Re:The only problem is... by RoccamOccam · · Score: 1

      The thing is that they're not gonna say no, they'd never say no ... because of the implication.

    9. Re: The only problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just keep telling yourself that you're smart, buddy. I'm sure that means a lot.

    10. Re: The only problem is... by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      So have the Chineese run the test in secret? NASA is far to risk adverse.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    11. Re: The only problem is... by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      You get a good test of if the resources you planned to take with you

      If by resources you mean "food" then this is a problem that has been solved since sailors discovered oranges prevented scurvy. I would be much more interested in a biodome experiment where they actually tried to keep a closed system going. I wouldn't even mind if they "cheated" and vented or used compressed air or other resources to regulate it as long as they tracked exactly how much outside resources were actually used. This would be useful data. How good are we at keeping the environment at the correct levels and how much resources do we need to sustain it. We have a small environment on the space station but I would love to see a 1 acre simulation. To prevent accidental leakage, I would recommend putting it in underwater in shallow water somewhere.

    12. Re: The only problem is... by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      It must be exhausting to be a person who assumes he can do everybody's jobs better than they can. Even more exhausting to know such a person.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    13. Re:The only problem is... by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      Oh there were a couple of other minor issues:
      They were in Hawaii
      They were in normal gravity
      They weren't being bombarded by radiation that would kill them in a week
      But I guess they proved that people can live in Hawaii for a full year, and the support staff got a nice vacation on the taxpayers dime.

    14. Re: The only problem is... by Trenjeska · · Score: 1

      They tried that before, and it seems the soil itself ate too much Oxygen to be replenished by the plants inside the dome

    15. Re: The only problem is... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      The airlock is RIGHT THERE.

      It's only an airlock if you're in space or underwater. In this case it was just a door.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    16. Re:The only problem is... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      You're expecting the first missions to Mars to not include any logistics or planning for the astronauts' return? Because that's what your post sounds like.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    17. Re:The only problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On Mars you don't have that luxury, therefore I doubt the relevance of this experiment.

      Which is why you send older people on such a mission. A crew with no ambition to have more children - only this last scientific breakthrough. And they won't outlast their supply of air, food & water.

    18. Re: The only problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So use soil in a dome, and saturate with oxygen until the soil won't absorb more. Then you have soil fit for shipping to mars. Ordinary soil may indeed have a oxygen deficit - but it is fixable for such a mission.

    19. Re: The only problem is... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Why would they have to rely completely on the plants themselves to replenish the oxygen? We've had carbon scrubbing substances for some time now, like lithium hydroxide and calcium carbonate. What the plants can't create themselves, they can supplement with technology.

      Could we do it right now? Probably not. But they could come up with a system that works.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    20. Re: The only problem is... by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      They tried that before, and it seems the soil itself ate too much Oxygen to be replenished by the plants inside the dome

      That was kindof my point. This is an area where we need more research. We do it on submarines and the space station but they are very small and constantly venting and replenishing. Not just for space research but for sustainability of earth, we need to understand how the earth replinishes its oxygen.

    21. Re: The only problem is... by laie_techie · · Score: 1

      The airlock is RIGHT THERE.

      It's only an airlock if you're in space or underwater. In this case it was just a door.

      I would imagine they have an actual air lock; the air you want to protect is the air inside the spaceship. I've even seen buildings in cold environments which have a small anteroom so when the door opens only a small amount of temperature-controlled air is lost. For space, the airlock can even suction the air off before opening the outside doors meaning near-zero air loss.

    22. Re: The only problem is... by bugs2squash · · Score: 2

      Part of the entertainment left for them was the movie "Capricorn one" and they were told that CGI renderings of the crew taking off for mars had been broadcast along with a "godspeed" message from the president.

      --
      Nullius in verba
    23. Re:The only problem is... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      That depends if China gets there first.

