Slashdot Mirror


WrkRiot Collapses Amongst Allegations of Fraud (qz.com)

HockeyPuck quotes a report from New York Times: This week, WrkRiot, began unraveling in a highly public fashion (Warning: may be paywalled). Its former head of marketing revealed that the start-up had been mired in internal chaos and had sometimes paid employees in cashier's checks before delaying payment... Penny Kim, the former marketing director at WrkRiot, wrote about her experience at the company -- a story that consists of alleged deceptions, including forged wire transfer receipts, late paychecks, and lies from executives. Her entire story can be found in a Medium post titled "I Got Scammed By A Silicon Valley Startup." Quartz reports: "Here's the story Kim lays out in her Medium post: In May 2016, after three interviews, she says she accepted the role of marketing director at 1for.one, one of WrkRiot's earlier incarnations. From the beginning, things didn't seem quite right, she says. The CEO, Isaac Choi, hired one of her direct reports without consulting her. A promised $4 million marketing budget never materialized. At investor meetings, the co-founders 'talked about themselves, their connections, and their qualifications for 30 minutes' rather than the product, which they touted as the next 'Credit Karma of LinkedIn.' The software engineering team was largely made up of young Chinese employees relying on visas sponsored by the company to remain in the U.S., Kim says. After repeated inquiring about salaries, Kim alleges, Choi sent forged Wells Fargo wire transfer receipts to 17 employees, and told them that if the money wasn't in their accounts that it was their responsibility to follow up with their banks. Kim ended up filing wage claims with the state of California as the paychecks stopped coming. Kim claims Choi fired her without cause and owes her back wages, a promised $10,000 relocation bonus, and three months of severance worth $50,000, as negotiated in her contract. A series of former employees, advisors, and even the company's former CTO have since denounced WrkRiot and its leadership, in particular Choi."

120 comments

  1. A *Minimum* of Journalistic Skill by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...that's all anybody is really expecting. Like, one sentence, a parenthetical phrase, even, describing WTF WrkRiot is, what they make, something, anything, in the first paragraph of the summary to make me care about this. We get a "Credit Karma of LinkedIn" buried somewhere in the middle, which -- fascinating-ly -- is actually LESS than descriptive or useful.

    Slashdot, I love you guys, but most days you make it really, really tough...

    1. Re:A *Minimum* of Journalistic Skill by alvinrod · · Score: 5, Informative

      From the sounds of things, the company itself didn't really have a clue what they made either. Being the "Credit Karma of LinkedIn" makes it sound like they were dealing in fertilizer if anything.

    2. Re:A *Minimum* of Journalistic Skill by queazocotal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Relevant xkcd is relevant. https://xkcd.com/1060/

    3. Re:A *Minimum* of Journalistic Skill by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Not just the gibberishly meaningless "Credit Karma of LinkedIn", but another "Credit Karma of LinkedIn". :eyeroll:

      No one should really wonder why /. has tanked in popularity...

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    4. Re: A *Minimum* of Journalistic Skill by ljw1004 · · Score: 2

      In this case I disagree. Knowing anything about the business of WrkRiot beyond just "silicon valley startup" adds nothing to the story.

    5. Re:A *Minimum* of Journalistic Skill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you need to know is that the fraudsters will not ever go to jail and will probably not ever make whole the former employees.

    6. Re:A *Minimum* of Journalistic Skill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only came here to make the exact comment. I rarely bother logging in anymore.

    7. Re:A *Minimum* of Journalistic Skill by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

      Like, one sentence, a parenthetical phrase, even, describing WTF WrkRiot is, what they make, something, anything, in the first paragraph of the summary to make me care about this.

      Yup. I had to search for it and still couldn't tell for sure what it is (was). It appears to have been some kind of job search board that went by the name "Jobsonic" in an earlier incarnation.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    8. Re:A *Minimum* of Journalistic Skill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given all you come here to do is whine, why not fuck off completely?

    9. Re: A *Minimum* of Journalistic Skill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      different person but I come for the whine of yesterday. Reminds me of how good things use to be

    10. Re:A *Minimum* of Journalistic Skill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Credit Karma of LinkedIn" was the ONLY description of the company there was. The co-founders of the company didn't get beyond that in their attempts to get VC backing.

    11. Re:A *Minimum* of Journalistic Skill by devjoe · · Score: 1

      The people who took jobs at this place should have known what they were in for when the only description they could get of the company was a comparison to a shady web site, somehow operating within another web site where it makes no sense at all for them to be.

    12. Re: A *Minimum* of Journalistic Skill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Donald?

    13. Re:A *Minimum* of Journalistic Skill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, it's no "Education Connection of MySpace," that's for sure.

