Slashdot Mirror


World Anti-Doping Agency Says It Was Hacked By Russia (theverge.com)

The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) is accusing Russian state-sponsored hackers of hacking its database of athletes involved in this year's Olympic Games in Rio. Whether it's in response to the WADA banning 119 Russian athletes from participating in the games due to a doping scandal, it has yet to be determined. The Verge reports: The agency claims the state-sponsored group Fancy Bear is behind the attack, although it doesn't clarify how that attribution was made. The accessed data included medical information, like Therapeutic Use Exemptions issued by International Sports Federations and National Anti-Doping Organizations. The group has reportedly released some of this data and threatened to release more. The attackers reportedly relied on spear phishing emails to gain access to the database and eventually used credentials specifically made for the Rio Olympic games. Fancy Bear was the same group responsible for hacking the Democratic National Committee earlier this year.

6 of 97 comments (clear)

  1. the latest excuse for poor security by ooloorie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "We were hacked by Russia" seems to be the latest excuse for poor security.

    Hopefully, the World Anti-Doping Agency will be sued into oblivion over their mishandling of personal data.

    1. Re:the latest excuse for poor security by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Security experts are so quick to find this "Fantasy Bear" everywhere, in all networks, systems when called in. But to stop access or have discovery while active in any network seems to be an issue even with such perfect and rapid after event detection....
      Always using the same easy to find Fancy Bear after an event, any event, all events.
      Yet Fancy Bear is always able to get in with no issues, stay in totally undetected to get so much data out and exit gracefully without detection every time.
      But is still fully understood by so many security experts and Fancy Bear is nice enough to be fully found in logs and ip's left all over any network it enters.
      Mythically powerful on any network until the worlds' s media is quickly told it is found in full every time... Fully detected.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  2. More Fancy Bear fiction again? by AHuxley · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It would be nice to actually listen to the people in news rather than place all blame on the cyber fantasy of Fancy Bear:
    "Julian Assange: 'A lot more material' coming on US elections" (July 27, 2016)
    http://edition.cnn.com/2016/07...
    ""Perhaps one day the source or sources will step forward and that might be an interesting moment some people may have egg on their faces. But to exclude certain actors is to make it easier to find out who our sources are,""
    Its amazing how that well understood but really powerful "Fancy Bear" tools set gets into so many well protected networks unnoticed... Only to be found by investigators so quickly as it is so just easy to find once it is in a network...
    So rather than some all powerful, hard to track, no logs, no tools left behind method is a rather common "spear phishing" event...

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  3. OP is making stuff up by BradMajors · · Score: 4, Insightful

    WADA (not a reliable source) said they were hacked by Russians. They did not say they were hacked by Russia.

  4. Re:How to Argue About Doping in Sport by bloodhawk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Personally I think the rules make sense as as you said it is supposed to be about who is the best athlete not who has the best chemists, the enforcement however is a disgrace as they seem to be completely political. I think it is pathetic that they banned Russia yet other countries that were arguably even worse violators received no such sanctions. As long as the rules a based on politics rather than fairness things will only continue to get worse.

  5. Re:Not bad, looks like a clean record to me. by LTIfox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And it's dubious that Ritalin would help a gymnast, though it might an endurance athlete.

    Are you high?! (sorry, can't help it)
    And it's not just Ritalin. For years she was scarfing Adderall and Dexedrine too. All stimulants. All banned.

    Taking this to extreme: let's attach a jet pack to Steven Hawking's chair (under doctor's prescription) and let him compete in 100m sprint. Although it would be fun to watch, it would definitely be unfair to other athletes.
    And that is my point: occasionally taking drugs to overcome injuries is totally fine by me. But taking them for years gives an unfair advantage - exactly what anti-doping tries to prevent.