      It's not that unreasonable a proposal. Removing the return trip would hugely reduce the cost of the mission, and there are plenty of volunteers who would still go even knowing their life expectancy would be no more than a few years. Better to die young serving mankind and advancing scientific knowledge than to lead an unremarkable life and die forgotten in the retirement home.

    24. Re: The only problem is... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      You have a point, although there would be a weight limit on board, which means that a non-reproducing method of scrubbing could only be used until it ran out. With plants, your goal is to bring something small that can use local resources to reproduce and grow its population into a system that could replace the synthetic scrubbing material when it ran out.

      Of course, for that to work, they need to find some way to make actual fertile soil from what is on Mars, because the amount of usable soil itself is a big limiting factor for plant growth, even in a facility or under a dome. And that will be hard, because what goes for dirt on Mars right now is a rather nasty material that will not lend itself well to becoming a component of fertile soil.

    25. Re: The only problem is... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      The Chinese are working on a Moon landing right now, where they don't need to run the year long test yet.

      And why rush it? The Americans doing the test first means that they can get all of the information they need that much more easily when it comes time for them to actually go to Mars.

      While it is too bad for them that the Chinese never had the chance to land on the Moon first, the bright side is that since China hasn't done anything first, they're under no pressure except internal expectations about getting the job done in any particular way. They don't lose face by being second to have some space achievement because there's no Space Race going on anymore and they are already going to be second or third no matter what they do. At least until they get to the point where they can take Mars seriously.

      And I almost hope they ramp up their Mars program, because I think the US needs a kick in the ass to get itself to Mars. My hope is that we've done some good work to get us ahead if it came down to it, but that lead will evaporate VERY quickly if we sit on our ass too long.

    26. Re: The only problem is... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      It may well be that someone walking out a door on Earth might come down to someone walking out an airlock in space. Or someone getting murdered in space.

      The door on Earth allows the pressure to be relieved prematurely, but be aware that if we can't sustain a mission on Earth where there is no danger, how are we going to sustain one in a craft that has to get to Mars?

      Sure, they may not be able to escape, but the strain could seriously degrade their efficiency to the point where the mission fails. And I would not rule out psychotic episodes.

      Obviously, this will not show all of the strains of being isolated in a cramped spacecraft with the same people or allow the enforced commitment of being a million miles away surrounded by hard vacuum, but I think if they do add some actual expedition prospects to the test at some point and then said, "you're not going to Mars if you fail out of this test," you'd need to drag them kicking and screaming out of the test enclosure even if they were injured. That's still not the same as being on the spacecraft, but those who are selected for the trip will also be those who will do anything to succeed when they are on their way.

    27. Re:The only problem is... by tnk1 · · Score: 2

      This was a psychological and operations test, so talking about the conditions of space actually misses the point.

      The reality is that they aren't going to have to care about the gravity or the ionizing radiation. If they notice any radiation on their trip, it will either be dealt with by an operational task they could practice on Earth, or they will have sustained damage and be in serious danger.... and hopefully have an operations checklist to deal with the problem.

      As for being in Hawaii, it's certainly not Mars, but again, conditions are irrelevant. They're not testing whether actual Mars procedures work, they're testing whether humans can deal with a regimented task load using certain roughly known requirements (like wearing space suits), and having twenty minute comms delays.

      To go to Mars, there is a certain level of tech required, and a certain type of person required. Both need to be tested, and eventually the tech and people need to be tested in increasingly real conditions, and together, but by setting aside the requirements for complete fidelity to conditions, you can do the "people" research in parallel with the tech. Waiting until we have the tech to do the people testing is an inefficiently serial approach that does not need to be taken until a certain point.

    28. Re:The only problem is... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      A suicide mission may get volunteers, and it may scientifically "succeed" but will not be accepted by the general public.

      It would start as an exciting adventure and end as a death watch. I'd rather let the Chinese get there "first" than have the US do that. I'd rather be the country that got people there and back again than the be ones who produced Mars' first corpses on purpose.