    14. Re:A *Minimum* of Journalistic Skill by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      I think the problem is that they didn't know what it was either. Typical of bubble-age startups. From the article it looks like VCs have learned a thing or two since the last bubble.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  2. Fucked Company 2.0 by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We need a new FuckedCompany for this bubble. That was always some good reading.

    1. Re:Fucked Company 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It should be called "H-1B'd" considering how many of these failure stories involve companies who fraudulently claim no Americans are available to work, then fraudulently import workers for their sweatshops.

    2. Re:Fucked Company 2.0 by BlackSupra · · Score: 1

      Here is some good reading:

      > http://autopsy.io/ - Lessons from Failed Startups

    3. Re:Fucked Company 2.0 by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      The last entry is from 2015. ANything more up to date?

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    4. Re:Fucked Company 2.0 by bengoerz · · Score: 1

      To be fair, WrkRiot wasn't really a "bubble" company. It was funded through the personal wealth of its founders, who ran out of cash and started begging from employees. That could happen in any market.

    5. Re:Fucked Company 2.0 by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

      It should be called "H-1B'd" considering how many of these failure stories involve companies who fraudulently claim no Americans are available to work, then fraudulently import workers for their sweatshops.

      They lobbied it to be "no Americans would accept our working conditions".

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    6. Re:Fucked Company 2.0 by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Also, "no Americans with the appropriate level of experience would accept entry level pay rates" so we must go foreign!

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    7. Re:Fucked Company 2.0 by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Probably means that whoevertheywere.io (I've already forgotten) have folded. Must have been a startup.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    8. Re:Fucked Company 2.0 by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      To be fair, WrkRiot wasn't really a "bubble" company. It was funded through the personal wealth of its founders, who ran out of cash and started begging from employees. That could happen in any market.

      That means it was not a company, it was a hobby! 8-P

      On the other hand, if the founders paid for it and -didn't- have to borrow from employees because they actually made money, then it would be a company. 8-)

  3. Startups are mostly garbage, news at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For every legit startup, there are 9 others that are garbage. That ratio is being generous.

    1. Re: Startups are mostly garbage, news at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No. The ratio is correct. As has been the case for many decades. 80% of all businesses fail, and after a quick Google search Forbes shows that 90% of all startups fail. Most likelyrics it's a hired rate because people (the investors) are just stupid and a tech startup needs ZERO capital to get started. A real business needs capital to get started so less people try and those who do usually do more research and try harder. Still, both have extremely high failure rates. Too many ppl think that their business idea is viable. A womans gold store in a tiny town for example. When they should have really been told no by the bank and everyone else.

    2. Re:Startups are mostly garbage, news at 11 by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have to agree. I know people who actively want to work at startups, despite having been through all the troubles at previous ones, and I can only conclude that they have brain damage. Now if you get the salary, then that's ok. Get the salary FIRST, get the benefits second, and only then accept the worthless stock options.

    3. Re:Startups are mostly garbage, news at 11 by AuMatar · · Score: 2

      Or because we've worked at the large companies and while the money is good, there's no feeling of importance or ability to effect the product. Even at some of those companies who pride themselves at it. Some of us are just miserable phoning it in.

      Now I agree- never work for free unless you're getting cofounder level equity. But given a choice between a megacorp and a startup, I'll happily take less at the startup. In fact I recently just did that- sure I'm making 200K less (not including whatever the new equity becomes worth) but dear god am I happier.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    4. Re:Startups are mostly garbage, news at 11 by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most startups I've seen have really awful workers; no real experience in creating a real product that actually makes it to market. I've worked at a few places that had been startups or were pre-IPO but out of the startup phase, and most of the existing code bases were rotten and the hardware was rushed together. So the work generally involves throwing out as much of the startup stuff as you can get away with and starting over with something that actually works, and when you have to keep the original stuff then you always have a new "you won't believe how stupid..." story for your friends.

      The thing is, people at startups most often have no actual desire to get to market, some of these companies have a plan to get bought out by someone else. When they do want to make an actual product the primary goal is still to RUSH as fast as you can before funding runs out or the investors get bored; rush to get a mockup, rush to get a demo, rush to add a prospective customer's favorite feature, rush to change the entire focus of the company, and get all that rushing done by Friday or there's no job left on Monday. There is zero incentive to have quality, quality is a hindrance that only slows down the rush. Stopping and thinking can only be done on your own time, and startups insist that you have no time of your own anyway.

      There's a LOT of ground in between no-nothing startup and a megacorp though, plenty of places outside of startups where you can make a difference and be important and actually have a product make it to customers.

      If you're making 200K less, then you're a manager and not a real worker anyway, or an exec and even less able to do real work.

