Slashdot Mirror


SpaceX Is Building a Hyperloop Test Track Near Los Angeles (techcrunch.com)

An anonymous reader writes from a report via TechCrunch: SpaceX appears to be hard at work building its Hyperloop test track through Hawthorne, a city in southwestern Los Angeles County, California. TechCrunch reports: "SpaceX is hosting a Hyperloop Pod Design Competition for student and engineering teams, and 23 winners were selected earlier this year to build their pod prototypes and race them on the test track, a 1-mile tube capable of achieving 99.8 percent vacuum. Said track was photographed by reddit user 42finder this week (via Electrek). Pod testing would be a big step for Hyperloop technology. The two main companies competing to build the first operational Hyperloop systems, Hyperloop Transportation Technologies and Hyperloop One, have yet to create pod tests. HyperloopOne has begun construction on its own test track in the Nevada desert, of course, but the SpaceX project looks considerably further along. Back when SpaceX first announced the competition, the timing of the final round which includes the actual test of final prototype pods was set for Summer 2016, but in July SpaceX announced that would slip to January of next year."

11 of 125 comments (clear)

  1. Is this Hyperloop or "Hyperloop"? by Rei · · Score: 2

    Because it's hard to know what one means when they talk about "Hyperloop" anymore. The original Hyperloop Alpha document spelled out a very explicit concept. Then they held the student Hyperloop pod competition and the winners were absolutely nothing like what was laid out in Hyperloop Alpha.

    It comes across to me that the main point of this competition is more to drive student interest in engineering rather than to build a viable transportation alternative. Hyperloop Transportation Technologies and Hyperloop One seem more focused on the latter.

    --
    "99 dead duelists of Dios on the wall. 99 dead duelists of Dios! Take one's ring, pass it around..."
    1. Re:Is this Hyperloop or "Hyperloop"? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm thinking that it is Hyper-Hype at the moment. It's all good clean Christian fun, until one explodes on the launchpad.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:Is this Hyperloop or "Hyperloop"? by michelcolman · · Score: 2

      For example, Elon suggested that air-cushion levitation would be the best method, but also acknowledged that magnetic levitation was a viable option.

      Just out of curiosity, how would an air cushion work in a vacuum tube?

    3. Re:Is this Hyperloop or "Hyperloop"? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You really think that shipping people at supersonic speeds in a ground-based platform of vacuum tubes is ever going to happen? Given the engineering "issues" (lol, to put it mildly) and the delicious soft-target nature of this thing, I can tell you that it's 100% pie-in-the-sky.

      Oh sure, they'll fuck around with it and burn through millions if not billions of sucker-bucks, but in reality it's never going to materialize.

      See for yourself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Cool idea for sure, but it's never going to happen.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    4. Re:Is this Hyperloop or "Hyperloop"? by Rei · · Score: 2

      Question: Do airplanes work?
      Answer: Yes!
      Question: How high can airplanes fly?
      Answer: The jet record is over 37 kilometers, around 4mb air pressure (4x Hyperloop).
      Question: Was it lift that limited it, or a lack of oxygen for the engines?
      Answer: Not even a contest - oxygen!
      Question: Was it in ground effect?
      Answer: Not even close!
      Question: Can ground effect increase lift by literally orders of magnitude as you reduce the distance to the lifting surface?
      Answer: Yes!
      Question: How far are Hyperloop's air bearings from the skin?
      Answer: 0,5 to 1,3mm
      Question: Is that the only source of lift?
      Answer: No! They also shunt in air from the big compressors on the front of each pod - 0,2kg/s at 9,4 kPa - the compressors using 276 kW to take in 99Pa air at 292K at 0,49kg/s to compress to 2,1 kPa at 857K, cooled in an intercooler with onboard water (0.14kg/s) to 300K, with 0.29kg/s shunted to the nozzle expander, leaving 0.2kg/s into the second stage compressor 11kPa 557K via 52kW of compressor power, into the second stage intercooler to 400K, and out via the air bearings.
      Question: Is all of this stuff and much more in the Hyperloop Alpha document for all of this?
      Answer: Yes!
      Question: Did the person you're responding to bother to read the document before going off on the concept?
      Answer: No!
      Question: Why would a person think that was a reasonable thing to do? ... Sorry, I've got no answer to the last one.