  8. Most important question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Did they have a sex during this year? :D

    Or how men fapped in presence of women

    1. Re:Most important question by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Funny

      Same way they do in the park. Provided they have trench coats, that is.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Most important question by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 0

      I've watched that movie and the only chick on the mission didn't survive the journey.

      Make sure you do like Charlton Heston did and land on a planet full of mute cavewomen.

  9. Phase 2 testing by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Now they need to try again underwater. Have to deal with pressurization issues of the living areas, a truly hostile environment outside, and of course the conscious realization on the part of the team that if things go wrong they go really wrong. Just adding in the additional stress of knowing there is a good possibility of dying if things go wrong could really change the psychological affects of the isolation and could cause real problems as more time is spent in isolation.

    Of course, it should go without saying to make sure that, should this kind of study be done, make sure the team down there stays away from any perfectly spherical objects they might run across. That tends to lead to bad outcomes in underwater habitats.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re:Phase 2 testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Submarine crews do almost that on a regular base

    2. Re:Phase 2 testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Underwater is backward of what should be tested. While the existence of such transitions is fitting, order matters.

      Cold and thin atmosphere, I was thinking of suggesting putting a hab-bubble on Everest, but it's far too warm and rainy while still having much more atmospheric pressure than appropriate for make a viable test.

      Maybe set up the habitation bubble on Antarctica and give them a communication system with a 3 minute latency at the start of the test, growing to 22 minutes 6 months in, then gradually reducing back to 3 minutes at the end of the year long test. It's a bit closer to the -107C to -17C temperature range, generally unpleasant, low precipitation (on much of it), and a royal pain to get any type of resupply. Still no proper pressure testing in the mix, but the rest is believably closer.

      For more realism, make sure they know that no one will come to help them.

    3. Re:Phase 2 testing by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      Submarine crews do almost that on a regular base

      True, but they don't stay submerged for months on end. They surface occasionally, make port calls, and can be resupplied easier than a fixed facility on the ocean floor. And even then trained submariners start getting a little stressed out towards the end of their deployments (which from what I can find generally run around 6-months).

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    4. Re:Phase 2 testing by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      You should try prison. Social isolation, pressure, things can go REALLY wrong, limited resources and food....

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    5. Re:Phase 2 testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? If the real danger is there you might as well try the real thing.
      What is the point in exposing yourself to the real dangers of the mission without accomplishing the actual mission?

    6. Re:Phase 2 testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Submarine crews live under the constant stress of high chance of death if something breaks (or war). This was more like a Norwegian prison.

    7. Re:Phase 2 testing by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Because underwater on Earth is about a thousand times safer and easier than a trip to Mars.

    8. Re:Phase 2 testing by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      Submarine crews do almost that on a regular base

      True, but they don't stay submerged for months on end.

      SSBN. USS Kamehameha (SSBN-642) had, as its normal mission "Sail out of harbor, submerge, make circles in the ocean for the two+ months of the patrol, surface, go back into port".

      Yes, I was part of her crew. So, yes, I know for a fact that we went out, submerged, and stayed that way. No port calls, no surfacing, no resupply. Just make holes in the ocean till the patrol was done.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    9. Re:Phase 2 testing by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Nuclear missile submarines do stay submerged for months on end. That's kind of the point - they exist specifically to prevent satellites from being able to fix their position.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    10. Re:Phase 2 testing by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2

      USS Kamehameha (SSBN-642) had, as its normal mission "Sail out of harbor, submerge, make circles in the ocean for the two+ months of the patrol, surface, go back into port".

      Cool. Now do the same thing 6 more times, without resurfacing.