    5. Re:Startups are mostly garbage, news at 11 by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      I disagree. If you want to be paid well and on the dot, go work for a regular company. Working for a startup is a different proposition: it's stress, long hours, and a crap salary (some pay top dollar to attract top talent, but only if they are exceptionally well funded, and you do need to be a recognized top talent to get in. Most pay crap). It's not everyone's cup of tea, but some people thrive in such an environment. I've done it and it's great, but very demanding. I'd do it again but I'll probably be more selective next time round.

      In a startup, what you're working towards with your co-workers is a big payday. And when that day arrives you do want your slice. If working for a startup is your thing, make sure you get the pay you need to get by, but do get those stock options. And make sure those options cannot easily be taken away. They often can, like so many potential multimillionaires at FaceBook found out when the Zuck fired them just before heir options vested.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    6. Re:Startups are mostly garbage, news at 11 by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The payday though is most often disappointing. Unless you've got a relatively simple product that's up and out to the public in a year and the bankers are excited and want to push you to IPO, there's generally a dilution of equity over time. So five or ten years at a startup and your payday is basically the size of a large bonus or a year's salary (which is great but it's not the quick retirement some people think they're going to have). If you take time to build a business instead of hoping for a quicky buy from Google then that time means equity dilutes. Bankers are getting smarter, they are much more likely now to want to see actual recurring revenue before the agree to help with the IPO, so it takes time and you need a real plan.

      There's no easy way to make sure those options don't get taken away. Even co-founders can find themselves cut out of the picture with just one vote on the board, so what chance does someone who actually was low class enough to actually have to interview for the job expect?

    7. Re:Startups are mostly garbage, news at 11 by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      True, you shouldn't go in with the expectation of easy riches, just make sure you get your bit when it does hit. About those options, here's a decent article on the subject. In a nutshell: make sure your options vest early and permanently (the latter is what screwed those FB people IIRC). Check the terms, and negotiate: in contrast to big companies where HR have nailed down renumeration and benefits to the last decimal in a rule book, startups have considerable leeway to meet your terms, especially if what you ask for doesn't translate into an immediate cash outlay for them.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    8. Re:Startups are mostly garbage, news at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never been at a startup that hasn't had salary, benefits, or snacks. Stocks are mostly worthless, but I think my current company is one of those exceptions, but only because we've already got contracts in place for at least the next few years. I am currently getting 5 times what I was getting in the enterprise world with less stress, shorter hours, and more time with my family. Not all startups suck. The best way is to be is to find a mid to late stage startup with a viable and proven business model and sign on then, it's the best of both worlds and provides as much if not more stability as an enterprise company.

    9. Re:Startups are mostly garbage, news at 11 by Captain+Linger · · Score: 1

      This. I mean, I guess if you're brought in by the allure of "working at a startup" and aren't particularly focused on the viability and the leadership team? Fine, I bet you find a lot of trash. Don't care about getting paid a fair (if stingy) wage? You'll find a ton of trash.

      I started at a rather young startup and took a very slight pay cut (and 40% less than my top offer). Had an opportunity not only to work with the most talented tech team I've ever seen, but also to grow my own skills and leadership, quickly. As soon as we weren't working on 1M in seed funding, I was more than adequately compensated with a salary that itself was 50% *more* than that top offer.

      And yeah, 2 years was enough, but I now have a greater equity stake than a lot of the latecoming executives, and the company is a (though still private) 300-person operation. I hope and suspect that will be relevant one day, but it's worth it even if the company folds.

    10. Re:Startups are mostly garbage, news at 11 by coofercat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'd agree - the startups I've worked for weren't necessarily going for a buy-out, although that'd have kept the VCs happy. Along the way though, we got to play with some cool tech, got some (potential) customer interaction experience, occasionally flew a few places, got some 'everything's broken, you're the only one here, so make it work' type experience and drank a boatload of beer at various places when the bosses got their credit cards out. Of course, when the company went down the pan, we all got left with nothing, but it wasn't a surprise so we all had a 'plan b' lined up.

      I wouldn't go for that now as I like the 9-5 so I can be at the right places at the right times for my kids. But back when I was (mostly) single, it was great fun, and rewarded me in a lot more ways than a regular salary.

      Just as a side note, one startup I was at really did try to go for quality. We still had to move too fast quite a bit towards the end, but the foundations were pretty solid. All that means nothing now, because the product is long lost in some vault somewhere and provides no benefit to the customers we (nearly) had, or indeed the world as a whole. The question is, was all that quality worth it?

    11. Re:Startups are mostly garbage, news at 11 by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Was never a manager, although I was a tech lead. I'm making that much less due to lucky timing on RSUs that were continuing to vest.

