Slashdot Mirror


Netflix Finds x265 20% More Efficient Than VP9 (streamingmedia.com)

Reader StreamingEagle writes (edited): Netflix conducted a large-scale study comparing x264, x265 and libvpx (Google-owned VP9), under real-world conditions, and found that x265 encodes used 35.4% to 53.3% fewer bits than x264, and between 21.8% fewer bits than libvpx, when measured with Netflix's advanced VMAF assessment tool. This was the first large-scale study to use real-world encoder implementations, and a large sample size of high quality, professional content.A Netflix spokesperson explained why they did the test in the first place; "We wanted to understand the current state of the x265 and libvpx codec implementations when used to generate non-realtime encodes optimized for OTT use case. It was important to see how the codecs performed when testing on a diverse set of premium content from our catalog. This test can help us find areas of improvement for the different codecs."

3 of 178 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Mostly... by Luthair · · Score: 5, Funny

    Clearly though, the image produced by mpeg2 is much superior to h265 much like records sound better than CDs.

  2. Re:Mostly... by Rockoon · · Score: 4, Funny

    mpeg2 uses gold bits, while h265 uses copper and aluminum.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  3. Re:Mostly... by Matt.Battey · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes but Capacitance Electronic Discs have a much warmer picture, especially when paired with new old-stock cathode ray tube amplifiers.