    11. Re:Phase 2 testing by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Actually, Everest or Antartica would be far colder for most practical purposes. Yes, Mars is technically much colder, but the air is thinner than the insulation in a vacuum thermos, so there's essentially zero thermal transfer except into the ground, which is easy enough to insulate against. Go exert yourself outside in an uninsulated (except for the soles of your feet) pressure suit, and just like in an orbital EVA overheating will be your problem, not the cold.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    12. Re:Phase 2 testing by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Cool. Now do the same thing 6 more times, without resurfacing.

      If he can do it for two months straight around the clock without snapping, my money would be on him doing two years too if he had to/wanted to. Elizabeth Fritzl did 24 years trapped in a cell in the basement, eventually no matter how bad the situation is it eventually just is. Same goes for people with severe disabilities and such, if I ended up in a wheelchair I'd get very depressed right away. But if I live through that first phase I don't see myself saying I've lived a year in a wheelchair but a year and a day is too much. I'd either have found a reason to live - or not - long before that.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    13. Re:Phase 2 testing by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Submarine crews do almost that on a regular base

      True, but they don't stay submerged for months on end.

      SSBN. USS Kamehameha (SSBN-642) had, as its normal mission "Sail out of harbor, submerge, make circles in the ocean for the two+ months of the patrol, surface, go back into port".

      Yes, I was part of her crew. So, yes, I know for a fact that we went out, submerged, and stayed that way. No port calls, no surfacing, no resupply. Just make holes in the ocean till the patrol was done.

      And after those 2+ months of constant patrolling didn't you have a few months on land while another crew took over the boat?

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    14. Re:Phase 2 testing by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Nuclear missile submarines do stay submerged for months on end. That's kind of the point - they exist specifically to prevent satellites from being able to fix their position.

      Don't most ballistic missile subs have 2 crews? They go out for 2-3 month straight, come back, then refit, swap crews, and go right back out.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    15. Re:Phase 2 testing by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Ballistic missile subs maintain their entire deployments underwater and make zero port calls since the point of them is for them to hide, frequently under pack ice, for that entire period of time. If they come up for air, or make any sort of port call, they can be found and tracked more easily by those who would want to put a torpedo up their ass before they could launch their missiles. They're not going to come up even to periscope depth very often, if at all, and then only for a short period of time for very specific reasons such as missile drills or maybe some sort of venting, and I am not certain that they even need to vent anything on a deployment.

      Of course, the accommodations are relatively spacious (compared to a spaceship) and there are a lot of people on board, but you still need some testing to be able to qualify for such a crew.

      Actually, I think being on a patrol in an SSBN would probably be decent practice for this, although I doubt that would be allowed to happen for obvious reasons.

    16. Re:Phase 2 testing by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      make sure the team down there stays away from any perfectly spherical objects they might run across. That tends to lead to bad outcomes in underwater habitats.

      ?

    17. Re:Phase 2 testing by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Patrol times were limited by space available for food, not because the Navy thought crews couldn't deal with longer trips.

      For longer patrols (which occasionally happened when your partner boat wasn't available for one reason or another), it wasn't unusual for the crew to be walking on cases of canned food until they'd eaten enough to clear the passages.

      Note, by the by, that Triton's submerged circumnavigation of the world would NOT have qualified as a "longer patrol".

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  10. No no no no.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tuna's bad.

    M'kay?

  11. Re: Tuna!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Next Time pack along some surstrÃmming.

  12. Life is tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Isolated NASA Team Ends Year-Long Mars Simulation In Hawaii '

    Being isolated on Hawaii seems a lot more appealing than being on the East Coast.

    Most people are just too stupid to function in civilization.

  13. 4 on 2 sexytime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope they weren't always under surveillance.

  14. MMMM Powdered Cheese by Bohnanza · · Score: 4, Funny
    "They each had a small sleeping cot and a desk inside their rooms. Provisions included powdered cheese and canned tuna."

    So I am fully qualified for a mission to mars?

    --

    -----

    Sorry, I'm only a 1336 h4x0r.

    1. Re:MMMM Powdered Cheese by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      Depends on your method of ingestion of said cheese. Inhalation through the nose is a red flag.

