Slashdot Mirror


Falcon 9 Explodes On Pad (npr.org)

Reader Mysticalfruit writes: NPR is reporting that a Falcon9 carrying the AMOS-6 satellite that was supposed to launch on Sat exploded during it's scheduled static fire. No injuries are reported. They're reporting that this was going to be the first reflown first stage.
The Verge adds:SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket, meant to launch a satellite this weekend, exploded on the launch pad at Cape Canaveral, Florida this morning. The explosion occurred during the preparation for the static fire test of the rocket's engines, NASA told the Associated Press. The blast reportedly shook buildings "several miles away." The company confirmed to The Verge the loss of the Falcon 9 an hour later: "SpaceX can confirm that in preparation for today's static fire, there was an anomaly on the pad resulting in the loss of the vehicle and its payload. Per standard procedure, the pad was clear and there were no injuries."

12 of 338 comments (clear)

  1. FaceTrace's Trace satellite destroyed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    awesome work, spaceX! You rock guys. Please send your next rocket to north korea. Thanks in advance.

    1. Re:FaceTrace's Trace satellite destroyed by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1, Funny

      Rejoice, here's your chance to masturbate today! ;)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:FaceTrace's Trace satellite destroyed by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Either way, I am sure SpaceX will be headed to Mars in 2018 like they promised.

  2. It blew up Facebook's $200M satellite with it by JoeyRox · · Score: 5, Funny

    As they say, there's always a silver lining...

    https://techcrunch.com/2016/09...

    1. Re:It blew up Facebook's $200M satellite with it by Megane · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, now they don't have to worry about bad weather this weekend!

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  3. Re:Failure on the *pad* not the rocket by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Funny

    But it's unfortunate that this is being reported as a failure of the SpaceX Rocket, while the malfunction was apparently in the pad.

    You're kidding, right? When SpaceX reported "an anomaly on the pad", they just meant the rocket had an issue leading to its explosion while it was standing on the pad waiting to fire.

    Of course Musk may choose to describe this as a "rapid unscheduled prelaunch disassembly" rather than an explosion - we'll have to see.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  4. Re:Some pics and videos by Thud457 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is why we put our space launch sites in places nobody cares about like Florida and Kazakhstan.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  5. Re:Sorry... Not a reused booster... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Slashdot Editors !

    Your story is wrong !

    CHANGE IT !

    EDIT !

  6. Like they say... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Privatization - better, cheaper, faster... more bang for the buck.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  7. Re:Predictable by segedunum · · Score: 4, Funny

    This rocket was brand new it was the first that would have been SCHEDULED TO REUSE later after this launch.

    So, it's looking good then?

  8. Re:Predictable by tnk1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Some re-assembly required.

  9. Re:Half expected by goodmanj · · Score: 3, Funny

    If it didn't have micro-fractures before, it sure does now... and they're definitely going to be hard to find.