      My experience with startup workers is the exact opposite. Smart owners fill the top positions with talent, even if they need to pay to get it. You might cheap out on things like manual testers and go for the guy still in college, or take a flyer on that new guy out of college for the 10th member of your dev team, but you aren't doing that on core positions.

      Of course maybe that's why the startups I went to all exited successfully.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    12. Re:Startups are mostly garbage, news at 11 by Megane · · Score: 1
      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    13. Re:Startups are mostly garbage, news at 11 by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      ... but dear god am I happier.

      Not being happy in your work has it's own costs and risks. But just "keep your eyes open" about what is happening.

      On the other hand, there are a lot of small established companies that are -not- so large, and are not startups. You don't have to jump "in the deep end of the pool".

  4. Never Heard Of Them by The+Raven · · Score: 2

    Obviously she must be horrible at her job as Marketing Director, and thus was fired with cause... /s

    Seriously though, I've never heard of them. What's the point of a job site nobody knows about?

    --
    "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
    1. Re:Never Heard Of Them by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Obviously she must be horrible at her job as Marketing Director, and thus was fired with cause... /s

      Seriously though, I've never heard of them. What's the point of a job site nobody knows about?

      Every company starts as an unknown. You could have said the same thing about Google in 1998. "'Google??' what kind of name is that? Why do they even exist when we have AltaVista and Excite!?"

      Of course, few startups advance to become a household name, most fail or are acquired and are forgotten.

    2. Re:Never Heard Of Them by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      So having a news story about an unknown startup is about as dumb as interviewing the guy next to you on the bus. Sure, it might turn out to be interesting but chances are it's a waste of time.

    3. Re:Never Heard Of Them by phorm · · Score: 1

      Apparently to siphon money off the employees and potentially any investors stupid enough to invest?

    4. Re:Never Heard Of Them by Megol · · Score: 1

      And the cowards are already popping up posting irrelevant shit like she can't be a victim because of her gender...

    5. Re:Never Heard Of Them by bengoerz · · Score: 3, Informative

      Her breakup story just made the New York Times, Slashdot, TechCrunch, and Inc.com. Seems like she's a pretty great Marketer.

    6. Re:Never Heard Of Them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the cowards are already popping up posting irrelevant shit like she can't be a victim because of her gender...

      and the white knights who make everything about some bullshit or another

    7. Re:Never Heard Of Them by hawguy · · Score: 1

      So having a news story about an unknown startup is about as dumb as interviewing the guy next to you on the bus. Sure, it might turn out to be interesting but chances are it's a waste of time.

      The story wasn't about the startup itself or their product, but about the way they defrauded their employees.

  5. What Employee Works Without Pay? by hondo77 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why do people stay at a company if it has missed a payday? The day my employer misses a payday, I go home and don't come back until they come up with a paycheck (if at all, since while I'm home I look for another job immediately). Do people stay out of loyalty or naiveté or what?

    --
    I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    1. Re:What Employee Works Without Pay? by queazocotal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, if you are required to work at the company to stay in the country...

    2. Re:What Employee Works Without Pay? by AuMatar · · Score: 2

      I work at a startup. I might deal with a missed payday or two- but I'd be expecting straight up equity in lieu of pay. Not paying me and not giving me equity or interest? Not happening.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    3. Re:What Employee Works Without Pay? by yarbo · · Score: 4, Informative

      She moved to California for this job. There's a certain amount of sunk costs involved in moving that makes the calculus a little trickier than just move back to Texas over a missed paycheck.

      Hindsight shows that it was a bad move, but there are counterexamples of people who have gotten their paychecks a little bit late and had a satisfying time at their company.

    4. Re:What Employee Works Without Pay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's the real question, how the fuck did a small startup get a bunch of work visas?

    5. Re:What Employee Works Without Pay? by TroII · · Score: 1

      That's the real question, how the fuck did a small startup get a bunch of work visas?

      The same way most companies get them, they lied to the government, and like most companies they won't face any consequences for doing so.

    6. Re: What Employee Works Without Pay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because sometimes pushing through a companies rough patch and not leave a small business hanging is the right thing to do. With the premise that the owners have looked after you. From personal experience we worked 4 weeks for free to get the product to market. The owners however informed us that if we work next month we might not get paid as money is out.

      So we worked got paid double and the company is still running usenext.

    7. Re:What Employee Works Without Pay? by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Well, if you are required to work at the company to stay in the country...

      Not sure if you are being serious, but: if your company isn't paying you, then you are already in violation of your H1 visa.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    8. Re:What Employee Works Without Pay? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's the real question, how the fuck did a small startup get a bunch of work visas?