    2. Re:MMMM Powdered Cheese by chihowa · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking. It's like grad school.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  15. low-danger volunteer selection bias by doug141 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of the participants said his reason for volunteering for the mission was the great opportunity to "act like an astronaut for a year." I think the motivation and psyche profile of dangerous-mission astronauts is likely to be very different.

    1. Re:low-danger volunteer selection bias by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      Except that there is also selection bias when it comes to real Astronauts. Indeed, they do NOT want a random sampling. That would be pretty terrible.

      The experiment isn't perfect. Ideally, we'd also have a set of ~10 groups all going at once. But it's close enough to be useful. And a sample size of one still tells us something. And I imagine anything they ran into within the last year and documented will be referenced by psychologists in various papers for decades to come.

  16. Facebook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did they have Google or Facebook?

    If not, then they had more privacy than a significant portion of the Earthlings.

  17. Missed opportunity by Overzeetop · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What they should have done was to inform them on day 355 that their mission was being unexpectedly extended for 26 additional months and gauge their reaction.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Missed opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      don't forget fake killing one of them so the rest thing they're going to die also.

    2. Re:Missed opportunity by tnk1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Let's not be needlessly cruel here. They're only going to Mars, not deploying to Iraq.

    3. Re:Missed opportunity by legRoom · · Score: 1

      If they want this to be taken seriously as a simulated Mars mission, it should have been considerably longer - two to three years. With current propulsion technology, travel time alone could exceed a year, before you add in time actually spent on Mars exploring (and waiting for a favourable launch window to return).

      Maybe they just figure that getting funding for an ultra-expensive, inefficient, all-chemical propulsion mission is politically impossible, anyway? (As it should be.)

      Still, even with a high delta-V electric propulsion system, I would think that you'd want to design the system with enough life support longevity to allow a slow Hohmann transfer as a back-up plan.

  18. Dubious value by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    For three reasons. One, as many have pointed out, because they knew they were not in real danger. Two, because they were not exposed to the levels of radiation they would on Mars. Three, because the gravity was Earth's, not Mars'. This was an interesting exercise, but it probably allowed NASA to iron out only the easy problems. The difficult ones they will have to face during the actual mission.

  19. Submarines by flyingfsck · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Nuclear submariners do this all the time. Why is it necessary for NASA to do these 'experiments?

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Submarines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gotta waste that delicious taxpayer money somehow.

    2. Re:Submarines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because this is a "marketing" ploy to get more people interested in actually planning, funding, etc. a mission. That is not necessarily a bad thing.

      Add that with: Its the Government. Why would one department head let some other department have all the credit and resulting budget. In government you don't sell things to earn revenue, you justify budgets by spending as much money as you can.

    3. Re:Submarines by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Where's the nuclear sub with a crew of only 6, living space that small, and mission duration of >11 months?

      We're all stuck on this planet together, indefinitely, and that goes wrong often enough - things change with scale.

    4. Re:Submarines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nuclear submariners do this all the time. Why is it necessary for NASA to do these 'experiments?

      Nuclear subs are surrounded by a source of readily available oxygen, and can easily resupply. It's not a good comparison.

    5. Re:Submarines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nuclear Submarines *never* have a gender mixed crew.

      They chain of command is also a powerful tool to resolve most social disputes.

      Civilians and scientists are less likely to accept the chain of command as readily as enlisted seamen.

      Also, standard submarine cycle is 100 days. Not 1 year.

    6. Re:Submarines by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Experience in subs IS useful, but your normal SSN or SSBN is very populated, and significantly better supplied than any Mars-bound ship is going to be.

      And if worst comes to worst, you can at least sometimes surface a sub that is in real trouble.

      More to the point, it is significantly more expensive to run this test in an actual submarine that it would be to have it in a building in Hawaii.

