Slashdot Mirror


US Investigating Potential Covert Russian Plan To Disrupt November Elections (washingtonpost.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Washington Post: U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies are probing what they see as a broad covert Russian operation in the United States to sow public distrust in the upcoming presidential election and in U.S. political institutions, intelligence and congressional officials said. The aim is to understand the scope and intent of the Russian campaign, which incorporates cyber-tools to hack systems used in the political process, enhancing Russia's ability to spread disinformation. The effort to better understand Russia's covert influence operations is being coordinated by James R. Clapper Jr., the director of national intelligence. The Kremlin's intent may not be to sway the election in one direction or another, officials said, but to cause chaos and provide propaganda fodder to attack U.S. democracy-building policies around the world, particularly in the countries of the former Soviet Union. U.S. intelligence officials described the covert influence campaign here as "ambitious" and said it is also designed to counter U.S. leadership and influence in international affairs. One congressional official, who has been briefed recently on the matter, said "Russian 'active measures' or covert influence or manipulation efforts, whether it's in Eastern Europe or in the United States" are worrisome. It "seems to be a global campaign," the aide said. As a result, the issue has "moved up as a priority" for the intelligence agencies, which include the FBI and Department of Homeland Security as well as the CIA and the National Security Agency. Their comments came just before President Obama and Russian President Vladimir Putin talked privately about cyberspying and other matters on the sidelines of the Group of 20 talks in China.

8 of 531 comments (clear)

  1. Russia would have nada If the US system was honest by atrimtab · · Score: 5, Informative
    Russia would have no negative information if the US system was run honestly and transparently. It is not and I thank *ALL* disclosures that wake up the US citizenry. The info source does not matter.

    .

    The current 2 party duopoly is a corrupt manipulative mess as the US presidential candidate choices.

    .

    Both Hillary and Trump are AWFUL candidates. So a huge number of voters are stuck voting against who they think is worse. There is NO positive choice.

    --
    Facebook is billions of individual "Skinner Boxes." And if you use it you are the pigeon!
  2. Re:We had electorial fraud during the DNC primarie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The fraud was related to evading campaign finance laws, not Bernie: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/dnc-leak-clinton-team-deflected-state-cash-concerns-226191

    What they did to Bernie wasn't fraud, at least not in the legal sense, just a slap in the face to those in the dem voter base who thought their party's candidate would be determined by a fair and democratic process. Of course the DNC, as a private entity, is free to hand-pick their candidate and skip the entire primary process - as they used to long ago - but decades of at least the illusion of democracy has led people to expect something vastly different.

  3. Russia doesn't need to do anything by bloodhawk · · Score: 4, Informative

    Smells like complete bullshit. don't get me wrong I would not put this past Russia (or the US) to engage in such practises but the US election is a world wide laughing stock at this point, If Russia had been manipulating it all along they could not have created a better 2 candidates themselves. I think more likely they are sitting back having a good old chuckle knowing that no matter who wins this election the US loses.

  4. Re:So then Hillary is the warmonger by dbIII · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm a bit confused on why they keep saying Trump is working with them

    Trump is being financed by Russian banks with very close ties to Putin, which is not the same thing but that's why people are saying Trump is working with them.

    Trump is working for Trump and is not going to work for either the Russians or the American people.

  5. Re: what Trump said and meant by will_die · · Score: 1, Informative

    No because powel had written permission to use the commercial server. After him rules were changed.
    Hilliary did not follow the rules that applied to her because she was too stupid and incompetent to understand them.

  6. It's the WaPo again... by Xenographic · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Washington Post has a bit of bias in this, so take it with a grain of salt. When will the Washington Post start investigating themselves for holding illicit fundraisers with the DNC? Or is it Russia's fault they did this? Those damned Russians, how dare they expose our corruption!

    Source: https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/2699

    Re: WaPo Party

      From:kaplanj@dnc.org
      To: RangappaA@dnc.org
      Date: 2015-09-22 13:29
      Subject: Re: WaPo Party

      Great - we were never going to list since the lawyers told us we cannot do it.

      We are waiting

      Jordan Kaplan
      National Finance Director
      Democratic National Committee
      (202) 488-5002 (o) | (312) 339-0224 (c)
      kaplanj@dnc.org

      > On Sep 22, 2015, at 11:25 AM, Rangappa, Anu wrote:
      >
      > They aren't going to give us a price per ticket and do not want their party to be listed in any package we are selling to donors. If we let them know we have donors in town who will be at the debate, we can add them to the list for the party.

  7. Re:We had electorial fraud during the DNC primarie by Xenographic · · Score: 3, Informative

    I love how people hide stuff like this at -1 because they don't want to hear it...

    The fraud was related to evading campaign finance laws, not Bernie: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/dnc-leak-clinton-team-deflected-state-cash-concerns-226191

    What they did to Bernie wasn't fraud, at least not in the legal sense, just a slap in the face to those in the dem voter base who thought their party's candidate would be determined by a fair and democratic process. Of course the DNC, as a private entity, is free to hand-pick their candidate and skip the entire primary process - as they used to long ago - but decades of at least the illusion of democracy has led people to expect something vastly different.

  8. Re:Russia doesn't need to interfere. by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 5, Informative

    A Russian disinformation campaign has already been in full swing in Germany for over a year. Russia has identified Germany as the key player in European politics and foreign policy and Russian internet trolls are flooding the comment sections of German news sites with pro-Russian propaganda while trying to sow distrust in German institutions, the government and mainstream German media. Meanwhile Russia is funding European far-right parties like FN in France and the AfD in Germany. The AfD releases pamplets in German and Russian language and explicitly targets the "Russlanddeutsche" former German expatriates that emigrated to Russia and returned since then.
    The extent of what is taking place in the German internet is worrying and can only be described by a massive Russian propaganda campaign designed to destabilize European and especially German democracy while bolstering parties that are more friendly to Russian interests and foreign policy. There is an information war going on.