      By applying for them. I worked for a 10 person startup a decade ago, and 3 of the employees were H1Bs. They were highly educated, experienced, and already worked for us from overseas, but we wanted to all be in one place. There was a bit of paperwork, and some delay, but the process was straightforward.

    9. Re:What Employee Works Without Pay? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      She moved to California for this job. There's a certain amount of sunk costs involved in moving that makes the calculus a little trickier than just move back to Texas over a missed paycheck.

      Yeah, too bad there are no other tech companies in California.

    10. Re:What Employee Works Without Pay? by hawguy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, if you are required to work at the company to stay in the country...

      Not sure if you are being serious, but: if your company isn't paying you, then you are already in violation of your H1 visa.

      Which is all the more reason to stay when the money they owe you is right around the corner, just need to wait for that wire transfer to come through, any day now.

    11. Re:What Employee Works Without Pay? by hawguy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why do people stay at a company if it has missed a payday? The day my employer misses a payday, I go home and don't come back until they come up with a paycheck (if at all, since while I'm home I look for another job immediately). Do people stay out of loyalty or naiveté or what?

      Because they realize that working at a startup takes a certain amount of sacrifice, I stayed at a startup when they couldn't make payroll for 3 weeks, they admitted it beforehand, and told us that we were free to take unpaid leave during that period if we wanted to, or we could work and eventually get paid. The CEO offered personal loans with his own money to anyone that had rent, mortgage or other obligation coming up. Most of the employees continued working, we got paid in 3 weeks as promised with a 25% bonus. Those that took the unpaid leave came back and returned to their jobs.

      Even in a hot job market like Silicon Valley, it takes more than a few weeks to line up a *good* job, so it's worth taking a bit of risk if you're otherwise happy with the company and the product you're working on.

    12. Re: What Employee Works Without Pay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nice. You must feel good about your decision.
      However, many companies aren't that honorable.

    13. Re:What Employee Works Without Pay? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      As you have it all worked out, you presumably learned from experience. You've got the whole scenario played out in your head, and tons of job-hopping under your belt. A 26 year old woman wouldn't have that experience. It's pretty rich to criticize someone for something like that.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    14. Re:What Employee Works Without Pay? by quetwo · · Score: 1

      And I think that is the key. They were upfront about it, and allowed you to make an informed decision. The owners of this wrkriot company lied and deceived their employees about what was going on.

      If there are rough waters ahead, be open and honest about it. Most people will understand and try and help out. In this case, they lied about what their situation was to most of the employees they brought on and continued lying when they ran out of runway and couldn't pay them anymore.

      The crazy thing was they leveraged themselves so much, they had no way to control their spending. Private jet service? Hiring dozens of employees when you are on the edge of the cliff? Just speaks volumes of their willingness to live reality vs. living the dream.

    15. Re:What Employee Works Without Pay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone tell Choi that indentured servants have been illegal in the USA for 99 years. Next year we can celebrate a happy centennial to outlawing of indentured servants. :)

    16. Re:What Employee Works Without Pay? by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Equity is not money. It's practically negative money for most startups. Even lottery tickets are worth more than equity.

    17. Re:What Employee Works Without Pay? by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Why do people stay at a company if it has missed a payday?

      Well, if you are required to work at the company to stay in the country...

      Isn't forced labor the definition of slavery?

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    18. Re:What Employee Works Without Pay? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      That's generally true but if it was completely true, there'd be no point founding anything either because all you do is get paid in equity as it were until you get actual real money to pay yourself. Whether it's worth working for equity is a combination of whether you can afford to get nothing, how much equity you get, how much you enjoy the work and how good you believe the chances of success are.

      I do know someone working for a startup for pure equity. There's not a chance in hell they could afford to pay her a competitive salary. But, it's a fun job, the startup looks as sound as any startup ever looks (they have an actual product and there's an actual market) and she's wealthy enough to have retirement as an alternative to the job.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    19. Re:What Employee Works Without Pay? by qbast · · Score: 1

      Yes. Thanks Cthulhu there is no forced labour involved here. These people are free to return wherever they came from.

    20. Re:What Employee Works Without Pay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I go home and don't come back ...

      I'm guessing you don't like your job. Accidents do happen. It happened to me once but was quickly fixed.

    21. Re:What Employee Works Without Pay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because all you have to do is walk into any random office building and say, "I want a job, give me one!" which they then promptly do.

    22. Re:What Employee Works Without Pay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People work at start-ups for all sorts of dumb reasons.

      I once worked at a small company where on two occasions they had to be "reminded" to give me my paycheck and both times they remedied it within a day, they didn't get to a third strike before I had left for other reasons but that silliness was a factor. No other employer has ever missed payday in all my years.