      Folks, when we're closer to the technical hurdles being figured out, we probably will have the Antarctic training and/or sub training that everyone thinks will be better. Until then, we can still get information out of something like this which will make even these more strenuous Earthbound tests more efficient.

    7. Re:Submarines by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Nuclear submariners do this all the time.

      When was the last time a nuclear submarine went on a two-year mission without shore leave or resupply, or even without surfacing?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  20. They should go through some ship's journals by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 2

    ... Or perhaps even better: sailors' personal diaries. Mankind has been exploring this planet for millennia. Every sea-faring nation sent out explorer ships at one time or another. Groups of men packed onto a boat with little privacy, not knowing whether they'd ever reach a destination or what they'd find. With the constant danger of disease, water / food / vitamin shortages, going overboard in a storm, fights with fellow sailors, etc etc. And no communication with the outside world for months.

    Plenty of historic reports to pick from, plenty examples of how sailors would (or wouldn't?) cope on such journeys. Never mind that in comparison to an ocean-going vessel, a 'habitat' on some remote island is a pretty controlled environment.

  21. Get me to mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I understand their optimism. They probably had access to "Earth news" during the experiment, but if I were just leaving the dome and was faced with the reality that either Hillary or Trump was seriously going to be the next U.S. president, I'd be considerably more motivated to overlook the problems of isolation and make it work. The survival of the species may hinge on whether or not we can get people off of this rock before it's utterly destroyed.

  22. Just to Clarify by drewmoney · · Score: 5, Informative

    From https://snowballschanceonmars....

    "Just to clarify, we don’t have cheese powder. To whoever said that we live on tuna and cheese powder we have freeze dried cheese that rehydrates into delicious real cheese. Not to mention our numerous homemade cheese and yogurt cultures (Haans, Phil, Geno) and sourdough starter (Bob). Yes, we have tuna, but it’s wild caught and comes in virgin olive oil. We also have FD chicken (my favorite!), ham, turkey, and many kinds of beef. There is an abundant supply of dehydrated/FD carrots, onions, tomatoes, peas, corn, celery, potato, berries, peaches (mine, mine, mine, mine), bananas, apples, and cherries. We eat the same foods as people who cook their meals and don’t eat takeout"

    1. Re:Just to Clarify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn. I've always wanted to go to Mars, but no bacon so I'll have to pass.

  23. The concept here... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Whereas people are making valid points about the flaws in this experiment, I don't think anyone at NASA thinks that this is a perfect dress rehearsal. It's about baby steps.

    You can bring in the real-life high paid astronauts, build expensive underwater, or Himalayan bases, give them less sense of security, etc later.

    If you think this is the only experiment that will happen you're mistaken, they're going to run similar tests numerous times. This experiment was about watching just basic psychology- start with a few factors, add some more, see the differences. See what causes the breaking point that would lead to a failed mission and try to alleviate it.

    Many people here are programmers. You don't write an entire program in its entirety and then test it. You build chunks and test them as you go along. This was step one.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  24. reminds me by davemchine · · Score: 1

    This story reminds me of the Bio-Dome.

  25. Don't forget the beano by phaserbanks · · Score: 1

    Six people eating powdered cheese and tuna in an airtight container is a recipe for conflict

  26. Hawaii? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They got a free year-long trip to Hawaii and spent the entirety of it indoors?

  27. Mars Is Cold As Hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why Hawaii? Mars is not a tropical romper room. Astronauts are gonna freeze their butts off.

    1. Re:Mars Is Cold As Hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the prevailing Space Nutter narrative is that space is actually full of chocolate cake and gold and platinum, if only we (the entire species) could get off (this rock) our butts and just *go* there and pluck the fruits of space that we are somehow "owed".

      The fact that space is enormous, hostile, and pretty much empty has nothing to do with it.

    2. Re:Mars Is Cold As Hell by legRoom · · Score: 1

      Why Hawaii? Mars is not a tropical romper room.

