Slashdot Mirror


Long TSA Delays Force Airports To Hire Private Security Contractors (popsci.com)

An anonymous Slashdot reader writes: TSA checkpoints caused 6,800 American Airlines passengers to miss their flights in just one week this spring, and the problem isn't improving. "Two years ago the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) offered $15,000 to anybody -- literally anybody -- who could come up with an idea to speed up airport security..." writes Popular Science. "They wouldn't say who won or for which idea, but since we're here two years later with longer wait times than ever, it's fair to say it hasn't lived up to the groundbreaking ideals of that call to action... Now in summer 2016, the TSA recommends arriving three hours early instead of a mere two."

So this spring the Seattle-Tacoma airport replaced many of the TSA staff with private screeners, although "Private security operates under strict direction from the TSA, and even those airports that heavily utilize private contractors still have a lot of TSA personnel in the back rooms..." according to the article. "The ability to do exactly what the TSA does, only faster and cheaper, seems to be the major draw." Now 22 U.S. airports are using private screeners, although the Seattle and San Francisco airports are the only ones with significant traffic.

The article also cites a Homeland Security report which discovered that investigators were able to smuggle a test bomb past security checkpoints in 67 out of 70 tests.

12 of 260 comments (clear)

  1. The easiest idea of all by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Obviously since something is easy and sensible it will never be done but for 15K I'll take a whack at it.

    To speed up the lines, get rid of the TSA.

    It's that simple.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  2. Next recommendation... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now in summer 2016, the TSA recommends arriving three hours early instead of a mere two.

    Drive to your destination -- even if it's overseas.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  3. They don't really want to make the lines faster by mishehu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because then they don't have power over us and they can't whine that they need all sorts of extra funding. They also refuse to return to only using the magnetometer instead of the nudie scanners or they insist on groping everybody's privates. And yet they are as effective as Walmart door-greeters when it comes to actual security. So why don't we just hire Walmart door greeters with the magnetometer to use, and be done with it?

  4. Re:Here's an idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes how entitled of us to expect that the TSA improve their procedures as time goes on, instead it gets even more inefficient! Last I checked us entitled slashdot users can't drive to Hawaii or any other place outside the continental US. But hey, thanks for your valuable input TSA agent.

  5. Re:Here's an idea... by jcr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here's a better idea: go fuck yourself.

    The TSA hasn't caught any terrorists yet. It's expensive, intrusive, and useless. Not only that, since a perp could just wander into the midst of several thousand people and blow them up while the TSA is making them stand in serpentine lines waiting for the bullshit obedience ritual, the TSA is only increasing the danger to the traveling public.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  6. Re:Scarecrow by PPH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No need to scare them away. After 9/11 nobody expects a hijacking to be a flight to Havana and an inconvenient delay. Passengers will kill the next terrorists before they can get into the cockpit or light their underpants on fire.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  7. Re:Here's an idea... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The TSA hasn't caught any terrorists yet. It's expensive, intrusive, and useless.

    The purpose of the screenings is not to "catch terrorists" but to deter the terrorists from even trying. I am not say that the TSA is effective, I am just saying that the lack of arrested terrorists isn't proof that they aren't.

  8. Re:Scarecrow by aralin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Exactly. This and the lock on cockpit door is all that was needed.

    --
    If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
  9. Re:Here's an idea... by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The only thing the TSA gorillas are achieving is to make tourists stop visiting the US.

    --
    Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
  10. Re:Here's an idea... by Calydor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So conventions of spelling, sentence structure and such don't apply on the internet?

    You know, that explains SO MUCH.

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  11. Re: Here's an idea... by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps you are caucasian and has rich man appearance

    --
    Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
  12. Re:Scarecrow by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, if the pilot wants to kill you, you're screwed. Duh. Anything else new?

    There are certain things you cannot protect yourself against. But it is absolutely and positively certain that no terrorist passenger will EVER again crash land a plane in a building. It's just like the trojan horse. The first was a huge success. The trick hasn't ever worked since.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.