    23. Re:What Employee Works Without Pay? by slew · · Score: 1

      The crazy thing was they leveraged themselves so much, they had no way to control their spending. Private jet service? Hiring dozens of employees when you are on the edge of the cliff? Just speaks volumes of their willingness to live reality vs. living the dream.

      This is a good example of how the startup culture often manifests itself as a cargo cult...

      Sadly in some startups, there is this continuous undertone that if they perform the various ritualistic acts they have observed in other startups, that will eventually manifest in the appearance of wealth. With some personalities (often spiritual leaders and prophets), failing to manifest such wealth, just causes them to double-down on their behavior on the belief that looking successful is a prerequisite to being successful (basically a dress-for-success mentality on steroids). Why would anyone invest in a company that is desperate for investors?

      The laws of physics generally prevail in the end...

    24. Re:What Employee Works Without Pay? by andymadigan · · Score: 1

      You haven't been to San Francisco, have you?

      --
      The right to protest the State is more sacred than the State.
  6. WTF is WrkRiot? Why would I give a rat's ass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ahh, yet another answer to Credit Karma. Startups are a dime a dozen. Especially those that challenge well established companies.
    If I get one whiff of weird shit going on at a company I'm interviewing with, I'm gone.
    A job interview should be considered an opportunity to figure out whether the company is worth your time, as well as showing your stuff off.
    Anyone who treats it otherwise is either very naive or stupid. If you don't do your due diligence, you get what you deserve.

  7. If anyone has ever worked in a startup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'll recognize this outfit immediately. There's a lot of people jockeying to be one of the "Cool Nerd Kids" with endless re-tellings of the pranks played back in their elite engineering school, etc. Lots of people wearing black clothes who don't necessarily look good in it.

  8. Re: A story as old as the hills. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't piss off a marketing director: cue exhibit A.

  9. Hacker News thread by yuhong · · Score: 1
  10. Typical but silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yes most startups that fail are like this. What we did was enter a startup just like this, and work hard and succeed and spun off from the shipwreck. That is what Silicon valley is about. Joining a messed up startup and sinking is just your own fault. Most sink, but if you swim you will succeed even if the company is flotsam! Silicon valley isn't about getting free rides, its your chance to fly on your own and leave the rest to sink.

  11. Re: A story as old as the hills. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a marketing director... I tell my wife to pick up a 12 pack of Budweiser and Cheese Puffs at the market. That's a marketing director.

  12. "Credit Karma of LinkedIn" by hsmith · · Score: 1

    What the fuck does it even mean? This is wha WrkRiot positioned themselves as. It makes no sense.

    1. Re:"Credit Karma of LinkedIn" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody knows what it means, but it's provocative! AKA the slogan of every startup over the last 2 or 3 years. "We don't really have a *business plan*, per se, but we're in the bay area, and we're going to be disruptive or something." And in come the millions. Fucking ridiculous.

  13. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  14. cheche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe anti-youtube digital phobia should end on china so new businesses could more easily be created motivated by those cultural gates and then side-show horror scams would not be that useful anymore.

  15. Re: A story as old as the hills. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You let her leave the kitchen? Da fuq?!!

  16. Any hope of charging this guy with fraud in China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    any hope of charging him with fraud in China, where they have a working judicial system? I'll buy the bullet....

  17. Who? by zenlessyank · · Score: 1

    I guess that is what you get when you try to be cute with a company name. If that is what this is about.

  18. Re:A story as old as the hills. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think you're missing the part where the startup illegally forges fake salary payments in order to extract even more work without paying their employees.

    I don't understand why you haven't been modded as a troll. You're made up a side to the story in order to discredit the speaker. No where does she talk about planning to make massive wealth. She didn't even name the company, other people looked into it and uncovered the company.

  19. She obviously hadn't heard Christmilk Digital, by Rujiel · · Score: 1

    their previous company, formed from the founder's grandfather's dying fever-dream.

    No brandcuffs!

  20. Re:A story as old as the hills. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +5 Insightful? Really? This is about the most incorrect statement I've seen today.

    FIX this useless moderation system, or keep bleeding users, dying site once known as /.

  21. Re: A story as old as the hills. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Budweiser? Cheese puffs?! You fucking peasant.

  22. Re:My God! by Desler · · Score: 1

    Yeah!! How dare she expected to get paid instead of being happy with lies and fraudulent wire transfer notices.