      Go look at the photos in the linked article: the astronauts in this test were stationed at high altitude, above the tree line in a desolate landscape of volcanic rock. It's fairly cold up there, despite being close to the equator.

      Nowhere on Earth is actually similar to Mars, but the spot NASA chose is better than most. (Of course, I'm sure the support staff enjoyed the tropical climate found below.)

  28. Stopped reading... by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    ...at Hawaii. Really how stupid is this? You chose Hawaii?

    1. Re:Stopped reading... by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      I gotta admit, I was thinking the same thing. Y'know, Hawaii, Mars, very similar places.

      Don't get me wrong--the people involved in the experiment are indoors. So it didn't really matter where it was.

      That said, "Why Hawaii?" It sounds like some researcher decided he wanted to spend a year in Hawaii. "Yeah, we're testing psychological reactions. Give me money to live in Hawaii for a year."

  29. Sure, and after a year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they step out into Hawaii, not a frozen deadly radioactive wasteland covered in toxic rocks. Send robots, take pictures. Manned space "exploration" is nothing more than a stunt, it was never more, and never will be.

  30. stinky by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    Bet they stink

    1. Re:stinky by Migraineman · · Score: 1

      Nah, they had a shower allocation of 8-minutes per week (ref: below video at 2:33.) If you don't take a Hollywood shower, that'll get you reasonably clean every other day.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tf7IEVTDjng

    2. Re:stinky by Baron_Yam · · Score: 2

      > If you don't take a Hollywood shower,

      Wet skin. Lather soap. Rinse.

      If you really had to shower daily (which is nice in close quarters but not exactly required to sustain life), you could get by on maybe 30 seconds of water.

      If you have a system to instantly recycle the shower water for the 'wet' part, you could use the entire 30 seconds for the 'rinse'.

  31. Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The team consisted of a French astro-biologist, a German physicist and four Americans -- a pilot, an architect, a journalist and a soil scientist... ...

    Ok, ok! i got one! A Catholic, A Jew, A Baptist, three Muslims and a Hindu walk into a bio-dome ....

  32. Re:Tuna!!! by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    Tuna? in Hawaii? They should have been eating Spam like all good Hawaiians do.

  33. No word on fats and keto by I4ko · · Score: 2

    It would be interesting to know if the guys were keto adapted at the end. Fats have more than twice the energy of carbs and carbs for the same volume and weight can be synthesized from protein. So sending proteins and fats only will reduce the volume and weight of food supplies quite a bit. Canned tuna if there was no sugar is actually just that, but powdered protein requires even less storage. I can't find any word on that; does anyone know?

    1. Re:No word on fats and keto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those of us outside the Nutritional Professions, what is a Keto? An abbreviation or a whole word? And what is keto adapted mean? A sincere thanks to you.

    2. Re:No word on fats and keto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could be the first to try this!

      At the end of their long isolation in Antarctica, and a diet of penguin and seal, Shackleton and his men dreamed and craved fresh bread and fruit.

  34. Got it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you're saying that in order to perform an experiment to evaluate the psychological pressures of a year long mission to a different planet, we should just send 6 people on a year long mission to a different planet?

    I don't think you've fully grasped the concept here.

  35. How simulations work [Re:Provisions] by XXongo · · Score: 1

    Provisions included powdered cheese and canned tuna.

    And the knowledge that if anything went wrong the "experiment" could be ended in a matter of minutes.

    This is true of every simulation, of course. When a pilot flies a Boeing 777 simulator, they don't die if the simulator crashes. When the army does wargame exercises, the red team doesn't die when their side gets bombed. That's why they're called "simulations".

  36. Little publicity [Re:Provisions] by XXongo · · Score: 1

    Hey don't knock it. This experiment didn't accomplish anything that will get us any closer to Mars. But it did accomplish its primary goal of getting NASA a week of good PR.

