Slashdot Mirror
Unredacted User Manuals Of Stingray Device Show How Accessible Surveillance Is (theintercept.com)
The Intercept has today published 200-page documents revealing details about Harris Corp's Stingray surveillance device, which has been one of the closely guarded secrets in law enforcement for more than 15 years. The firm, in collaboration with police clients across the U.S. have "fought" to keep information about the mobile phone-monitoring boxes from the public against which they are used. The publication reports that the surveillance equipment carries a price tag in the "low six figures." From the report:The San Bernardino Sheriff's Department alone has snooped via Stingray, sans warrant, over 300 times. Richard Tynan, a technologist with Privacy International, told The Intercept that the "manuals released today offer the most up-to-date view on the operation of" Stingrays and similar cellular surveillance devices, with powerful capabilities that threaten civil liberties, communications infrastructure, and potentially national security. He noted that the documents show the "Stingray II" device can impersonate four cellular communications towers at once, monitoring up to four cellular provider networks simultaneously, and with an add-on can operate on so-called 2G, 3G, and 4G networks simultaneously.
It is the beginning of the end for society as a whole if no one cares if the police obey the law. The Sheriff of San Bernadino should face charges for unlawful surveillance.
Do you have a warrant, issued by a neutral magistrate, specifically identifying the party that you wish to spy upon, which you obtained by swearing out a truthful affidavit that you have reason to believe a crime has been committed?
If yes: you're good to go. If no: fuck you, you're committing wire fraud, you son of a bitch.
-jcr
The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
If police can do it, so can "the bad guys". Why aren't there better technical barriers in place to prevent this sort of thing? If this snooping is illegal, that's a great first step, but why are these devices even able to work? Are the mobile carriers working with law enforcement to enable these devices, or just indifferent to it?
When it came to light that law enforcement was abusing their power by indiscriminately snooping on internet traffic, we started to see more websites use encryption (birth of Let's Encrypt). When it came to light that law enforcement was abusing their power regarding accessing information stored on a phone, we started to see widespread use of device encryption (Android and iOS now encrypt by default). Is StringRay abuse the precursor to the next iteration of mobile security?
They probably consider themselves "people who get paid," like most of the rest of us.
"First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
Or how about our OWN stingray type devices?
Imagine the chaos if you're tracking an IMSI and it's passing through several stingray devices - yours, and half a dozen others. Since each is pretending to the uplink of the next, the actual location of the phone in question can be quite a distance away. And if you're monitoring the location of the signal, you're just getting the next stingray in line.
No. We are way past calling this a slippery slope. Look up, theres the cliff we fell off.
How about unreasonable search and seizure? How about due process? How about manufactured evidence? Is using the spectrum like this even legal? Aren't they violating the licensing laws of the spectrum?
If they went to get a warrant, and asked the cell companies to give them the data, that would be legal. We can't allow them to trample on our freedoms and liberties because its inconvenient for them to go through the process the american people have approved. There is no consent of the governed here.