    What a stupid, greedy cunt she must be. *rolls eyes*

  23. Sounds like a business plan... by Streetlight · · Score: 1

    - Have an idea which is sold as being the next big thing.
    - Claim to have a great education at one of the great universities and follow on requisite experience needed to build up a company to build the next big thing
    - Maybe round up some venture capital or claim to have some VC
    - Hire some employees with promises of reasonable income for a startup with the implications that they will become wealthy beyond their wildest dreams in a short time because the idea is the next big thing and have the capital to make it happen since the investors believe it's so
    - Some of the employees hired to build the next big thing haven't got a clue how to build the next big thing
    - Don't pay the employees, i.e, cheat them out of promised pay, relocation expenses, etc.
    - Fire the employees who ask why they haven't been paid
    - Close the company
    - If there was any venture capital, keep it and hide it somewhere

    As was once said, perhaps in the investigation of the Watergate scandal, follow the money. That's how we'll find our who was involved and what happened.

    --
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
  24. Editors: DO YOUR FUCKING JOB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Jesus. Getting pretty sick of this shit. Tell us what WrkRiot is. What is it? Why should I care?

    You fucking idiots.

    1. Re:Editors: DO YOUR FUCKING JOB by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Informative

      They're the Credit Karma of Linked in, duh.

      No I have no idea what the hell that is either.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re:Editors: DO YOUR FUCKING JOB by naughtynaughty · · Score: 4, Informative

      https://www.crunchbase.com/org...
      Total Equity Funding
      $1.13M in 2 Rounds from 2 Investors
      Most Recent Funding
      $130k Seed on August 1, 2016
      Headquarters:
      Santa Clara, California
      Description:
      Taking the search out of job search with a patent pending customized platform utilizing NLP and Machine Learning.
      Founders:
      Isaac Choi
      Categories:
      Employment, SaaS, Machine Learning, Natural Language Processing, Text Analytics
      Website:
      http://wrkriot.om/

      Company Details
      Founded:
      November 1, 2015
      Aliases:
      JobSonic
      Employees:
      11 - 50 | 1 in CrunchBase
      JobSonic is currently trying to make sure that job search engines cater to the needs of the job seekers by allowing them to be matched and ranked to all job postings in real-time. We have created a data driven job board using the latest technologies in natural language processing, text analytics and machine learning. Our goal is to make sure that all the people in the world will have an opportunity to work in a full time job positions and are able to get all the benefits needed to live without any worries concerning their health and retirement.
      Everyone deserves the right to work, provide, save and grow for their family. Everybody should be allowed the right to better themselves and in this current economic downfall people are being pushed into working for the on-demand market, which is actually suppressing people.
      We do this by allowing a person's resumes to be matched through signal classifications to every job posting on the web within their desired industries, salaries and locations in real time. Not only are their resumes matched, but the job postings will be ranked in order from the highest possible choices to the lowest.

    3. Re:Editors: DO YOUR FUCKING JOB by Shimbo · · Score: 1

      Credit Karma appears to be on of these 'fintech' firms, where you sign away all your privacy in return for free credit reports. So I guess Wrkriot were looking for a way to leech off LinkedIn. Her timing obviously completely sucked, because Microsoft bought LinkedIn in June and put a bomb under the leeches shortly after.

    4. Re:Editors: DO YOUR FUCKING JOB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You shouldn't care, they were a scam, the editors did the right thing for once.

    5. Re: Editors: DO YOUR FUCKING JOB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you see the words "patent pending" run away like hell. They always break my bullshit-O-meter. Also "trying to make sure search engines"... Explain to me, how do you affect 3rd party engines... You don't, that's how. Also fuck them for trying to automate professional recruiters and staffing agents thus creating more unemployment. I'm glad they are failing.

  25. Re:My God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice characterization, but no. Not greedy, but too easily seduced by bullshit.
    She didn't spend enough time doing due diligence.
    Now, please explain to the rest of the class why you would immediately jump to the "stupid, greedy cunt" assumption.
    Grownups find that trite and rather boring.
    Still think the world owes you something? If so, you have some serious growing up and learning to do.

    Get over yourself. With that attitude, you're just more roadkill on the highway of life.

  26. Re: A story as old as the hills. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't be so backwards. Women can be allowed outside when their housekeeping duties require it. But I see how this could be a slippery slope...

  27. IT'S NOT LINUX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WrkRiot is not Linux, and you shouldn't care, because if it's not Linux, it's irrelevant.

  28. Re: My God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoosh

  29. my startup experience by nathar · · Score: 1

    I worked at a startup. it was my first job out of college. I remember being so excited because "we were going to make a difference," but really I was just fooling myself. I had no experience and this place was the only job I found that would take me before I ran out of rent money. 12-15 hour shifts, no health insurance, I had to bring my own computer (I only had a tower, no laptop so that was interesting), and we worked out of a basement. Eventually it became a little more professional with health insurance, and a proper work building, they bought me a computer. I pushed my boss hard for this stuff. Then I had a child and couldn't work the hours, so I went to greener pastures with a more sane work environment. Fast forward a year after I left and I get a call from one of the previous employees who I refer to as my "war buddy" because of all the strange and difficult happenings at this previous place of employment for both of us. He tells me the boss just killed his wife at the work place by cutting off her head. That was my first boss, my first work experience. Every job since then has been a cake-walk.