    Since pretty much nobody-- outside of a few people who are already space fans-- has paid any attention at all to this, due to almost no NASA publicity whatsoever, I don't think that this was a major goal.

    I'm not sure why they just ran the simulation for 1 year, though. It typically takes about 1.4 years for the planetary alignment needed for a return.

    1. Re:Little publicity [Re:Provisions] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Return? Who said anything about a return ticket? This express to Mars is one way baby!

  37. Virtual Privacy? by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

    I wonder if VR might help with the privacy issue.

    While you wouldn't actually be distanced from everyone else, a VR headset and noise cancelling headphones might be enough to get the feeling of having time to yourself.

  38. Doctor Who by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anybody else notice the Doctor Who Tardis' door in of the pictures from the article's source?

  39. Antartica? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the next step to run the exact same experiment in Antarctica?

  40. People die in military training by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FWIW, people die in military training exercises. Not just aircraft crashes either. My father was mechanized infantry and saw the results of a gruesome fatal accident in the field. Its nothing compared to war, but fatalities in the field, on the range, etc do occur. People in the military are quite well aware that mistakes in their "routine" activities can get people killed. A friend loaded ordinance on an aircraft for the navy, working on a carrier flight deck is considered one of the most hazardous jobs in the world.

  41. Food needs to be excellent on long missions ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

    FWIW, dehydrated food is much better today than when I was a kid decades ago. Of course, everything tastes better when hiking/camping. That may not hold true in lab experiments.

    I think the Navy's experience with submarine crews would be most relevant, food needs to be excellent to prevent morale problems when isolated from the world for months at a time.

  42. NASA doesn't allow flogging by perpenso · · Score: 1

    Plus the 16-19th century was full of many time long term boat trips in confined spaces.

    Where officers were allowed to flog the crew to maintain order and work performance, even the occasional hanging of the truly unruly. I expect NASA wants a more relaxed environment.

  43. Obvious question: by Hartree · · Score: 1

    Did they have powdered toast to put their powdered cheese on?

  44. Why the hell in HAWAII? by argStyopa · · Score: 2

    Nothing at all like Mars: check.
    Fails to be in any way convenient for researchers and "support" projects: check
    Justifies a lot of people going to Hawaii paid for by the US taxpayer: check

    Well, I guess that's clear enough.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:Why the hell in HAWAII? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the lead researcher works is from the university of Hawaii, it seems not unreasonable to have the habitat near the university. And a barren slope on an old volcano is reasonably alien. Sure, there's probably a desert somewhere in Arizona that's equally dry and inhospitable, but that's a lot hotter. And Mars isn't exactly hot. You could look at Alaska, but Mars tends to get less snow.

  45. Just joking, honey by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Since August 29th, 2015, the group lived in close quarters in a dome, without fresh air, fresh food or privacy.

    So basically, like being married with kids.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  46. Re:Tuna!!! by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

    I think the cheese and tuna would probably suffice though. Now you know why they really wore the suits so much of the time.

    --

    Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  47. Would have been interesting to break them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would have been interesting throw in some stress events to see how they handle it. Cut off all outside communication and do not tell them how long it will be back on, say the water recycler is acting up so water is only for drinking now, have one crew member be a mole to sabotage things, eyc. It would not be ethical to push them to their breaking point, but would be fun to watch.

  48. Pfffft... done before, in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pauly Shore already showed us how to do it in Biodome, and another group showed us how _not_ to do it in Biosphere 2.

  49. I'm thinking the Red Dwarf theme song here. by Meski · · Score: 1

    I want to lie, Shipwrecked in-comatose
    Drinking fresh mango juice
    Gold fish shoals
    Nibbling at my toes


    Just because, Hawaii.

  50. Re: The only problem is chemistry at DeVry by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    How would calcium carbonate scrub carbon [dioxide]? By forming calcium evenmorecarbonate?

    In any case, scrubbing and oxygen production are two different things.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."