      --
      "99 dead duelists of Dios on the wall. 99 dead duelists of Dios! Take one's ring, pass it around..."
  2. Are we allowed to criticize this snake oil yet? by Shane_Optima · · Score: 2

    It's a bit depressing the way so many otherwise intelligent people get starry-eyed about this impractical pipe dream. I get that the idea of a vacuum tube travel is awesome to think about, particularly for long distances, but the hyperloop has all kinds of issues that must be overcome so that... what? So that we can travel at a measly 2x faster than existing Maglev trains on a path that's just a few hundred miles long, in a tube that is much more expensive than Maglev track and is much more vulnerable to accidents or terrorist attacks?

    Meh. Wake me up when they've figured out how to (economically) build a tube that can convey vehicles at 5,000 MPH all the way to Beijing.

  3. Re:A vehicle travelling at thousands of mph .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A giant tinfoil bird, built to within a hair breadth of strength requirements, cruising in air too rarefied and cold to breath, tens of thousands of feet above the ocean with a couple of glorified leafblowers for engines.

    Thanks but I'll stick to walking to go long distance.

  4. Re:What a boondoggle by Rei · · Score: 2

    I will only comment on Hyperloop Alpha. The new "Hyperloops" in the competition have nothing in common with it, and I'm not going to bother with them.

    Let's just say this works and I'm sure it will, as the engineering of vacuum tubes has been known for nearly a century

    Hyperloop is not a vactrain.

    (for those of you older folks, this is just an evolution of the system we used before ATMs when you deposited your check at your drive-up bank into a vacuum tube system to the bank teller).

    No, those are pneumatic tubes, which are neither nor vactubes nor Hyperloop.

    Don't you think you should at least know what you're talking about before you start criticizing something?

    The infrastructure alone will cost $100B. I get that number because I anticipate that building a sealed tube is going to be a lot more expensive than high speed rail tracks

    1) Explain why rail tracks are the best analogy for building a Hyperloop tube, as opposed to, you know, actual long tubes.
    2) Explain why Hyperloop should cost anywhere near that much when actual pipeline costs, per unit cross section, are well in line with Hyperloop.

    There are of course, differences, but they fall on both sides. For example, comparing to oil pipeline, Hyperloop requires much greater straightness, high wall smoothness, and accelerator segments. An oil pipeline deals with a higher pressure differential, deals with much more challenging environmental/permitting issues, higher power pumps and has thermal management challenges not faced by Hyperloop. I could keep going on both sides, of course.

    , and the cost of the high speed rail project in California is now estimated at $68.4B.

    Rail isn't a pipeline.

    If you want to go into some of the reasons for the differences in cost:

    1) HSR does more. Hyperloop is a straight shot between two cities. HSR has stops. These stops involve going through towns. This is very expensive. It also means more stations. These too cost money. HSR is also higher capacity (although Hyperloop is in turn higher capacity than LA/SF air traffic, and significantly cheaper per ticket than both rail and air)

    2) HSR is hurt by its path. A large portion of HSR's costs are permitting and right of way. Hyperloop minimizes these by using public right of way with elevation, on a premise of government buy-in to the concept (although other options not considered in the Alpha document are possible, such as rail right-of-ways). HSR's need to serve specific cities for political purposes limits where it can go.

    3) HSR is limited by its weight. The cost of elevating a structure is directly proportional to its peak loadings. HSR's peak loadings are an order of magnitude higher than Hyperloop's.

    The steel alone will be very hard to come by,

    Not in the very least. They budget several times the billet price, on the high end of the tonnage price for delivered tube segments. It's really not that much steel - subtract the inner cross section from the outer cross section and multiply the length if you don't believe me.

    because while rail steel and ribar is made in tremendous volume,

    The word is "rebar". Rebar is irrelevant to this conversation. There is no single type of "rail steel", particularly when one is discussing HSR.

    this requires plate steel that is then rolled by a steel fab

    That is not how pipelines are made. Pipelines are made of extruded tubular steel segments, the same as "ribar" and "rail steel".

    Then there's the regional politics to deal with. Building a Hyperloop from LA to San Fran will run through the cities or counties of at least 6 and as many as 9 municipalities depending on the route you choose.

    What do yo

    --
    "99 dead duelists of Dios on the wall. 99 dead duelists of Dios! Take one's ring, pass it around..."
  5. Artist's rendition. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

    Apparently, the test track will be orange with banked curves and an actual loop.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  6. Whats with all the Luddites here by johncandale · · Score: 2

    Everything seems unsafe till its proven safe. High speed ground transport is needed. And this would be much more effececit then auto cars once they get the bugs out..

  7. Re:Safe? by Sperbels · · Score: 2

    They wouldn't have thought to land a rocket vertically? That's been depicted in science fiction since the 50's. Not to mention, they actually did have a little success with this in mid 90's with the DC-X.