    1. Re:my startup experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something like that would have made the news,
      Link for proof?

    2. Re:my startup experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/...

      Took 2 seconds to Google, you lazy faggot.

    3. Re:my startup experience by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      That story is just crazy enough to be true! 8-}

  30. Re:My God! by Desler · · Score: 1

    No, that is spot on. You seem to blame her for everything and completely gloss over the fraud perpetrated by her bosses.

  31. The echoes of 1999/2000 are calling... by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

    I remember hearing high-dram startup flame-out stories right around this time 15-16 years ago. The only differences this time are:
    - Phones/tablets instead of PCs/browsers
    - Truly stupid startups are able to stick around longer because of public cloud services
    - This round of startups isn't going to leave behind goodies like thousands of miles of dark fiber, data centers full of equipment, etc.

    Seriously, "the credit karma of LinkedIn?" What does that even mean??

    1. Re: The echoes of 1999/2000 are calling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. What/who is credit karma

    2. Re:The echoes of 1999/2000 are calling... by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      ...The only differences this time are: ...
      - This round of startups isn't going to leave behind goodies like thousands of miles of dark fiber, data centers full of equipment, etc.

      I'm not so sure. AWS, GCP, and Azure have all been drastically expanding capacity.

      Tons of great software has been written and open sourced.

      We now have a ton of tech that makes previously difficult things very easy for a small team of developers to manage. There have to be some benefits in that.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  32. Sunk costs by sjbe · · Score: 1

    There's a certain amount of sunk costs involved in moving that makes the calculus a little trickier than just move back to Texas over a missed paycheck.

    Considering sunk costs in your evaluation of what to do going forward is irrational. Either the expected future prospects of an investment (time, money, effort, etc) are worthwhile or they are not. The past investments are already spent and gone and if one is acting rationally they should play no role in determining actions going forward. Yes it is frustrating to spend a lot of resources on something that ultimately proves a dead end or the expected return seems too low to justify continuing with but once you realize it is a dead end you then are throwing good money after bad.

    1. Re:Sunk costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a certain amount of sunk costs involved in moving that makes the calculus a little trickier than just move back to Texas over a missed paycheck.

      Considering sunk costs in your evaluation of what to do going forward is irrational. Either the expected future prospects of an investment (time, money, effort, etc) are worthwhile or they are not. The past investments are already spent and gone and if one is acting rationally they should play no role in determining actions going forward. Yes it is frustrating to spend a lot of resources on something that ultimately proves a dead end or the expected return seems too low to justify continuing with but once you realize it is a dead end you then are throwing good money after bad.

      People aren't rational though. Even those who pride themselves on being rational aren't rational.

  33. Re:My God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, I chose to take a look at things that were under her control. The decision to go to work for those scumbags was hers and hers alone.
    She even wrote that she'd repeatedly ignored the warning signs.
    If it looks like shit and smells like shit, it's probably shit.

    The idiots behind WrkRiot will get theirs, it's just a matter of time. I'll let the justice system sort that mess out.

  34. This is not unusual. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Just about all the stuff described in that long blogpost is pretty normal. I've been screwed over just about more times than I can count. Today I smell bullshit from miles away and (re)act accordingly. CYA is the rule of the game. Know what you are getting into and avoid total doucebags.

    Web business is often shady and always at the intersection between employed, freelance and entrepreneur/in-on-your-own-good-will. Think and act accordingly and don't take any shit. If a deal is on and isn't delivered (that next invoice payment, the salary, whatever) go into professional mode inmediately.

    And, of course, never work without a signature on a piece of paper.
    I did that once again a few years back despite better knowlege and got screwed over yet again. By someone I thought I knew.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  35. bank accounts and routing numbers by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    He asked us to write down our bank accounts and routing numbers.

    Say goodbye to the contents of your bank account. Those are the only things someone needs to write bad checks against your account. The check does not even need to have your name on it.

    Someone that is going to commit fraud and fake a bank authorization is certainly not above draining your bank account.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  36. Re:My God! by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    It's tough to care when the person is too lazy, green or stupid to do due diligence and gets fucked.

    I can understand not having sympathy for the lazy or stupid, but the green? We were all n00bs once, at everything we now do well. We've been through that, and we should remember what it was like.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  37. Marketing Director's Salary by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

    Isn't $135,000 kind of low for a Director of Marketing position in the Bay area?