Slashdot Mirror
Who Is Getting Left Behind In the Internet Revolution? (sciencemag.org)
Reader sciencehabit writes: The internet is often hailed as a liberating technology. No matter who you are or what kind of country you live in, your voice can be amplified online and heard around the world. But that assumes that people can get on the internet in the first place. Research has shown that poverty and remoteness can prevent people from getting online, but a new study out today also shows that just belonging to a politically marginalized group can translate to poorer access. The study, published online today in Science, provides the first global map of the people being left behind by the internet revolution. Mapping the internet is hard. Although it is true that every computer with a connection has a real-world location, no one actually knows where they all are. Rather than being organized top-down, the world's computers are connected to each other by a bushy, redundant network of servers. Each country builds and maintains its own infrastructure for connecting citizens to the wider internet. The decision to expand and maintain the infrastructure in one region and not another is up to those in power. And therein lies the problem: Ethnic and religious minorities who are excluded from their country's political process may also be systematically excluded from the global internet.
Who Is Getting Left Behind In the Internet Revolution?
The lucky ones }:-)
(runs & hides)
Why would I need to "poverty adjust" my internet bill?
To see how much it would cost me if I were poor? I've been poor, didn't really tickle my jigglies much. Worked hard, saved harder, educated myself harder still. Now my kid has no idea what growing up poor is like, so I make her work hard and study hard like an asian parent, an A- is unacceptable.
from the ./ summary:
Advocacy of individual economic freedom is often criticized because, among the many possible exercises of that freedom, is radical capitalism: the single-minded pursuit of profits over all other social concerns. Yet, a dedication to monetary profit alone in such conditions as described in the linked study would be preferable to the actual circumstance: a dedication to denying an oppressed group a vital service. Certainly there is much to be made by selling these groups internet service and someone is forgoing profits by not making those sales. More accurately, someone is compelled by government to forgo profits.
If all you want to do is make big profits, by definition you do not want to limit those profits by declining sales to politically unpopular groups.
The economist Milton Friedman said, "Human freedom and economic freedom work together." I disagree because that understates the connectedness of those freedoms; the two are one-in-the-same.
Ceci n'est pas une signature.
You would want to poverty adjust a bill to consider the impact it would have on someone with lesser means. Below a certain amount of income, it is very difficult to get by, and even harder to rise. I am not saying it doesn't happen, but the American Dream is too often just a dream, and the reality is that we live in a country where poverty is a crime. We live in a country where it is illegal to be homeless, or dollar-less. It is illegal to sleep in your car.
BTW, here in Silicon Valley, often I see a certain middle age man walk by and take food out of the trash to eat it. Even though, I don't have much, I've tried to offer to buy him a bagel or something, but he refuses.
When I was young, we went hungry at times, but I did not starve.
I have a friend who used to eat from McDonalds's dumpster when he was hungry.
https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
"If you live in the US, poverty is not unavoidable. It is usually a consequence of your own actions."
Ah, yes, the American dream. You already said it yourself: "But I'm very blessed.". Not all people are.
Saying that everybody can get out of the trap is non-sense. It may be very invigorating for you to think so, but in the end you're turning it around.
That you made it doesn't mean that everybody else can. Do you really think the *because they want to be*, because they are lazy, because they are quitters?
Just for fun, draw up a list of all the things that could have stopped you achieving what you did. You might find life is even better than you expected. You'll hopefully also see that your life cannot be lived by everybody else.
Feeling blessed is an attitude, not a circumstance. It is a way of saying that I'm grateful to God for life, and for living in a country that rewards hard work.
If you believe you can't do better, you certainly won't. Many people who are poor are indeed poor because they are lazy or quitters. I recognize that there are people who have true disabilities or major problems that cause them to be poor, through no fault of their own, but this is the exception, not the rule.
I work with young people in an inner city neighborhood of Houston. I'm there to show them that they CAN achieve more, if they just want it and work for it. Some of them are showing signs of promise, but others continue to make the same bad choices that will lead to repeating their parents' lives of poverty. These behaviors are clearly visible, even in school age children.
I had many obstacles on my own way to a "successful" life. My parents lived well below the poverty line. Nobody came to my neighborhood with HUD vouchers or food stamps. Nobody gave me job training classes. I had to go after it, to want it, to work for it.
Everybody has things that "stop" them from achieving. Whining about obstacles doesn't help. Instead, start finding ways to achieve your goals despite those obstacles!